Re: Where do we put Chris Webber if they go on to win the 02 ring?
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2021 9:19 am
LA Bird wrote:feyki wrote:LA Bird wrote:Yeah and DeMarcus Cousins put up 27/11/5 in his prime.
Thank goodness the Kings didn't win the title. Webber would have been so ridiculously overrated if they had won.
This is totally false. Cousins was playing with more turnovers than assists. On the other hand, Webber had almost 2,0 ast/to rate in his prime. Huge playmaking efficiency gap between the two. It's like comparing Dirk and Embiid regarding of playmaking. You can't evaluate scoring rate without shot efficiency and same goes for assists without turnovers.
You missed the point. I wasn't comparing Cousins and Webber. I was using Cousins as an example of how a 27/11/4 statline does not mean a player was MVP level. As you pointed out, there is more to it than just point/rebound/assist. Webber is better than Cousins but he still not MVP level.
How do you define the mvp level? This is important point. Any player who was top 5 in the league was on the mvp level, to me.