RealGM Top 100 List #58

Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063

User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,343
And1: 16,270
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#21 » by Dr Positivity » Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:47 pm

lukekarts wrote:Re: Wes Unseld.

He's one of those players - I guess in the same mould as guys such as Ben Wallace, Dennis Rodman and Dave DeBusschere, that made his name through 'passion' and 'heart' rather than stats. Still, his stats weren't all that bad...

His prime was 5 years where he averaged 13.92 points on ~50% shooting; 17 rebounds, 3.5 assists. His scoring efficiency was OK - top 10 in TS%, twice; 1st in eFG% for one season and top 10 a further 3 times. Equally, his rebounding was really good, top 5 in rebounds per game for 8 seasons, including 1st once and 2nd three times; also reflected in his TRB%. Advanced metrics showed his defence to be excellent, which supports the reasons he earned his MVP - DWS ranked him 2nd, 4th, 6th, 6th, 2nd etc. over respective seasons.

Now, I don't really put much emphasis into stats, moreso what I see and hear. My argument in that case was this: Wes Unseld 'did all the unspectacular things that lead to glamorous victories' (quote stolen from NBA.com, but it sums it up perfectly). His arrival in Washington took them from a 36 win team to a 57 win team, a season which ended at the hands of the stacked New York Knicks in the Conference Finals. He earned a lot of work for his defensive efforts against players like Kareem, Wilt, and less so Willis Reed. His offensiive game wasn't spectacular but he hustled for points and considering his size disadvantage he was pretty effective. He was a very good passer for his position which contributed immensely. They're all the reasons he was elected to the Hall of Fame and the NBA 50th anniversary team.



Yes, it's important to note that Unseld is the bar none GOAT at two aspects of the game - setting picks and outlet passes, and they generally don't show up in the boxscore at all. Reading through the vaults (Google Archive has little that isn't asking to be paid for, but SI does) has quotes like this:

Unseld is important to the Bullets not only because he is one of the few centers with the agility and strength to battle New York's Willis Reed on equal terms and at least keep Lew Alcindor busy, but also because he is the key to the Baltimore offense. The Bullet attack packs all the subtlety of a howitzer, Unseld clearing defensive rebounds and flinging the hardest, fastest outlet passes in the league to his teammates as they scramble downcourt. The man who takes most of those quick shots is Earl Monroe. The Pearl, whose knees are considered the worst two joints in Baltimore—no small accomplishment even though the strippers on The Block are being chased as part of urban renewal—acquired another injury early in the opener against Philadelphia. A knee to the ribs kept him out of all but 11 minutes of the game and the Bullets lost 126-112.



http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/ ... /index.htm

For Wes Unseld, last Saturday's quiet assault on the Chicago Bulls was just another typical night's work. The big guy played beautifully, managing to draw about as much attention from the crowd as one of the kids hawking Cokes in the Capital Centre, and the Washington Bullets won yet another game, nine now out of their first 11, leaving the rest of the NBA's Central Division an early-season shambles. Unseld finished with just four points, which is what most superstars get before they're warmed up, and he couldn't have been more delighted. "It is not my job to look good," he says. "It is my job to make other people look good." And, the 6'7", 245-pound center-forward could have added, to make other people's people look bad.

Against Chicago, six Bullets finished with more points than Unseld. All that firepower left Unseld free to roam in comparative obscurity, doing what he enjoys most: setting murderous picks, hauling in rebounds, directing a devastating defense, neutralizing the other center—this time, Nate Thurmond—and triggering the Bullets' offense with some of the most amazing passing in the league. There were also the blocked shots, the steals, the forcing of turnovers. After you watch Unseld play, scoring becomes a shallow statistic.

"I have to admit I didn't know just how great he really was when I came here," says K.C. Jones, now in his second season as the Bullets' coach. "You have to be with him to appreciate how much he does. It's that air of leadership. He just does it all. He's so big, yet so quick."



http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/ ... /index.htm

Just how far Washington goes beyond the division will depend upon the left knee of Wes Unseld, the granitic 245-pound foundation of the Bullets' fast break and defense. Actually both of Unseld's knees are bad, but the left is (or was) worse and was operated on this summer. If the exhibition tour was an indication of things to come, the Brahman Bullet will be operating at full bore.

Inspired by Unseld's apparent health, the Bullets' promotion office came up with a new nickname, The Sure Shots, which will fit only if the Bullets improve upon their 44.1% field goal mark, poorer last season than all but two NBA teams. When Unseld plays, he adds two dimensions—rebounding and picking—to the Bullet offense. Without him, as they were for much of last season, Washington relies almost solely on one-on-one efforts by either Elvin Hayes or Phil Chenier, the slick young guard who has signed a seven-year contract calling for something like $2.5 million. In just his third season Chenier led the team in scoring with a 21.9 average. He and flashy Kevin Porter give the Bullets a solid backcourt. But sharpshooters have their off-nights and when Hayes and Chenier found their one-on-one assaults flagging, the Bullets were often in trouble. Now, with Unseld, they can go to the fast break. And when that does not work, running your man into the big guy when he sets a pick is a pleasant prospect.

Unseld also gives the Bullets a more flexible defense. Jones prefers to use his muscle against strong centers like Abdul-Jabbar or Bob Lanier, but will switch Hayes to the position against quicker pivotmen. In the latter case, Unseld becomes a power forward in tandem with Mike Riordan, a smooth operator cast, modestly, along the lines of John Havlicek.



http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/ ... /index.htm

Also a pretty interesting quote from the post championship article:

Unseld, the center who had labored for nine years without a championship and was voted MVP mainly on sentiment—Dandridge having been more valuable during Washington's 21 playoff games—drew the most reporters. "What I feel is relief," said Unseld. "Aren't you happy?" he was asked. "Sure I'm happy," he said. "Look at me. I'm ecstatic." An ecstatic statue, apparently.



http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/ ... /index.htm

Almost all the SI articles I've read treat Unseld as the superstar and Hayes as the secondary guy. This in this artice: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/ ... /index.htm, Big E is in the title but the article talks about Unseld for multiple paragraphs and how his injury left them in disarray before even getting to them. It continues:

For the Bullets, the season might have been much worse were it not for Elvin Hayes, who has done an extraordinary job of filling the void left by Unseld. He has played more minutes (45 per game) than any man in the NBA, his rebounding average of 18.6 is far ahead of anyone else's and, despite a wretched .413 shooting percentage, he is clearly having his most brilliant season.

Hayes had some fine years—at least statistically—with the Rockets before joining the Bullets last season. He is the only man whose name is not Russell or Chamberlain who has led the NBA in rebounding for even so much as a singgle season between 1958 and 1973. And he is one of five players in the league's history ever to win titles in both scoring and rebounding.

Yet during his four years with the Rockets, Hayes was variously considered a ball hog, a rotten apple, a dumbbell and a guaranteed loser. Each season Hayes would try to explain that he was the victim of circumstance—as the lone big-name player on a poor team he was being assessed an unfair portion of the blame. And he would promise to sweeten his often sullen demeanor. By the time he left Houston, the NBA had come to expect an annual "New Big E" to go along with the yearly "New Wilt."

As it turned out, all Hayes needed was a new team. He fit in easily with the Bullets, played excellently last season and has been even better this year, particularly in those areas only other players are likely to notice. Forward Mike Riordan points to Hayes' improvement at picking and passing, additions to his game that have helped replace Unseld's considerable expertise. Hayes also has been a human Electrolux under both backboards. In 27 games this season he has ended up with more rebounds than points, a remarkable feat for a player who regularly scores more than 20.



It's pretty clear Houston Hayes had a horrible reputation, like some Washington era Webber Portland era Zbo style bashing before all 3 players found a good situation

The two most important facts about Wes Unseld's career

- Everyone in his time agreed his boxscore stats came nowhere near capturing what he did offensively and defensively

- Everyone in his time treated him like a superstar

So while I didn't vote for him, I'm not that upset at him making it this high
Liberate The Zoomers
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,985
And1: 9,676
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#22 » by penbeast0 » Wed Oct 26, 2011 10:10 pm

Laimbeer wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:FENCER'S LIST

Vote: Sam Jones

Nominate: Dolph Schayes
(James Worthy to break a tie)


Thought we couldn't do contingencies? 8-)

Vote: Dolph Schayes


Nominate: waiting


WE don't, that was an awkward way to remind myself that if Shayes gets on, he still has one name left on his nomination list. Sorry.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 52,779
And1: 21,719
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#23 » by Doctor MJ » Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:30 pm

Dr Mufasa wrote:Still voting Pau even though nobody wubs him


lol, aw I wub him. He's definitely on my mind, just not quite there yet.

ftr, among current players I have Manu & Pau coming up very soon, and then larger gap before getting into Billups & Carter who'll come next.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
ronnymac2
RealGM
Posts: 11,003
And1: 5,070
Joined: Apr 11, 2008
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#24 » by ronnymac2 » Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:40 am

I don't get the love for Bobby Jones here. I love him as a player, and I'd want him for my team, but there are better candidates than Jones that still need to be nominated.
Pay no mind to the battles you've won
It'll take a lot more than rage and muscle
Open your heart and hands, my son
Or you'll never make it over the river
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 52,779
And1: 21,719
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#25 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:22 am

ronnymac2 wrote:I don't get the love for Bobby Jones here. I love him as a player, and I'd want him for my team, but there are better candidates than Jones that still need to be nominated.


Well, I guess one thing to consider is that there are really a bunch of solid Nuggets from the '70s and '80s: English, Thompson, Issel, Vandegwhe, Lever, and Jones. I don't think anyone would bat an eye if Thompson or Issel started getting some major love as they seem more like traditional stars, but is it really clear cut they should be in before Jones? Pretty debatable to me.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,985
And1: 9,676
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#26 » by penbeast0 » Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:20 pm

Again, ronny, you seem to be underestimating defensive impact. A good offensive player who plays great defense is more valuable than a scorer . . . Jones is the perfect example. I'd say he contributed more to more wins and more playoff wins than someone like Carmelo. Admittedly I cant prove it. :D
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
lukekarts
Head Coach
Posts: 7,168
And1: 336
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Location: UK
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#27 » by lukekarts » Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:38 pm

penbeast0 wrote:Again, ronny, you seem to be underestimating defensive impact. A good offensive player who plays great defense is more valuable than a scorer . . . Jones is the perfect example. I'd say he contributed more to more wins and more playoff wins than someone like Carmelo. Admittedly I cant prove it. :D


Possibly true, but Jones would need a Carmelo to even be put in that situation to start with.
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,206
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#28 » by ElGee » Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:05 pm

Usually, people drastically overrate volume scoring. I think some people are underrating it here.

Scoring is the most important element of a basketball game. Individuals can have a greater offensive impact in the game today than individual defenders.

I think the tendency to overrate scoring isn't something innate to scorers, but the casual/less discerning fans simply spend too much time watching the ball and not enough time on everything else taking place in the game. That means a bad shot, a bad decision, a great pass from someone else, key defensive plays (especially off the ball) go totally unnoticed and their internal processor just keeps noting "score! score! score! That guys the best." Scoring is still THE most important part of a basketball game (defined by the rules) but many people overlook everything else, thus de-emphasizing non-scoring contributions will overemphasizing raw scoring.

But it's still really important.

Try and find the best team without good scorers. It's a difficult task. From the 3-point era, the 93-94 Knicks come to mind. Of course, Patrick Ewing shouldered 25 a night so that's a tough theory to get behind.

The 2002 Nets might be the best example. Clearly a defensively oriented team, with their best player being a 15 point/39% scorer who was known for distributing. I'm being a bit generous here because they started 2 offensively oriented shooters (Van Horn and Kittles) and Kenyon Martin wasn't a slouch, but it's an instructive example. That team finished 17th in ORtg (-0.5) In the PS they scored 102.3 pts per 100 (-0.1) Boasting the top defense in the league, they were still a sub 4 SRS team.

The 2007 Bulls also come to mind. A 4.5 SRS team (better than the 02 Nets) Chicago brought it's best scorer off the bench usually (Ben Gordon) and played good minutes with a plethora of non-offensive players. When Gordon wasn't on the floor, the team ORtg was 102.2. In the PS, in 84 minutes without Gordon the team ORtg was 82.2.

The most recent examples are the Bucks and Bobcats from last year...teams barely clawing over .500. Without Andrew Bogut in the PS the Bucks imported John Salmons scoring (and he did do some heavy lifting in the PS). Brandon Jennings averaged 19 per game in the PS and Salmons 17. With Salmons out of the game, the team ORtg was 96.9 in the PS (51 min). With Jennings out, is was 96.3 (87 min).

And of course, there is always LeBron-ball in Cleveland. Without LeBron, the Cavs offensive ratings were:

2008 RS: 96.3
2008 PS: 83.2
2009 RS: 101.3 (At least Mo Williams could score - 5 30-pointers and 2 40-pointers that year)
2009 PS: 105.3
2010 RS: 100.1
2010 PS: 95.2

Basically, it just seems impossible to achieve a certain level of team offensive efficiency without people who are good at putting the ball in the basket. Without that baseline level of offense, it's nearly impossible to build excellent teams. The best you can hope for is some (still) competent offense players to get the offense near average (hopefully) to pair with a league-best defense. A combination that is going to net ~4 SRS points (~52 wins).

That's why it's hard for me to build around Bobby Jones, Dennis Rodman, Ben Wallace, etc. These are players providing great non-offensive value (Jones at least has some offense) but it prevents them from reaching a certain level of overall impact because they are lacking in such a critical area of the game.

Bottom line: I don't see anything to suggest such players help random teams (or even well-built teams) as much as someone like peak Carmelo Anthony (2009). The counter-example is usually "well, if I have the 96 Bulls I want to add Dennis Rodman." That's true, because the 96 Bulls were built around 2 wings. But if you have the 95 Spurs, I think it's within reason to think Carmelo helps more than Dennis. I think it's also within reason to think Carmelo can help teams like the 2010 Bucks or a number of other offensively deficient teams more than Ben Wallace could. The 90s Jazz + peak Anthony = scary. (And yes, scary even if he only scored 18-20 a game.)

For the record: I wouldn't necessarily say that about Melo's seasons outside of 2009. So what the scorer does with his talent and how he plays with his teammates is still an important determining factor - there's a huge difference between peak Bernard Kings and Jerry Stackhouse.
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
User avatar
ronnymac2
RealGM
Posts: 11,003
And1: 5,070
Joined: Apr 11, 2008
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#29 » by ronnymac2 » Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:48 pm

penbeast0 wrote:Again, ronny, you seem to be underestimating defensive impact. A good offensive player who plays great defense is more valuable than a scorer . . . Jones is the perfect example. I'd say he contributed more to more wins and more playoff wins than someone like Carmelo. Admittedly I cant prove it. :D


He does play great defense, but look at his minutes. He barely played Manu minutes, let alone superstar minutes. How much impact can you exert on a game in less than 30 minutes per night when your primary contribution is on defense? He isn't even a traditional interior defensive anchor.

What puts Jones over guys that can play big minutes and anchor my team on one side of the court? Why Jones over Hal Greer and Chauncey? What puts him over Mutombo and Thurmond and Wallace?
Pay no mind to the battles you've won
It'll take a lot more than rage and muscle
Open your heart and hands, my son
Or you'll never make it over the river
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,343
And1: 16,270
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#30 » by Dr Positivity » Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:22 pm

Votes

Paul Arizin (4) - Doctor MJ, penbeast0, DavidStern, lukekarts
Marques Johnson (3) - therealbig3, ElGee, FJS
Bernard King (1) - ronnymac2
Sam Jones (1) - JordansBulls, Fencer reregistered
Gasol (1) - Dr Mufasa

Nom

Vince Carter (3) - therealbig3, ronnymac2, Dr Mufasa
James Worthy (2) - lukekarts, FJS
Penny Hardaway (2) - ElGee, JordansBulls
Bobby Jones (2) - penbeast0, DavidStern
Dolph Schayes (2) - Fencer Reregistered, Laimbeer

In the interest of run-off voting I'll change my vote to Marques which makes it a tie - Marques is the better defender, has better passing numbers and it's not irrelevant that he clearly faced better and more athletic competition

I'm surprised Grant Hill is getting so much less than support than them though, it seems to me that whatever difference there is between the 3 as scorers it's marginal, and then Grant being a 6-7apg pseudo point takes him to another level as an offensive creator

Also if we're about to vote in Paul Arizin should Cliff Hagan get his number called soon? Hagan had a top 5 efficiency and ppg at the same time in his prime and went into god mode in the 58 and 59 playoffs. He also ranks 45th in the RPOY shares as a result
Liberate The Zoomers
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,859
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#31 » by drza » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:17 pm

My standing vote is Ginobili, but seeing as he has no shot whatsoever here I guess I'll run-off vote. I'm not fully convicted on either Arizin or Johnson, but DocMJ's analogy that Arizin was somewhat of a 50s Ginobili who played more minutes is resonating with me at the moment.

As far as nominations go, I'm pretty sure I would take Webber over Vince. But again, he has no legs right now, and I voted Penny last thread so I'll stay there.

Vote: Paul Arizin
Nominate: Penny Hardaway
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#32 » by lorak » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:46 pm

changing my nomination to Penny
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,784
And1: 15,007
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#33 » by Laimbeer » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:48 pm

Vote: Arizin
Nominate: Schayes
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 52,779
And1: 21,719
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#34 » by Doctor MJ » Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:19 am

btw, I'm sticking with my Mutombo nomination. Lots of good arguments for other guys, but the number of players in league history who are truly all-world defensive anchors with strong longevity is small, and half of them were net negatives on offense which I don't at all consider Mutombo.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,985
And1: 9,676
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #58 

Post#35 » by penbeast0 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:56 am

Looks like Arizin and Penny
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.

Return to Player Comparisons