What makes Garnett better than Robinson

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

G35
RealGM
Posts: 22,500
And1: 8,057
Joined: Dec 10, 2005
     

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#21 » by G35 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 4:44 pm

nate33 wrote:Garnett has a Narrative advantage over Robinson because he won a championship as the undisputed best player on his team. Robinson never made the Finals and only made the Conference Finals once in 8 prime seasons, until the arrival of Duncan.

Garnett didn't exactly have much success in Minnesota, but he did drag a dreadful team the conference Finals once, with a lot less talent than Robinson had. And once Garnett had talent around him in Boston, he was very successful. He won a championship and lost twice to the eventual champions, even though he was a bit past his prime.



1995 Drob took the Spurs to the WCF

2004 KG took the Wolves to the WCF

I do not think those Spurs had more talent than those Wolves.

Using PER for each of these teams can give a basic idea:

1995 Spurs
Avery Johnson (PG) - 15.7
Vinny Del Negro (SG) - 13.8
Sean Elliott (SF) - 16.0
Dennis Rodman (PF) - 16.6
DRob (C) - 29.7

Bench
Chuck Person - 11.5
JR Reid - 12.7
Terry Cummings - 13.3
Doc Rivers - 12.0

2004 Wolves
Sam Cassell (PG) - 22.8
Trenton Hassell (SG) - 8.2
Latrell Sprewell (SF) - 14.7
Kevin Garnett (PF) - 29.4
Ervin Johnson (C) - 8.5

Bench
Fred Hoiberg - 13.6
Mark Madsen - 9.4
Wally Z - 15.3
Gary Trent - 12.9

Sam Cassell by himself gives the Wolves the talent advantage, but the Wolves were better constructed than the Spurs. Pairing an elite big man with an elite PG is the ideal situation.

Having a big time shot maker, which Cassell clearly was, and being able to take over the offense when necessary covers a lot of KG's weaknesses on the offensive side.

Whereas, the Spurs decide to pair DRob with Dennis Rodman...this is looking back with 20/20 vision, but rebounding and defense was not the Spurs problem. Drob has that covered. Giving him an upgrade at PG or SG would have done so much more for that Spurs team.....
I'm so tired of the typical......
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,599
And1: 24,910
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#22 » by 70sFan » Tue Nov 30, 2021 5:15 pm

G35 wrote:
nate33 wrote:Garnett has a Narrative advantage over Robinson because he won a championship as the undisputed best player on his team. Robinson never made the Finals and only made the Conference Finals once in 8 prime seasons, until the arrival of Duncan.

Garnett didn't exactly have much success in Minnesota, but he did drag a dreadful team the conference Finals once, with a lot less talent than Robinson had. And once Garnett had talent around him in Boston, he was very successful. He won a championship and lost twice to the eventual champions, even though he was a bit past his prime.



1995 Drob took the Spurs to the WCF

2004 KG took the Wolves to the WCF

I do not think those Spurs had more talent than those Wolves.

Using PER for each of these teams can give a basic idea:

1995 Spurs
Avery Johnson (PG) - 15.7
Vinny Del Negro (SG) - 13.8
Sean Elliott (SF) - 16.0
Dennis Rodman (PF) - 16.6
DRob (C) - 29.7

Bench
Chuck Person - 11.5
JR Reid - 12.7
Terry Cummings - 13.3
Doc Rivers - 12.0

2004 Wolves
Sam Cassell (PG) - 22.8
Trenton Hassell (SG) - 8.2
Latrell Sprewell (SF) - 14.7
Kevin Garnett (PF) - 29.4
Ervin Johnson (C) - 8.5

Bench
Fred Hoiberg - 13.6
Mark Madsen - 9.4
Wally Z - 15.3
Gary Trent - 12.9

Sam Cassell by himself gives the Wolves the talent advantage, but the Wolves were better constructed than the Spurs. Pairing an elite big man with an elite PG is the ideal situation.

Having a big time shot maker, which Cassell clearly was, and being able to take over the offense when necessary covers a lot of KG's weaknesses on the offensive side.

Whereas, the Spurs decide to pair DRob with Dennis Rodman...this is looking back with 20/20 vision, but rebounding and defense was not the Spurs problem. Drob has that covered. Giving him an upgrade at PG or SG would have done so much more for that Spurs team.....

That's true, but Cassell got injured in 2004 WCF. What's your point then?
jdzimme3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 847
And1: 328
Joined: Oct 29, 2003

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#23 » by jdzimme3 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 5:23 pm

David robinson was the better player. Better on both defense and offense. That is not to say kg wasn’t tremendous. He was a better passer and had better longevity than robinson. I believe The primary reason he is ranked ahead of robinson on realgm is that everyone on realgm has seen kg play and not everyone saw robinson in his prime.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,599
And1: 24,910
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#24 » by 70sFan » Tue Nov 30, 2021 5:29 pm

jdzimme3 wrote:David robinson was the better player. Better on both defense and offense. That is not to say kg wasn’t tremendous. He was a better passer and had better longevity than robinson. I believe The primary reason he is ranked ahead of robinson on realgm is that everyone on realgm has seen kg play and not everyone saw robinson in his prime.

I'm pretty sure the majority of active posters on PC Board saw prime Robinson in action. I mean, he played in the 1990s, not in the 1960s - we have a lot of his games available online.
jdzimme3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 847
And1: 328
Joined: Oct 29, 2003

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#25 » by jdzimme3 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 5:35 pm

70sFan wrote:
jdzimme3 wrote:David robinson was the better player. Better on both defense and offense. That is not to say kg wasn’t tremendous. He was a better passer and had better longevity than robinson. I believe The primary reason he is ranked ahead of robinson on realgm is that everyone on realgm has seen kg play and not everyone saw robinson in his prime.

I'm pretty sure the majority of active posters on PC Board saw prime Robinson in action. I mean, he played in the 1990s, not in the 1960s - we have a lot of his games available online.


I agree that many if not most saw robinson. My comment was more that a higher percentage have seen kg
G35
RealGM
Posts: 22,500
And1: 8,057
Joined: Dec 10, 2005
     

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#26 » by G35 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 5:58 pm

70sFan wrote:
G35 wrote:
nate33 wrote:Garnett has a Narrative advantage over Robinson because he won a championship as the undisputed best player on his team. Robinson never made the Finals and only made the Conference Finals once in 8 prime seasons, until the arrival of Duncan.

Garnett didn't exactly have much success in Minnesota, but he did drag a dreadful team the conference Finals once, with a lot less talent than Robinson had. And once Garnett had talent around him in Boston, he was very successful. He won a championship and lost twice to the eventual champions, even though he was a bit past his prime.



1995 Drob took the Spurs to the WCF

2004 KG took the Wolves to the WCF

I do not think those Spurs had more talent than those Wolves.

Using PER for each of these teams can give a basic idea:

1995 Spurs
Avery Johnson (PG) - 15.7
Vinny Del Negro (SG) - 13.8
Sean Elliott (SF) - 16.0
Dennis Rodman (PF) - 16.6
DRob (C) - 29.7

Bench
Chuck Person - 11.5
JR Reid - 12.7
Terry Cummings - 13.3
Doc Rivers - 12.0

2004 Wolves
Sam Cassell (PG) - 22.8
Trenton Hassell (SG) - 8.2
Latrell Sprewell (SF) - 14.7
Kevin Garnett (PF) - 29.4
Ervin Johnson (C) - 8.5

Bench
Fred Hoiberg - 13.6
Mark Madsen - 9.4
Wally Z - 15.3
Gary Trent - 12.9

Sam Cassell by himself gives the Wolves the talent advantage, but the Wolves were better constructed than the Spurs. Pairing an elite big man with an elite PG is the ideal situation.

Having a big time shot maker, which Cassell clearly was, and being able to take over the offense when necessary covers a lot of KG's weaknesses on the offensive side.

Whereas, the Spurs decide to pair DRob with Dennis Rodman...this is looking back with 20/20 vision, but rebounding and defense was not the Spurs problem. Drob has that covered. Giving him an upgrade at PG or SG would have done so much more for that Spurs team.....

That's true, but Cassell got injured in 2004 WCF. What's your point then?


My point was that DRob did not play with more talent than KG.....
I'm so tired of the typical......
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 16,647
And1: 11,500
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#27 » by eminence » Tue Nov 30, 2021 6:05 pm

Longevity is the #1 reason, though I also prefer KG for peak/prime by a slim margin (think his game plays a little better off most guards, prefer him slightly on defense - just generally prefer his defensive reads).

I currently rate Robinson as the best Spur in '99.
I bought a boat.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,599
And1: 24,910
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#28 » by 70sFan » Tue Nov 30, 2021 9:16 pm

G35 wrote:
70sFan wrote:
G35 wrote:

1995 Drob took the Spurs to the WCF

2004 KG took the Wolves to the WCF

I do not think those Spurs had more talent than those Wolves.

Using PER for each of these teams can give a basic idea:

1995 Spurs
Avery Johnson (PG) - 15.7
Vinny Del Negro (SG) - 13.8
Sean Elliott (SF) - 16.0
Dennis Rodman (PF) - 16.6
DRob (C) - 29.7

Bench
Chuck Person - 11.5
JR Reid - 12.7
Terry Cummings - 13.3
Doc Rivers - 12.0

2004 Wolves
Sam Cassell (PG) - 22.8
Trenton Hassell (SG) - 8.2
Latrell Sprewell (SF) - 14.7
Kevin Garnett (PF) - 29.4
Ervin Johnson (C) - 8.5

Bench
Fred Hoiberg - 13.6
Mark Madsen - 9.4
Wally Z - 15.3
Gary Trent - 12.9

Sam Cassell by himself gives the Wolves the talent advantage, but the Wolves were better constructed than the Spurs. Pairing an elite big man with an elite PG is the ideal situation.

Having a big time shot maker, which Cassell clearly was, and being able to take over the offense when necessary covers a lot of KG's weaknesses on the offensive side.

Whereas, the Spurs decide to pair DRob with Dennis Rodman...this is looking back with 20/20 vision, but rebounding and defense was not the Spurs problem. Drob has that covered. Giving him an upgrade at PG or SG would have done so much more for that Spurs team.....

That's true, but Cassell got injured in 2004 WCF. What's your point then?


My point was that DRob did not play with more talent than KG.....

Which is fair, but since Cassell got injured I think it's fair to say that Wolves were worse when they lost in WCF.
Dnt hate
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,718
And1: 899
Joined: Jun 14, 2016

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#29 » by Dnt hate » Wed Dec 1, 2021 2:59 am

Make a poll. I vote DRob
G35
RealGM
Posts: 22,500
And1: 8,057
Joined: Dec 10, 2005
     

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#30 » by G35 » Thu Dec 2, 2021 2:39 am

70sFan wrote:
G35 wrote:
70sFan wrote:That's true, but Cassell got injured in 2004 WCF. What's your point then?


My point was that DRob did not play with more talent than KG.....

Which is fair, but since Cassell got injured I think it's fair to say that Wolves were worse when they lost in WCF.



Taking that further, the Spurs played the Rockets better than the Orlando did in the finals. The Magic were swept and they had more talent than the Spurs did.

Whereas, the Lakers lost to the Pistons pretty badly in the finals.

That 1995 series is pretty overblown by the narrative of Hakeem vs DRob. But it was a 4-2 series and it really went back and forth. The first game was decided by 1pt and the final game was decided by 5pts. The Spurs blew the Rockets out by 22 pts in G4 and the Rockets returned the favor winning by 21pts in G5.

The difference was, the Rockets traded for Drexler mid-season and that was a huge difference, Clyde became a reliable 2nd scorer that took pressure off Hakeem. OTOH, Dennis Rodman was arguably the Spurs 2nd best player and his skills overlapped DRob's...and he was mentally not focused on winning.

https://www.reddit.com/r/NBASpurs/comments/16j8tx/a_chapter_from_dennis_rodmans_book_on_his_time_in/

It started to fall apart in the Western Conference Semifinals against the Lakers. In Game 3 of the series, which we lost, I came out of the game in the second half and took my shoes off on the sideline. This was no different than most other games. I didn't see a place for me to sit, so I lay down to the press table that ran behind the baseline. So there I was, shoes off, towel over my head, kicking back watching the game.

Then, during a time-out, I didn't get up. I didn't join the huddle. I sat where I was, watching. The television cameras caught me the whole time, like they always do, so the whole world saw me sitting there, back against the press table, with my shoes off.

Bob Hill didn't like this. Gregg Popovich didn't like this. I didn't play any more in that game. Nothing was said to me; I guess it was just supposed to be understood that I wasn't going back in. After we lost that game, we still led in the series, two games to one, and the Spurs decided to suspend me for Game 4. They said the suspension was for "insubordination". Then, after we won that game, they decided I wasn't going to start Game 5.


Some of the players - Doc Rivers is one guy I remember - said I was being immature and doing things to hurt the team. That's when I first realized I wasn't going to be back next year. Players started deciding I wasn't worth the trouble, that the team would be better off without me.

The suspension was Popovich's decision, but I believe he had the approval of the coaches and the players. They weren't going to say anything he didn't want to hear.


I didn't like the coaching in the playoffs. Simple as that.

Bob Hill coached the conference semifinals and the finals like we were playing Minnesota in the middle of December. He was going with a nine- and ten-man rotation. You don't do that in the playoffs. You don't sit me out for long stretches when I'm the team's best rebounder, best defensive player, and the only guy standing there with two championship rings. It's ridiculous. You play six or seven guys in the playoffs and make sure your stars are out there for forty minutes a game. That's the only way you can win.

After we lost Game 3, we won two of the next three to advance to the Western Conference Finals against the Rockets. They won in Los Angeles without me. I admit that. I sat and they won. It worked out perfectly for the Spurs: they got another chance to show they were "taming" Dennis Rodman, and the team won the series. Perfect.



After the second game of the Western Conference Finals against Houston - after we fell behind two games to none with two losses at home - Avery Johnson stood up in the locker room, in front of the whole team and most of all the team's management, and said, "We can't wait for David Robinson to take us, because he ain't going to be there for us."

David Robinson was there, sitting right in the middle of everyone. When Avery was finished, David was still sitting there. He sat there and took it.

We lost that series in six games, and the Rockets went on to sweep the Orlando Magic in four games to win the title. I guess you could say, based on that, we were the second-best team in the NBA. That's not good enough, though, because I think we could have - and should have - beaten the Rockets.



So if you want me to guard him in the second, half, fine. David got into foul trouble against Hakeem just by falling down. David asked me for help, and I told him right to his **** face, "I am not going down there." I was not going to help him. He didn't say anything to me, because there was nothing he could say. Before those games, he looked so **** scared in the locker room, he couldn't stop shaking.

They asked me to double-team Olajuwon, and I refused. The way the defense was drawn up, there was no way I was going to be able to get back down inside when my man was at the top of the key or way out on the baseline. The defense didn't make sense, and I told Bob Hill this. He just looked at me and said, "This is the defense we're going to run."



This is excerpts from Rodman's book, "Bad As I Wanna Be" and it highlights a few things that I think about DRob and those Spurs teams.

- DRob did more with less because he had a crazy man in Dennis Rodman who did not like the coaches were coaching in the playoffs and in particular he did not like Bob Hill or Greg Popovich...it is difficult to measure the effects Rodman's presence had on the series but it did not help

- This also tells me that Popovich was extremely lucky to get Tim Duncan and DRob who had the mentality to follow coaches lead. Many players would not deal as well with his authoritarian coaching/disciplinary style
I'm so tired of the typical......
migya
General Manager
Posts: 7,973
And1: 1,459
Joined: Aug 13, 2005

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#31 » by migya » Thu Dec 2, 2021 9:57 am

G35 wrote:
70sFan wrote:
G35 wrote:
My point was that DRob did not play with more talent than KG.....

Which is fair, but since Cassell got injured I think it's fair to say that Wolves were worse when they lost in WCF.



Taking that further, the Spurs played the Rockets better than the Orlando did in the finals. The Magic were swept and they had more talent than the Spurs did.

Whereas, the Lakers lost to the Pistons pretty badly in the finals.

That 1995 series is pretty overblown by the narrative of Hakeem vs DRob. But it was a 4-2 series and it really went back and forth. The first game was decided by 1pt and the final game was decided by 5pts. The Spurs blew the Rockets out by 22 pts in G4 and the Rockets returned the favor winning by 21pts in G5.

The difference was, the Rockets traded for Drexler mid-season and that was a huge difference, Clyde became a reliable 2nd scorer that took pressure off Hakeem. OTOH, Dennis Rodman was arguably the Spurs 2nd best player and his skills overlapped DRob's...and he was mentally not focused on winning.

https://www.reddit.com/r/NBASpurs/comments/16j8tx/a_chapter_from_dennis_rodmans_book_on_his_time_in/

It started to fall apart in the Western Conference Semifinals against the Lakers. In Game 3 of the series, which we lost, I came out of the game in the second half and took my shoes off on the sideline. This was no different than most other games. I didn't see a place for me to sit, so I lay down to the press table that ran behind the baseline. So there I was, shoes off, towel over my head, kicking back watching the game.

Then, during a time-out, I didn't get up. I didn't join the huddle. I sat where I was, watching. The television cameras caught me the whole time, like they always do, so the whole world saw me sitting there, back against the press table, with my shoes off.

Bob Hill didn't like this. Gregg Popovich didn't like this. I didn't play any more in that game. Nothing was said to me; I guess it was just supposed to be understood that I wasn't going back in. After we lost that game, we still led in the series, two games to one, and the Spurs decided to suspend me for Game 4. They said the suspension was for "insubordination". Then, after we won that game, they decided I wasn't going to start Game 5.


Some of the players - Doc Rivers is one guy I remember - said I was being immature and doing things to hurt the team. That's when I first realized I wasn't going to be back next year. Players started deciding I wasn't worth the trouble, that the team would be better off without me.

The suspension was Popovich's decision, but I believe he had the approval of the coaches and the players. They weren't going to say anything he didn't want to hear.


I didn't like the coaching in the playoffs. Simple as that.

Bob Hill coached the conference semifinals and the finals like we were playing Minnesota in the middle of December. He was going with a nine- and ten-man rotation. You don't do that in the playoffs. You don't sit me out for long stretches when I'm the team's best rebounder, best defensive player, and the only guy standing there with two championship rings. It's ridiculous. You play six or seven guys in the playoffs and make sure your stars are out there for forty minutes a game. That's the only way you can win.

After we lost Game 3, we won two of the next three to advance to the Western Conference Finals against the Rockets. They won in Los Angeles without me. I admit that. I sat and they won. It worked out perfectly for the Spurs: they got another chance to show they were "taming" Dennis Rodman, and the team won the series. Perfect.



After the second game of the Western Conference Finals against Houston - after we fell behind two games to none with two losses at home - Avery Johnson stood up in the locker room, in front of the whole team and most of all the team's management, and said, "We can't wait for David Robinson to take us, because he ain't going to be there for us."

David Robinson was there, sitting right in the middle of everyone. When Avery was finished, David was still sitting there. He sat there and took it.

We lost that series in six games, and the Rockets went on to sweep the Orlando Magic in four games to win the title. I guess you could say, based on that, we were the second-best team in the NBA. That's not good enough, though, because I think we could have - and should have - beaten the Rockets.



So if you want me to guard him in the second, half, fine. David got into foul trouble against Hakeem just by falling down. David asked me for help, and I told him right to his **** face, "I am not going down there." I was not going to help him. He didn't say anything to me, because there was nothing he could say. Before those games, he looked so **** scared in the locker room, he couldn't stop shaking.

They asked me to double-team Olajuwon, and I refused. The way the defense was drawn up, there was no way I was going to be able to get back down inside when my man was at the top of the key or way out on the baseline. The defense didn't make sense, and I told Bob Hill this. He just looked at me and said, "This is the defense we're going to run."



This is excerpts from Rodman's book, "Bad As I Wanna Be" and it highlights a few things that I think about DRob and those Spurs teams.

- DRob did more with less because he had a crazy man in Dennis Rodman who did not like the coaches were coaching in the playoffs and in particular he did not like Bob Hill or Greg Popovich...it is difficult to measure the effects Rodman's presence had on the series but it did not help

- This also tells me that Popovich was extremely lucky to get Tim Duncan and DRob who had the mentality to follow coaches lead. Many players would not deal as well with his authoritarian coaching/disciplinary style


Rodman was a difference maker and the Spurs did get Elliott back so it turned out well for them, but if they could've traded Rodman for Robert Horry even instead of Perdue, I think that Spurs team wins it all in 96 or 97 at least. Robinson's career is one of the obvious cases of bad luck and team management. Had he just had one other consistent allstar type or great fitting player he would've gotten championships without Duncan.
User avatar
-Luke-
Veteran
Posts: 2,851
And1: 5,970
Joined: Feb 21, 2021
Contact:
   

Re: What makes Garnett better than Robinson 

Post#32 » by -Luke- » Thu Dec 2, 2021 10:39 am

That he was not in the Navy makes KG's career better than Robinson's.

Robinson was 24 when he first played in the NBA. At that age KG already made 3-4 All-Star games, 2 All-NBA teams (one of them first team), one All-Defenisve First Team and was 2nd in MVP voting once. I don't think KG had a higher peak than Robinson, it's those ~ 500 additional NBA games.

The Navy ruined The Admirals case (On the other hand, he wouldn't be "The Admiral" without the Navy.).

Return to Player Comparisons