#3 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

ThaRegul8r
Head Coach
Posts: 6,448
And1: 3,037
Joined: Jan 12, 2006
   

Re: #3 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#61 » by ThaRegul8r » Fri Jan 4, 2019 2:44 am

Dr Positivity wrote:Thurmond claimed he blocked the second most shots in history after Russell and has a handful of 10 block games recorded by newspapers.


Eh, I'm aware of the quote, of course, but that should be taken with a big grain of salt.

These are the facts:

Wilt played less than 72 games in a year all of once in his 14-year career, and averaged 45.8 minutes a game.

Thurmond played 65 games in '66-67, 51 the next year, 43 in '69-70, 62 in '73-74, and 49 in '76-77, and averaged 37.2 minutes a game for his 14-year career.

Unless one is going to assert that Thurmond averaged more blocks a game than both Wilt or Russell in order to make up for the fact that Thurmond played less games (81—an entire season's worth) and less minutes (11,978) than Wilt in the same amount of time in the league to finish behind Russell and ahead of Wilt, I'm not sure why one would take that seriously.

One has to evaluate things that are said, and use the ones that are actually helpful in increasing understanding of historical players, and disregard the rest. Based on the above facts, he didn't block more shots than Wilt in less time on the court and less games played in the same amount of years.

And whether it was true or not, that wouldn't be what the case for how good he was defensively would rest on.

cecilthesheep wrote:I knew Thurmond was great, but I didn't realize that his defensive reputation among his contemporaries outpaced Wilt so far as to actually rival Russell.


Thurmond was regarded as second only to Russell defensively during the time they both played concurrently, and both were above Wilt.
I remember your posts from the RPOY project, you consistently brought it. Please continue to do so, sir. This board needs guys like you to counteract ... worthless posters


Retirement isn’t the end of the road, but just a turn in the road. – Unknown
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,739
And1: 3,199
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: #3 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#62 » by Owly » Fri Jan 4, 2019 4:22 pm

FrogBros4Life wrote:
Owly wrote:
FrogBros4Life wrote:

Unseld didn't have amazing defensive box score stats, but he's another one of those players that I think has a value greater than what is captured numerically. Despite that, he did lead the NBA in DBPM for 2 years (it wasn't tracked his first 5 years in the league), and had a DRTG between 97 and 88 for the first 5 years it was kept (and again, there is no data for his first 5 years in the league).

His team defensive data for their best 5 year stretch:

72-73: OppPPG=4th, TeamDRTG= 5th
73-74: OppPPG=5th, TeamDRTG=4th
74-75: OppPPG=2nd, TeamDRTG=1st
75-76: OppPPG=3rd, TeamDRTG=2nd
76-77: OppPPG=6th, TeamDRTG=8th

And they weren't bad in the years before or after.

On top of that, I think Unseld is probably one of the top 5 guys ever in terms of boxing out (a crucial factor in team defense), and he might be the best defensive communicator in the history of the game. It's possible I may be overstating Unseld's defensive contributions somewhat, but your response seems to indicate you are vastly under rating him in that area.

Every one of those defenses are after Hayes arrived.

In '74 the rotation is mostly the same (Riordan, Hayes, Chenier, Clark and Unseld. Porters minutes come up. Stallworth falls out of the rotation, Weatherspoon edges into it). K.C. Jones replaces Gene Shue as coach. They move from Baltimore to Washington. Unseld's minutes go down by more than 1300 due to an injury and when active his play was diminished, including notably on defense...

[Team defense section] Unseld's injury allowed forwards and centers to go around him. A lot will depend on whether he can make a full recovery.

The player section notes the knee injuries and contemplating retirement during the season. And the Bullets defense ... stayed the same. And those minutes appear to be going to ... Manny Leaks? To be fair they improve with Unseld healthy the next year and a more set rotation but on even factoring this in this isn't the picture of an elite, high impact defender (cf: see Robinson, David and team performance without him).

That isn't to say he isn't a good defender but it's hard for me to buy him as the big causal factor (versus Hayes) rather than a complementary piece. And a solid, good complementary piece isn't remotely comparable to the guys discussed here. That's that Unseld was most of his career.

And, so far as I can tell, Unseld's DBPM is as high as it is because of assists, which is one of the reasons I'm very, very hesitant in putting any serious trust in it as a metric.

He's got year one where him taking minutes off Ray Scott and Leroy Ellis (and taking Bob Ferry out of the rotation) really improves the D (the one season where we see a big impact, and a case for best defender on a really good defensive team). Then another good but much closer to the pack year (2.1 points per 100 possessions above average). Then they're pretty average until Hayes' arrival. In '80 his final full season they're a below above average on D (0.4 worse per 100 poss than league average). He goes down to circa 2000 minutes in '81 and they improve (+2.8) and then get even better when Unseld retires (+4.4)

As ever there'll be plenty of noise in year-to-year comps. But there's nothing there that says Unseld was generally elite. Nothing that says Hayes wasn't the driving force.

Fwiw, I've not read anything (that I can recall) saying he's an elite defensive communicator, do you have any sources you could share on that? (I do consider him an elite team rebounder, that just isn't nearly enough to warrant being in the same area code as Robinson).


The Bullets best years defensively during Unseld's career may have come with Hayes on the roster, but they went from a league average defensive team, to a strong defensive team, in Unseld's rookie season without changing much else of the roster. They were one of the best defenses in the league for 3 of Unseld's first 5 years...all without Hayes. I'm pretty comfortable in saying that Unseld was the backbone of their team D, though obviously Hayes was a vital cog in that as well once he arrived. Also...you claim that Unseld's DBPM is as good as it is because of his assist numbers, but wouldn't that be captured in his OBPM? Am I misinterpreting some of the data?

I could not find any journalistic sources that specifically state that Unseld was a great on court communicator, but there are numerous quotes out there from former teammates, future players, biographers etc. who all note how invaluable he was due to things like his on court leadership, his Bball IQ, and his team oriented approach to the game. I can't use that as irrefutable evidence, but those are obviously (some of) the characteristics you would expect to find in someone who was a great defensive communicator.

I did however find some old threads on RealGM about Unseld where some other posters who saw him play also noted his communication as a major strength. I'm sure there are still some posters here who can corroborate that about him as well.

I believe Hayes has far greater evidence of impact on arrival and leaving teams. I believe some of this is covered in votes for him in the RealGM 100 (viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1634894&p=60146723#p60146723 -I think there has been more, perhaps in earlier threads, but Hayes moved the defensive needle far more). Thus I would strongly disagree with the characterisation as Unseld as the backbone and Hayes as a cog.

You have them as a good defensive team "for 3 of Unseld's first 5 years...all without Hayes" this is incorrect in that in year 5 of Hayes and Unseld's careers they are both on the Bullets - this also takes away one of your good defensive years making it 2 out of 4. Also "one of the league's best defensive teams" means relatively little if they aren't actually distancing themselves from the pack. Unseld has year 1 as one piece of evidence that for one year he really impacted a good defensive team. Year 2 and they're 3rd (of 14 - 4 of whom are recent expansion teams, so even that's pulling the average down) but at +2.1 ... it's good (though as before expansion) but even if you were that good at both ends a +4.2 doesn't really typically make you a legitimate contender (assuming that represents the team's full health goodness - teams winning titles from this range tend to have been injury struck in the RS). So just +2.1, it's good but it's not taking you anywhere by itself.

Using DBPM without knowing it's inputs is ... unfortunate. Now DBPM isn't the easiest to understand (I won't claim to fully) but yes assists is part of it (it's part of the offense part too). Take a look at how it measures out Alonzo Mourning (2.3 career DBPM) versus say Nikola Jokic (2.5 DDPM), Alvan Adams (2.3 DBPM), Oliver Miller (3.3 DBPM), Tom Boerwinkle (2.5 DBPM) and Rich Kelley (2.8 DBPM) and Sam Lacey (3.9 DBPM) and tell me with a straight face that you want to use that as a core part of support for Unseld and that it doesn't have a blindspot for passing big-men and .... well, yeah. Its infatuation with a combination of rebounding and assists leads it to believe that Russell Westbrook is presently the best defender in the league and (at 5.4 DBPM) is having a better defensive season than Dikembe Mutombo ever did.

The qualities you list could be present in an elite defensive communicator, indeed they probably would be. That he has some things useful, arguably necessary does not mean he has all the things sufficient for it and thus far I've seen nothing saying that he was.
countryboy667
Pro Prospect
Posts: 771
And1: 338
Joined: Jun 07, 2015
       

Re: #3 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#63 » by countryboy667 » Fri Jan 4, 2019 5:35 pm

Samurai wrote:
countryboy667 wrote:Once again, Olajowon gets overrated to hell and back... :roll:

If you want to have greater impact, I would encourage you to actually vote in this project. From what I can tell, many of the voters have not seen the great players of the 60's and even 70's; having that perspective greatly adds to the diversity of voters and can improve the product of these types of projects.


The votes of "old men yelling at clouds" (as (I've seen it described) means nothing==less than nothing--to the younger persons on this site. As far as the millennials are concerned, they live in the best of all possible worlds and the old timers aren't worthy of respect compared to today's ubermensch

Wilt was easily the greatest when motivated, but he wasn't always motivated--Russell said something like this about Wilt--you gave the man his props because you didn't want to piss him off--If you did, you paid the price.

Consistently? slightly different styles, but I'd put it between Russell and Thurmond with David Robinson and Artis Gilmore a bit behind those two.

It's hard for me to talk about active players because I only see Pacer games these days, and that pretty seldom. A bit more recently than
the ones above, Ben Wallace was good. So was Bill Walton.

The Turner kid the Pacers have today is developing into a very good one, something a lot of posters here seem not to have noticed. But then very few posters here seem to have any time to talk about any team not in the West.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,513
And1: 10,004
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: #3 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#64 » by penbeast0 » Fri Jan 4, 2019 6:17 pm

ThaRegul8r wrote:
Thurmond was regarded as second only to Russell defensively during the time they both played concurrently, and both were above Wilt.



Let's break that down a little.

64, 65 Wilt was certainly the primary defender on the Warriors, playing the center position with Nate more a rich man's Clyde Lee role at PF.

66, 67, 68 Wilt left SF in 65 with the 64 Warriors having been the 2nd best defensive team to join Philly, the 7th best (out of 9). That season everyone was very impressed with Nate's transition to C but it was certainly not consensus that Nate was the better defender. Ignoring 65 where Wilt played half the season in SF and Nate half at C, the next 3 seasons, Wilt pushed Philly to be a better defensive team than Nate pushed SF. Wilt was the man, with the established stardom, and was getting credit for being a greater defensive force than ever before (or playing more like Russell) in Alex Hannum's offense. Hard to imagine that there was a strong consensus that Nate was better. I will say that both were getting a lot of recognition for being the two other great defensive forces in the league behind Russell.

69 The Warriors defense slipped a little to 5th (out of 14). Wilt's move to the Lakers was very controversial and the Lakers defense wasn't impressive (8/14) as everyone was more worried about Wilt fitting with the new team. This is the 1st year I can see Thurmond's defense being consensus better than Wilt.

70 Wilt only played 12 games due to injury, Nate only played 43. This year, like 65, didn't cement either of their reputations.

71 Wilt's last year as a 20 ppg scorer, the two teams were 5th (SF) and 8th (LA) in defensive rating. I would see Nate as probably having the rep as having passed Wilt defensively although with Russell out, new heros like Willis Reed were emerging and getting a lot of the spotlight.

72 Wilt gave up scoring to focus solely on defense. Elgin Baylor goes down and yet the Lakers dominate the league winning the title easily with Wilt almost certainly getting the credit for the much improved defense (2/17) while GS has a good year in their shadow but not as good (4/17). I'm not suggest the defensive ratings informed the popular opinion all that much but they do show a bit of how effective the actual defense was and that tended to carry over into the media accounts. I would guess that there are a lot of articles about Wilt's defensive style and how he is again the best defender in the league but this wouldn't be nearly as strong an opinion as many now make it; I would guess the popular opinion is again split.

73 Lakers again better defensively than the Warriors; Wilt again focusing almost all his attention on defense. Popular opinion (as I remember it and thinking about their respective narratives) again split.

74 Wilt agrees to go to the ABA (never ended up playing there). Warriors slip back to mediocre defense though with Rick Barry and Cazzie Russell on the wings, not a lot of perimeter defense being played (interior defense has not only Nate but also Clyde Lee and George Johnson, both with excellent defensive reps). Warriors felt Thurmond was slipping enough (his scoring was down to 13.0 from 20.0 in 71) that they were willing to send him to Chicago after the season for Cliff Ray, he was 32 and this was probably the last year he was really thought of as a dominant defender, especially when his new teams were disappointing (for various reasons).

So, I have it as

Thurmond's rookie year 64, certainly Wilt
65 and 71 wasted seasons in terms of comparing the two.
66-68 Wilt still probably has the bigger defensive rep although Thurmond challenging him, this would most likely be the period where ThaRegul8r and I disagree and I was pretty young and at best a casual fan until 69 but I don't see it, especially with 67.
70 Thurmond takes over as the acknowledge best defensive center in the league with Russell retiring and Wilt moving to LA
72-73 Wilt's defensive resurgence. A lot of argument, very little consensus on who is better defensively although team stats may imply Wilt.
74 Wilt retires, Thurmond's late year of defensive prime (post offensive prime).
75+ Thurmond seen as disappointing though still a strong defender.

I don't see the statement that Thurmond was seen as better when the two were contemporaries as accurate. You might compare each player's first 5 years and say Thurmond had a better rep his first 5 years but you would have to acknowledge Wilt's better rep his last few. Wilt was also always the better rebounder (by numbers) and played the bigger minutes.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Samurai
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 3,137
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
     

Re: #3 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#65 » by Samurai » Fri Jan 4, 2019 6:41 pm

countryboy667 wrote:
Samurai wrote:
countryboy667 wrote:Once again, Olajowon gets overrated to hell and back... :roll:

If you want to have greater impact, I would encourage you to actually vote in this project. From what I can tell, many of the voters have not seen the great players of the 60's and even 70's; having that perspective greatly adds to the diversity of voters and can improve the product of these types of projects.


The votes of "old men yelling at clouds" (as (I've seen it described) means nothing==less than nothing--to the younger persons on this site. As far as the millennials are concerned, they live in the best of all possible worlds and the old timers aren't worthy of respect compared to today's ubermensch

In terms of discussion, I'm sure that some posters who have never seen the greats of yesteryear will not listen to those of us who have seen them. But in a project like this, your vote has the same weight as a voter still in high school. Each vote counts the same, so I think your vote is an important input.
FrogBros4Life
Sophomore
Posts: 138
And1: 155
Joined: Dec 30, 2018

Re: #3 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#66 » by FrogBros4Life » Sat Jan 5, 2019 3:07 am

Owly wrote:
FrogBros4Life wrote:
Owly wrote:Every one of those defenses are after Hayes arrived.

In '74 the rotation is mostly the same (Riordan, Hayes, Chenier, Clark and Unseld. Porters minutes come up. Stallworth falls out of the rotation, Weatherspoon edges into it). K.C. Jones replaces Gene Shue as coach. They move from Baltimore to Washington. Unseld's minutes go down by more than 1300 due to an injury and when active his play was diminished, including notably on defense...


The player section notes the knee injuries and contemplating retirement during the season. And the Bullets defense ... stayed the same. And those minutes appear to be going to ... Manny Leaks? To be fair they improve with Unseld healthy the next year and a more set rotation but on even factoring this in this isn't the picture of an elite, high impact defender (cf: see Robinson, David and team performance without him).

That isn't to say he isn't a good defender but it's hard for me to buy him as the big causal factor (versus Hayes) rather than a complementary piece. And a solid, good complementary piece isn't remotely comparable to the guys discussed here. That's that Unseld was most of his career.

And, so far as I can tell, Unseld's DBPM is as high as it is because of assists, which is one of the reasons I'm very, very hesitant in putting any serious trust in it as a metric.

He's got year one where him taking minutes off Ray Scott and Leroy Ellis (and taking Bob Ferry out of the rotation) really improves the D (the one season where we see a big impact, and a case for best defender on a really good defensive team). Then another good but much closer to the pack year (2.1 points per 100 possessions above average). Then they're pretty average until Hayes' arrival. In '80 his final full season they're a below above average on D (0.4 worse per 100 poss than league average). He goes down to circa 2000 minutes in '81 and they improve (+2.8) and then get even better when Unseld retires (+4.4)

As ever there'll be plenty of noise in year-to-year comps. But there's nothing there that says Unseld was generally elite. Nothing that says Hayes wasn't the driving force.

Fwiw, I've not read anything (that I can recall) saying he's an elite defensive communicator, do you have any sources you could share on that? (I do consider him an elite team rebounder, that just isn't nearly enough to warrant being in the same area code as Robinson).


The Bullets best years defensively during Unseld's career may have come with Hayes on the roster, but they went from a league average defensive team, to a strong defensive team, in Unseld's rookie season without changing much else of the roster. They were one of the best defenses in the league for 3 of Unseld's first 5 years...all without Hayes. I'm pretty comfortable in saying that Unseld was the backbone of their team D, though obviously Hayes was a vital cog in that as well once he arrived. Also...you claim that Unseld's DBPM is as good as it is because of his assist numbers, but wouldn't that be captured in his OBPM? Am I misinterpreting some of the data?

I could not find any journalistic sources that specifically state that Unseld was a great on court communicator, but there are numerous quotes out there from former teammates, future players, biographers etc. who all note how invaluable he was due to things like his on court leadership, his Bball IQ, and his team oriented approach to the game. I can't use that as irrefutable evidence, but those are obviously (some of) the characteristics you would expect to find in someone who was a great defensive communicator.

I did however find some old threads on RealGM about Unseld where some other posters who saw him play also noted his communication as a major strength. I'm sure there are still some posters here who can corroborate that about him as well.

I believe Hayes has far greater evidence of impact on arrival and leaving teams. I believe some of this is covered in votes for him in the RealGM 100 (viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1634894&p=60146723#p60146723 -I think there has been more, perhaps in earlier threads, but Hayes moved the defensive needle far more). Thus I would strongly disagree with the characterisation as Unseld as the backbone and Hayes as a cog.

You have them as a good defensive team "for 3 of Unseld's first 5 years...all without Hayes" this is incorrect in that in year 5 of Hayes and Unseld's careers they are both on the Bullets - this also takes away one of your good defensive years making it 2 out of 4. Also "one of the league's best defensive teams" means relatively little if they aren't actually distancing themselves from the pack. Unseld has year 1 as one piece of evidence that for one year he really impacted a good defensive team. Year 2 and they're 3rd (of 14 - 4 of whom are recent expansion teams, so even that's pulling the average down) but at +2.1 ... it's good (though as before expansion) but even if you were that good at both ends a +4.2 doesn't really typically make you a legitimate contender (assuming that represents the team's full health goodness - teams winning titles from this range tend to have been injury struck in the RS). So just +2.1, it's good but it's not taking you anywhere by itself.

Using DBPM without knowing it's inputs is ... unfortunate. Now DBPM isn't the easiest to understand (I won't claim to fully) but yes assists is part of it (it's part of the offense part too). Take a look at how it measures out Alonzo Mourning (2.3 career DBPM) versus say Nikola Jokic (2.5 DDPM), Alvan Adams (2.3 DBPM), Oliver Miller (3.3 DBPM), Tom Boerwinkle (2.5 DBPM) and Rich Kelley (2.8 DBPM) and Sam Lacey (3.9 DBPM) and tell me with a straight face that you want to use that as a core part of support for Unseld and that it doesn't have a blindspot for passing big-men and .... well, yeah. Its infatuation with a combination of rebounding and assists leads it to believe that Russell Westbrook is presently the best defender in the league and (at 5.4 DBPM) is having a better defensive season than Dikembe Mutombo ever did.

The qualities you list could be present in an elite defensive communicator, indeed they probably would be. That he has some things useful, arguably necessary does not mean he has all the things sufficient for it and thus far I've seen nothing saying that he was.


Hayes and Unseld did play together that year (my mistake), though I still think the overall body of work points to Unseld being the more impactful defender, and that's even before you take the intangible stuff into consideration which clearly (imo) paints Unseld as the superior player there. You disagree. That's fine. As for the rest of your post...upon further examination, it appears you are correct about DBPM and that there is some "statistical residue" from the assist data that's built into the overall BPM formula that does in fact bleed into the DBPM after it's isolated from the main ouput. I hadn't bothered to look that deeply into the guts of the math before because 1.) The word for word explanation of DBPM on BBREF explicitly states that DBPM is derived by subtracting the offensive data from BPM as a whole, leaving behind the defensive information (It's not so much hard to understand as it is poorly defined, and thus is misleading since it does actually still contain offensive data), and 2.) I think most people would assume that a value that is labeled and promoted as a defensive statistic would, despite its accuracy or reliability, in fact focus exclusively on defensive data and not....well....assist %. Quite odd. However, that's what I get for assuming. Thank you for bringing this to my attention in your own boorish way.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,696
And1: 8,336
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: #3 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#67 » by trex_8063 » Sat Jan 5, 2019 11:29 pm

FrogBros4Life wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:Personally, I'd say it's a big stretch to say Barkley outplayed Robinson on the defensive end.


Again, I'm not saying that Barkley outplayed him on the defensive end for the whole series. For that one game? Yeah, I'd say he did. Barkley had 17 defensive rebounds, compared to 7 for Robinson. Barkley had 4 steals and 2 blocks. Robinson had 4 blocks and 2 steals. Steals are generally a little more valuable than blocks so I again give Barkley the advantage. Barkley also had a lot of deflections and was generally more of a disruptive defensive force the entire game. Also back to timely contributions. Barkley had a steal on Robinson in the post during the last minute or so with the game undecided that helped determine the outcome. And on the biggest defensive stop of the game, Robinson couldn't return the favor. Not sure how anyone can say Robinson played better offensively or defensively that specific game. Seems pretty cut and dry.



I couldn't find video of the full game; other than some highlight reels, the best I could find was this video......

.......which is the last ~9 minutes of the game, which I did scout and will refer to from time-to-time.

Adding up DRebs, Stls, and Blks----or even with certain weighting on them [e.g. (x * DReb) + (y * Stl) + (z * Blk) = Total Defensive Contribution]-----as a means of calculating defensive performance is going to have a lot of room for error. For instance, by such methodology, James Harden has been a better defensive player every year of his career than Joe Dumars EVER was. And Harden has been a better defensive player every year in a Rockets jersey than Bruce Bowen EVER was. I trust I don't need to elaborate further on this point.

For that matter, if we want to play the strictly numbers game, I would say the numbers indicate Robinson outplayed Barkley on the offensive end in game 6:
Barkley had 28 pts @ 50.1% TS, with 4 ORebs, 4 Ast, and 4 tov. His ORtg was 100 (-3.8 relative to his team avg).
Robinson had 22 pts @ 52.0% TS, with 7 ORebs, 5 Ast, and only 2 tov. His ORtg was 119 (+17.2 relative to his team avg). This while drawing at least as many double-teams as Barkley [probably more] because there so few other scoring threats on that Spurs team, as well as being the primary screen-setter for any pnr action.
And if "timely" plays carry increased importance---as you have argued---I'd note that it was Robinson who grabbed the rebound on the Danny Ainge missed FT and was fouled (by Barkley, fwiw) with I think 10.6 seconds left (Spurs down by 2). He then goes and ices two FT's to tie the game. I cannot see that as any less clutch than Barkley's final shot.

But anyway, circling back to defense, I would disagree that Barkley was a bigger disruptive force on defense than Robinson (though I cannot say it to a certainly because I only had those 9 minutes of the game to scout), just based on the types of players that they are. By the very nature of being an elite rim-protector, it can have a lot of impact on the shot type the opponent takes, even if one doesn't come up with a block: in any given game, there are generally a lot of possessions that get deferred to the mid-range or outside (because said rim-protector is inside), as well as a lot of shots which aren't blocked but are changed near the rim.

I scouted those 9 minutes of the game, and I will allow that Robinson did have a couple of defensive miscues, and that Barkley did---for the most part----play pretty well on the defensive end. But to provide some examples of what the effect a rim protector has.......

8:40 - Robinson makes an excellent contest on Tom Chambers (no block, just alters the shot, forcing a miss). He can't get the handle on the loose ball after the miss, though he does rotate nicely to the help position after the next inbound.

9:50 - Makes just a hint of a show at the penetrating Kevin Johnson, who elects to kick it out rather than challenge him (DRob ultimately gets the DReb on the missed outside shot).<<<------This kind of thing happens all the time with elite rim protectors, and goes pretty much entirely unnoticed by casual fans, but it DOES ultimately effect the team's defensive efficiency when the opponent is simply reluctant to come inside and settling for lesser shots.
We see this again the very next possession (starting at 10:33), where KJ begins to penetrate the middle, gets to about the FT-line and stops because Robinson's right there. He kicks out to Barkley, who is conceded the outside shot by Robinson (again, I'd argue this is largely gameplan--->let him shoot from the outside).

12:21 - Another example of how an elite rim-protector dissuades shots near the hoop: DRob has hedged a little toward the penetrating KJ (who kicks to Oliver Miller). Robinson is then a little slow recovering to Barkley (where the ball goes next), but even so, Barkley thinks better of it as Robinson goes up, kicking back to Oliver Miller for a 14-ft jump shot. The shot goes in, but I can't imagine a mid-range jumper by Oliver Miller is the shot they want to get on a possession.

23:59 - Another example of altering things where he'll get no boxscore credit. He's first very physical with Barkley, not allowing him to get to the ball-handler to set the screen (forcing the Suns to burn 2-3 extra seconds of the shotclock just to get a screen set), he then makes a decent show on KJ but Sean Elliot has unfortunately died on the screen, so KJ is able to penetrate into the interior (fwiw, if you pause the video and view the position of everyone, Robinson absolutely made the correct play in rotating back toward the open Barkley rather than COMPLETELY staying with KJ). Cummings comes to help on KJ, who dishes to the open Oliver Miller under the hoop, but the dunk is missed as----guess who---Robinson challenges the shot. Again, no block credited here (and unfortunately for the Spurs the ball bounces directly to KJ who pops it back up and in), but that was an excellent defensive possession for Robinson as an individual.


So anyway, Barkley did play better defensively in this sample than I was expecting to find, and Robinson did have a couple of poor possessions in there. But nonetheless, I'd be skeptical that Barkley was actually causing more disruption (in terms of non-box plays) than Robinson over the course of the whole game.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
FrogBros4Life
Sophomore
Posts: 138
And1: 155
Joined: Dec 30, 2018

Re: #3 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#68 » by FrogBros4Life » Sat Jan 5, 2019 11:47 pm

Oh, I totally agree that rim protection extends beyond simply blocking shots, and that altering shots and deterring players from even attempting a shot in the first place is also extremely valuable. I also agree 100% that Robinson was one of the best rim protectors ever in the history of the game, and that in that specific area Barkley isn't even in the same stratosphere. However, I also think that elite defensive impact also extends beyond rim protection in and of itself, and in that one game, Barkley's defensive activity was off the charts. Robinson had a very good defensive game, Barkley had a better one, especially considering the stakes. You don't get 20+ rebounds on the road in a close out playoff game unless your energy and activity level is at a 10/10. Barkley was also doing a lot of dislodging of offensive players from a premium position in the post (which doesn't show up in a box score), and smartly hedging the passing lanes (ditto)...which has a similar result of Robinson deterring players from taking shots, except in this case Barkley is deterring players from attempting an entry pass. He was extremely disruptive this entire game. For lack of a better word, I would say that Barkley was hungrier than Robinson that day.

I also am aware that the stats for that game rate Robinson as having the better Ortg, while it shows Barkley as having the better Drtg. I didn't bring that up earlier, because I think Barkley had the better offensive AND defensive performance this game, and I didn't want to cherry pick a stat that only favored one side of my argument. I just made a post in the Isiah Thomas thread about advanced stats not always being a reliable indicator of what actually transpired over the course of the game (or season, or career), and I think some of that applies in this specific instance too. David Robinson objectively had a terrific game, and nobody can truthfully say he didn't, but I think Barkley's impact on both ends of the floor ended up being more valuable. The fact that Barkley's team won, on Robinson's court, with Barkley stealing the ball from Robinson in crunch time to set up a possession where Barkley then scores the winning shot over Robinson, kind of underscores that.

Return to Player Comparisons