PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 92,725
- And1: 99,219
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Man I really like those last 3 picks. Smart and Hill were both guys I considered picking multiple times. And glad to see Mo Cheeks get some love here.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Odinn21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: May 19, 2019
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Texas Chuck wrote:Man I really like those last 3 picks. Smart and Hill were both guys I considered picking multiple times. And glad to see Mo Cheeks get some love here.
I had George Hill on my radar. Was down to Hill and Cheeks, I was already leaning on Cheeks because his passing was considerably better. But getting sniped on is never sweet.
Since your Moses pick, there are 5 perimeter defenders got selected. We're stacking up.
---
BTW, I'm having troubles in my personal life. I'll finish the draft since I'm not far away from making my last selection. But I may transfer my team to a person who wanted to participate and couldn't get the chance and likes my team and its philosophy.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 92,725
- And1: 99,219
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:BTW, I'm having troubles in my personal life.
Sorry to hear that mate. I hope things improve for you soon.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 92,725
- And1: 99,219
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
how in the world do you get Squid and Redick this late? 70'sfan with some late round gold!
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Odinn21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: May 19, 2019
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Texas Chuck wrote:Odinn21 wrote:BTW, I'm having troubles in my personal life.
Sorry to hear that mate. I hope things improve for you soon.
Thanks a lot.
70sFan wrote:Steal of the 7th round - I select my shutdown defender who happened to be also excellent offensive player - Sidney Moncrief
I didn't look at your team's fga particularly. Wonder if you'd be able to get early-mid '80s prime Moncrief. If you can land that version, it's a WOW pick.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
70sFan
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,220
- And1: 25,488
- Joined: Aug 11, 2015
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:BTW, I'm having troubles in my personal life. I'll finish the draft since I'm not far away from making my last selection. But I may transfer my team to a person who wanted to participate and couldn't get the chance and likes my team and its philosophy.
I hope things will get better. I think that this year is tough for all of us (for different reasons). I wish you the best!
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
70sFan
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,220
- And1: 25,488
- Joined: Aug 11, 2015
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:70sFan wrote:Steal of the 7th round - I select my shutdown defender who happened to be also excellent offensive player - Sidney Moncrief
I didn't look at your team's fga particularly. Wonder if you'd be able to get early-mid '80s prime Moncrief. If you can land that version, it's a WOW pick.
I will, still thinking which year I should choose...
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Dutchball97
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,408
- And1: 5,004
- Joined: Mar 28, 2020
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
I was looking at Moncrief for a few rounds but he just had 2-3 FGA too much to fit in sadly. Really good pick here.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Odinn21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: May 19, 2019
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
70sFan wrote:Odinn21 wrote:70sFan wrote:Steal of the 7th round - I select my shutdown defender who happened to be also excellent offensive player - Sidney Moncrief
I didn't look at your team's fga particularly. Wonder if you'd be able to get early-mid '80s prime Moncrief. If you can land that version, it's a WOW pick.
I will, still thinking which year I should choose...
I like 1983-84 the most but 1982-83 is also very close. Though would went with 1983-84 definitely if fga is a concern.
---
I like my team very much. I feel like I can compete with anyone and have a good chance. Not sure if better chance, but this is my 1st time in an all-time draft and I feel I did well.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Doctor MJ
- Senior Mod

- Posts: 53,740
- And1: 22,672
- Joined: Mar 10, 2005
- Location: Cali
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:BTW, I'm having troubles in my personal life. I'll finish the draft since I'm not far away from making my last selection. But I may transfer my team to a person who wanted to participate and couldn't get the chance and likes my team and its philosophy.
I'm sorry to hear that Odinn. Take care of yourself, and whatever you need to do, see you on the other side.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
70sFan
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,220
- And1: 25,488
- Joined: Aug 11, 2015
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:70sFan wrote:Odinn21 wrote:
I didn't look at your team's fga particularly. Wonder if you'd be able to get early-mid '80s prime Moncrief. If you can land that version, it's a WOW pick.
I will, still thinking which year I should choose...
I like 1983-84 the most but 1982-83 is also very close. Though would went with 1983-84 definitely if fga is a concern.
---
I like my team very much. I feel like I can compete with anyone and have a good chance. Not sure if better chance, but this is my 1st time in an all-time draft and I feel I did well.
1984 has a bit too much FGA to my team unfortunately. I'm torn between 1982 (more athletic) and 1986 (better shooting).
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 92,725
- And1: 99,219
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Colbinii wrote:I will go with a veteran who came to the United States to play basketball at the age of 35. He is a smart defender, great set-up shooter and understands the dynamics of his role to a T.
Pablo Prigioni
First, you are really really good at this. Love your team.
2nd this really really hurts. He was written in pen as my final pick and now I have to come up with something totally different. May have to change up a season for someone else now to free up some FGA.
To add on Pablo, he is a great ball control guy. Assuming you use 13-14, you get a 4 to 1 A/T ratio. Perfect for a backup PG. Also if you have a lead in the closing minutes he's a great FT shooter so he can help close certain games.
Understatement to say I love this pick as a sub 3 FGA guy.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Doctor MJ
- Senior Mod

- Posts: 53,740
- And1: 22,672
- Joined: Mar 10, 2005
- Location: Cali
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
And with that, just finished my team with my last pick. That's always one of those things you feel mixed about. The goal was to build a complete team, but the excitement of seeing whether you'll get your guy is something you miss immediately.
I'm fortunate to say that in this draft I never had my next choice "stolen". Each round while I made a list of candidate, my top candidate was there for me when the pick finally came to me. Some skill there in predicting the market, but also a lot of luck. Regardless, what that means is that I built the team I set out to build. However much people like it or not, this was the team I could envision around Nash here and I'm going to savor that.
I'm fortunate to say that in this draft I never had my next choice "stolen". Each round while I made a list of candidate, my top candidate was there for me when the pick finally came to me. Some skill there in predicting the market, but also a lot of luck. Regardless, what that means is that I built the team I set out to build. However much people like it or not, this was the team I could envision around Nash here and I'm going to savor that.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 92,725
- And1: 99,219
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
So in researching guys trying to fill my last roster spot I'm discovering a lot of guys shot the ball way more often than they should have.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Colbinii
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,859
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Texas Chuck wrote:So in researching guys trying to fill my last roster spot I'm discovering a lot of guys shot the ball way more often than they should have.
I originally wanted Matthew Dellevadova but he shot the ball nearly 5 times per game in 2015 and shot 30.2% from 2.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Colbinii
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,859
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Texas Chuck wrote:Colbinii wrote:I will go with a veteran who came to the United States to play basketball at the age of 35. He is a smart defender, great set-up shooter and understands the dynamics of his role to a T.
Pablo Prigioni
First, you are really really good at this. Love your team.
2nd this really really hurts. He was written in pen as my final pick and now I have to come up with something totally different. May have to change up a season for someone else now to free up some FGA.
To add on Pablo, he is a great ball control guy. Assuming you use 13-14, you get a 4 to 1 A/T ratio. Perfect for a backup PG. Also if you have a lead in the closing minutes he's a great FT shooter so he can help close certain games.
Understatement to say I love this pick as a sub 3 FGA guy.
Thanks--yeah I really like Pablo too. There should be a lot of players whom shoot 3 times or less in 20 minutes but players love to shoot.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Doctor MJ
- Senior Mod

- Posts: 53,740
- And1: 22,672
- Joined: Mar 10, 2005
- Location: Cali
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Texas Chuck wrote:Man I really like those last 3 picks. Smart and Hill were both guys I considered picking multiple times. And glad to see Mo Cheeks get some love here.
Yup. Had me worried. Smart was literally the next guy on my list after Rubio and Hill was on my list as well.
(I'm obviously doing a very 3-point focused thing so Cheeks wasn't someone I was thinking this time around, but he's more than worthy. He's a guy whose hey day was before my time so I knew him from stats first. When I actually saw him as his best, he was so much better than I imagine. Definitely someone who pops out from the other 9 guys on the court.)
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Dutchball97
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,408
- And1: 5,004
- Joined: Mar 28, 2020
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
It's been really fun to draft this team and I'm honestly very happy with how it turned out. I didn't expect to get a bench as good as Marcus Smart, Bruce Bowen and Marcus Camby. I have no clue if my team is popular with voters but we'll see.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 92,725
- And1: 99,219
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
So unlike Doc I did get sniped a couple times, the worst being Hawk Eye stealing Billups out from under me. But despite that I definitely built the team I wanted to build as well.
Like everyone else I wonder how others will view it, but I love having no passengers on the roster and lots of modular pieces. And only one even neutral defender in Robinson with everyone else a small to huge plus so teams can't target a guy offensively -- especially not with two of the best-all time help defenders in KG and AK running around.
Really had fun with this and love lots of other teams.
Like everyone else I wonder how others will view it, but I love having no passengers on the roster and lots of modular pieces. And only one even neutral defender in Robinson with everyone else a small to huge plus so teams can't target a guy offensively -- especially not with two of the best-all time help defenders in KG and AK running around.
Really had fun with this and love lots of other teams.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
70sFan
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,220
- And1: 25,488
- Joined: Aug 11, 2015
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
I also like my team, at first I wasn't sure about my defense against quick perimeter players, but now with SquidI don't see any glarring defensive weakness from my team. Gilmore would frustrate any bigman with size and strength, he was also fantastic rim protector. Prince, Squid and Kidd are elite pieces around Duncan's inside pressence. Diaw was quite decent defensively too, especially next to rim protectors. Even Gervin in his early NBA years brings me length and shotblocking.

