trex_8063 wrote:euroleague wrote:If you scroll to the bottom of my original post, you can see Alonzo mourning is ranked over AI...
I have had that listing noted for some time, thank you.
But he isn't technically listed "over AI", because AI isn't shown at all.....which is why I double-check.
As stated:trex_8063 wrote:euroleague, I also included you in Zo's camp here, but I'm less sure than I am with penbeast0. You have similarly used language that implies those players listed [again, with no Iverson] are the ones you intend to support next. Though periodically you've popped new players into your listings out of the blue, or NOT supported the next guy you'd listed when a spot opens up in your top 3; so I've not been sure if that's actually your extended list, or if you're just providing a list of tractioned players which has NOT been updated [to include Iverson].
Again, please let me know if I am in error in assuming you'd favour Mourning in this H2H.
"....are in order of my rankings" implies "these are the next guys I'd support", but could also mean "this is the order I'd go with among those guys being mentioned" (and just not updated to include Iverson, among others).euroleague wrote:Not sure why I should bother doing rankings if you won’t read them?
Yeah, sort of feeling the same way.
Pretty obvious that ‘these guys are listed in order of my rankings’, and I say they are the ones I was debating for my 3rd spot, it’s pretty clear what that ranking is.
Regarding my rankings, as I said in my post, I overlooked certain players who leapt over my previous ranked players into my top 3. As we get further into this project, the separation becomes less, and rankings may become a bit more fluid. When a player’s primary achievement is being an MVP contender/MVP in a weak year, with one or two good playoffs... there will be many players with around the same level of achievement/greatness.
To use an analogy, the top 10 in men’s tennis is pretty consistent. The top 100 has far more variation throughout the year.