Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 - 2020-21 Giannis Antetokounmpo

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,051
And1: 5,856
Joined: Jul 24, 2022
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#41 » by AEnigma » Thu Jul 28, 2022 1:14 pm

Dutchball97 wrote:
AEnigma wrote:If the priority is to vote for players with an MVP and Finals MVP, what puts Moses above Willis Reed or Bill Walton (or Mikan or Pettit, for the older school voters)? Why put so much stock into Moses winning a three game series and then going “fo’ [five] fo’” on a team that had been to two of the past three finals (and probably would have won a championship in the year they missed if they had made one more basket in Game 7)?


It's nice to see someone else push back against the "data-first" approach that many voters seem to employ. While I intensively try to use stats in my evaluations as well I agree it's more productive to first look at what actually happened and then check if the data backs it up instead of simply looking at your preferred stat and voting for the highest number. In most cases stats (whether raw, box or impact) aren't meant to be compared straight up year to year. I'm not trying to invalidate the posters who do use the "data-first" approach but sometimes it moves the discussion overwhelmingly to certain players, while discounting others, especially when relying on limited and flawed stats from before the +- era. Actually sounds a lot like the "winning bias" I'm acused of so maybe we're not that different after all.

I did want to touch on the quoted part of your comment though as I have Moses #2 on my ballot with him being the clear MVP and FMVP counting as an important feat for me. I skipped the whiteness debate because that's not really something that's been relevant for a while now where I'm from and I can't see across the ocean how much of the racial bias in the US actually impacted MVP voting.

As to the mentioned players I don't think their case is as strong as Moses from an achievement perspective. In 1970 Reed barely beat out West and Kareem for MVP and I'm not sure it was even completely deserved. The 1970 Knicks in general were a two-headed dragon with Reed and Frazier where all the credit went to the big man by default when it wasn't like that at all. You could make that argument for Moses and Dr J but Moses was undoubtedly the best player on his team in both the regular season and play-offs. Dr J was definitely also not someone who didn't get his fair share of credit. Walton as a player in a vacuum probably should've been voted in already but across a whole season I don't see him having as strong of a case. He won FMVP in 77 and then got better the year after and somehow won the 78 MVP while only playing 58 games before getting injured early in the post-season. If there was a way to mashup the 77 and 78 seasons he'd be top 10 for me but as it stands I still have a couple more guys over him. Mikan is tough because relatively to competition he is at worst a top 5 player in league history but the problem is his competition is also without a doubt by far the worst in NBA history. Pettit didn't have his strongest regular season in 58 (even though he was so consistent it isn't too far off his best outings) and then got somewhat upstaged by Hagan in the play-offs. 59 seems to be the pick for his peak here and he did win MVP then but lost right away to Baylor's Lakers in the post-season.


Pretty much what I thought, thanks.

Okay, then — and this is not in comparison to Moses, but more looking ahead five or ten picks — what about guys who missed out on one of the awards but were still the best players on title teams while being a clear top player? You mentioned Walt — 1972 or 1973 getting your attention in the late teens or early twenties? Dave Cowens in 1976 (third in MVP voting and won in 1973)? Rick Barry in 1975 (was openly hated by the MVP voting bloc :lol:)? I understand not loading up on the 1970s too much too fast, but definitely curious how those names will compare for you with the votes for Nash, Ewing, Howard, Barkley, Malone, CP3, etc. that we will probably start to see from that 17-25 range.
MyUniBroDavis wrote:Some people are clearly far too overreliant on data without context and look at good all in one or impact numbers and get wowed by that rather than looking at how a roster is actually built around a player
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,426
And1: 6,352
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#42 » by CharityStripe34 » Thu Jul 28, 2022 2:22 pm

This is the first discussion where I've heard Gianni be labeled as a "poor playmaker." Learning new things every day I guess.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,299
And1: 6,902
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#43 » by falcolombardi » Thu Jul 28, 2022 2:36 pm

CharityStripe34 wrote:This is the first discussion where I've heard Gianni be labeled as a "poor playmaker." Learning new things every day I guess.


No way giannis is a poor playmaker

He creates so many quality shots for teammates and almost always makes solid reads and knows when to pass
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,406
And1: 5,001
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#44 » by Dutchball97 » Thu Jul 28, 2022 2:38 pm

AEnigma wrote:
Dutchball97 wrote:
AEnigma wrote:If the priority is to vote for players with an MVP and Finals MVP, what puts Moses above Willis Reed or Bill Walton (or Mikan or Pettit, for the older school voters)? Why put so much stock into Moses winning a three game series and then going “fo’ [five] fo’” on a team that had been to two of the past three finals (and probably would have won a championship in the year they missed if they had made one more basket in Game 7)?


It's nice to see someone else push back against the "data-first" approach that many voters seem to employ. While I intensively try to use stats in my evaluations as well I agree it's more productive to first look at what actually happened and then check if the data backs it up instead of simply looking at your preferred stat and voting for the highest number. In most cases stats (whether raw, box or impact) aren't meant to be compared straight up year to year. I'm not trying to invalidate the posters who do use the "data-first" approach but sometimes it moves the discussion overwhelmingly to certain players, while discounting others, especially when relying on limited and flawed stats from before the +- era. Actually sounds a lot like the "winning bias" I'm acused of so maybe we're not that different after all.

I did want to touch on the quoted part of your comment though as I have Moses #2 on my ballot with him being the clear MVP and FMVP counting as an important feat for me. I skipped the whiteness debate because that's not really something that's been relevant for a while now where I'm from and I can't see across the ocean how much of the racial bias in the US actually impacted MVP voting.

As to the mentioned players I don't think their case is as strong as Moses from an achievement perspective. In 1970 Reed barely beat out West and Kareem for MVP and I'm not sure it was even completely deserved. The 1970 Knicks in general were a two-headed dragon with Reed and Frazier where all the credit went to the big man by default when it wasn't like that at all. You could make that argument for Moses and Dr J but Moses was undoubtedly the best player on his team in both the regular season and play-offs. Dr J was definitely also not someone who didn't get his fair share of credit. Walton as a player in a vacuum probably should've been voted in already but across a whole season I don't see him having as strong of a case. He won FMVP in 77 and then got better the year after and somehow won the 78 MVP while only playing 58 games before getting injured early in the post-season. If there was a way to mashup the 77 and 78 seasons he'd be top 10 for me but as it stands I still have a couple more guys over him. Mikan is tough because relatively to competition he is at worst a top 5 player in league history but the problem is his competition is also without a doubt by far the worst in NBA history. Pettit didn't have his strongest regular season in 58 (even though he was so consistent it isn't too far off his best outings) and then got somewhat upstaged by Hagan in the play-offs. 59 seems to be the pick for his peak here and he did win MVP then but lost right away to Baylor's Lakers in the post-season.


Pretty much what I thought, thanks.

Okay, then — and this is not in comparison to Moses, but more looking ahead five or ten picks — what about guys who missed out on one of the awards but were still the best players on title teams while being a clear top player? You mentioned Walt — 1972 or 1973 getting your attention in the late teens or early twenties? Dave Cowens in 1976 (third in MVP voting and won in 1973)? Rick Barry in 1975 (was openly hated by the MVP voting bloc :lol:)? I understand not loading up on the 1970s too much too fast, but definitely curious how those names will compare for you with the votes for Nash, Ewing, Howard, Barkley, Malone, CP3, etc. that we will probably start to see from that 17-25 range.


It's more about "being MVP level" and going as far as possible while playing at an elite level in the post-season. I voted for 64 Russell who got 3rd in MVP voting, while FMVP didn't exist yet and I currently have 21 Giannis on my ballot who was 4th in MVP voting so it's not like winning both awards is a must. In the case of Moses him winning MVP and FMVP is more to illustrate that Moses won MVP with 69 of 75 first place votes, while leading the league in WS and then went on to be the clear best player on an all-time dominant title run.

I'm not too high on Cowens. I think he's a fringe MVP candidate who shouldn't have won the 73 MVP. I don't see him as the best player on the 74 team either. I'll vote for his 76 season somewhere down the line but I do have quite a few guys I think deserve to get in before him. Being the undisputed best player in a season means a lot for my appreciation of someone's peak and I don't think Cowens was ever that.

73 Frazier is in a similar boat to 76 Cowens to me. A fringe MVP candidate who led his team to a title with good but not great stats. I think Barry has a better case for his 1975 season as he was more dominant in the play-offs and I buy him as more of a legit MVP level player at his peak than either Frazier or Cowens. How they compare to the guys you mentioned I'll have to take a deeper look at. After the top 10 things open up a lot more.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,178
And1: 28,694
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#45 » by Ron Swanson » Thu Jul 28, 2022 2:55 pm

I'll just chime in and say that I really don't see much if any argument for any version of Admiral over peak Giannis anymore. Even a "completely data driven" approach requires us to heavily favor minor advantages in incomplete RS data sets (PIPM, backpicks BPM, RAPM) for peak D-Rob. As has already been discussed, it's not as if Giannis doesn't grade out comparably well in most RS metrics (2020 Giannis is the 3rd highest RAPM score recorded and 4th highest RPM behind only '14-16 Curry and '22 Jokic) while anchoring back-to-back historically great RS teams (8.04 and 9.41 SRS).

I'll admit that perhaps this is in general, my problem with single-season peaks. Objectively using a data-driven approach, most players' peak RS and PS years don't align, so there's this tendency to extrapolate what we already "know" about a player's capabilities and imbue them with this sense of "see, they were always good enough to be, well, this good", without actually asking ourselves if we believe it's true, or simply confirmation bias.

I suspect this is precisely what someone like AEnigma is frustrated with when it's selectively applied to guys like Robinson and KG, but not as much with Giannis. Specifically, Giannis doesn't get the same hindsight benefit of losing by nature of inferior supporting talent. Admiral couldn't win because his supporting cast sucked. Ok, (in some years) fair, but Giannis from 2018-2020 is viewed much differently in the lens of him "failing" and "not being playoff resilient" which I find rather disingenuous even if you can argue that it's partially true (it is with most of these guys). Because when it comes to the postseason, Giannis' last two runs (6 series, including the single-highest Game Score recorded in a Finals series) really do put him on another tier than Robinson. It just seems like such a stretch at this point to have any of the RS impact guys (D-Rob, Karl Malone, Barkley, Harden) over the two-way RS/PS dominance and consistency of Giannis. Ok, side rant over...

2021 Giannis (2022 HM): I guess it's pretty obvious based on what I already detailed above. Impact and box metrics don't compare to his MVP years, but that's precisely why I feel it gets unfairly downgraded despite being an MVP level RS in any other year. 28/11/6 on 63.3% TS, 29.2 PER, .244 WS/48, 9.0 BPM. But obviously, his playoff run is what separates him from the pack (30/13/5 on 60% TS, 27.6 PER, .224 WS/48, 9.9 BPM), capping it off with arguably the greatest statistical Finals series on record (35/13/5/2 on 65.8% TS) while playing on a hyper-extended knee. And honestly, you could just as easily go 2022 here. For anyone questioning the "impact" narrative for Giannis, I can't imagine how the Bucks being a whopping 28.8 points per-100 worse in the playoffs with Giannis off the court (+7.7 on, -21.1 off) wouldn't completely dispel any criticism over his ability to carry substandard supporting casts.

1964 Oscar: Went back and forth between Big-O and Giannis, but ultimately went with the two-way dominance over Oscar's offensive wizardry. Really think this is one of the most impressive MVP years ever, sandwiched in-between the dominance of Russell/Wilt. Just a smidge below a GOAT offensive season contender, but clearly his best postseason in combination with some truly ahead-of-it's-time efficiency from the lead guard spot (31/11/10 on 57.6% TS, 27.6 PER, .276 WS/48). Hard to fault him too much for losing against the Russell Celtics in the playoffs, but I also can't completely hand-wave how his efficiency and play-making volume suffered mightily in that series.

1966 Jerry West: Admittedly it was hard for me to pick a West year ('65 and '69 got consideration), but ultimately decided on his most complete RS/PS season. 31/7/6 on 57.3% TS, 24.6 PER, .256 WS/48, but what's pretty remarkable is that he both upped his scoring volume (34.2) AND his efficiency (58.1% TS) in the postseason. Same concerns I have with Oscar seem to apply to West. I'm not particularly high on West's defense (although definitely better than Oscar), and while I actually might prefer his scoring efficiency/resiliency over a lot of offensive perimeter greats, I don't think his his play-making is as scalable.
DraymondGold
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 748
Joined: May 19, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#46 » by DraymondGold » Thu Jul 28, 2022 4:44 pm

falcolombardi wrote:
CharityStripe34 wrote:This is the first discussion where I've heard Gianni be labeled as a "poor playmaker." Learning new things every day I guess.


No way giannis is a poor playmaker

He creates so many quality shots for teammates and almost always makes solid reads and knows when to pass
Hey y'all -- "poor" i's all relative. Poor playmaker relative to an average NBA starter? Of course not! Giannis is pretty great! But is he a poor playmaker among the Top 20 peaks of all time?

Perhaps I could have been less dramatic with my language, but I personally think he's clearly a step down as a playmaker from Oscar or Jokic or Walton, who are some of the other guys people have been mentioning.

He's definitely better than Moses (most all-time players are haha).

That leaves the middle tier of peaks we're discussing -- Robinson, West, Kobe, Wade, Erving, KD (anyone else?). How would y'all see him ranking among those just in terms of playmaking / creation? I personally don't see him as a better pure passer than Kobe or West. I also like perimeter spacing of a few of those players more (e.g. KD/ Kobe/West). If you consider off-ball ability / a lack of ball-dominance important to creation (I have it in a different category, but they do have some philosophical similarities... they're basically asking how well a player pairs with others on offense), then you could at least argue others. That said, Giannis' rim gravity is probably better than any of this middle tier of playmakers.

How would you rank these guys as playmakers / creators?
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,299
And1: 6,902
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#47 » by falcolombardi » Thu Jul 28, 2022 4:55 pm

DraymondGold wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:
CharityStripe34 wrote:This is the first discussion where I've heard Gianni be labeled as a "poor playmaker." Learning new things every day I guess.


No way giannis is a poor playmaker

He creates so many quality shots for teammates and almost always makes solid reads and knows when to pass
Hey y'all -- "poor" i's all relative. Poor playmaker relative to an average NBA starter? Of course not! Giannis is pretty great! But is he a poor playmaker among the Top 20 peaks of all time?

Perhaps I could have been less dramatic with my language, but I personally think he's clearly a step down as a playmaker from Oscar or Jokic or Walton, who are some of the other guys people have been mentioning.

He's definitely better than Moses (most all-time players are haha).

That leaves the middle tier of peaks we're discussing -- Robinson, West, Kobe, Wade, Erving, KD (anyone else?). How would y'all see him ranking among those just in terms of playmaking / creation? I personally don't see him as a better pure passer than Kobe or West. I also like perimeter spacing of a few of those players more (e.g. KD/ Kobe/West). If you consider off-ball ability / a lack of ball-dominance important to creation (I have it in a different category, but they do have some philosophical similarities... they're basically asking how well a player pairs with others on offense), then you could at least argue others. That said, Giannis' rim gravity is probably better than any of this middle tier of playmakers.

How would you rank these guys as playmakers / creators?


Giannis just creates too many looks with his scoring threat inside to be seen as anythingh but a excellebt playmaker imo

I dunno about robinson, julius or west who i dont think i have watched enough.

I think he is a comparable passer to wade, with some advantagea for both. I quite like giannis passing after post ups when he gets doubled whereas wade handle, mobility and smaller size lets him move around the defense gaps easier to sneak inside on and off ball

Both make mostly good rwads and create a ton of their scoring threath

I think kobe may make the better/tougher read passes of all these but is also more likely to settle in hero ball stretches taking tough shots unnecesarrily

I am not too high on dursnt passing but i think he got better with time by brooklyn years, i still feel he is the worst of the 4
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 52,803
And1: 21,730
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#48 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Jul 28, 2022 5:28 pm

f4p wrote:
AEnigma wrote:
f4p wrote:
I don't think suggesting Steve Nash being white helped him a little is that out there. It was certainly implied/joked about/argued plenty at the time he was actually winning. It doesn't mean voters were walking out of Klan meetings to vote for Nash, just that it was novel and probably put a little extra pep in their steps when it came time to vote. I think it certainly works in a similar way to how Curry doesn't "look the part" and that tends to get him a little extra juice in these things. Certainly among casuals, and voters are casuals, by and large. Anyway, the main point was that MVP's aren't everything but 3 of them must mean something. Especially, when maybe the only other controversial/arguable even 2 time winner could have had a little help/media push that certainly wouldn't be applicable to Moses.


So because lazy jokes and dumb arguments were made then (mostly by people who have always disrespected Nash), we should make them now?


i'm not sure why you are getting so upset over a fairly off-handed comment, and one that isn't exactly unique to myself. my first google result led to a Quora response ( https://www.quora.com/Would-Steve-Nash-have-won-two-NBA-MVP-awards-had-he-not-been-white) by someone with "Senior Moderator at RealGM" in their description (6 years ago, maybe they aren't anymore). This doesn't seem like a lazy/dumb response:

So, this question bugs me, but not in the sense that I think the question should get down voted. It bugs me because I've been defending Nash against people who simply don't understand his impact for years and years and I feel like this question is likely posed by someone like this...but frankly it's not that crazy of a question to ask.

I'll start off by saying this:

If you look at team offense and regression data, what Steve Nash did in that era is off the charts. Talk to the vast majority of basketball fans and ask them if Nash might have been the best offensive player in history, and they'll call you crazy, an idiot, or a homer, or possibly all 3. But he deserves to be in that conversation none the less and any time you see someone whose been around the block like me say that, understand that we're about as surprised to say this as you are to hear it. I didn't think it was possible for someone who looked like Nash to be anywhere near that good.

Let me repeat that last part:

I didn't think it was possible for someone who looked like Nash to be anywhere near that good.

I don't think anyone did. And while that held Nash back for years and years, when Nash finally broke through, it mad him stand out all the more. When Nash became THE story in the NBA, his appearance said much of what the people "heard", and it was that amplitude of narrative that Nash drove writers to think on him further.

Let me now make an alternative question:

Would Steve Nash have won two MVPs had the (mostly black) NBA players voted instead of the (mostly white) writers?

I'll say straight out, Nash wouldn't have won either... for largely the same reason that players sided with James Harden over Steph Curry for best player last year. If you wanted an explanation based on painting a caricature of both sides:

Writers become attached to the story. Players become attached to the glamour.

And if you think those two are the same, well, most times they are, but not always.

Because writers have such a fetish for an award telling a story, anything that contributes to the salience of the story attached with an award winner has to be considered as something that seriously made a difference. And we cannot deny that Nash race made him pop out of the picture.

However, it has to be noted that Nash was only in the picture because of a perfect storm of other things, and I don't think that really needs explaining. Nash wasn't seen as an MVP candidate in previous years despite having similar volume state despite being white, so obviously big narratives took hold distinct from that.

My feeling is that if being white helped him win the MVPs, it only helped a little. That little is not nothing - it's enough that my answer to this question in the end is just:

Maybe.



You talk about casuals: tell me, how do casuals feel about Nash? How many casuals prefer results over gaudy box scores? How many casuals continue to see those MVPs as robberies? How many casuals weep for stolen awards from Shaq and Kobe and Lebron (notoriously very un-casual friendly).


we're 15 years on at this point. casuals loved westbrook in 2017 and he will probably continue to fade in the casual mind as the years go by and we are removed from "but muh triple double" mania. removed from the moment, nash's mvp's look weird in retrospect. especially because arguably his biggest support comes from the advanced stats we have now, which makes his mvp dominance with pedestrian box stats all the more peculiar, as the idea of a 15 ppg mvp would have seemed crazy before he got it.

Nash was novel in 2005, sure, but not because he was white. He won because he joined a lottery team and revolutionised the league en route to a comfortable first seed. Want to see whether that corresponds better to MVPs than “being white”?


it's less that he won in 2005. kobe and kg were on bad teams, the spurs were just being the spurs, dirk wasn't quite there in the public's mind, shaq had the "impact" narrative like nash but it was nothing like his best seasons, lebron's team wasn't good. okay, so he gets one. but you say "that sure was a weird year" and go back to traditional voting. but it looks really weird in retrospect to see steve nash with as many mvp's as shaq and hakeem combined, with 15/11 and 18/10 seasons, one for a 54 win team. and damn near a 3rd one in 2007, which would have been a travesty for him to have 3. it's the cumulative effect from a historical perspective, the double narrative benefit in back to back years, that makes people less than sure that it was without a side reason.



Moses won in 1979 and 1982 by virtue of playing heavy minutes and being a combined point and rebound monster. Superficial biases worked for him, not against him. Otherwise, your theory would dictate that Bird would have won comfortably in 1982.

Or maybe voters just got more casual twenty-five years later.


yes, superficial basketball biases. like we've seen plenty of times before.


So, I haven't been following the discussion that led up to this, and I want to urge caution when talking about race here.

However, I think in the interest of full disclosure I have to make clear that I am that Quora poster, and if you want me to speak to something specifically I said then, let me know.

Re: '05-06 an issue more than '04-05. Some things on this:

1. It's important to note that it was '04-05 when the racial stuff came up, so I don't think it's as appropriate to look at the racial lens specifically to understand '05-06. Fundamentally, the conversation was about how someone like Steve Nash could possibly be more valuable than Shaq, and the thing is: That argument really fell apart on a number of levels. Whether or not Nash's race helped him grab the attention of voters, the logic behind the Shaq candidacy was flawed in the first place for reasons that had nothing to do with race, and everything to do with equating his '04-05 performance with his prime performances, and specifically dismissing the idea that Dwyane Wade was emerging as a superstar talent. To me Tim Duncan was the guy to be talking about as the other major candidate until he went down with injury.

2. '05-06 needs to be seen as a year where the MVP candidates were all flawed - a bit like '10-11, except that unlike '10-11, no consensus was ever reached. No candidate in '05-06 won a majority, and even if you take Nash out of the picture, there was no consensus as to who the most deserving candidate was of the remaining guys. As such, I've always talked about the award that year as one where no one can seriously claim they got "robbed", but that there were actually 6 guys (Billups, Bryant, James, Nash, Nowitzki, Wade) who had a reasonable case that could conceivably be seen as MVP worthy, and Nash winning the award speaks a lot to the logic the made sense to the voters, which can be seen as in the same family as what's typically used for COY & MIP: The Suns were expected to be much worse after losing their lead scorer and 3/5ths of their starting lineup, and people gave credit to Nash for the resiliency that surprised them. Me personally, at the time I had Nash 3rd behind LeBron & Wade, but it was something I went back & forth on.

3. Nash having 2 MVPs certainly seemed and seems weird to most, but let's also note that it could have been 3 in theory. In '06-07 Nash had an excellent case for MVP, and while Dirk winning the award made plenty of sense (and I had him as my choice), there were two key games between them late in the year where Nash came out looking like the better player by a good margin. Had Nash not won MVP the prior years, it's entirely possible that he'd have won it in '06-07. But with his 2 MVPs, voters clearly took an approach of avoiding giving him serious consideration for a 3rd in a row, which I would say is normal for the MVP. While there's some reluctance to give a guy 2 MVPs in a row, it's that 3rd MVP where you really tend to see that resistance, which pertains to why I said Giannis had next to no chance at winning the MVP in '20-21, and why I'm currently saying it's going to be very, very difficult for Jokic to win the MVP in '22-23.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,426
And1: 6,352
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#49 » by CharityStripe34 » Thu Jul 28, 2022 5:59 pm

DraymondGold wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:
CharityStripe34 wrote:This is the first discussion where I've heard Gianni be labeled as a "poor playmaker." Learning new things every day I guess.


No way giannis is a poor playmaker

He creates so many quality shots for teammates and almost always makes solid reads and knows when to pass
Hey y'all -- "poor" i's all relative. Poor playmaker relative to an average NBA starter? Of course not! Giannis is pretty great! But is he a poor playmaker among the Top 20 peaks of all time?

Perhaps I could have been less dramatic with my language, but I personally think he's clearly a step down as a playmaker from Oscar or Jokic or Walton, who are some of the other guys people have been mentioning.

He's definitely better than Moses (most all-time players are haha).

That leaves the middle tier of peaks we're discussing -- Robinson, West, Kobe, Wade, Erving, KD (anyone else?). How would y'all see him ranking among those just in terms of playmaking / creation? I personally don't see him as a better pure passer than Kobe or West. I also like perimeter spacing of a few of those players more (e.g. KD/ Kobe/West). If you consider off-ball ability / a lack of ball-dominance important to creation (I have it in a different category, but they do have some philosophical similarities... they're basically asking how well a player pairs with others on offense), then you could at least argue others. That said, Giannis' rim gravity is probably better than any of this middle tier of playmakers.

How would you rank these guys as playmakers / creators?


Obviously he's not on the same level as a LeBron, Jokic or Walton but he certainly makes plenty of "graduate level" passes on the regular. I.e. skip-passes to the opposite corner anticipating a double-team, timing passes to fellow bigs on drives (or guards). He's clearly a step above Robinson, IMO. One of his strengths ever since he was drafted was being an unselfish and good passer, and he's only improved. Since we're discussing peaks, I'd check out the first quarter of Game 7 against Boston in May as a nice highlight package in real gametime of how he can actually run an offense. And no he's not a Westbrook "bailout" type of passer he usually makes the right reads regardless if it'll result in an assist or a hockey assist.

He's certainly comparable to Hakeem or Garnett (if we're talking passing bigs), with the added caveat that he actually played 2-3 seasons as lead ball-handler/initiator with Jason Kidd as coach before he hit his prime so he can create for others. Unlike Walton and Jokic he's often the one leading the break off a rebound (in transition) so he's certainly not the long-range passer off of rebounds that they are/were.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,178
And1: 28,694
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#50 » by Ron Swanson » Thu Jul 28, 2022 6:23 pm

Seems a bit weird to harp on Giannis' play-making/passing when you could argue he's comparable or better to all but 4 out of the 12 guys that have already been voted in (Jordan, Lebron, Bird, Magic). Is there really an argument or convincing data that guys like Duncan, Kareem, Shaq, Hakeem, KG, and Russell were actually better "play-makers"? I'm assuming Giannis' ability to run point as a lead ball-handler as well as his interior-gravity (probably 2nd only to Shaq) gives him a clear edge there.

Also, I don't think we need to analyze Nash's MVP's any further than just acknowledging that there are certainly "lean" MVP years. Same reason why Moses has as many MVP trophies as all of Kobe/KG/Hakeem combined. I personally would have went Kobe or Wade in '06, but Nash was at least defensible and it was a weird year where all the known quantities were either on subpar teams (KG, Kobe), or had relative down statistical years (Duncan, Dirk). I haven't mapped my list out but I'd imagine I'll go awhile before I start mentioning Nash (maybe the 25-30-ish range?), as I'm not really of the notion that he's a particularly strong "peak" guy.
DraymondGold
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 748
Joined: May 19, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#51 » by DraymondGold » Thu Jul 28, 2022 10:57 pm

1. 94 David Robinson
1b. 95 David Robinson
2. 1966 Jerry West
2b. 1969 Jerry West, 2c. 1967
3. 1964 Oscar Robertson

Side note: I have the same ballot as capfan33. Neat! :D

Reasoning:
Don't particularly feel like a long post. In short:

A) Robinson clearly has the best impact data, and despite others' disagreement, I don't feel like the impact metrics are biased enough by era/teammates/fit/etc. to put him lower. Defensively, he's the only remaining person in Tier 1/2 of my GOAT defenders (along with Russell obviously, Hakeem, Duncan, KG, Wilt not in order). I love his rim protection, big man man defense, and help defense. His ability to raise regular season defenses is like a rich-man's Gobert, but I see his perimeter mobility as less of an liability (at least in that era). The fact that he was the center on the GOAT Defensive Dynasty of the modern NBA (both statistically and by the eye test) also says a lot, and while credit goes to Tim Duncan for that, I'm not sure there's anybody left who could do this well defensively in that era (e.g. Giannis' rim protection isn't on the same level).
Offensively, he's a great scorer (though not the same level as others in this tier), and great off-ball player. He's a great first option in the regular season (trex_8063 joked that he was basically asked to be Russell and Jordan in the regular season haha), and while this scheme alongside his poor fitting/low-value teammates did become more vulnerable in the playoffs, I see this as an issue of fit/situation, not an inherent limit to Robinson. He performed much better and showed more resilience as a defensive 1 and offensive 1b/2, which is a fairly common archetype in history on championship teams (Thinking Basketball estimates ~50% of championship teams have this archetype). He basically never got to play with an all-star guard, despite having one of the best big-man off-ball games. That lob threat would be legendary.

As for 94 vs 95, I'm open to discussion. There's a trend of all-time players having a better regular season early on in their career (with their more athletic motor), and then losing athleticism but gaining enough experience/skill/BBIQ to offset their lost motor and have a better playoff performance when they're older. This trend isn't universal, but it does raise a question of whether this is the case for Robinson in 94 (clearly best regular season) vs 95/96 (likely better postseason). I see 96 as enough of a drop in athleticism to put it below 94. In the film I've seen, I haven't been convinced yet that 95 showed sufficient skill/experience improvement (compared to say 09 vs 13 LeBron's visible growth in skillset, with his off-ball game, shooting, post-game, and improved passing). Not for certain, just the way I'm leaning now. If anyone wants to do any film analysis of 95 vs 94, that would probably be the way to convince me otherwise.

We've already debated Robinson vs Giannis too much, so no need to re-sour the discussion with that.
The similarities with Walton are highly interesting, and not lost on me. Walton's one of the few players ever to have a comparable defensive impact, his passing is clearly better, and his shooting was (odd but) ahead of its time. Like with all players, each comes with some uncertainty, but I have higher uncertainty for Walton, given how short his healthy peak was. Probably the single greatest loss in basketball history in terms of greatness we didn't get to see due to injury.
One poster mentioned that Walton's peak has the best single-season WOWY on record. Wow! That does raise an eyebrow, but I'm not (yet) convinced for two reasons. 1) WOWY Biases. WOWY tends to like offensive quarterbacks (i.e. playmakers who run the offense > finishers who make the last shot) and defensive centerpieces (i.e. high volume defensive rim protectors). Walton's basically the perfect archetype to be highly rated in this stat. Is there some truth to this? I'd say so... I do personally value offensive playmaking > finishing more than the average RealGM person, and WOWY does support this. But this may also be a slight systematic overrating by WOWY... it can be harder to replace a playmaker who runs the offense or a defensive rim protector for just a few games without totally changing your offensive/defensive scheme. 2) Robinson is still Tier 1 in WOWY, even if his best season is a hair behind Walton's.

B) West:
The next tier will be the hardest to order. Now that players' imperfections are getting bigger, we have to start making some difficult comparisons. I might end up changing this vote in the next round (maybe for Walton, Kobe, KD, Oscar, or Jokic). Here's my thought process currently:

Skill wise, Jerry West looks great. He's very likely the best scorer of the bunch, with a fantastic driving game, incredible foul-drawing ability, and a shooting touch that was ahead of his time. He also improved his scoring in the playoffs more than any other star here. In terms of playmaking, he definitely ins't at the level of Oscar, Walton, or Jokic. That said, I don't see it below Kobe, and it's probably above KD (and other players like Moses, Erving, Wade). His defense is also often heralded as the best of the guards and wings we're considering.

Statistically, West seems lower in the group. So what made me pick him?
-BPM: While West does have a lower BPM than many of his competitors, it was far harder to gain separation in BPM as a 1960s guard. BPM could be underrating both Oscar and West. Further, BPM may be less effectively capturing West's defensive value, without any sort of steal/block input. Much of the BPM gap gets closed if we just look at Offensive BPM, and Defensive BPM has him as the worst defender of the guard/wing group (again because of the missing steal/steal numbers), which is certainly not true.
-WOWY: West performs a lot better here. He's 2nd all time in prime un-regressed WOWY and 11th all time in prime regressed WOWYR (which is like RAPM to the un-regressed APM). This stat puts him above all the other wings/guards except Oscar. While Oscar does pull ahead in prime WOWY, if we constrain it to 5-year peak WOWY, West pulls ahead of Oscar (5 years gives us stabler numbers). It's also worth noting that WOWY tends to favor players who are quarterbacks of the offense or defense (e.g. primary play-makers or primary rim protectors) over finishers like West. The fact that West gets this close to Oscar, despite Oscar playing an archetype that is arguably favored by WOWY, makes me wonder whether West is better.
-WS/48: Sticking with the comparison to Oscar, while Oscar is ahead in 1-year regular season WS/48, they're actually tied in 2-year regular season WS/48. The gap shrinks in the playoffs, and West is again ahead in multi-year playoff WS/48.

Philosophically, I also like many of West's characteristics.
He's quite scalable, certainly more than Oscar, Kobe, and Wade. He's single best shooter of the 1960s. As a combo-guard, he could play both on and off ball. And as I've said, he's also arguably the best defender of the bunch. These are all scalable skills. He's also arguably the most resilient; nobody improves their scoring more in the playoffs. I'm definitely open to the idea that the one-number metrics underrate his defense (specifically BPM and WS/48), especially when lacking even the most basic defensive stats in the 60s. I also see him as someone who would clearly win the time-machine test. Jerry West played in the single worst era for a perimeter guard. Today, his all-time shooting would improve, as would the value of his perimeter defense.

Is it possible I'm biased, with the philosophical argument making me too favorable of his worse data? Absolutely possible. Like I said, I'm still figuring this next tier out, so feel free to push back if you disagree. I'm open to reconsidering :D


C) Oscar. Like I mentioned before, uncertainty gets higher the further down the list we go. I could see arguments for plenty of other players. I went with Oscar, as he's probably the single best offensive player until Magic/Bird (maybe Kareem too, but he's a GOAT candidate so not much shame in being behind a legend). He's like Chris Paul, if Chris Paul stayed healthy in the playoffs, played in a much harder era for guards, and still showed all-time impact. His WOWY score is also Tier 1 near the top of the list. He's certainly the best passer and playmaker of the wings/guards (over Kobe/Wade/Durant/Erving). He's also clearly a Top 3 scorer of the 60s (he averaged over 8 rTS% for across a 9-year prime!). On defense, his teams were not great, but I'd argue that's from having teams that over-focused on offense-first lineups rather than a fault of Oscar the point position. There's plenty of stories then and by posters today saying he was a small positive on defense, at a minimum. The limited film I've been able to find on him supports this, showing him bother opponents and of course help the possession game as one of the best rebounding guards ever. While I'd suggest rebounding tends to get somewhat overrated in the modern era (at least by casual fans, see Russel Westbrook's MVP), and while we don't have either TRB% or Reb/75 for Oscar's peak, he's still clearly Tier 1 in Reb/36 among guards.

HM: same as before. Jokic, Kobe, Wade, Walton, KD, Giannis, not in order.
DraymondGold
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 748
Joined: May 19, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#52 » by DraymondGold » Thu Jul 28, 2022 11:14 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:Seems a bit weird to harp on Giannis' play-making/passing when you could argue he's comparable or better to all but 4 out of the 12 guys that have already been voted in (Jordan, Lebron, Bird, Magic). Is there really an argument or convincing data that guys like Duncan, Kareem, Shaq, Hakeem, KG, and Russell were actually better "play-makers"? I'm assuming Giannis' ability to run point as a lead ball-handler as well as his interior-gravity (probably 2nd only to Shaq) gives him a clear edge there.

Also, I don't think we need to analyze Nash's MVP's any further than just acknowledging that there are certainly "lean" MVP years. Same reason why Moses has as many MVP trophies as all of Kobe/KG/Hakeem combined. I personally would have went Kobe or Wade in '06, but Nash was at least defensible and it was a weird year where all the known quantities were either on subpar teams (KG, Kobe), or had relative down statistical years (Duncan, Dirk). I haven't mapped my list out but I'd imagine I'll go awhile before I start mentioning Nash (maybe the 25-30-ish range?), as I'm not really of the notion that he's a particularly strong "peak" guy.
Missing Wilt and Curry from the 12, who I also have as better passers. Here are my ballpark playmaking tiers relative to Giannis

-Clearly better passers / overall playmakers: Jordan, LeBron, Bird, Magic, Curry, Wilt, KG (not in order obviously) [Add Jokic, Walton, Oscar if including players who are in discussion now]
-Likely better playmakers: Shaq (one of the few players with higher rim gravity. I'd argue at least as good in vision/off-ball creation), Kareem (see 70sFan's film analysis earlier in this project), West (definitely better passer and perimeter spacer, though that was less valuable then. Less rim gravity of course, and his best passing was after his 1966 peak. If it's 1969/70 West, he's bumped up.)
-Similar as playmakers: Robinson (lowering him to avoid more arguments on the topic haha), Duncan, Russell (much better secondary passer and better vision, obviously worse offensive gravity), Kobe (definitely better vision, better passing execution, better perimeter spacing, but not as willing passer as I'd like), KD (not better passer or rim gravity, but better perimeter gravity and off-ball), Wade.
-Clearly Worse: Hakeem, Moses.

Order is approximate, didn't spend long on this. I could see arguments for dropping players up or down a tier. But that's how I see it. So, ballpark, that's
-10 who are clearly better
-3 who are likely better
-6 in a similar tier
-2 clearly worse
In my tier list, that puts him around the 15th/21 which is the ~25% percentile among these tiers.

Maybe I'm just lower on Giannis' playmaking than others. Let's say I were to bump his playmaking to where you have it (you said he's ~5th best out of top 12 which is ~60th percentile among this tier). Going from the ~25th percentile to the 60th percentile would certainly raise his peak value into possible contention in my ballot. If you combined that playmaking improvement with either A) having him on the same level defensively as Robinson, i.e. as a Tier 1/Tier 2 GOAT defender, OR B) disbelieved his scoring decline in the playoffs, despite his efficiency relative to opponent defense still dropping in 21/22.... then he would definitely be at the top of the list.

Personally, I'm hesitant to give any of those 3 concessions to him, which is why I have him closer to the bottom of my Top 20 GOAT peaks. But if you give him 2-3 of these 3 concessions, I could see why that would make Giannis rise to near the top of your list.
DraymondGold
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 748
Joined: May 19, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#53 » by DraymondGold » Fri Jul 29, 2022 12:44 am

After all this talk, let me just do a Giannis play-by-play film review.

Unfortunately I couldn’t find any publicly available full-game stuff from the 21 Nets series, which was my preference. The only complete, easily-accessible quarter I could find was the end of Bucks vs Suns Game 6.

Context:
Does this Overrate Giannis? this is Giannis’ single best series ever, and this game in particular is also one of Giannis single best playoff shooting games ever. There’s reason to think this film study would overrate him.
Does this Underrate Giannis? It’s the very last minutes of the 21 playoffs, so Giannis and… well, everyone :lol: … might be more fatigued and more conservative than usual. So it’s his best series ever, one of his best playoff-games ever, but certainly not his best quarter ever. Not sure how those factors balance out.

Format: X:XX Minute mark in video, Offense/Defense, [short summary], then longer summary.

0:00 Defense [okay]
Good defensive positioning. Could be more aggressive with help if he new the shot was going to go up (Booker doesn’t have the passing to pass behind him through the double), but sound positioning since he wasn’t going for the hard double.

0:17 Offense [Mistake early on, great later on]
Not crazy about that early-shotclock off-ball stuff. It’s off-ball screen to force a switch, but neither Bucks players do the action quick enough to actually pressure the defense. And here’s why I’m a touch lower on the off-ball gravity (compared to reputation, it’s still great) — Giannis’ old defender gets to sit in the lane with the worse spacing, which forces the long-midrange rather than the rim attempt. Inefficient shot, and it misses.
But, to Giannis’ credit, absolutely great off-ball movement at the end to get positioning, great pass to get it to him, and love the dunk through the defense.

0:27 D [okay]
Mostly unforced turnover from Paul.

0:32 O [Mistake]
2 on 2 in transition. Giannis Decision making: again, I actually think he could go for the score here. Check out the footwork of the Suns player by Giannis right before the pass… he’s in no position to defend, and neither is Booker. Still, if you’re ever going to be slightly too conservative, it would be at the end of a finals series when you’re up in the 4th quarter. Not perfect, but perfectly understandable.
But… at the end of the shot clock, look at the defense. Giannis defender is sagging of Giannis by almost 10 feet. This lack of shooting threat prevents middle penetration, forces the midrange shot, which misses

0:52 D [good]
Nothing highlight-worthy, but you could argue this is similar to the Gobert/Russell defensive “Anti-gravity”. Giannis sags off in the right spot to prevent middle penetration, forcing the Suns to go baseline. Giannis doesn’t end the defensive position but good positioning is good positioning.
Side comment, here we see how good Giannis' teammates are defensively compared to others in this tier.

1:35 O [Bad Mistake]
The kind of play that I seem to be harsher on than others. Giannis is triple teamed by the side. There’s a layup pass, a corner 3, and two more 3 pointers who are being zoned by 1 poor defender. Does he pass? No. Giannis does a Dream-shake-spin into a fadeaway midrange which misses.
To me, this shows my decision making concerns with Giannis and my playoff efficiency concerns with Giannis (his efficiency from medium midrange, long midrange, and 3 point land all get worse in playoffs).

1:52 D [Okay]
Again, Giannis isn’t quite as active on defense. If you’re favorable to him, you could say Giannis’ intimidation dissuades Booker from the iso, but it seems like the entire point of the Suns play was to get a post-mismatch for Ayton, which they get with little trouble. Giannis just sits in position after the switch.
Can we be forgiving from context? Sure. It’s tiring at the end of the playoffs. Here’s where I wish we could get that Nets series, which might (?) be more favorable to Giannis' motor.

… welp, they skipped a minute. So much for showing the Entire “Final 6:40” in this video. Alas, false advertising from the YouTube Name lol :lol:

2:15 D [mistake, then makes up for it]
Giannis is just a bit behind the best defensive minds (e.g. Russell/KG) in terms of predicting the switch. The quicker mind might have prevented the pass… Booker’s maybe 5 feet past the screen when Giannis recognizes he needs to rotate. Still, it’s far from slow (quite quick when comparing Giannis to non all-time defenders)… but he still gives up inner position. Also not a fan of the fact that Giannis bit on the pump fake. This could have been a layup from a more athletic/taller opponent.
But, he uses his size advantage well here. Once the triple comes, it looks like Giannis’ hands force the steal. Nice! Fine rebounding... Ayton does push Giannis slightly out of rebounding position occasionally in this game, but doesn't matter here.

2:40 O [Good triple team, bad pass... is this a mistake?]
Like that he’s attempting to be the pick n roll screener. Still, the screen doesn’t produce any advantage and booker (weak defender) recovers without any issue.
Giannis ISO, and wow what a difficult leaning pass! This is the second jump-pass that Giannis has done (maybe he picked up this habit from MJ highlights?). Produces an open 3 with his fantastic rim gravity, and the shooter misses. Full credit Giannis, full blame teammate?

But: Here’s where my earlier point comes in. I suggested his sub-optimal (among all-time greats, not among normal humans) passing may make it harder for teammates to benefit from Giannis’ rim gravity. Check out where placement of the pass is… it’s way outside the shooter’s pocket. Does the shooter miss? Sure thing, fault to the shooter. But does Giannis’ passing give the shooter the bess chance of success? I wouldn’t say so…

2:55 D [eh]
Giannis isn’t in position to get back in transition. Hard to blame him, he did produce an open 3 while falling out of the other baseline, but the Suns’ 2 on 1 does give the opponents a point.

3:08 O [mistake/negative]
Again, we get the off-ball concerns I have with Giannis. His lack of shooting lets his defender sag in, forces Middleteon to change direction, but more sagging in the paint forces… yet another midrange attempt from bucks, which gets knocked out.

3:45 D [okay]
Yet again, Giannis isn’t too active, but if you’re favorable to Giannis, you could say it’s intimidation of his man defense. Good man defense from Giannis’ teammates. Not great box-out from Giannis against paul who sneaks in, but doesn’t really matter.

5:15 O [good!]
I like the off-ball screen, which does produce some separation. A better shooter could use that, but Bucks don’t get anything. Pass to Giannis, cross-screen hand off to Middleton on the move. The non-giannis screen actually does create an advantage, and Middleton makes the shot on his own off the hand-off.
Good Bucks offense. Although Giannis didn’t produce or really help the made shot, I love the driving quickness and energy off-ball during Middleton’s midrange attempt. He gets himself in good position as a rollman and a rebounder.
This shows some of the off-ball improvement that Giannis didn’t really have quite as much in the first 2 rounds (including against the Nets, at least from memory), but did have for the last 2 rounds.

5:55 D [okay]
None of the 3 Bucks defenders (including Giannis) are quick enough to get around the off-ball screen or call the switch to prevent an open 3. Suns get an open 3, down only 6. Not great from Giannis, but not terrible… they all 3 had moments where they could have prevented this.
That said, good positioning for the rebound.

7:00 D [mistake]
The suns are down 8, 40 seconds left. They might be looking to make a 3. Giannis sags off too much from Chris Paul for my taste and CP3 takes the 3.

… another time skip. Shame, it’s a fun watch. :cry:

8:07 D ["intentional mistake"]
Doesn’t provide any rim protection when he could, but it's clearly intentional… they’d rather give up a layup, avoid an unnecessary foul on paul, and get possession in the final minute.

8:50 O [eh, not great]
First free-throw attempts for Giannis. Makes 1/2 for 50%. This is a chance to talk about Giannis’ Free throw shooting. It’s far from good historically among all-time players, and it declines in literally every single playoffs Giannis has been it. We’ve debated whether that’s just a rather consistent unlucky/cold streak or causal (e.g. because he has more fatigue in the playoffs). His FT% in the 2021 Regular season was 68.5%, his FT% in the 21 Playoffs was 58.7%, and his FT% across 3-year playoff run was 61.5%.
Using this game to talk about his 2021 playoff numbers are ironic, since he actually had a bit of a hot-free throw shooting stretch at this point in the playoffs. He made a surprising amount in this game specifically. But on average, it still wasn't great. Thinking Basketball once said unexpected hot-shooting can massively increase your value in small samples. I wonder how much this hot streak was good shooting luck vs just getting into the right mentality, and how much they boosted his playoff plus/minus numbers?
Regardless, credit. After this shot, Giannis is a champion. I have him lower than most people all-time, but he's still better than 99.99% of NBA players ever.


Overal:
-Offensive pros: Rim gravity pops up, just like everybody (even me haha!) have been saying. His rim scoring also pops up. His improved off-ball ability in the 2nd half of the 2021 playoffs (vs first half of the 2021 playoffs or the 2020 playoffs) was also visible.
-Defensive pros: Good positioning, arguably some amount of defensive intimidation.

-Offensive cons: My concerns with his shooting and spacing showed up just like I thought. The decline from midrange and free throw was visible, as was the poor perimeter gravity making it harder on Giannis' teammates. My playmaking concerns also appeared. A few moments of sub-optimal decision making and passing (great for an average player, not great for an all-time offensive player).
-Defensive cons: To my eye, he clearly has worse rim protection and had slightly less overall impact than the Robinson/Walton tier. His defensive activity was down compared to them. If you're favorable to Giannis, would you explain this away using arguments for his intimidation, 4th Quarter fatigue, or era differences? Or is this a sign that he actually is a tier lower than them?

Let me know what y'all think! I've been accused of pretty heavy bias and dishonesty in this thread, so if anyone thinks this film-analysis is unfair, don't hesitate to (respectfully) let me know where you disagree :D
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 52,803
And1: 21,730
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#54 » by Doctor MJ » Fri Jul 29, 2022 1:15 am

Dutchball97 wrote:
f4p wrote:Questions about 1976 Dr J

Is there any reason to be so high on Dr J compared to Moses? Moses won 3 NBA MVP's. Maybe voting was worse than it is today, but 3 bad votes? 2 in a row in a league with Bird, Magic, Kareem, and Dr J? Getting a 40 win team to the Finals? Taking over Dr J's own team and getting him his title? Feels like people are discounting Moses too much. I would get if 1977 Dr J dominated the NBA right away, but he fell off quite a bit, though he did recover in 1980-82.


The amount of MVPs someone has isn't the most impactful thing to how good someone was at their peak. Even then Dr J was a 3x ABA MVP and won MVP the year before Moses won the back to back MVPs. Dr J won his 81 MVP in the same league with Bird, Magic, Kareem and Moses. And since you have 2017 Kawhi as you're #1 here I'm surprised you do seem to value the award so much in your evaluations, when Kawhi never won one.

I also wouldn't be so hard on Dr J's 1977 season. He joined a new team, in a new league with different rules and twice the talent as the year before. Even then his production only went down due to shooting less and having less playmaking duties, he was still almost just as efficient as the year before. Then you have to take into account how he stepped up in the play-offs. He even led the play-offs in both WS and VORP in the same year as our #4 peak Kareem and another guy who is already getting votes in Walton. I have Moses and Dr J right next to each other as you can see so I wouldn't call that discounting Moses but saying Moses is on another tier as Dr J seems to me like you're the one discounting Julius Erving.


Good points, felt I should say my perspective here too.

Getting a sense of what happened with ABA players after the merger is tricky.

If you look simply at Erving's stats, it's easy to think, "NBA's a tougher league, so he's not as effective."

But plenty of ABA players took a step forward in the merger as well, and largely the players who got to stay together with their previous ABA teams, did pretty well.

Further, the best DRtg in the NBA that year came from the Denver Nuggets who came from the ABA, and Erving torched in the final ABA finals. If we know that Erving was capable of torching the best defense in the new NBA is the context is different, then we really need to focus on that context to understand what he actually was and how impressed we should be with him.

I certainly don't claim to "be the one who knows", but everyone's got to try to make their own basketball-sense of things, here's what I have at present:

1. I think Erving benefitted from spacing quite a bit as a player. He wasn't a great shooter, he was at his best when he could drive, and his approach didn't yield extreme amounts of free throws.

2. I think the ABA in general had better spacing than the NBA, in part because of the 3-point line (though they didn't actually shoot very many of them).

3. I think that the Nets had figured out how to work around Erving with a fit like a glove, and that switching to any other team was likely to take some time for the new team to do this again. Erving was limited in how much he could change his game and still be ultra-effective.

4. It's hard to overstate how ridiculously bad the team-building fit was on the 76ers with Erving joining George McGinnis. It's like pairing Tom Brady with Peyton Manning and expecting your football team to be unstoppable because if one great quarterback is good, two must be better!

5. Don't forget to look at what happened to the Nets in the NBA once Erving got ripped away from them. They fell apart on both sides of the ball. To me a great example of what a high-fit-low-talent supporting cast looks like when you take their keystone away. They deserve credit for how well they worked with Erving, but there should be no mistaking that Erving's value to that team was utterly massive.

6. Gradually as we move forward, we have to think more about Erving's injuries. This isn't something that began in the NBA (go look at any picture on the Nets, I think you'll see those tell-tale knee braces that were absent earlier on the Virginia Squires), so I really don't want to imply that injuries explain the difference in '76-77, nevertheless, the reason why Erving was so special was because of what he could do with his body that no one else could, and so I think in general he didn't age as well as guys whose specialty wasn't attached with youthful explosiveness. This to say, that while I think the drop off in '76-77 is mostly about change of context, I don't think it's crazy to think Erving could peak at age 25, whereas top tier players typically peak a bit later.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Proxy
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 192
Joined: Jun 30, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#55 » by Proxy » Fri Jul 29, 2022 3:02 am

Proxy wrote:13. 1977 Bill Walton:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2214973&start=40#p100653991
14. 1964 Oscar Robertson (1963?):
I really have no idea on this pick and the next one. Think i'm gonna take his offense over Jerry's combination of offense/defense, i'm starting to believe Oscar was a slight positive defensively rather than a negative like I did before at his and that makes his argument a bit similar to that of Magic's/Steph's, really just more limited by how possible it was to create as much separation as a playmaker cuz of era.
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2214211&p=100598026&hilit=Oscar#p100598026
15. 1966 Jerry West (1965):
Way too similar to Oscar in impact based on how I view the two to justify many spaces apart in a list like this for me, one of the most absurd playoff performers and risers statistically, great portability and good defensive impact. May make a bigger post later cuz it looks like he isn't getting in any time soon. I feel his perception would be more optimistic if he didn't have so many years plagued by injuries, 1968 would probably be my year if he didn't play 50 games.
I'm once again considering moving Jerry over Oscar, I do like his scalability and portability more and the point brought up about how those WOWY measurements favor Oscar's player archetype more and isn't entirely reflective of what his value would be in most situations is a fair one, as well as how Jerry actually does perform arguably better in those in smaller samples apparently(DraymondGold brought up 5 year stretches instead of entire primes). I still never did a comparison of their performances in the PS againat similar levels of comp but Jerry does just have a bigger sample size of games overall. Is that being a bit unfair to Oscar due to their situations in the same era not being able to get him that lager sample? Maybe a little bit and it's hard to say, but confidence should matters a bit with players like these. Idt it will matter much for this round specifically and i'm still working through it(w/ Walton as well) but it might pretty soon.

I'm also not ruling out ABA Julius, Drob, Kobe, Dirk, Wade, KD, AD, Giannis, and Jokic but i'm struggling to see a stronger argument for Moses and i'm questionable when it comes to Mikan(more lack of data related) and Kawhi - he doesn't really click to me as this level on film(defense and offensive peaks did not happen at the same time and drastic improvements as a playmaker post 2019) and there's reason to believe some of his statistical footprint is slightly overstating his impact - ex not playing multiple games in a series the Spurs got dominated in for 2017 inflating his on/off and declines in scoring ability in deeper player runs especially past the first round probably due to durability issues - some bc of that injury in 2017, but I do thing he was pretty ridiculous through 2 rounds in 2017 and 2019, maybe his drop from averaging like 30 a game on 70 TS%(lol) is in line with other ATGs than I give credit for but I haven't had the time to look into it more recently
AEnigma wrote:Arf arf.
Image

trex_8063 wrote:Calling someone a stinky turd is not acceptable.
PLEASE stop doing that.

One_and_Done wrote:I mean, how would you feel if the NBA traced it's origins to an 1821 league of 3 foot dwarves who performed in circuses?
DraymondGold
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 748
Joined: May 19, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#56 » by DraymondGold » Fri Jul 29, 2022 3:39 am

Proxy wrote:
Proxy wrote:13. 1977 Bill Walton:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2214973&start=40#p100653991
14. 1964 Oscar Robertson (1963?):
I really have no idea on this pick and the next one. Think i'm gonna take his offense over Jerry's combination of offense/defense, i'm starting to believe Oscar was a slight positive defensively rather than a negative like I did before at his and that makes his argument a bit similar to that of Magic's/Steph's, really just more limited by how possible it was to create as much separation as a playmaker cuz of era.
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2214211&p=100598026&hilit=Oscar#p100598026
15. 1966 Jerry West (1965):
Way too similar to Oscar in impact based on how I view the two to justify many spaces apart in a list like this for me, one of the most absurd playoff performers and risers statistically, great portability and good defensive impact. May make a bigger post later cuz it looks like he isn't getting in any time soon. I feel his perception would be more optimistic if he didn't have so many years plagued by injuries, 1968 would probably be my year if he didn't play 50 games.
I'm once again considering moving Jerry over Oscar, I do like his scalability and portability more and the point brought up about how those WOWY measurements favor Oscar's player archetype more and isn't entirely reflective of what his value would be in most situations is a fair one, as well as how Jerry actually does perform arguably better in those in smaller samples apparently(DraymondGold brought up 5 year stretches instead of entire primes). I still never did a comparison of their performances in the PS againat similar levels of comp but Jerry does just have a bigger sample size of games overall. Is that being a bit unfair to Oscar due to their situations in the same era not being able to get him that lager sample? Maybe a little bit and it's hard to say, but confidence should matters a bit with players like these. Idt it will matter much for this round specifically and i'm still working through it(w/ Walton as well) but it might pretty soon.

I'm also not ruling out ABA Julius, Drob, Kobe, Dirk, Wade, KD, AD, Giannis, and Jokic but i'm struggling to see a stronger argument for Moses and i'm questionable when it comes to Mikan(more lack of data related) and Kawhi - he doesn't really click to me as this level on film(defense and offensive peaks did not happen at the same time and drastic improvements as a playmaker post 2019) and there's reason to believe some of his statistical footprint is slightly overstating his impact - ex not playing multiple games in a series the Spurs got dominated in for 2017 inflating his on/off and declines in scoring ability in deeper player runs especially past the first round probably due to durability issues - some bc of that injury in 2017, but I do thing he was pretty ridiculous through 2 rounds in 2017 and 2019, maybe his drop from averaging like 30 a game on 70 TS%(lol) is in line with other ATGs than I give credit for but I haven't had the time to look into it more recently
Hiya Proxy! Hopefully you aren't feeling too frustrated having the same ballot again. I know the feeling :lol: It's hard when these players are so close together.

Anyway, thanks for your Backpicks/WOWY data for Oscar, and for the footage!

First, since you mentioned comparing Jerry and Oscar vs the same defenses, I wanted to share a cool project by ty 4191 (and 70s Fan?): https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2185164. It looks at how all-time players' stats change vs opposing defenses. They haven't gotten around to Oscar yet, but they do have Jerry! In short, Jerry does great against elite opponents, which does fit his reputation of resilience.
But he shows clear scoring declines against All-time-great opponents (possibly increasing his playmaking if they're focusing on preventing his scoring?). I haven't checked what opponents those are, so it would be interesting for someone to delve deeper into which opponents specifically caused this drop. Compared to Kobe, it looks like Kobe's scoring fairs slightly better against all-time great teams, while West's playmaking might be a hair better (and hard to know about West's defense but his reputation is better than Kobe's).

Second, I had a question for you this round (or next round since this one's almost over). Is there any reason you like West in 65 > 69? I tend to like his passing more as he got older, but I'm not an expert on his defensive evolution. Do you think there's a scoring volume decline or defensive decline from 65 to 69 that makes up for the playmaking improvement?
User avatar
Proxy
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 192
Joined: Jun 30, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#57 » by Proxy » Fri Jul 29, 2022 3:46 am

DraymondGold wrote:
Proxy wrote:
Proxy wrote:13. 1977 Bill Walton:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2214973&start=40#p100653991
14. 1964 Oscar Robertson (1963?):
I really have no idea on this pick and the next one. Think i'm gonna take his offense over Jerry's combination of offense/defense, i'm starting to believe Oscar was a slight positive defensively rather than a negative like I did before at his and that makes his argument a bit similar to that of Magic's/Steph's, really just more limited by how possible it was to create as much separation as a playmaker cuz of era.
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2214211&p=100598026&hilit=Oscar#p100598026
15. 1966 Jerry West (1965):
Way too similar to Oscar in impact based on how I view the two to justify many spaces apart in a list like this for me, one of the most absurd playoff performers and risers statistically, great portability and good defensive impact. May make a bigger post later cuz it looks like he isn't getting in any time soon. I feel his perception would be more optimistic if he didn't have so many years plagued by injuries, 1968 would probably be my year if he didn't play 50 games.
I'm once again considering moving Jerry over Oscar, I do like his scalability and portability more and the point brought up about how those WOWY measurements favor Oscar's player archetype more and isn't entirely reflective of what his value would be in most situations is a fair one, as well as how Jerry actually does perform arguably better in those in smaller samples apparently(DraymondGold brought up 5 year stretches instead of entire primes). I still never did a comparison of their performances in the PS againat similar levels of comp but Jerry does just have a bigger sample size of games overall. Is that being a bit unfair to Oscar due to their situations in the same era not being able to get him that lager sample? Maybe a little bit and it's hard to say, but confidence should matters a bit with players like these. Idt it will matter much for this round specifically and i'm still working through it(w/ Walton as well) but it might pretty soon.

I'm also not ruling out ABA Julius, Drob, Kobe, Dirk, Wade, KD, AD, Giannis, and Jokic but i'm struggling to see a stronger argument for Moses and i'm questionable when it comes to Mikan(more lack of data related) and Kawhi - he doesn't really click to me as this level on film(defense and offensive peaks did not happen at the same time and drastic improvements as a playmaker post 2019) and there's reason to believe some of his statistical footprint is slightly overstating his impact - ex not playing multiple games in a series the Spurs got dominated in for 2017 inflating his on/off and declines in scoring ability in deeper player runs especially past the first round probably due to durability issues - some bc of that injury in 2017, but I do thing he was pretty ridiculous through 2 rounds in 2017 and 2019, maybe his drop from averaging like 30 a game on 70 TS%(lol) is in line with other ATGs than I give credit for but I haven't had the time to look into it more recently
Hiya Proxy! Hopefully you aren't feeling too frustrated having the same ballot again. I know the feeling :lol: It's hard when these players are so close together.

Anyway, thanks for your Backpicks/WOWY data for Oscar, and for the footage!

First, since you mentioned comparing Jerry and Oscar vs the same defenses, I wanted to share a cool project by ty 4191 (and 70s Fan?): https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2185164. It looks at how all-time players' stats change vs opposing defenses. They haven't gotten around to Oscar yet, but they do have Jerry! In short, Jerry does great against elite opponents, which does fit his reputation of resilience.
But he shows clear scoring declines against All-time-great opponents (possibly increasing his playmaking if they're focusing on preventing his scoring?). I haven't checked what opponents those are, so it would be interesting for someone to delve deeper into which opponents specifically caused this drop. Compared to Kobe, it looks like Kobe's scoring fairs slightly better against all-time great teams, while West's playmaking might be a hair better (and hard to know about West's defense but his reputation is better than Kobe's).

Second, I had a question for you this round (or next round since this one's almost over). Is there any reason you like West in 65 > 69? I tend to like his passing more as he got older, but I'm not an expert on his defensive evolution. Do you think there's a scoring volume decline or defensive decline from 65 to 69 that makes up for the playmaking improvement?


I appreciate you linking that project and i'll take a look at it tomorrow. The 65 Vs 69 West thing was just because of durability but I probably didn't evaluate it fairly, he also did have deep playoff runs afterall, so I probably should have added it on anyways. I also tend to prefer 68/69 West over 65/66 as a player for those playmaking reasons, maybe I should've included 1970 honestly
AEnigma wrote:Arf arf.
Image

trex_8063 wrote:Calling someone a stinky turd is not acceptable.
PLEASE stop doing that.

One_and_Done wrote:I mean, how would you feel if the NBA traced it's origins to an 1821 league of 3 foot dwarves who performed in circuses?
User avatar
LA Bird
Analyst
Posts: 3,592
And1: 3,327
Joined: Feb 16, 2015

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#58 » by LA Bird » Fri Jul 29, 2022 12:57 pm

There is a circular tie between 21 Antetokounmpo, 64 Robertson, 94 Robinson so we have a runoff between the three seasons. If you didn't vote for any of these seasons or you haven't voted in this round at all yet, please do so before 9am ET tomorrow. If there is still a tie as at the end of the runoff, a winner will be determined according to the tiebreak rule in the project thread.

Spoiler:
_Game7_ wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.

Amares wrote:.

Ambrose wrote:.

ardee wrote:.

BallerHogger wrote:.

Bel wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

Blazers-1977 wrote:.

capfan33 wrote:.

cecilthesheep wrote:.

ceiling raiser wrote:.

ceoofkobefans wrote:.

ChartFiction wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

coastalmarker99 wrote:.

Colbinii wrote:.

cupcakesnake wrote:.

DatAsh wrote:.

Djoker wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

dontcalltimeout wrote:.

DQuinn1575 wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Dr Spaceman wrote:.

DraymondGold wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dutchball97 wrote:.

E-Balla wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

eminence wrote:.

falcolombardi wrote:.

f4p wrote:.

freethedevil wrote:.

Ginoboleee wrote:.

GoldenFrieza21 wrote:.

Gregoire wrote:.

HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:.

HHera187 wrote:.

homecourtloss wrote:.

Homer38 wrote:.

iggymcfrack wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

jalengreen wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

JoeMalburg wrote:.

Joey Wheeler wrote:.

JordansBulls wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

letskissbro wrote:.

liamliam1234 wrote:.

Lou Fan wrote:.

Mavericksfan wrote:.

Max123 wrote:.

mdonnelly1989 wrote:.

michievous wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Mutnt wrote:.

MyUniBroDavis wrote:.

Narigo wrote:.

No-more-rings wrote:.

NoxusApprentice wrote:.

OhayoKD wrote:.

pandrade83 wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

PCProductions wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

Point-Forward wrote:.

Proxy wrote:.

Quotatious wrote:.

RebelWithoutACause wrote:.

RSCD_3 wrote:.

Samurai wrote:.

SickMother wrote:.

SideshowBob wrote:.

SKF_85 wrote:.

Stan wrote:.

Sublime187 wrote:.

theonlyclutch wrote:.

The-Power wrote:.

thizznation wrote:.

Timmyyy wrote:.

trelos6 wrote:.

trex_8063 wrote:.

Vladimir777 wrote:.

yoyoboy wrote:.
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,560
And1: 1,582
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 

Post#59 » by f4p » Fri Jul 29, 2022 1:22 pm

LA Bird wrote:There is a circular tie between 21 Antetokounmpo, 64 Robertson, 94 Robinson so we have a runoff between the three seasons. If you didn't vote for any of these seasons or you haven't voted in this round at all yet, please do so before 9am ET tomorrow. If there is still a tie as at the end of the runoff, a winner will be determined according to the tiebreak rule in the project thread.

Spoiler:
_Game7_ wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.

Amares wrote:.

Ambrose wrote:.

ardee wrote:.

BallerHogger wrote:.

Bel wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

Blazers-1977 wrote:.

capfan33 wrote:.

cecilthesheep wrote:.

ceiling raiser wrote:.

ceoofkobefans wrote:.

ChartFiction wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

coastalmarker99 wrote:.

Colbinii wrote:.

cupcakesnake wrote:.

DatAsh wrote:.

Djoker wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

dontcalltimeout wrote:.

DQuinn1575 wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Dr Spaceman wrote:.

DraymondGold wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dutchball97 wrote:.

E-Balla wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

eminence wrote:.

falcolombardi wrote:.

f4p wrote:.

freethedevil wrote:.

Ginoboleee wrote:.

GoldenFrieza21 wrote:.

Gregoire wrote:.

HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:.

HHera187 wrote:.

homecourtloss wrote:.

Homer38 wrote:.

iggymcfrack wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

jalengreen wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

JoeMalburg wrote:.

Joey Wheeler wrote:.

JordansBulls wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

letskissbro wrote:.

liamliam1234 wrote:.

Lou Fan wrote:.

Mavericksfan wrote:.

Max123 wrote:.

mdonnelly1989 wrote:.

michievous wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Mutnt wrote:.

MyUniBroDavis wrote:.

Narigo wrote:.

No-more-rings wrote:.

NoxusApprentice wrote:.

OhayoKD wrote:.

pandrade83 wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

PCProductions wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

Point-Forward wrote:.

Proxy wrote:.

Quotatious wrote:.

RebelWithoutACause wrote:.

RSCD_3 wrote:.

Samurai wrote:.

SickMother wrote:.

SideshowBob wrote:.

SKF_85 wrote:.

Stan wrote:.

Sublime187 wrote:.

theonlyclutch wrote:.

The-Power wrote:.

thizznation wrote:.

Timmyyy wrote:.

trelos6 wrote:.

trex_8063 wrote:.

Vladimir777 wrote:.

yoyoboy wrote:.


I didn't vote for any of the 3 seasons so I vote for 21 Giannis. Technically I would vote 22 Giannis and 21 alternate but I assume that doesn't matter.
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,406
And1: 5,001
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #13 - Runoff (21 Antetokounmpo vs 64 Robertson vs 94 Robinson) 

Post#60 » by Dutchball97 » Fri Jul 29, 2022 2:34 pm

I have 21 Giannis 3rd on my ballot so if I got it correctly that means I have a singular vote for Giannis in the run-off without input on who I'd take 2nd and 3rd between them, right? Otherwise I'd have 64 Oscar over 94 Robinson. Both men had regular seasons that jump off the page in just about any available metric we have for them but they lacked the supporting cast to put the stamp of a title on top. Oscar won a series where he played really well too but it was against a pretty lackluster 76ers team (-3.75 SRS) led by Hal Greer and it still went to a final 5th game. So that doesn't really seperate them too much for me. However, what does influence me taking Oscar over Robinson here is that Oscar lost to the dynasty Celtics at their best, while being the best offensive player in the series (arguably best overall but I'd probably go Russell for that one). Robinson lost to a good Jazz team (although a clear tier below the 64 Celtics) but the Spurs were the higher seed and had the higher SRS so that takes some of that excuse away. Especially because Karl Malone outplayed Robinson imo quite clearly during their series as well.

Return to Player Comparisons