#30 Highest Peak of All Time (Howard '11 wins)

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 52,806
And1: 21,736
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: #30 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Fri 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#21 » by Doctor MJ » Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:27 am

Vote: Howard '11

Sticking with'im.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Lightning25
Banned User
Posts: 1,309
And1: 29
Joined: Nov 09, 2011
Location: The Windy City

Re: #30 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Fri 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#22 » by Lightning25 » Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:41 pm

Tally

1975 Barry - JordansBulls, DavidStern
1988 Mchale - therealbig3
1987 Mchale - C-Mizle
2011 Howard - Doctor MJ

I think I'm going to hold off for my vote. I'm not sure if Durant has anything going here so there wouldn't be much of a point in voting for him yet. fatal9 has backed off on him and I think I might join him on that.
ardee
RealGM
Posts: 15,320
And1: 5,397
Joined: Nov 16, 2011

Re: #30 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Fri 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#23 » by ardee » Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:01 pm

Vote: 1975 Rick Barry

Just very impressed with that Playoff run and knocking off a team much better then his during the regular season, with the kind of help he had.
User avatar
fatal9
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,341
And1: 548
Joined: Sep 13, 2009

Re: #30 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Fri 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#24 » by fatal9 » Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:36 pm

vote: 2011 Howard
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,366
And1: 16,274
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: #30 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Fri 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#25 » by Dr Positivity » Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:48 pm

Vote 2011 Howard
Liberate The Zoomers
SDChargers#1
Starter
Posts: 2,372
And1: 104
Joined: Nov 15, 2005

Re: #30 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Fri 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#26 » by SDChargers#1 » Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:23 pm

Vote: 2011 Dwight Howard.

What separates him from Barry and King is the defense. Both were pretty poor on that end, while it is Dwight's biggest strength.

What separates Dwight from McHale from me is the whole first option thing. McHale never had a chance to be fair, but considering what Dwight has accomplished as the sole Star on his team, gives him the edge for me.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 52,806
And1: 21,736
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: #30 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Fri 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#27 » by Doctor MJ » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:59 am

Howard '11 takes it.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,998
And1: 9,685
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: #30 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Fri 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#28 » by penbeast0 » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:13 am

DavidStern wrote:re: Barry was inefficient
It's not true, and for sure his scoring efficiency didn't affected negatively his teams ORTGs


1965 - no Barry, Warriors 9th (in 9 teams league) in ortg, -6.4 (!) relatively to league average

1966 - rookie Barry, 7th (9 teams), but -2.8 relatively to league average, so huge improvement

1967 - 7th (10 teams), but -0.7 and he lead Warriors (team which didn't make playoffs two previous years despite having Thurmond) to the finals as 2nd year player

1968 - no Barry, 10th (12 teams) and -2.8

That was worse version of Barry, who scored a lot, but didn't do much else on offense. He was still very good (around +3 SRS player) but worse than his prime version.


1972 - no Barry, Warrios 15th place in ortg (17 teams in the NBA), -3.1 ortg relatively to league average

1973 - 11th (17 teams), -0.5 ortg it was Barry's first year after ABA, transition season I would say as he need time to adjust, but he still improved team a lot.

1974 - it was the year, when Barry entered his prime and showed perfect (for a wing) balance between scoring, playmaking and defense. Warriors offense was 2nd in the league despite so called Barry's inefficient shooting...

1975 - the same story, 2nd offense in the league and of course championship without great defenders and with second option such as Wilkes (who later was 4th best player on title Lakers teams)

1976 - Warriors still were 2nd best offense in the NBA and their anchor still was "inefficent" Barry.

1977 - 4th offense (among 22 teams)
1978 - 10th offense (among 22 teams), last Barry's season as a Warrior, first season since 1973 when his assist average was below 6 per game.

So what we see here is first true point forawrd leading "mini" offensive dynasty during mid 70s. It didn't last long (only 4 seasons), but was pretty impressive looking at Barry's supporting cast. So I think Rick's inefficiency is very overblown thing. Sure, he probably was inefficient scorer by modern standards, but his style of play for sure helped his teams and made them very good on offensive end. And it shouldn't be surprise, because off ball perimeter scorers are always valuable offensively. Playmaking forwards also are positive for offense. And Barry did both these things extremely well + he was very good scorer and above average defender. He was like combination of Reggie Miller (off ball stuff) and Grant Hill with better defense.

PS
Most of his career Barry's TS% was above league average.


I will give you that he was a playmaker equivalent to or superior to Grant Hill, and that he had Reggie Miller range, if not Reggie Miller accuracy, relative to his league . . . but where did you get the idea that Barry, always known for weak defense, was better than Grant Hill who was known for pretty decent defense in his prime?

Do the Warriors defensive stats bear this out (understanding he was playing with outstanding defenders like Nate Thurmond/Clyde Lee then Clifford Ray/Jamaal Wilkes in the front court much of his career)?
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.

Return to Player Comparisons