Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

Who will be the better player?

Anthony Randolph
188
46%
Michael Beasley
217
54%
 
Total votes: 405

loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#181 » by loserX » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:13 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:LOL This is starting to get ridiculous. So just because all of the above mentioned people would rather have Beasley means that they are non believers? Most of them people have said or do think that the kid does have potential to be a real good player (just obviously not as good as GS fans think).


The whole thread was resolved by this post:

Sid the Squid wrote:He's a far far FAR superior talent when compared with Beasley.. How do you not see it? lol


I mean, "lol". You can't argue with that. The guy said "lol". It's the new QED...nothing left to debate.
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#182 » by Sid the Squid » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:17 pm

Wait till you see this kid play..then you will understand..this thread will get voted into the realgm HOShame.
User avatar
KR4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,059
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Location: Capitola, CA

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#183 » by KR4 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:19 pm

Sid the Squid wrote:Wait till you see this kid play..then you will understand..this thread will get voted into the realgm HOShame.


Hahaha...

Let me know when any of you east-coasters actually watch AR play a game from start to finish.
Leeeee's Nuts!
poopdamoop
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,492
And1: 823
Joined: Mar 09, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#184 » by poopdamoop » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:20 pm

God forbid people take the guy who just had a better season. I mean what are they thinking?
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#185 » by Sid the Squid » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:20 pm

Wade2k6 wrote: Most of them people have said or do think that the kid does have potential to be a real good player (just obviously not as good as GS fans think).
Most of them people are starting to hedge their bets now that they realize just what type of talent AR really has..6 months ago you guys were crowing on and on about how great Beasley was compared to our stick.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 30
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#186 » by NetsForce » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:24 pm

I'd still take Brook Lopez over either Beasley or Real Magic easily.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#187 » by loserX » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:29 pm

Sid the Squid wrote:Wait till you see this kid play..then you will understand..this thread will get voted into the realgm HOShame.


You're the "lol" guy, right? No need to keep drilling, man, you already struck oil. Case is closed.
User avatar
5Strong
Pro Prospect
Posts: 800
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 06, 2009
Location: San Francisco, Ca

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#188 » by 5Strong » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:34 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:2 years ago GS fans said Wright was going to be an all-star, and he's been a bust to this point. I never said Morrow disappointed, but he's severely hyped by GS fans. And I remember a few years ago Ellis getting severely over hyped as well.


Wright: Define GS fans. There might have been a few that felt that way but that was hardly the consensus among GS fans. I think I know. Most felt he had all-star potential when drafted but we've hardly pegged him as such based on his play here at G State. When he's been healthy he's looked like a nice player but he's never healthy and looks like he hasn't added an inch of muscle since he was drafted.

Morrow: Severely hyped? We love the kid, but ask yourself this question, what are we hyping him as. Do you see a contingent of Warriors fans saying Morrow is going to be a star?

Ellis: He got injured. That's it. The guy put up insane numbers every step away until the moped incident last spring. The question is whether or not he can be a point guard, but he has done nothing to indicate that the hoopla was undeserved.

Wade2k6 wrote:The kid averaged 7-5 in 17 minutes on a team 30+ games under .500. To say he's a sure thing to be a star is ridiculous. Does he have potential to be an all-star? Yes. That doesn't mean he's going to be one. I personally see him as a 3rd option on a championship level team and should ideally be the teams third best player.


Nobody is a sure thing, but once again the question is, what's going to stop him from reaching his ceiling? You can't say he doesn't have the drive, doesn't have the size, doesn't have the quickness. Every flaw in his game is correctable and the only stopping them from being corrected would be if he didn't put the work in. You really want to doubt that he won't put the work in? The guy has an insane work ethic. Good luck with that.

The next question, what is his ceiling? The person who said Tayshaun Prince, that is laughable. Prince can't wreak havoc in the paint like Randolph can. Tayshaun's style is steady and dependable. Randolph's style is explosive and intimidating.

I said before the draft I would take Anthony Randolph over Michael Beasley. The kid is a diamond in the rough and is easy to dismiss because of how raw he is. Once you look closer, though, you'll see that he won't be raw for very long.
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#189 » by Wade2k6 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:45 pm

Okay you win. Randolph is the best prospect in the '08 draft. Better yet, he's the best prospect of this decade (Yes that's including Paul, Wade, LeBron, Dwight, etc). I don't know why the Bulls, Heat, etc. passed on Randolph. I mean seriously, who would rather have a 16/6 player and a 14/5 player over a 7/5 player?

Beasley clearly had the better rookie year. Beasley has the higher upside and potential. Beasley is a more skilled player. I'd take Beasley 10/10 times over Randolph and I'm glad the Heat didn't reach by taking Randolph 2nd.
User avatar
KR4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,059
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Location: Capitola, CA

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#190 » by KR4 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:06 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:Okay you win. Randolph is the best prospect in the '08 draft.


Sweet!

:eyebrows:
Leeeee's Nuts!
User avatar
Burnt_Face_Man
Sophomore
Posts: 196
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 20, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#191 » by Burnt_Face_Man » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:17 pm

I don't think it's unreasonable to call Anthony Randolph the worst player in the league. Please refer to my player tier rankings:


Alpha Tier(unattainable)

-
-
-
Tier "A"
-Lebron
-Dwyane Wade
-Kobe
Tier 2
-Chris Paul
-Dwight
-Tim Duncan
Tier "C"
-Dirk
-Kevin Garnett
-Brandon Roy
-etc.
Beta Tier
-Chris Bosh
-David West
-Al jefferson
-etc.
Tier 3
-Mo williams
-Lamarcus Aldridge
-Kevin Martin
-etc.
Tier 4
-J.R Smith
-Lamar Odom
-Rajon Rondo
-etc.
-Tier "F"
-Emeka Okafor
-Delonte West
-Jose Calderon
-Tier 7
-Luke Ridnour
-Amir Johnson
-etc.
-BOTTOM TIER
-jake voskuhl
-Anthony Randolph
-Anthony Randolph
LIAR!
ARISE_CHICKEN
Senior
Posts: 675
And1: 238
Joined: Aug 03, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#192 » by ARISE_CHICKEN » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:43 pm

Please add a lol to the end of your post, I will not be convinced otherwise.
BROWN
RealGM
Posts: 10,955
And1: 74
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: RealCity - MTL

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#193 » by BROWN » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:46 pm

Let's get the season started already. This thread will be epic by the end of this season.
User avatar
oaktownwarriors87
RealGM
Posts: 13,855
And1: 4,418
Joined: Mar 01, 2005
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#194 » by oaktownwarriors87 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:51 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:2 years ago GS fans said Wright was going to be an all-star, and he's been a bust to this point. I never said Morrow disappointed, but he's severely hyped by GS fans. And I remember a few years ago Ellis getting severely over hyped as well.


What on earth are you talking about? Wright was thought to have some potential, but after Warriors fans really watched him play in the NBA they said IF he adds weight and works hard he could be a very good player.... still true to this day. Is it going to happen? Who knows, probably not.

Find me 5 fans who think Morrow will average more than 18 points next year. Hell, find me ONE.

PPG 23.5
FG% 48.4
FT% 86.2
RPG 4.6
APG 4.7
SPG 1.9

Those are the numbers Monta Ellis put up playing hurt last year after the all-star break. He was never 100% and should come back 100% this year. Warriors fans never called Monta an MVP type player but we have always believed he could be an All-Star... to say otherwise is just hate.

You're just pulling crap out of your butt right now. You're desperate and can't backup anything you say. Never compare what Warriors fans say about Randolph to what they said about Wright.
cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
ARISE_CHICKEN
Senior
Posts: 675
And1: 238
Joined: Aug 03, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#195 » by ARISE_CHICKEN » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:59 pm

I don't even think Bulls fans are this optimistic on Rose, and he is about the closest thing to a surefire star from that class today.
User avatar
oaktownwarriors87
RealGM
Posts: 13,855
And1: 4,418
Joined: Mar 01, 2005
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#196 » by oaktownwarriors87 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:20 pm

This link is to the 6th longest all-time Player comparison thread, the mods should merge them together...

viewtopic.php?f=64&t=894697

I can generalize the Heat Fans and say that they though Beasley was going to be a 32/10 type player... but I'm not an ass.
cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
User avatar
Dresta
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,530
And1: 218
Joined: Nov 04, 2008

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#197 » by Dresta » Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:51 pm

oaktownwarriors87 wrote:
I also forgot to mention that Beasley outperformed Randolph on all the physical tests also.


Yeah, he really out performed him in these categories. And I'm sure all the new muscle Randolph has added since then wouldn't help him either.

Max Vert
Randolph 35'
Beasley 35'

Max Vert Reach
Randolph 12'
Beasley 11'10

The Sprint
Randolph 3.26
Beasley 3.26

Body fat percent
Randolph 4.7
Beasley 7.7
lol, talk about picking and choosing your stats, and not even getting them right as well.

No-step Vert
Randolph 29'
Beasley 30'

Max Vert
Randolph 35'
Beasley 35'

The Sprint
Randolph 3.26
Beasley 3.24

Agility
Randolph 11.86
Beasley (I hear he's slow footed) 11.06

Bench
Randolph 7
Beasley 19

Weight
Randolph 197 (lol)
Beasley 239

So Beasley weighs 40 pounds more then Randolph, yet is faster, more agile, and able to jump slightly higher. Not too difficult to realize who out-performed who. And for your information Beasley also apparently put on 10 pounds while increasing his quickness this offseason, and this is an official comment from a coach, rather then some random remark he made about himself.
User avatar
KR4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,059
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Location: Capitola, CA

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#198 » by KR4 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:57 pm

Dresta wrote:I like-a-da stats.


Who gives 2 steaming ****s about those stats?
Leeeee's Nuts!
User avatar
WadeKnicks2010
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,871
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
Location: NYC

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#199 » by WadeKnicks2010 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:06 am

I can't believe this discussion is still going on.
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#200 » by Wade2k6 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:25 am

oaktownwarriors87 wrote:
I also forgot to mention that Beasley outperformed Randolph on all the physical tests also.


Yeah, he really out performed him in these categories. And I'm sure all the new muscle Randolph has added since then wouldn't help him either.

Max Vert
Randolph 35'
Beasley 35'

Max Vert Reach
Randolph 12'
Beasley 11'10

The Sprint
Randolph 3.26
Beasley 3.26

Body fat percent
Randolph 4.7
Beasley 7.7

As Dresta said, you now have a ton of credibility. :lol:

First you pick and choose which tests to bring up, then you don't even get your numbers right. Beasley beat AR in nearly every test.

Return to Player Comparisons