Djoker wrote:I don't think NO-KG-AI was saying that teams today should go all out in the regular season to prove something. Resting for the postseason is fine and probably the optimal strategy. The point is that a team that wins 53 games and then a championship isn't the same as a team that wins 67 games and then a championship. The latter is much more difficult and should be appreciated more.
When a player misses say 10 regular season games every season, takes off second nights of back-to-back etc. plays shortened seasons due to lockouts/Covid/whatever it just doesn't seem right to value that the same way as another season where a player plays all 82 games with highest minutes to boot. It's not a Lebron thing. All modern players suffer in all-time comparisons due to having seasons that feel incomplete. I wonder what kind of postseason numbers Jordan and all other past legends would put up if they had the luxury to take the foot off the gas pedal in the regular season. It's a relevant question to ponder. Modern and past stars aren't competing on an equal footing from a load management perspective. The NBA 8 years ago reduced the minimum games requirement for scoring titles and other statistical achievements. These days you can win a scoring title playing 58 games. Before 2014 you had to play 70 games. A scoring title now isn't even the same thing it used to be back then. 58 games is a bit over two thirds of the season. And that's just one example.
As for proving things to fans, excuse me but they should. The NBA wouldn't exist if not for the fans. People pay big money to go watch an NBA game. Imagine paying $600 for you and your girl to go watch a Lakers - Nets game and an hour before the game you find out Lebron is sitting out the game resting a sore ankle and Durant isn't playing because it's the 2nd night of a back to back and he's supposedly resting a sore shoulder. You'd feel cheated and rightfully so.
Would be playing themselves against more rested rivals too