Doctor MJ wrote:I think what confuses me about your perspective is that it's pretty clear to me that the best rookies of all-time come from the era where they played several years of college ball. Literally, all these modern rookies suck relative to the modern NBA compared to Kareem and other guys did with their respective NBA's. So if Kareem could get a ROY, why would eliminate worse rookies from consideration?
Now am I saying that 4 years of college ball now is better than one year plus one year of training with an NBA team? No, but the fact that the best talents just don't stay in college is a big part of that.
I think you're missing my point, so let me clarify.
I don't particularly care about rookies from not-this-era in a conversation about rookies in this era. I agree that 3 or 4 years of physical maturity and skill practice matters. I don't think that has any bearing whatsoever on Chet vs. Wemby or the 2024 ROY race, though, which is why I've been trying to not talk about that in this conversation.
I think that anyone who has that extra time in today's game has an advantage over those who do not, which makes it not a particularly fair comparison in an awards race... and that is largely reinforced by what you're discussing in terms of those earlier rookies, at that.






















