The case for Shaq 2000 as the GOAT Peak

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

GreenHat
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,985
And1: 340
Joined: Jan 01, 2011

Re: The case for Shaq 2000 as the GOAT Peak 

Post#61 » by GreenHat » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:53 pm

FuShengTHEGreat wrote:
GreenHat wrote:So Shaq would have been better off in in your mind losing earlier in the playoffs like Hakeem did than to the Spurs. That makes so much sense.


Yeah its kinda hard to lose earlier in the playoffs as you say when your best years are spent with peak Penny, Kobe Bryant and Dwayne Wade in succession. And yet still he couldn't be bothered to stay playing with any of these guys. In addition to burning bridges with 2 of the 3 greatest coaches in NBA history.....in succession.

Yeah I'm sure he'd have lost a lot less earlier in his best years with Clyde in his twighlight, Vernon "jailbird" Maxwell and Sleepy the chucker Floyd.

Ironic thing is, Shaq lost a lot earlier than Hakeem in the 95 Finals. :lol:


Teams aren't as good as the second best player on their team. Look at the whole roster not just the name of the second leading scorer.

If you read this thread you would see how good that Laker team even with peak Kobe was without Shaq. That's kind of the point of the thread.

Also Shaq's best season was played with a 21 yr old far from his prime Kobe and he had several great years with out peak seasons from the guys you mentioned. You're either not informed or lying.

Speaking of you being misinformed, you think Shaq burned the bridge with Phil? Phil wanted Kobe gone. From his own book:

Now I was the one who was angry. I went upstairs to see Mitch in his office. Wasting no time, I went off on a tirade about the need to deal Kobe before the trading deadline in mid-February. “I won’t coach this team next year if he is still here,” I said emphatically. “He won’t listen to anyone. I’ve had it with this kid.” My monologue-Mitch barely said a word at first-reminded me of similar eruption in the middle of my first year when I presented what I thought was a very logical argument for trading Kobe at that time.


Hakeem lost in the first round a lot and you say Shaq would have lost a lot earlier than him? Somehow I don't see Shaq being on a perennial lottery team.

That Drexler in his "twighlight" was 32 yrs old (same age as Hakeem) and still a great player. Did you even watch the Rockets in '95? It seems like you didn't.

Not to mention the whole team getting hot from three. Not hard to win when you have Drexler and then have the rest of your team get hot from three. The role players shot 43% against the Magic and all of them shot 40% from 3 in the playoffs. You bring up '95 Finals but it was Hakeem's teammates that outplayed Shaq's in that series.
Your emotions fuel the narratives that you create. You see what you want to see. You believe what you want to believe. You ascribe meaning when it is not there. You create significance when it is not present.
LAKERS_1981
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,675
And1: 41
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: The case for Shaq 2000 as the GOAT Peak 

Post#62 » by LAKERS_1981 » Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:20 pm

SHAQ 2000 is the GOAT peak in my book.

Dont just look at stats, just watch the game. He was killing people down low he was a physical monster and we will not see another player like him.

p.s i was not saying he was the GOAT player just that for one season he was the best player i have ever seen.
Lakers 72,80,82,85,87,88,00,01,02,09 and 10 champions
90sAllDecade
Starter
Posts: 2,264
And1: 818
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
Location: Clutch City, Texas
   

Re: The case for Shaq 2000 as the GOAT Peak 

Post#63 » by 90sAllDecade » Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:16 pm

GreenHat wrote:How is .5 a slight difference when one guy has 2.8? That's nearly 20% more. We're talking about 200+ games that's more than 100 extra turnovers.


Okay, whatever language you prefer.

Shaq played less regular season games so he had a .4 rebound advantage, thats 3% more, 88 extra boards. Shaq had a 1.6 point advantage, thats 6% more, 352 extra points. Hakeem had .5 more turnovers, thats 18% more, 117 extra turnovers.

But Hakeem played a 14 game larger sample with 327 more minutes (better health or stamina?), so his advantages are increased too. Hakeem had a 1.2 edge in blocks about a 30% more. So 234 games, that's 280 extra blocks. Hakeem had a l.2 edge in steals about 30% more. 234 games, that's 280 extra steals

I'll get to Hakeem's great defensive advantage below.

You also use Hakeem winning DPOY as evidence of his defense but ignore that Shaq finished second in the same award. DPOY isn't a great indicator but at least decide if you want it to be used as evidence or not.


Fair enough and actually I don't put much stock in accolades at all, I just use them to get broad strokes of a player's contribution that year. The flaw is that other great players weren't competing for the same award during peak years, among other inaccuracies. So, we'll hash out who you think was better defensively those three year peaks.

How would you like to measure their defense? I'll use everything I can think of. Since they both played center, the most important team defensive position and their peaks were only 4 years apart, they are easier to compare. Green indicates categories when a player is better than the other, Red indicates worse in comparsion, Bold is a tie.

Defense Shaq 99'-02' vs. Hakeem 92'-95'

Hakeem Regular Season

Def. Reb: 9.0
DRB% 24.2
Blks: 3.8
Steals: 1.8

Team Opp ppg Rank: 3rd (93'), 5th (94'), 14th (95')
Team Drtg rank: 2nd (94'), 3rd (93'), 12th (95')

Shaq Regular Season

Def. Reb: 8.5
DRB% 23.9
Blks: 2.6
Steals: 0.6

Team Opp ppg Rank: 6th (00'), 9th (02'), 23rd (01')
Team Drtg rank: 1st (00'), 7th (02'), 21st (01')

Hakeem Playoffs

Def. Reb: 8.7
DRB% 22.2
Blks: 3.7
Steals: 1.5

Team Opp ppg Rank: 3rd (93'), 7th (94'), 12th (95')
Team Drtg rank: 3rd (94'), 6th (93'), 9th (95')

Shaq Playoffs

Def. Reb: 9.7
DRB% 25.5
Blks: 2.4
Steals: 0.5

Team Opp ppg Rank: 3rd (01'), 7th (02'), 15th (00')
Team Drtg rank: 1st (01'), 7th (02'), 13th (00')

And to help account for teammate help or hindrance and pace for Drtg.

Rockets Drtg vs 92'-95' Hakeem

105.2 - 96 (-9.2 diff)
101.4 - 95 (-6.4 diff)
107.4 - 100 (-7.4 diff)
Total avg Drtg: -7.6

Lakers Drtg vs 99'-02' Shaq

98.2 - 95 (-3.2 diff)
104.8 - 101 (-3.8 diff)
101.7 - 99 (-2.7 diff)
Total avg Drtg: -3.2

Playoffs

Rockets Drtg vs 92'-95' Hakeem


104.8 - 97 (-7.8 diff)
104.1 - 97 (-7.1 diff)
112.2 - 108 (-4.2 diff)
Total avg Drtg: -6.36

Lakers Drtg vs 99'-02' Shaq

107.5 - 104 (-3.5 diff)
97.9 - 96 (-1.9 diff)
102.3 - 99 (-3.3 diff)
Total avg Drtg: -2.9

So not only was Hakeem better in just about every defensive category, he also had less defensive help than Shaq and also faced tougher competition. Once again, Shaq is not close in his peak years.

You use TS% which clearly understates the overall efficiency of bad free throw shooters who are intentionally fouled. Its curious that you would use basic box score stats for everything but then switch to TS% when its convenient for Hakeem.


I don't use certain advanced stats, because they often lack context in comparisons. So you can think of them in the comparisons I used above too. (I want to note that I don't like using team based stats for a player, so that's why I subtracted their individual Drtg.)

Defensive rating is useful only in the context of a season, because pace can alter it. So it's good for in season rankings versus competition but poor for comparing raw numbers differnet seasons, especially individual players. So I used league rankings in season versus competition.

Defensive winshares and winshares in general are team based stats that if you have a stronger roster, you'll get more wins and increase your winshare totals. They also don't acccount for beating weaker competition. It is useful for within team comparisons within a season.

PER is a primarily offensive stat and unreliable for measuring defense as well as other flaws.

TS% as far as I know is one of the most reliable stats for measuring overall offensive shooting percentages. Shaq was a bad free throw shooter, it's a weakness in his offensive game and should be accounted for in comparsions imo. I also showed Shaq's advantage in TS% in the regular season.

Not only was Shaq a better rebounder but he was also a lot better on the offensive glass. No easy boards or stealing rebounds from your teammates there.

Also not sure why you are looking at an arbitrary length of time that is cherry picked to fit Hakeem.


It includes Hakeem's defensive peak and offensive peak. Shaq peaked in both one year, Hakeem peaked in different years. This is Shaq's best three year span, "three-peat" Shaq versus Hakeem's three year peak.

It can be argued only using one year in thier careers and not including Hakeem's offensive and defensive peaks in a smaller sample comparison is arbitrary.

I'll acknowledge Shaq had a slightly better single year, (but it's kind of a wash when you include defense, team support and competition) but Hakeem had better peak years overall and was a better player in combined impact.
NBA TV Clutch City Documentary Trailer:
https://vimeo.com/134215151
FuShengTHEGreat
Analyst
Posts: 3,091
And1: 1,467
Joined: Jan 02, 2010

Re: The case for Shaq 2000 as the GOAT Peak 

Post#64 » by FuShengTHEGreat » Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:45 am

GreenHat wrote:Hakeem lost in the first round a lot and you say Shaq would have lost a lot earlier than him? Somehow I don't see Shaq being on a perennial lottery team.

That Drexler in his "twighlight" was 32 yrs old (same age as Hakeem) and still a great player. Did you even watch the Rockets in '95? It seems like you didn't.

Not to mention the whole team getting hot from three. Not hard to win when you have Drexler and then have the rest of your team get hot from three. The role players shot 43% against the Magic and all of them shot 40% from 3 in the playoffs. You bring up '95 Finals but it was Hakeem's teammates that outplayed Shaq's in that series.


Yeah of course you don't see Shaq being on a perennial lottery team. As his career showed he ran aplenty from teams better built than those 80s/90s HOU teams when things didn't go his way. You can post all the FGA's, teamates stepping up, yadda, but at the end of the day your boy still was outplayed. There are quite a few times during Shaq's title years where he didn't step up and had people carrying his bags.

Hakeem n' Clyde didn't even have a full 2 months of reg season ball together, and that team was struggling with chemistry issues so no it isn't as straightforward as you make it to be with your "Clyde was still a great player" statement. He was playing the worst ball of his career prior(excluding his rookie season) to being shipped out of Portland. A lot of HOF duos took time to gel before they won a NBA title. Duncan n Drob didn't win a ring together off the bat. Kobe n Shaq didn't win in their first 3 years together. MJ and Scottie didn't win in their first 3 years either. DWade n' LBJ failed in their 1st attempt.
User avatar
RayBan-Sematra
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,236
And1: 911
Joined: Oct 03, 2012

Re: The case for Shaq 2000 as the GOAT Peak 

Post#65 » by RayBan-Sematra » Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:57 am

FuShengTHEGreat wrote:As his career showed he ran aplenty from teams better built than those 80s/90s HOU teams when things didn't go his way.

Shaq spent the majority of his useful career (93-06) on two franchises.
And he left Orlando because they disrespected him and low balled him financially.

While obviously his move to LAL was also partly due to things he desired from a media perspective Orlando truly did the exact opposite of what a smart franchise would do when trying to keep a once in a generation type star player.

There are quite a few times during Shaq's title years where he didn't step up and had people carrying his bags.

Shaq was the best player and playoff performer in the league for 3 of his 4 titles and was dominant in the first three rounds of the playoffs and he was "very good" in 3/4 Finals wins in 2006.

Doesn't sound like he was being carried.
FuShengTHEGreat
Analyst
Posts: 3,091
And1: 1,467
Joined: Jan 02, 2010

Re: The case for Shaq 2000 as the GOAT Peak 

Post#66 » by FuShengTHEGreat » Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:01 am

GreenHat wrote:Teams aren't as good as the second best player on their team. Look at the whole roster not just the name of the second leading scorer.

If you read this thread you would see how good that Laker team even with peak Kobe was without Shaq. That's kind of the point of the thread.Also Shaq's best season was played with a 21 yr old far from his prime Kobe and he had several great years with out peak seasons from the guys you mentioned. You're either not informed or lying


Yeah who couldn't win in the playoffs with role players that won a combined 10 NBA titles before they even played a minute with Shaq?
colts18
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 3,255
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: The case for Shaq 2000 as the GOAT Peak 

Post#67 » by colts18 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:32 pm

FuShengTHEGreat wrote:Yeah who couldn't win in the playoffs with role players that won a combined 10 NBA titles before they even played a minute with Shaq?

And how many of those titles did the role players play a huge part in?
Gregoire
Analyst
Posts: 3,529
And1: 669
Joined: Jul 29, 2012

Re: The case for Shaq 2000 as the GOAT Peak 

Post#68 » by Gregoire » Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:50 am

MJ clearly had better peak. And Kareem, Wilt,Hakeem and current Lebron had the case over Shaq. But in my book his peak in second (shared with Wilt)
Heej wrote:
These no calls on LeBron are crazy. A lot of stars got foul calls to protect them.
falcolombardi wrote:
Come playoffs 18 lebron beats any version of jordan
AEnigma wrote:
Jordan is not as smart a help defender as Kidd

Return to Player Comparisons