MartinToVaught wrote:70sFan wrote:MartinToVaught wrote:The Celtics made 22 threes to the Bucks' 4. And Bud's defensive system made it very easy for them to make those shots. That was the game right there. I don't see how this is a vindication, not an indictment, of Bud's system despite the ORtg.
You miss one small point:
- in RS, Celtics took 50.3 2PA on average and made 54.7% of them,
- in game 7, Celtics took 33 2PA and made 45.5% of them.
Yeah, Celtics took a lot of threes and they made them on unusually high rate. It didn't lead to efficient offense though. It was league average offense, despite making 22 threes. The truth is that you can live even with such a hot shooting night as long as your opponent can't create any shots at the rim.
Bucks making only 4 threes had nothing to do with their defense. Their offense was terrible throughout the whole series and that's the reason why they lost. I really don't understand how you can criticize their defense when their offense was all-time bad.
The Bucks' offense was always going to take a huge hit without Middleton. There was no getting around that no matter what. The least Bud could have done was not put another obstacle in the way of his own team by conceding a ton of wide-open threes when it was going to be hard enough already for them to win the series.
So you would rather not play Lopez and play Celtics game against them? They'd get destroyed in 5 then.
You basically criticize Bucks defense for not being able to carry them through -15.1 offensive performance. Do you realize that Bucks would have to play GOAT-level defense to make it work?