How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed?

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,905
And1: 13,730
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#21 » by sp6r=underrated » Wed Jul 20, 2022 5:48 am

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
sp6r=underrated wrote:
A combination of things caused his breakdown:

1. He is highly susceptible to minor but chronic injuries. This has caused him to miss more and more time. The missed results an on-court rust and a reluctance to go all out.

2. He accomplished his career objectives. He was the #1 rated High School. He picked the most blue blood of programs to attend for one and dones, Kentucky. He was the #1 pick in the draft. He made All-NBA teams/Defensive teams with the small market team that drafted him. He signed max contracts and demanded a trade to the two glamour* cities. He got his way to the marquees franchise in the NBA. He won a title in his first year with a great playoffs.

It'd be normal to have a motivation dropoff at that point. Really the abnormal thing are the guys like Lebron who keep their motivation going long after they have no sensible reason to do so.

3. The 2021 and 2022 campaigns are not nearly the outliers we think they are. If you look at his resume you'll see quite a few seasons similar to 2021 and 2022. He was never as consistent year to year as the generational big that preceded him like Hakeem, Robinson, Duncan, KG and others. Heck even though he missed time due to injuries Shaq was still more on-court effective than Davis in the down seasons. Nor was he as consistently effective as the ones after him.

The decline we are seeing is smaller than we realized and then should be seen as more normal. In a lot of ways he's closer to a T-Mac than the guys we pegged him too.

* I know he put Milwaukee on the list too. But that was just to deflect criticism. He was LA/NYC or bust.


T-Mac delt with several injuries that possible aged him quickly.

Nonetheless,

AD from 15-22 averaged per 75 possessions an Inflation Adjusted (rTS%)

15: 27.6 pts (5.7%)
16: 26.3 pts (1.8%)
17: 28.9 pts (2.7%)
18: 28.1 pts (5.6%)
19: 27.4 pts (4%)
20: 26.7 pts (4.1%)

Then in 21 and 22

21: 24.3 pts (-2.0%)
22: 23.7 pts (0.9%)

This is just his scoring decline, not even taking into account he looks much sprier and lighter on his feet. The drop in his movement is startling for someone his age. He isn't nearly the same athlete. This decline isn't normal whatsoever. The only star who maybe never suffered a major injury to decline by so much, so quickly is maybe Moses Malone.


He just tried to build muscle and it didn’t work out lol, he’ll be fine next year if we get Kyrie especially


LOL right back at you, Dude's been prone to minor injuries his entire career. The assumption he'll be fine next year is just that a big assumption.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#22 » by MyUniBroDavis » Wed Jul 20, 2022 6:07 am

sp6r=underrated wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
T-Mac delt with several injuries that possible aged him quickly.

Nonetheless,

AD from 15-22 averaged per 75 possessions an Inflation Adjusted (rTS%)

15: 27.6 pts (5.7%)
16: 26.3 pts (1.8%)
17: 28.9 pts (2.7%)
18: 28.1 pts (5.6%)
19: 27.4 pts (4%)
20: 26.7 pts (4.1%)

Then in 21 and 22

21: 24.3 pts (-2.0%)
22: 23.7 pts (0.9%)

This is just his scoring decline, not even taking into account he looks much sprier and lighter on his feet. The drop in his movement is startling for someone his age. He isn't nearly the same athlete. This decline isn't normal whatsoever. The only star who maybe never suffered a major injury to decline by so much, so quickly is maybe Moses Malone.


He just tried to build muscle and it didn’t work out lol, he’ll be fine next year if we get Kyrie especially


LOL right back at you, Dude's been prone to minor injuries his entire career. The assumption he'll be fine next year is just that a big assumption.


Lol right back at you may be the strangest thing I’ve seen typed including that dude that tried bringing in evolution (as a species) when talking about tim Duncan

In terms of him getting slow and stuff it’s cuz he bulked up too fast, he’ll get skinny and prolly be fine in the 60 or so games he hopefully plays
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,168
And1: 20,221
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#23 » by NO-KG-AI » Wed Jul 20, 2022 11:53 am

Davis doesn’t look like he bulked up, he looks lke he got out of shape. When he came into the season with a fat face, I was already worried.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#24 » by HeartBreakKid » Wed Jul 20, 2022 11:56 am

Overrated. He was hot, it happens.
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,905
And1: 13,730
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#25 » by sp6r=underrated » Wed Jul 20, 2022 4:47 pm

NO-KG-AI wrote:Davis doesn’t look like he bulked up, he looks lke he got out of shape. When he came into the season with a fat face, I was already worried.


Sad thing is the NBA is right now moving in a 7 fter way. A lot of the elites are 7 ft and Anthony should be in the middle of it. He feels like an afterthought after Embiid, Jokic, Giannis
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,272
And1: 2,984
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#26 » by LukaTheGOAT » Fri Jul 22, 2022 3:25 am

sp6r=underrated wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
sp6r=underrated wrote:
A combination of things caused his breakdown:

1. He is highly susceptible to minor but chronic injuries. This has caused him to miss more and more time. The missed results an on-court rust and a reluctance to go all out.

2. He accomplished his career objectives. He was the #1 rated High School. He picked the most blue blood of programs to attend for one and dones, Kentucky. He was the #1 pick in the draft. He made All-NBA teams/Defensive teams with the small market team that drafted him. He signed max contracts and demanded a trade to the two glamour* cities. He got his way to the marquees franchise in the NBA. He won a title in his first year with a great playoffs.

It'd be normal to have a motivation dropoff at that point. Really the abnormal thing are the guys like Lebron who keep their motivation going long after they have no sensible reason to do so.

3. The 2021 and 2022 campaigns are not nearly the outliers we think they are. If you look at his resume you'll see quite a few seasons similar to 2021 and 2022. He was never as consistent year to year as the generational big that preceded him like Hakeem, Robinson, Duncan, KG and others. Heck even though he missed time due to injuries Shaq was still more on-court effective than Davis in the down seasons. Nor was he as consistently effective as the ones after him.

The decline we are seeing is smaller than we realized and then should be seen as more normal. In a lot of ways he's closer to a T-Mac than the guys we pegged him too.

* I know he put Milwaukee on the list too. But that was just to deflect criticism. He was LA/NYC or bust.


T-Mac delt with several injuries that possible aged him quickly.

Nonetheless,

AD from 15-22 averaged per 75 possessions an Inflation Adjusted (rTS%)

15: 27.6 pts (5.7%)
16: 26.3 pts (1.8%)
17: 28.9 pts (2.7%)
18: 28.1 pts (5.6%)
19: 27.4 pts (4%)
20: 26.7 pts (4.1%)

Then in 21 and 22

21: 24.3 pts (-2.0%)
22: 23.7 pts (0.9%)

This is just his scoring decline, not even taking into account he looks much sprier and lighter on his feet. The drop in his movement is startling for someone his age. He isn't nearly the same athlete. This decline isn't normal whatsoever. The only star who maybe never suffered a major injury to decline by so much, so quickly is maybe Moses Malone.


Look at the fluctations in his BPM for the box score and RAPM (admittedly +/- is more noisy year to year) and compare it to bigs primes. You see much larger fluctuations as I stated. Focusing on ppg when NBA scoring is exploding is misleading. His passing numbers go way up in 21/22.


Some of Anthony Davis' metric through his 18-20 3 year peak versus 21 and 22

BPM
18: 6.7
19: 9.4
20: 8

21: 4.8
22: 3.8

Backpicks BPM

18: 4.6
19: 5.6
20: 5.6

21: 2.9
22: 2.8

LEBRON:

18: 4.69
19: 5.83
20: 4.71

21: 3.29
22: 2.60

PER

18: 28.9
19: 30.3
20: 27.4

21: 22.1
22: 23.9

WS/48

18: .241
19: .247
20: .250

21: .152
22: .155

Man it is clear to be 18-20 AD might end up being one of the disrespected players we have seen in a while. Whether it through accident or trying to just agree with the crowd, the way people act as if AD was just another star in the league during 18-20 is disappointing. Statistically, there is little reason to believe any potential improvements he might have made as a passer cover up his regression as a defender and scorer.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#27 » by MyUniBroDavis » Fri Jul 22, 2022 4:22 am

LukaTheGOAT wrote:
sp6r=underrated wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
T-Mac delt with several injuries that possible aged him quickly.

Nonetheless,

AD from 15-22 averaged per 75 possessions an Inflation Adjusted (rTS%)

15: 27.6 pts (5.7%)
16: 26.3 pts (1.8%)
17: 28.9 pts (2.7%)
18: 28.1 pts (5.6%)
19: 27.4 pts (4%)
20: 26.7 pts (4.1%)

Then in 21 and 22

21: 24.3 pts (-2.0%)
22: 23.7 pts (0.9%)

This is just his scoring decline, not even taking into account he looks much sprier and lighter on his feet. The drop in his movement is startling for someone his age. He isn't nearly the same athlete. This decline isn't normal whatsoever. The only star who maybe never suffered a major injury to decline by so much, so quickly is maybe Moses Malone.


Look at the fluctations in his BPM for the box score and RAPM (admittedly +/- is more noisy year to year) and compare it to bigs primes. You see much larger fluctuations as I stated. Focusing on ppg when NBA scoring is exploding is misleading. His passing numbers go way up in 21/22.


Some of Anthony Davis' metric through his 18-20 3 year peak versus 21 and 22

BPM
18: 6.7
19: 9.4
20: 8

21: 4.8
22: 3.8

Backpicks BPM

18: 4.6
19: 5.6
20: 5.6

21: 2.9
22: 2.8

LEBRON:

18: 4.69
19: 5.83
20: 4.71

21: 3.29
22: 2.60

PER

18: 28.9
19: 30.3
20: 27.4

21: 22.1
22: 23.9

WS/48

18: .241
19: .247
20: .250

21: .152
22: .155

Man it is clear to be 18-20 AD might end up being one of the disrespected players we have seen in a while. Whether it through accident or trying to just agree with the crowd, the way people act as if AD was just another star in the league during 18-20 is disappointing. Statistically, there is little reason to believe any potential improvements he might have made as a passer cover up his regression as a defender and scorer.


Honestly 2020 Bubble AD, in terms of level of play, fully put up a tier 1 all time playoff run with his secondary skillset lol
User avatar
Proxy
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 192
Joined: Jun 30, 2021
       

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#28 » by Proxy » Fri Jul 22, 2022 5:06 am

Man, I know alot of people fixate on the shot making(deservedly so to some degree because some of the shooting was definitely a bit flukey and boosted his numbers ofc) - I also used to believe this until hearing an argument by a friend that changed my perspective

But he was also doing things like:

-1.426 PPP as a P&R roll man / 47 poss
-1.489 PPP as a cutter(VERY underdiscussed aspect of his game) / 47 poss
-1.4 PPP on putbacks from offensive rebounds / 45 poss

Via Synergy^

When watching AD, I honestly think the interior scoring even if the numbers are slightly boosted by Bron, the defense, and some of the self creation scoring ability were all fairly legit.

His scoring flexibility(not focusing on the actual production) and constant opportunity hunting on and off the ball(easily one of the more impressive bigmen ever in this regard and it gets very underdiscussed), that punished unsuspecting defenders constantly depending on how they decided to play him(fairly common occurance in this run) is really what makes that run stand out for me more so than his outside shooting production.

These are definitely valuable traits for any player to have in a PS setting. Yeah this run specifically had some absurd shot making ability, but I think those aspects have been more important, consistent elements of his game his entire prime and part of why he looks like a playoff "riser" in general.
AEnigma wrote:Arf arf.
Image

trex_8063 wrote:Calling someone a stinky turd is not acceptable.
PLEASE stop doing that.

One_and_Done wrote:I mean, how would you feel if the NBA traced it's origins to an 1821 league of 3 foot dwarves who performed in circuses?
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,851
And1: 29,741
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#29 » by Ron Swanson » Fri Jul 22, 2022 4:01 pm

Davis from 2015-2020 was no less than a Top-6 player on the planet putting up some monster box and impact numbers. Yes, compared to his career averages, I think we can safely assume that some of the shooting numbers during the bubble run were fluky (a lot of fluky things happened in an empty gym environment), but it's really weird how people retroactively try and claim that he wasn't an MVP caliber player in hindsight. He's been a huge impact guy in the postseason during his career, regardless of situation (+12.6 playoffs on/off).

I suspect some of it is a combination of recency-bias and this tendency amongst a certain crowd to downplay Lebron's costars, but AD's now the same age as Amare was his second season in New York, when his physical prime was well past him. His body just hasn't held up like other all-time greats.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#30 » by HeartBreakKid » Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:36 am

Ron Swanson wrote:Davis from 2015-2020 was no less than a Top-6 player on the planet putting up some monster box and impact numbers. Yes, compared to his career averages, I think we can safely assume that some of the shooting numbers during the bubble run were fluky (a lot of fluky things happened in an empty gym environment), but it's really weird how people retroactively try and claim that he wasn't an MVP caliber player in hindsight. He's been a huge impact guy in the postseason during his career, regardless of situation (+12.6 playoffs on/off).

I suspect some of it is a combination of recency-bias and this tendency amongst a certain crowd to downplay Lebron's costars, but AD's now the same age as Amare was his second season in New York, when his physical prime was well past him. His body just hasn't held up like other all-time greats.


Who has said he was not an MVP caliber player?

And recency bias...? we are talking about a recent season. This is literally the least bias time that has been available to talk about Anthony Davis - you think right after he won the title would have less bias?
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,574
And1: 7,175
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#31 » by falcolombardi » Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:47 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:Davis from 2015-2020 was no less than a Top-6 player on the planet putting up some monster box and impact numbers. Yes, compared to his career averages, I think we can safely assume that some of the shooting numbers during the bubble run were fluky (a lot of fluky things happened in an empty gym environment), but it's really weird how people retroactively try and claim that he wasn't an MVP caliber player in hindsight. He's been a huge impact guy in the postseason during his career, regardless of situation (+12.6 playoffs on/off).

I suspect some of it is a combination of recency-bias and this tendency amongst a certain crowd to downplay Lebron's costars, but AD's now the same age as Amare was his second season in New York, when his physical prime was well past him. His body just hasn't held up like other all-time greats.


Who has said he was not an MVP caliber player?

And recency bias...? we are talking about a recent season. This is literally the least bias time that has been available to talk about Anthony Davis - you think right after he won the title would have less bias?


In fairness negative bias also happens

While there was recency bias in davis favor after 2020, is possible there is bias in the other direction against him right now after him and lakers 2022 struggles
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#32 » by HeartBreakKid » Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:49 am

falcolombardi wrote:
HeartBreakKid wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:Davis from 2015-2020 was no less than a Top-6 player on the planet putting up some monster box and impact numbers. Yes, compared to his career averages, I think we can safely assume that some of the shooting numbers during the bubble run were fluky (a lot of fluky things happened in an empty gym environment), but it's really weird how people retroactively try and claim that he wasn't an MVP caliber player in hindsight. He's been a huge impact guy in the postseason during his career, regardless of situation (+12.6 playoffs on/off).

I suspect some of it is a combination of recency-bias and this tendency amongst a certain crowd to downplay Lebron's costars, but AD's now the same age as Amare was his second season in New York, when his physical prime was well past him. His body just hasn't held up like other all-time greats.


Who has said he was not an MVP caliber player?

And recency bias...? we are talking about a recent season. This is literally the least bias time that has been available to talk about Anthony Davis - you think right after he won the title would have less bias?


In fairness negative bias also happens

While there was recency bias in davis favor after 2020, is possible there is bias in the other direction against him right now after him and lakers 2022 struggles

Right, so I don't get it then, when would there be a time for there not to be recency bias for something that happened as recency as 2020?


Calling things receny bias is just lazy and a ton of posters always do it. It's basically a strawman argument.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#33 » by MyUniBroDavis » Sat Jul 23, 2022 7:54 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:
HeartBreakKid wrote:
Who has said he was not an MVP caliber player?

And recency bias...? we are talking about a recent season. This is literally the least bias time that has been available to talk about Anthony Davis - you think right after he won the title would have less bias?


In fairness negative bias also happens

While there was recency bias in davis favor after 2020, is possible there is bias in the other direction against him right now after him and lakers 2022 struggles

Right, so I don't get it then, when would there be a time for there not to be recency bias for something that happened as recency as 2020?


Calling things receny bias is just lazy and a ton of posters always do it. It's basically a strawman argument.


ADs 2020 playoff run has 100% become underrated because of his recent struggles, the man had one of the absolute best two way runs ever and gets hated on because he played with lebron.

It was flukey shooting but his level of play that run was undeniable. You replace Lebron with a lower level player that synegizes better like a Kyrie and ADs numbers would skyrocket
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#34 » by MyUniBroDavis » Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:18 am

No-more-rings wrote:I thought he had life easy with Lebron garnering more of the defensive attention. Not to discredit him, but it's nice to see people have a more realistic view of him 2 years later. At the time people we had a few people comparing his playoff run to guys like Tim Duncan and Hakeem.


f4p wrote:I still think he benefits too much from being next to Lebron to call it an all-time peak. Yes, AD actually has very impressive playoff numbers so it can't solely be attributed to Lebron, but AD's game (at least at that point) seems tailor made to benefit from Lebron. He's almost certainly the most perfect fit for Lebron that he's ever had. Lebron runs the show and gets everyone where they need to be, AD did a superb job hitting his jumpers (unsustainably, but he did it) and finishing from Lebron's attention and still got some of his own shots. And obviously, the Lakers played amazing defense with him probably being the biggest reason. So certainly an amazing playoff run but too conveniently next to Lebron for me to call it an all-time peak.


I really do wonder how many people actually watched the Lakers during the bubble vs just making the assumption that lebron playmaking + AD good off ball = perfect combination

Bubble AD and 2020 playoff Lebron fit well in the sense that they were an elite two way duo and the best players of the nba bubble.

How Lebron helped AD is basically off of drive and kicks, which I don’t see as anything crazy since spacing 5 gets three point opportunities, and that he and rondo could find AD when he was moving off ball.

That’s pretty much it.

I’ll write down factors going against them, but people REALLY overestimate the significance of the second part of that.

AD was assisted in 57.8% of his 2 point shots in the 2020 RS, the lowest of his career up until that point. For reference, the lowest before that was 61.8% of his 2 point shots assisted, and his more off ball season which was his peak RS impact over the whole year was 71.5%

In the playoffs, this number was 57.7%.

For reference, 2003 Duncan was assisted on 47.5% of his shots in the RS, 51.4% in the playoffs.
2004 KG at 66.3% in the RS, 54% in the playoffs
2011 Dirk at 59% in the RS, 48.5% in the playoffs
2000 Shaq at 60.1% in the RS and 62.8% in the playoffs

In terms of high leverage opportunities, he averaged 2.2 cut scoring possessions a game, and 2.2 roll man possessions a game (9.6% of his possessions for both).

For reference, 12% of Duncan’s were roll man possessions in 07 (data goes from 05 onwards) and 8.6% were cuts

People assume AD spends way more off ball than he is because of his 2015 season where 24% of his possessions were as the roll man. He honestly should be off ball far more, but he isn’t.

28.4% of his shots were within 3 feet, his career average is 34.7%

So did lebron lead to him getting super easy shots or anything like that or “playing it in easy mode?” No, not particularly.

Obviously, having Lebron is better than not having Lebron, it’s silly to say otherwise, but the idea that AD had some sort of unprecedented level of openness he never experienced before is just not true.

Regular season
Lebron on
32.3/12.4/4.5 on 3.1 turnovers a game and 59.3 TS
Lebron off
40.6/12.6/4.0 on 3.8 turnovers a game and 64.0 TS

Playoffs
Lebron on
34.4/12.4/4.4 on 3.2 turnovers a game and 65.5 TS
Lebron off
43.2/14.2/5.2 on 3.8 turnovers a game and 68.7 TS

Lost most of my post after this cuz the page reloaded, so gonna be pretty brief here

This isn’t to say Lebron doesn’t help AD, lebron there is better than lebron not there of course

But it’s ridiculously overstated. Yes, a lot of ADs assists are from lebron, since lebron is quite literally the only playmaker other than rondo on that team. Unless the idea is Lebron makes it so that off ball movement is a million times easier because everyone is watching lebron, which I just feel isn’t a statement I have to respond to because that’s just kinda wild lol (most of those assists were Lebron watching and waiting vs doing something and AD doing something in secondary weakside action)

I think the idea is either because of how nba defenses set up vs slashers, (shell defense), or because opponents ran zone a few times and it looks like they’re loading up on bron (and to be clear AD then broke the zone because bigs that can shoot from the nail kill the zone). If it’s because teams didn’t instantly double AD like they did in the 2000s that’s just not understanding how modern defenses and offenses interact lol. Sometimes the gameplan is hard doubles but it’s hardly the norm, it’s not as if defenses didn’t pack the paint or send help against AD either, but he acts really fast especially if he has a step, but most people confuse post doubles with them deciding to double when someone cuts from the wing or something and the defender that was stunting high messed up and has to kind of make up for it, or run back.

But it’s like, yeah if lebrons attacking you can just help off of one of the Lakers many inconsistent shooters than isn’t AD, and if AD is attacking you can help off of one of the many inconsistent shooters that isn’t Lebron, and we kind of did see the paint get completely packed in the Nuggets series especially at times (Houston too early on, idr the blazers or the heat)

It’s like the Lebron and AD pick and roll is this unstoppable beast that they just don’t run, in reality teams have just switched it and found decent success, which is why they don’t run it much. At the very least if they switch that helps Lebron far more and hes the one attacking, the guys that guard Lebron are usually the ones that guard AD, since you want more mobile bigs or strong tall wings guarding AD vs plodding bigs who he killed

You could also drop too, which is okay, brons a decent three point shooter though so it’s not ideal, and in the bubble AD was going crazy from three. To be clear the majority of the time they dropped AD ended up going for long twos, they went in though.

Rondo is a non scoring threat and despite his percentages they let him shoot, so you just focus on stopping AD.

Essentially most of the positives form the pick and roll game come from the fact that if they mess up the coverage it works out, but there are definately better pick and roll partners in the nba solely for ADs efficiency

ADs pretty much never had an “ideal” pick and roll partner his entire career anyways, so he could be unlocked hella if he had that

Beyond that, ADs skillset in my opinion offensicely goes
off-ball scoring/P and R rolling and cutting > posting up > face up game.

Vogel is a pretty horrible offensive coach, I think most laker fans would attest to that, and they don’t have a guy that requires you to stay on the level of the ball handler in p and r like a Kyrie/lillard/Murray/Curry/Trae, so I don’t think his off ball scoring is particularly maximized, evidenced by his relatively suprising lack of cuts and roll possessions anyway.

The Lakers have pretty trash spacing relative to the nba, especially in the bubble, Pretty much everyone who followed them knows the defense just packed into the paint and chilled there. I mean the Lakers were 21st in three point shooting and volume with lebron and AD, I think that says it all lol.

Bubble wise, rondos numbers were a result of them letting him take open shots, and I don’t think they were particularly scared of green whose shot died in the playoffs, so the Lakers 3 reliable rotation three point shooters other than AD were lebron/KCP/kieff

Also the Lakers don’t know how to run a basic post possession if the defense helps at literal incompetent levels lmao

https://www.bball-index.com/the-lakers-have-a-post-problem/

So AD was in easy mode in the sense that he and Lebron both had incredible ATG postseasons on the same team and killed everyone else

AD being in easy mode in terms of his scoring despite having the largest on ball role in his career, a relatively low percentage of his shots as the typical high value off ball shots, especially considering he’s primary skill is off ball, on a team with pretty horrendous spacing relative to the rest of the nba, on a team with poor offensive coaching that also particularly struggles at coaching a post offense.

It was easy mode in terms of the wins being easy, but that’s about it, people handwave and say “Lebron” without explaining what that actually means, when you look into his actual offensive situation that’s not a situation conducive to historic effeciency high volume scoring as a big

I guess the one thing is lebron ran the offense for the most part? The only series where lebron was super clearly running the show in comparison was the heat series where AD was hurt anyway (and still hit 25ppg on 67TS with DPOY defense). I don’t think ball dominance is necessary for high impact anyways
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,915
And1: 1,895
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#35 » by f4p » Sat Jul 23, 2022 2:50 pm

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
No-more-rings wrote:I thought he had life easy with Lebron garnering more of the defensive attention. Not to discredit him, but it's nice to see people have a more realistic view of him 2 years later. At the time people we had a few people comparing his playoff run to guys like Tim Duncan and Hakeem.


f4p wrote:I still think he benefits too much from being next to Lebron to call it an all-time peak. Yes, AD actually has very impressive playoff numbers so it can't solely be attributed to Lebron, but AD's game (at least at that point) seems tailor made to benefit from Lebron. He's almost certainly the most perfect fit for Lebron that he's ever had. Lebron runs the show and gets everyone where they need to be, AD did a superb job hitting his jumpers (unsustainably, but he did it) and finishing from Lebron's attention and still got some of his own shots. And obviously, the Lakers played amazing defense with him probably being the biggest reason. So certainly an amazing playoff run but too conveniently next to Lebron for me to call it an all-time peak.


I really do wonder how many people actually watched the Lakers during the bubble vs just making the assumption that lebron playmaking + AD good off ball = perfect combination

Bubble AD and 2020 playoff Lebron fit well in the sense that they were an elite two way duo and the best players of the nba bubble.

How Lebron helped AD is basically off of drive and kicks, which I don’t see as anything crazy since spacing 5 gets three point opportunities, and that he and rondo could find AD when he was moving off ball.

That’s pretty much it.

I’ll write down factors going against them, but people REALLY overestimate the significance of the second part of that.

AD was assisted in 57.8% of his 2 point shots in the 2020 RS, the lowest of his career up until that point. For reference, the lowest before that was 61.8% of his 2 point shots assisted, and his more off ball season which was his peak RS impact over the whole year was 71.5%

In the playoffs, this number was 57.7%.

For reference, 2003 Duncan was assisted on 47.5% of his shots in the RS, 51.4% in the playoffs.
2004 KG at 66.3% in the RS, 54% in the playoffs
2011 Dirk at 59% in the RS, 48.5% in the playoffs
2000 Shaq at 60.1% in the RS and 62.8% in the playoffs

In terms of high leverage opportunities, he averaged 2.2 cut scoring possessions a game, and 2.2 roll man possessions a game (9.6% of his possessions for both).

For reference, 12% of Duncan’s were roll man possessions in 07 (data goes from 05 onwards) and 8.6% were cuts

People assume AD spends way more off ball than he is because of his 2015 season where 24% of his possessions were as the roll man. He honestly should be off ball far more, but he isn’t.

28.4% of his shots were within 3 feet, his career average is 34.7%

So did lebron lead to him getting super easy shots or anything like that or “playing it in easy mode?” No, not particularly.

Obviously, having Lebron is better than not having Lebron, it’s silly to say otherwise, but the idea that AD had some sort of unprecedented level of openness he never experienced before is just not true.

Regular season
Lebron on
32.3/12.4/4.5 on 3.1 turnovers a game and 59.3 TS
Lebron off
40.6/12.6/4.0 on 3.8 turnovers a game and 64.0 TS

Playoffs
Lebron on
34.4/12.4/4.4 on 3.2 turnovers a game and 65.5 TS
Lebron off
43.2/14.2/5.2 on 3.8 turnovers a game and 68.7 TS

Lost most of my post after this cuz the page reloaded, so gonna be pretty brief here

This isn’t to say Lebron doesn’t help AD, lebron there is better than lebron not there of course

But it’s ridiculously overstated. Yes, a lot of ADs assists are from lebron, since lebron is quite literally the only playmaker other than rondo on that team. Unless the idea is Lebron makes it so that off ball movement is a million times easier because everyone is watching lebron, which I just feel isn’t a statement I have to respond to because that’s just kinda wild lol (most of those assists were Lebron watching and waiting vs doing something and AD doing something in secondary weakside action)

I think the idea is either because of how nba defenses set up vs slashers, (shell defense), or because opponents ran zone a few times and it looks like they’re loading up on bron (and to be clear AD then broke the zone because bigs that can shoot from the nail kill the zone). If it’s because teams didn’t instantly double AD like they did in the 2000s that’s just not understanding how modern defenses and offenses interact lol. Sometimes the gameplan is hard doubles but it’s hardly the norm, it’s not as if defenses didn’t pack the paint or send help against AD either, but he acts really fast especially if he has a step, but most people confuse post doubles with them deciding to double when someone cuts from the wing or something and the defender that was stunting high messed up and has to kind of make up for it, or run back.

But it’s like, yeah if lebrons attacking you can just help off of one of the Lakers many inconsistent shooters than isn’t AD, and if AD is attacking you can help off of one of the many inconsistent shooters that isn’t Lebron, and we kind of did see the paint get completely packed in the Nuggets series especially at times (Houston too early on, idr the blazers or the heat)

It’s like the Lebron and AD pick and roll is this unstoppable beast that they just don’t run, in reality teams have just switched it and found decent success, which is why they don’t run it much. At the very least if they switch that helps Lebron far more and hes the one attacking, the guys that guard Lebron are usually the ones that guard AD, since you want more mobile bigs or strong tall wings guarding AD vs plodding bigs who he killed

You could also drop too, which is okay, brons a decent three point shooter though so it’s not ideal, and in the bubble AD was going crazy from three. To be clear the majority of the time they dropped AD ended up going for long twos, they went in though.

Rondo is a non scoring threat and despite his percentages they let him shoot, so you just focus on stopping AD.

Essentially most of the positives form the pick and roll game come from the fact that if they mess up the coverage it works out, but there are definately better pick and roll partners in the nba solely for ADs efficiency

ADs pretty much never had an “ideal” pick and roll partner his entire career anyways, so he could be unlocked hella if he had that

Beyond that, ADs skillset in my opinion offensicely goes
off-ball scoring/P and R rolling and cutting > posting up > face up game.

Vogel is a pretty horrible offensive coach, I think most laker fans would attest to that, and they don’t have a guy that requires you to stay on the level of the ball handler in p and r like a Kyrie/lillard/Murray/Curry/Trae, so I don’t think his off ball scoring is particularly maximized, evidenced by his relatively suprising lack of cuts and roll possessions anyway.

The Lakers have pretty trash spacing relative to the nba, especially in the bubble, Pretty much everyone who followed them knows the defense just packed into the paint and chilled there. I mean the Lakers were 21st in three point shooting and volume with lebron and AD, I think that says it all lol.

Bubble wise, rondos numbers were a result of them letting him take open shots, and I don’t think they were particularly scared of green whose shot died in the playoffs, so the Lakers 3 reliable rotation three point shooters other than AD were lebron/KCP/kieff

Also the Lakers don’t know how to run a basic post possession if the defense helps at literal incompetent levels lmao

https://www.bball-index.com/the-lakers-have-a-post-problem/

So AD was in easy mode in the sense that he and Lebron both had incredible ATG postseasons on the same team and killed everyone else

AD being in easy mode in terms of his scoring despite having the largest on ball role in his career, a relatively low percentage of his shots as the typical high value off ball shots, especially considering he’s primary skill is off ball, on a team with pretty horrendous spacing relative to the rest of the nba, on a team with poor offensive coaching that also particularly struggles at coaching a post offense.

It was easy mode in terms of the wins being easy, but that’s about it, people handwave and say “Lebron” without explaining what that actually means, when you look into his actual offensive situation that’s not a situation conducive to historic effeciency high volume scoring as a big

I guess the one thing is lebron ran the offense for the most part? The only series where lebron was super clearly running the show in comparison was the heat series where AD was hurt anyway (and still hit 25ppg on 67TS with DPOY defense). I don’t think ball dominance is necessary for high impact anyways



i agree with a lot of what you say. i think i mentioned somewhere that in a vacuum AD might have outplayed lebron during the playoffs. and considering how great lebron's numbers are, that's saying something. my feeling was lebron was holding back because he knew the lakers were the best team left and he could see AD was killing it, so there was no need to risk injury or fatigue until it was absolutely necessary (being 35 years old and all). he would run the offense, get people where they should be, and let AD go to work. obviously, if lebron just gets the ball to AD in the post, then AD is doing most of the work, but it felt like lebron was still the maestro of the offense and made sure AD didn't have to do anything he couldn't do. and, if i'm going into psychological factors, i think lebron is just a nice security blanket that lets a guy like AD know that he can play with freedom and if it ever gets really tough, lebron will come and solve the problem.

having said that, it's perfectly reasonable to say "who cares about psychology 101 and who cares if lebron was holding back, AD was actually doing the heavy lifting and what counts is what you do", and from that perspective, AD killed it. the lakers weren't overly talented outside of lebron/AD and, while their opponents were very weak, they still won pretty handily. so if we know a team of only 2 players won a title pretty handily, and one of the two was holding back, then the one who wasn't must have been pretty amazing. and certainly AD's jumpshooting wasn't just nice and he wasn't just some kyle korver waiting for lebron to get him an open shot. his insane jumpshooting at his size was essentially gamebreaking for a limited offense because it's essentially what the defense needs to not work to have a chance. but it always worked.

as a rockets fan, while i figured the lakers would win, part of why the small ball approach seemed viable was that pj tucker could just body AD and get him to take fadeaway 15 footers and face-up 18 footers and that wouldn't be great offense. except AD seemingly made every thing he shot and completely destroyed what little hope there was (also rondo didn't miss anything either, so that was annoying).

and if AD doesn't hit that buzzer beating 3 against denver, who knows how that series plays out. so while it's still hard to shake the idea that it was lebron's team and he made life easier for everyone, there should definitely be appreciation for how easily the lakers won and how much of that was because AD was having an incredible playoffs.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#36 » by MyUniBroDavis » Sat Jul 23, 2022 6:46 pm

f4p wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
No-more-rings wrote:I thought he had life easy with Lebron garnering more of the defensive attention. Not to discredit him, but it's nice to see people have a more realistic view of him 2 years later. At the time people we had a few people comparing his playoff run to guys like Tim Duncan and Hakeem.


f4p wrote:I still think he benefits too much from being next to Lebron to call it an all-time peak. Yes, AD actually has very impressive playoff numbers so it can't solely be attributed to Lebron, but AD's game (at least at that point) seems tailor made to benefit from Lebron. He's almost certainly the most perfect fit for Lebron that he's ever had. Lebron runs the show and gets everyone where they need to be, AD did a superb job hitting his jumpers (unsustainably, but he did it) and finishing from Lebron's attention and still got some of his own shots. And obviously, the Lakers played amazing defense with him probably being the biggest reason. So certainly an amazing playoff run but too conveniently next to Lebron for me to call it an all-time peak.


I really do wonder how many people actually watched the Lakers during the bubble vs just making the assumption that lebron playmaking + AD good off ball = perfect combination

Bubble AD and 2020 playoff Lebron fit well in the sense that they were an elite two way duo and the best players of the nba bubble.

How Lebron helped AD is basically off of drive and kicks, which I don’t see as anything crazy since spacing 5 gets three point opportunities, and that he and rondo could find AD when he was moving off ball.

That’s pretty much it.

I’ll write down factors going against them, but people REALLY overestimate the significance of the second part of that.

AD was assisted in 57.8% of his 2 point shots in the 2020 RS, the lowest of his career up until that point. For reference, the lowest before that was 61.8% of his 2 point shots assisted, and his more off ball season which was his peak RS impact over the whole year was 71.5%

In the playoffs, this number was 57.7%.

For reference, 2003 Duncan was assisted on 47.5% of his shots in the RS, 51.4% in the playoffs.
2004 KG at 66.3% in the RS, 54% in the playoffs
2011 Dirk at 59% in the RS, 48.5% in the playoffs
2000 Shaq at 60.1% in the RS and 62.8% in the playoffs

In terms of high leverage opportunities, he averaged 2.2 cut scoring possessions a game, and 2.2 roll man possessions a game (9.6% of his possessions for both).

For reference, 12% of Duncan’s were roll man possessions in 07 (data goes from 05 onwards) and 8.6% were cuts

People assume AD spends way more off ball than he is because of his 2015 season where 24% of his possessions were as the roll man. He honestly should be off ball far more, but he isn’t.

28.4% of his shots were within 3 feet, his career average is 34.7%

So did lebron lead to him getting super easy shots or anything like that or “playing it in easy mode?” No, not particularly.

Obviously, having Lebron is better than not having Lebron, it’s silly to say otherwise, but the idea that AD had some sort of unprecedented level of openness he never experienced before is just not true.

Regular season
Lebron on
32.3/12.4/4.5 on 3.1 turnovers a game and 59.3 TS
Lebron off
40.6/12.6/4.0 on 3.8 turnovers a game and 64.0 TS

Playoffs
Lebron on
34.4/12.4/4.4 on 3.2 turnovers a game and 65.5 TS
Lebron off
43.2/14.2/5.2 on 3.8 turnovers a game and 68.7 TS

Lost most of my post after this cuz the page reloaded, so gonna be pretty brief here

This isn’t to say Lebron doesn’t help AD, lebron there is better than lebron not there of course

But it’s ridiculously overstated. Yes, a lot of ADs assists are from lebron, since lebron is quite literally the only playmaker other than rondo on that team. Unless the idea is Lebron makes it so that off ball movement is a million times easier because everyone is watching lebron, which I just feel isn’t a statement I have to respond to because that’s just kinda wild lol (most of those assists were Lebron watching and waiting vs doing something and AD doing something in secondary weakside action)

I think the idea is either because of how nba defenses set up vs slashers, (shell defense), or because opponents ran zone a few times and it looks like they’re loading up on bron (and to be clear AD then broke the zone because bigs that can shoot from the nail kill the zone). If it’s because teams didn’t instantly double AD like they did in the 2000s that’s just not understanding how modern defenses and offenses interact lol. Sometimes the gameplan is hard doubles but it’s hardly the norm, it’s not as if defenses didn’t pack the paint or send help against AD either, but he acts really fast especially if he has a step, but most people confuse post doubles with them deciding to double when someone cuts from the wing or something and the defender that was stunting high messed up and has to kind of make up for it, or run back.

But it’s like, yeah if lebrons attacking you can just help off of one of the Lakers many inconsistent shooters than isn’t AD, and if AD is attacking you can help off of one of the many inconsistent shooters that isn’t Lebron, and we kind of did see the paint get completely packed in the Nuggets series especially at times (Houston too early on, idr the blazers or the heat)

It’s like the Lebron and AD pick and roll is this unstoppable beast that they just don’t run, in reality teams have just switched it and found decent success, which is why they don’t run it much. At the very least if they switch that helps Lebron far more and hes the one attacking, the guys that guard Lebron are usually the ones that guard AD, since you want more mobile bigs or strong tall wings guarding AD vs plodding bigs who he killed

You could also drop too, which is okay, brons a decent three point shooter though so it’s not ideal, and in the bubble AD was going crazy from three. To be clear the majority of the time they dropped AD ended up going for long twos, they went in though.

Rondo is a non scoring threat and despite his percentages they let him shoot, so you just focus on stopping AD.

Essentially most of the positives form the pick and roll game come from the fact that if they mess up the coverage it works out, but there are definately better pick and roll partners in the nba solely for ADs efficiency

ADs pretty much never had an “ideal” pick and roll partner his entire career anyways, so he could be unlocked hella if he had that

Beyond that, ADs skillset in my opinion offensicely goes
off-ball scoring/P and R rolling and cutting > posting up > face up game.

Vogel is a pretty horrible offensive coach, I think most laker fans would attest to that, and they don’t have a guy that requires you to stay on the level of the ball handler in p and r like a Kyrie/lillard/Murray/Curry/Trae, so I don’t think his off ball scoring is particularly maximized, evidenced by his relatively suprising lack of cuts and roll possessions anyway.

The Lakers have pretty trash spacing relative to the nba, especially in the bubble, Pretty much everyone who followed them knows the defense just packed into the paint and chilled there. I mean the Lakers were 21st in three point shooting and volume with lebron and AD, I think that says it all lol.

Bubble wise, rondos numbers were a result of them letting him take open shots, and I don’t think they were particularly scared of green whose shot died in the playoffs, so the Lakers 3 reliable rotation three point shooters other than AD were lebron/KCP/kieff

Also the Lakers don’t know how to run a basic post possession if the defense helps at literal incompetent levels lmao

https://www.bball-index.com/the-lakers-have-a-post-problem/

So AD was in easy mode in the sense that he and Lebron both had incredible ATG postseasons on the same team and killed everyone else

AD being in easy mode in terms of his scoring despite having the largest on ball role in his career, a relatively low percentage of his shots as the typical high value off ball shots, especially considering he’s primary skill is off ball, on a team with pretty horrendous spacing relative to the rest of the nba, on a team with poor offensive coaching that also particularly struggles at coaching a post offense.

It was easy mode in terms of the wins being easy, but that’s about it, people handwave and say “Lebron” without explaining what that actually means, when you look into his actual offensive situation that’s not a situation conducive to historic effeciency high volume scoring as a big

I guess the one thing is lebron ran the offense for the most part? The only series where lebron was super clearly running the show in comparison was the heat series where AD was hurt anyway (and still hit 25ppg on 67TS with DPOY defense). I don’t think ball dominance is necessary for high impact anyways



i agree with a lot of what you say. i think i mentioned somewhere that in a vacuum AD might have outplayed lebron during the playoffs. and considering how great lebron's numbers are, that's saying something. my feeling was lebron was holding back because he knew the lakers were the best team left and he could see AD was killing it, so there was no need to risk injury or fatigue until it was absolutely necessary (being 35 years old and all). he would run the offense, get people where they should be, and let AD go to work. obviously, if lebron just gets the ball to AD in the post, then AD is doing most of the work, but it felt like lebron was still the maestro of the offense and made sure AD didn't have to do anything he couldn't do. and, if i'm going into psychological factors, i think lebron is just a nice security blanket that lets a guy like AD know that he can play with freedom and if it ever gets really tough, lebron will come and solve the problem.

having said that, it's perfectly reasonable to say "who cares about psychology 101 and who cares if lebron was holding back, AD was actually doing the heavy lifting and what counts is what you do", and from that perspective, AD killed it. the lakers weren't overly talented outside of lebron/AD and, while their opponents were very weak, they still won pretty handily. so if we know a team of only 2 players won a title pretty handily, and one of the two was holding back, then the one who wasn't must have been pretty amazing. and certainly AD's jumpshooting wasn't just nice and he wasn't just some kyle korver waiting for lebron to get him an open shot. his insane jumpshooting at his size was essentially gamebreaking for a limited offense because it's essentially what the defense needs to not work to have a chance. but it always worked.

as a rockets fan, while i figured the lakers would win, part of why the small ball approach seemed viable was that pj tucker could just body AD and get him to take fadeaway 15 footers and face-up 18 footers and that wouldn't be great offense. except AD seemingly made every thing he shot and completely destroyed what little hope there was (also rondo didn't miss anything either, so that was annoying).

and if AD doesn't hit that buzzer beating 3 against denver, who knows how that series plays out. so while it's still hard to shake the idea that it was lebron's team and he made life easier for everyone, there should definitely be appreciation for how easily the lakers won and how much of that was because AD was having an incredible playoffs.


I do think 2020 playoff bron>2020 bubble AD if they’re both going all out, and while I think they beat Denver either way, I do agree with a lot of the stuff here
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,467
And1: 5,349
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#37 » by JordansBulls » Sun Jul 24, 2022 4:33 am

The season part you can count, the bubble part no so much. Fans have to be present for it to be legit.
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#38 » by Colbinii » Sun Jul 24, 2022 6:34 am

JordansBulls wrote:The season part you can count, the bubble part no so much. Fans have to be present for it to be legit.


Do you still consider yourself a Virgin or did your mothers attendance make the act legit?
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#39 » by MyUniBroDavis » Sun Jul 24, 2022 9:50 am

Colbinii wrote:
JordansBulls wrote:The season part you can count, the bubble part no so much. Fans have to be present for it to be legit.


Do you still consider yourself a Virgin or did your mothers attendance make the act legit?


Excuse me his mother was with me
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,933
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: How should 2020 Anthony Davis be viewed? 

Post#40 » by OhayoKD » Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:05 pm

No-more-rings wrote:I thought he had life easy with Lebron garnering more of the defensive attention. Not to discredit him, but it's nice to see people have a more realistic view of him 2 years later. At the time people we had a few people comparing his playoff run to guys like Tim Duncan and Hakeem.

i mean they also had no spacing and they were extremely top heavy. Ultimately with less help he replicated 2017 kd's scoring and had all-time great defensive impact. And it's not like he wasn't killing it with nop in the playoffs before.

Return to Player Comparisons