2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,736
And1: 22,665
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#561 » by Doctor MJ » Tue Sep 22, 2020 3:11 am

ardee wrote:
yoyoboy wrote:So the two players of the year might actually be from the same team. That’s crazy. Has that happened before?


It has in 2001.

RealGM voted Kobe 3 but let's be real, this board even now doesn't treat Kobe fairly and some of the posters from back then were even more anti-Kobe.

I don't see how anyone can watch the 2001 Playoffs in their entirety and conclude that Duncan was better than Kobe that year.... because you'd be saying non-peak Duncan is better than someone who played at peak Jordan level.


You had to go and ruin it by you - the fan - talking about all the Kobe haters.

That group was the best group I ever did a project with. I'm sorry you can't be objective enough to at least respect their difference in opinion.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
TheGOATRises007
RealGM
Posts: 21,590
And1: 20,256
Joined: Oct 05, 2013
         

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#562 » by TheGOATRises007 » Tue Sep 22, 2020 8:07 am

ardee wrote:
yoyoboy wrote:So the two players of the year might actually be from the same team. That’s crazy. Has that happened before?


It has in 2001.

RealGM voted Kobe 3 but let's be real, this board even now doesn't treat Kobe fairly and some of the posters from back then were even more anti-Kobe.

I don't see how anyone can watch the 2001 Playoffs in their entirety and conclude that Duncan was better than Kobe that year.... because you'd be saying non-peak Duncan is better than someone who played at peak Jordan level.


Kobe in 2001 didn't play at peak Jordan level.

I don't know how the vote went then, but that statement is objectively incorrect.

Kobe has never played to that level.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,568
And1: 16,115
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#563 » by therealbig3 » Tue Sep 22, 2020 8:24 am

Totally fair to take AD over LeBron based on a superior playoff run, but we have a huge sample size during the RS where LeBron looked clearly better beyond the box score stats. And I'm not really seeing them as totally different players all of a sudden. I think Davis has better opportunities to put up monster numbers though, because he's getting really favorable matchups all PS. Doesn't change who he and LeBron are as players.
ardee
RealGM
Posts: 15,320
And1: 5,397
Joined: Nov 16, 2011

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#564 » by ardee » Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:51 am

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:
ardee wrote:
yoyoboy wrote:So the two players of the year might actually be from the same team. That’s crazy. Has that happened before?


It has in 2001.

RealGM voted Kobe 3 but let's be real, this board even now doesn't treat Kobe fairly and some of the posters from back then were even more anti-Kobe.

I don't see how anyone can watch the 2001 Playoffs in their entirety and conclude that Duncan was better than Kobe that year.... because you'd be saying non-peak Duncan is better than someone who played at peak Jordan level.


Kobe in 2001 didn't play at peak Jordan level.

I don't know how the vote went then, but that statement is objectively incorrect.

Kobe has never played to that level.


In the Playoffs he did. 32/7/6 on 60% TS through the entire Western Conference Playoffs while being among the best perimeter defenders in the league. That is objectively peak Jordan level for a good stretch against elite competition.
ardee
RealGM
Posts: 15,320
And1: 5,397
Joined: Nov 16, 2011

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#565 » by ardee » Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:54 am

Doctor MJ wrote:
ardee wrote:
yoyoboy wrote:So the two players of the year might actually be from the same team. That’s crazy. Has that happened before?


It has in 2001.

RealGM voted Kobe 3 but let's be real, this board even now doesn't treat Kobe fairly and some of the posters from back then were even more anti-Kobe.

I don't see how anyone can watch the 2001 Playoffs in their entirety and conclude that Duncan was better than Kobe that year.... because you'd be saying non-peak Duncan is better than someone who played at peak Jordan level.


You had to go and ruin it by you - the fan - talking about all the Kobe haters.

That group was the best group I ever did a project with. I'm sorry you can't be objective enough to at least respect their difference in opinion.


It was a great project and I learned a lot reading through it over the years. But I'm sorry: there were people who didn't vote Kobe top 5 in 2006. The man was the sole reason the Lakers were the 7th best SRS and 8th best offense in the league while starting some of the biggest scrubs in the league... it's one thing to rank Wade or Dirk over him (I disagree but I can see it as understandable). But to say the man who broke half the scoring records in the books and it actually translated to results on the court was not one of the five best players in the league? To me that smacks of a lack of objectivity.
freethedevil
Head Coach
Posts: 7,262
And1: 3,237
Joined: Dec 09, 2018
         

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#566 » by freethedevil » Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:44 am

ardee wrote:
Eddy_JukeZ wrote:
ardee wrote:
It has in 2001.

RealGM voted Kobe 3 but let's be real, this board even now doesn't treat Kobe fairly and some of the posters from back then were even more anti-Kobe.

I don't see how anyone can watch the 2001 Playoffs in their entirety and conclude that Duncan was better than Kobe that year.... because you'd be saying non-peak Duncan is better than someone who played at peak Jordan level.


Kobe in 2001 didn't play at peak Jordan level.

I don't know how the vote went then, but that statement is objectively incorrect.

Kobe has never played to that level.


In the Playoffs he did. 32/7/6 on 60% TS through the entire Western Conference Playoffs while being among the best perimeter defenders in the league. That is objectively peak Jordan level for a good stretch against elite competition.


How did that translate to impacting winning tho?

playoff aupm

Lebron 09
+9.9
08-10
+7.9

01-03 Tim Duncan
+8.1

98-04 Shaq
+6.6

Post prime 97-98 MJ
+6

04 KG
+6
02,3,08 KG
+5.4

13-15 Curry
+5.4

09 Wade +5.2

So how does "objectively peak mj" compare?


08-10 Kobe
+4.4
01 Kobe
+3


Friendly reminder the lakers played at a 56 win pace without kobe in 2000-01. They played 43 win basketball without Shaq.
+4.4

Arbitrary stat line tho.

Why don't you cherrypick his OBPM again?
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#567 » by MyUniBroDavis » Tue Sep 22, 2020 12:50 pm

freethedevil wrote:
ardee wrote:
Eddy_JukeZ wrote:
Kobe in 2001 didn't play at peak Jordan level.

I don't know how the vote went then, but that statement is objectively incorrect.

Kobe has never played to that level.


In the Playoffs he did. 32/7/6 on 60% TS through the entire Western Conference Playoffs while being among the best perimeter defenders in the league. That is objectively peak Jordan level for a good stretch against elite competition.


How did that translate to impacting winning tho?

playoff aupm

Lebron 09
+9.9
08-10
+7.9

01-03 Tim Duncan
+8.1

98-04 Shaq
+6.6

Post prime 97-98 MJ
+6

04 KG
+6
02,3,08 KG
+5.4

13-15 Curry
+5.4

09 Wade +5.2

So how does "objectively peak mj" compare?


08-10 Kobe
+4.4
01 Kobe
+3


Friendly reminder the lakers played at a 56 win pace without kobe in 2000-01. They played 43 win basketball without Shaq.
+4.4

Arbitrary stat line tho.

Why don't you cherrypick his OBPM again?


Isnt aupm just an aproximation of rapm? If i recall less than half were within 1+- rapm, and over a 10 to 20 game sample itd be even worse since it uses on-off as a big component, even rapm itself would be worse for that considering that it takes like 2 seasons or something and rapm one year doesnt predict it as well for the next as some other stats

I dont remember how the testing for rapm works that makes people sure on its accuracy, i do think that the idea that ita the perfect thing to gauge impact isnt accurate because at the bery least teams have access to better ones that arent public iirc

When it comes to playoff runs film's more important than impact metrics imo, its a small enough sample you can analyze whats happening on a granular scale and its tol small a sample for impact metrics to be your whole argument although obv it can be a part

Not saying whwre i dtand on this, idk much about early kobe but everyone knows my stance on 06-09 kobe being up there in primes

I dont know what i think about impact but i will say impact is determined by player play + a variety of team or role and matchup factors that matter much more than people seem to think, at least post illegal D. Giannis is probably an easy example, there are fully things that could be done jusy from a strats perspective for giannis to countee that build a wall strat that kills him that bud doesnt do

It comes into player impact vs how good they are and really people have different stances on that and to say one is right vs the other is stupid. In terms of impact i wouldnt pick 06-09 kobe over some players but if i had to build a team to build an offense around given they play with a certain playstyle thats a completely different story
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,822
And1: 25,116
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#568 » by E-Balla » Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:24 pm

freethedevil wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
Tbf lebrons best has definately been better than ADs best but he hasnt been hitting it as much, some of it because it takes him a bit longer to respond to adjustments sometimes but sometimes it just feels like he doesnt need to

LeBron's best prior to this season maybe. During this season LeBron hasn't played as well as AD is all year for any stretch and his best single game isn't better than AD's either.

there was one game vs houston where it felt like he was protecting the rim even more than ad.

That was a great game but it's not better than AD's best game is what I'm saying. Actually he barely had a better game that day, AD had Westbrook and Harden on lockdown that game and IIRC both guys were playing well when other people other than AD guarded them that night.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#569 » by MyUniBroDavis » Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:25 pm

I mean in terms of impact, curry probably blows durant out of the water past few years, that doesnt necessarily mean that id pick curry to start a team even purely offensively, since thats mean i need a strong playmaking roll man, good playmakers and a good system, in varying degrees

I think their scheme gets a bit hyped up but obv its really good, but in terms of their best action its still gonna be the curry + draymond or curry + durant pick and roll because both guys cant be in 4v3 situations and you have to stay on or blitz curry, which means hes gonna get a switch alot, which explains alot of his success in iso.

Like if nurkic or whiteside were competent playmakers on the short roll lillard would be near curry tier in those situations, but because they arent it was just "blitz lol bye."

Obv currys off ball stuff compensates this but other problems surface here as well. Obv id pick him over almost everyone but its not wrong to pick durant offensively in that situation because durants more portable and theoretically meshes better on most teams, in that his strengths cant be as minimized in bad situations or by strats and itll be more on his performance

For prime kobe the only thing really is he had bad shot selection, but people really overestimate the effect this had on his fg%, or maybe his inability to hit them or his overall effeciency. In terms of overall effeciency in the half court he was more effecient than lebron or wade were. The main thing impact wise id say is that the hear and cavs were both teams that ran alot of pick and roll with them, and ball screen pick and rolls with an elite scoring superstar is pretty much the most effective offense you could run at the time with the rules the way they were, and in spite of the fact kobe was very good at this, incredibly good actually, the triangle doesnt promote this alot and when it does its not in the way for it to be succesful

The arguments against shot selection would make more sense if he wasnt an overall high effeciency scorer who ranks better in the halfcourt relative to league average than guys like harden or doncic

Idk how id rank him but i trhink those 06-09 yrars offensively can challenge anyone personally
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,144
And1: 11,942
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#570 » by eminence » Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:50 pm

Nurk is fine on the short roll, Lillard just isn't nearly the passer Curry is so it's a ton easier to blitz him.
I bought a boat.
ardee
RealGM
Posts: 15,320
And1: 5,397
Joined: Nov 16, 2011

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#571 » by ardee » Tue Sep 22, 2020 2:20 pm

freethedevil wrote:
ardee wrote:
Eddy_JukeZ wrote:
Kobe in 2001 didn't play at peak Jordan level.

I don't know how the vote went then, but that statement is objectively incorrect.

Kobe has never played to that level.


In the Playoffs he did. 32/7/6 on 60% TS through the entire Western Conference Playoffs while being among the best perimeter defenders in the league. That is objectively peak Jordan level for a good stretch against elite competition.


How did that translate to impacting winning tho?

playoff aupm

Lebron 09
+9.9
08-10
+7.9

01-03 Tim Duncan
+8.1

98-04 Shaq
+6.6

Post prime 97-98 MJ
+6

04 KG
+6
02,3,08 KG
+5.4

13-15 Curry
+5.4

09 Wade +5.2

So how does "objectively peak mj" compare?


08-10 Kobe
+4.4
01 Kobe
+3


Friendly reminder the lakers played at a 56 win pace without kobe in 2000-01. They played 43 win basketball without Shaq.
+4.4

Arbitrary stat line tho.

Why don't you cherrypick his OBPM again?


He had a higher On-Off than Shaq in the Playoffs and they were 15-1. It translated just fine.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#572 » by MyUniBroDavis » Tue Sep 22, 2020 2:42 pm

E-Balla wrote:
freethedevil wrote:
E-Balla wrote:LeBron's best prior to this season maybe. During this season LeBron hasn't played as well as AD is all year for any stretch and his best single game isn't better than AD's either.

there was one game vs houston where it felt like he was protecting the rim even more than ad.

That was a great game but it's not better than AD's best game is what I'm saying. Actually he barely had a better game that day, AD had Westbrook and Harden on lockdown that game and IIRC both guys were playing well when other people other than AD guarded them that night.


I think that its more so that because of what we seen with lebron its fair to give him that benefit of the doubt that he has another level he can hit till he shows he really cant, and i think with how long its been we can give him till the finals. I think this is the first series where AD is blatantly better, portland id give it to bron, houstan id give it to AD but its not by an absurd amount, since id say AD should dominate that matchup more and bron was playing crazy D that series and the way the rockets play make it hard for AD to be as impactful on defense as he normally is

Otoh when it comes to their best, i do think AD might be better in a team built around him than lebron in a team built around him at this point in their careers, but as someone who got hella into the nba when seeing that unibrow commercial, i dont think people get how crazy it is to watch AD do what hes doing now

Like with AD, and in the playoffs before, his best skill was normally his off ball game, and lack of playmaking and pick and roll ball handlers outside of bron made me worried that this part of his game wpuld take a step back

And it did, and it was annoying over the RS, but in the playoffs he just randomly becomes the best on ball scorer big in the nba, and i might take out big lmao. Its kind of insane

With AD his performance and therefor kmpact should be more reliant than bron, because he is supposed to need a good ball handling pick and roll guard, a guy like lillard murray curry or cp3, yet he doesnt and he just of nopes it


I think in context his playoff run has been historic. Like brons not the best partner AD could have in terms pf his individual performance, a guy like cp3/curry/lillard/murray would be better because hed get switched on to smalls

Like when it comes to this series, while jokic is facing a tougher defense with the coming of murray being a guy you need to guard like lillard and curry in the p and r, hes now, in my opinion, in a harden like perfect situation for his talents on offense. Mainly, he has top tier shooting (now that murray is a top shooter), top tier p and r partner thats a small so better switches, and a top tier offensive coach.

When it comes to davis, outside of bron, playof rondo is good but hes still non threat in the pick and roll as a scorer which means they cant run it well since they just focus on AD, outside of that no one can run the pick and roll and everyones g league level at passing, outside of kcp and green, their shooting specialists, and bron, in the bubble they dont have anyone in their rotation who shot above 33.3% from three. Vogels a good coach, incredible on d, but not great on offense

Like they have near league worst shooting now, bad playmaking outside of bron and rondo, rondo who cant score well enough in p and r to be a great partner, and defensice minded coach

Its like when you check the boxes, without bron AD might have the worst constructed team around him in the nba considering his playstyle

I think when evaluating this run you have to consider that while tules have helped players today, the biggest thing is undoubtedly spacing, yet davis is often playing with less spacing than any team remaining in the playoffs.

When you consider how much more effecient davis has been than his positional peers, that this team is poorly constructed in terms of heightening his individual effeciency, that hes a two way guy and and that hes scoring at a genuine historic rate given his minutes and the offense is not built around him like harden or doncic, then i think we have to consider how good this playoff run really is. Like even his passing has been on point.

Like unless he sucks from here on out, i feel like this has to be way up there in big man playoff runs. Idk how much of it is real and how much is fluke because hes shooting really is insane, but i think if he pulls off a great finals series, you have top tier scoring, high tier passing, high tier defense, high creation for a big man, and in terms of effeciency, for a big, pretty much unheard of territory. Doing this on a team built to his original weaknesses only adds to it

Like the tyoical argument against his effeciency is that hes scoring easy buckets so his effeciency should be high, but he has less of a percentage of his possessions cutting (8.2%) and as the roll man (7.6%), than 07 duncan (12.1%% and 7.5%) 2011 dirk (13.6% and 3%)

For a modern day comparison, for a creator, jokic is at 16.9% and 8%, for a off ball big, adebayo at 17.7% and 24%. Embiid last year, 15.5% and 8.4%. Giannis last year, 6.5% and 5.5%, this year, 9.2% and 5.7%, but keep in mind giannis has double the percentage in transition, its higher relative to their half court offense

Ad in the 2018 run was 18.8% and 14.1% so its just kinda wild lol

So its just kind of like, ADs scoring at a really high rate, at an absurdly effecient rate, in a role that isnt effecient not just relative to modern guys but even in the 2000s, since he isnt getting easy buckets (which i forgot to mention but hes better at getting them than anyone, hes effeciency in them blows the others out of the water) despite being in a team that doesnt help his individual performance at all

If it ends in a title and he goes off, i cant think of many big men runs that have been more impressive

Yeah but i still thinj lebrons gonna be better in the finals ngl
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#573 » by MyUniBroDavis » Tue Sep 22, 2020 2:49 pm

eminence wrote:Nurk is fine on the short roll, Lillard just isn't nearly the passer Curry is so it's a ton easier to blitz him.


Dude nurkic on the short rill against us was like a painful experience lol, dame got him the ball and he really couldnt deliver at all, and then lillard got triggered and made dumb plays

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=PposSiQG3SI 2 minute mark

Even if hes fine regularly he really wasnt at all against us, or in the few games he played today

Last year he was ok as a scorer in the roll to the rim and as a post playmaker but his short roll passing wasnt that great iirc, might be misremembering
freethedevil
Head Coach
Posts: 7,262
And1: 3,237
Joined: Dec 09, 2018
         

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#574 » by freethedevil » Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:14 am

ardee wrote:
freethedevil wrote:
ardee wrote:
In the Playoffs he did. 32/7/6 on 60% TS through the entire Western Conference Playoffs while being among the best perimeter defenders in the league. That is objectively peak Jordan level for a good stretch against elite competition.


How did that translate to impacting winning tho?

playoff aupm

Lebron 09
+9.9
08-10
+7.9

01-03 Tim Duncan
+8.1

98-04 Shaq
+6.6

Post prime 97-98 MJ
+6

04 KG
+6
02,3,08 KG
+5.4

13-15 Curry
+5.4

09 Wade +5.2

So how does "objectively peak mj" compare?


08-10 Kobe
+4.4
01 Kobe
+3


Friendly reminder the lakers played at a 56 win pace without kobe in 2000-01. They played 43 win basketball without Shaq.
+4.4

Arbitrary stat line tho.

Why don't you cherrypick his OBPM again?


He had a higher On-Off than Shaq in the Playoffs and they were 15-1. It translated just fine.

on/off? you mean a stat that measures lineups and not induviduals since it doesn't, wait for it, adjust for lineups?
Surely you wouldn't dare argue kobe was better than nash in 07 since he lost, given that team data is apparently interchangable with induvidual data.

Lmao.
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,135
And1: 6,787
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#575 » by Jaivl » Wed Sep 23, 2020 9:36 am

ardee wrote:
Eddy_JukeZ wrote:
ardee wrote:
It has in 2001.

RealGM voted Kobe 3 but let's be real, this board even now doesn't treat Kobe fairly and some of the posters from back then were even more anti-Kobe.

I don't see how anyone can watch the 2001 Playoffs in their entirety and conclude that Duncan was better than Kobe that year.... because you'd be saying non-peak Duncan is better than someone who played at peak Jordan level.


Kobe in 2001 didn't play at peak Jordan level.

I don't know how the vote went then, but that statement is objectively incorrect.

Kobe has never played to that level.


In the Playoffs he did. 32/7/6 on 60% TS through the entire Western Conference Playoffs while being among the best perimeter defenders in the league. That is objectively peak Jordan level for a good stretch against elite competition.

That's like... an average Jordan year, not really peak 15-game Jordan.
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
mikejames23
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,604
And1: 745
Joined: Nov 28, 2012
         

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#576 » by mikejames23 » Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:49 pm

Found this pretty useful:

Clutch Leaders

1. Giannis
2. Embiid
3. Morant
4. D'Angelo
5. Fox

No surprise really. Giannis and Embiid rocking the show.

On/Off Court

1. Giannis
2. Paul
3. Tatum
4. James
5. Millsap

Haven't discussed Tatum in Top 5, though he's always been outstanding. Paul Millsap can't do what he used to, but is still valued at the Top of +/- ratings.

Team Won-Lost Close Games

1. Milwaukee
2. Utah
3. OKC
4. LAL
5. Denver

Milwaukee is a king in some of these RS stats. Truly impressive.

So Milwaukee/Giannis dominate all the stats in general. Not a big surprise. He's def. a lock for my Top 5.

Highest playoff +/- in recent years. NBA's true death lineups:

1. Billups/Rip/Prince/R.Wallace/B.Wallace
2. K. Irving/J.Smith/L.James/K.Love/T.Thompson
3. G. Hill/L.Stephenson/P.George/D.West/R.Hibbert
4. J.Kidd/J.Terry/S. Marion/Dirk/T.Chandler
5. D.Fisher/K.Bryant/R.Fox/R.Horry/Shaq

For an all time sense, some of the best lineups ever played. Loved this.

All sourced from 82games.com, a leader in stats.

http://www.82games.com/index.htm
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#577 » by HeartBreakKid » Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:14 pm

E-Balla wrote:
freethedevil wrote:nice cherrypick. did you forget when he lost them game 5? or when he disappeared in game 3? Butler was inconsistent as ****. Bam's defense was constant and he was conssitently keeping giannis in check on the other end of the floor. Bam was the most pivotal part of series. Heat aren't the raptors on the perimiter, but bam made sure it didn't matter. No one else in the league could have done the job bam did on giannis save for maybe ad and simmons. And he was as effecient as jimmy in terms of scoring despite having to deal the most with the bucks best defensively. Butler's game 1 4th quarter explosion by contrast came largely by feasting on corver and pat. BAm on the other hand was forcing giannis to choose between allowing a dunk or getting sent flying all series.

Also, why are you talking about how bam should be feasting against the celtics but ignoring that he also feasted on the bucks?

Butler can get bonus points for leadership or whatever, but bam's clearly the more valuable player.

Agreed on lebron though.

You're saying Jimmy lost them game 4 because he only scored 17 when Bam averaged 17 a night against Milwaukee. :lol: Jimmy isn't a scorer, he's a do what he needs to do to winner. Bam wasn't feasting on the Bucks he feasted in games 3 and 4. The other 3 games he was good but was just another guy in their ensemble cast.

I mean so is Bam, he is most definitely not a scorer.
User avatar
Rapcity_11
RealGM
Posts: 24,805
And1: 9,694
Joined: Jul 26, 2006
     

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#578 » by Rapcity_11 » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:14 pm

ardee wrote:
Eddy_JukeZ wrote:
ardee wrote:
It has in 2001.

RealGM voted Kobe 3 but let's be real, this board even now doesn't treat Kobe fairly and some of the posters from back then were even more anti-Kobe.

I don't see how anyone can watch the 2001 Playoffs in their entirety and conclude that Duncan was better than Kobe that year.... because you'd be saying non-peak Duncan is better than someone who played at peak Jordan level.


Kobe in 2001 didn't play at peak Jordan level.

I don't know how the vote went then, but that statement is objectively incorrect.

Kobe has never played to that level.


In the Playoffs he did. 32/7/6 on 60% TS through the entire Western Conference Playoffs while being among the best perimeter defenders in the league. That is objectively peak Jordan level for a good stretch against elite competition.


Why are you excluding the finals?

Also, it was 57.7% TS, nice try rounding that up to 60%.
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,822
And1: 25,116
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#579 » by E-Balla » Wed Sep 23, 2020 10:58 pm

HeartBreakKid wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
freethedevil wrote:nice cherrypick. did you forget when he lost them game 5? or when he disappeared in game 3? Butler was inconsistent as ****. Bam's defense was constant and he was conssitently keeping giannis in check on the other end of the floor. Bam was the most pivotal part of series. Heat aren't the raptors on the perimiter, but bam made sure it didn't matter. No one else in the league could have done the job bam did on giannis save for maybe ad and simmons. And he was as effecient as jimmy in terms of scoring despite having to deal the most with the bucks best defensively. Butler's game 1 4th quarter explosion by contrast came largely by feasting on corver and pat. BAm on the other hand was forcing giannis to choose between allowing a dunk or getting sent flying all series.

Also, why are you talking about how bam should be feasting against the celtics but ignoring that he also feasted on the bucks?

Butler can get bonus points for leadership or whatever, but bam's clearly the more valuable player.

Agreed on lebron though.

You're saying Jimmy lost them game 4 because he only scored 17 when Bam averaged 17 a night against Milwaukee. :lol: Jimmy isn't a scorer, he's a do what he needs to do to winner. Bam wasn't feasting on the Bucks he feasted in games 3 and 4. The other 3 games he was good but was just another guy in their ensemble cast.

I mean so is Bam, he is most definitely not a scorer.

Which is why I'm not saying Bam lost them a game. This isn't relevant to my point about Jimmy.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: 2019-2020 Player of the Year Discussion Thread 

Post#580 » by HeartBreakKid » Thu Sep 24, 2020 12:51 am

E-Balla wrote:
HeartBreakKid wrote:
E-Balla wrote:You're saying Jimmy lost them game 4 because he only scored 17 when Bam averaged 17 a night against Milwaukee. :lol: Jimmy isn't a scorer, he's a do what he needs to do to winner. Bam wasn't feasting on the Bucks he feasted in games 3 and 4. The other 3 games he was good but was just another guy in their ensemble cast.

I mean so is Bam, he is most definitely not a scorer.

Which is why I'm not saying Bam lost them a game. This isn't relevant to my point about Jimmy.

gotcha, i figured.

Return to Player Comparisons