People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind?

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,419
And1: 9,948
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#61 » by penbeast0 » Mon Sep 12, 2022 11:04 am

Stalwart wrote:
70sFan wrote:
Dutchball97 wrote:If MJ didn't retire twice mid-career I don't think there would even be a GOAT debate.

He still wouldn't touch Russell's level of success.


He wouldn't touch Russell's team success in terms of championships. But if you consider regular season records and playoff series won then things get a little closer. It doesn't close the gap completely of course. But then when you consider individual success things pretty much balance out.

If you stop here then you can definitely say Russell > Jordan no problem. However, if at this point you also factor in context like era, league size, teammates, eye test, statistics, intangibles, impact on the sport...then it becomes a clear win for Jordan.

If were looking at resume with no context then it probably goes Russell > Kareem > Jordan > Wilt/Lebron > Magic/Tim > Kobe/Shaq/Bird.


MJ's argument is basically scoring + rings + good at everything else but in terms of intangibles, his are probably the worst of any of the top 20 players in NBA history unless you have Barkley in your top 20. The rings plus the marketing cover this up but if he hadn't had great team success and had continued the ripping teammates publicly, locker room fights, ignoring coaches to go hero ball, etc. then it would actually hurt his legacy considerably. But the rings and how he won the rings excuse this just as Russell's rings and how he won those rings excuse his weak offense.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,153
And1: 25,431
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#62 » by 70sFan » Mon Sep 12, 2022 11:09 am

Stalwart wrote:If you stop here then you can definitely say Russell > Jordan no problem. However, if at this point you also factor in context like era, league size, teammates, eye test, statistics, intangibles, impact on the sport...then it becomes a clear win for Jordan.

I think the bolded parts are at very least debatable and in some (like intangibles), I think Russell has a clear edge. League size can be an argument for either side, depending on how you look at it (less rounds in the playoffs vs significantly expanded league). Teammates are questionable, impact on the sport also depends on the context you look at (Russell did more to the league and sport development than Jordan, but Jordan was more popular and helped popularize the league internationally). I won't even touch eye test, because most people don't even analyze defense (if you would, you could see that Russell looks extremely impressive on the tape).

If were looking at resume with no context then it probably goes Russell > Kareem > Jordan > Wilt/Lebron > Magic/Tim > Kobe/Shaq/Bird.

I think Wilt would be lower (unless you include a lot of arbitrary records) in Kobe/Shaq/Bird tier.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,610
And1: 43,862
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#63 » by zimpy27 » Mon Sep 12, 2022 11:26 am

oaktownwarriors87 wrote:
70sFan wrote:
oaktownwarriors87 wrote:
Correct, I do not think he has a respectable argument over Jordan

At the end, these are all only opinions but don't you think that you sells James short here?


I still consider him a top 10 player.

Statistically throughout their career they have a lot of similarities. Jordan won more against tougher competition, and he did it while being #1 guy in the league on the #1 team.

Jordan dominated advanced metrics in 5 of his 6 Championships
LeBron dominated advanced metrics in 2 of his 4 Championships

Jordan had the #1 rated team in 5 of his 6 Championships
LeBron had the #1 rated team in 0 of his 4 Championships

Jordan is 14-7 (66.66%) against teams with an SRS of 5.0+
LeBron is 4-9 (30.77%) against teams with an SR of 5.0+

Jordans Championship teams rank #2, #5, #9, #20, #63, & #127 All-Time in SRS
LeBrons Championship teams rank #74, #119, #153, & #174 All-Time in SRS

LeBron's career is crazy impressive, it's just very clear that Jordan and his teams were better and more dominant. Jordan tops him in both volume and quality.

I don't value LeBron putting up big numbers on mediocre teams in the NBA over Jordan winning a national championship in college. I don't really value LeBron putting up big numbers on mediocre teams after 35, either. Sure, it's impressive, but playing more games and staying in the league doesn't make him better, because he's not better. He's worse, and he's hanging around longer. If he was putting up extra years where he was actually dominant and winning I could value it, but he isn't.

LeBron has been missing a bunch of games, losing, and he's at the bottom of the league in movement/speed on both the offensive and defensive end. That's not really longevity, it's more just stat padding.

Their statistical similarities make them easy to compare, and Jordan comes out on top.


To engage in a GOAT discussion without respecting the candidacy of the 2nd most popular GOAT choice is kind of pointless.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Stalwart
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,839
And1: 959
Joined: Jun 06, 2021

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#64 » by Stalwart » Mon Sep 12, 2022 5:25 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
70sFan wrote:He still wouldn't touch Russell's level of success.


He wouldn't touch Russell's team success in terms of championships. But if you consider regular season records and playoff series won then things get a little closer. It doesn't close the gap completely of course. But then when you consider individual success things pretty much balance out.

If you stop here then you can definitely say Russell > Jordan no problem. However, if at this point you also factor in context like era, league size, teammates, eye test, statistics, intangibles, impact on the sport...then it becomes a clear win for Jordan.

If were looking at resume with no context then it probably goes Russell > Kareem > Jordan > Wilt/Lebron > Magic/Tim > Kobe/Shaq/Bird.


MJ's argument is basically scoring + rings + good at everything else but in terms of intangibles, his are probably the worst of any of the top 20 players in NBA history unless you have Barkley in your top 20. The rings plus the marketing cover this up but if he hadn't had great team success and had continued the ripping teammates publicly, locker room fights, ignoring coaches to go hero ball, etc. then it would actually hurt his legacy considerably. But the rings and how he won the rings excuse this just as Russell's rings and how he won those rings excuse his weak offense.


But don't his teammates praise him? Don't they call him a great teammate and a great leader? Don't they claim he drove them to be the best versions of themselves? And didn't they win...every single year? How is that not being a great leader?

As far as having the worst intangibles in terms of leadership and locker room culture that honor belongs to Lebron.
capfan33
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 751
Joined: May 21, 2022
 

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#65 » by capfan33 » Mon Sep 12, 2022 6:05 pm

Stalwart wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
He wouldn't touch Russell's team success in terms of championships. But if you consider regular season records and playoff series won then things get a little closer. It doesn't close the gap completely of course. But then when you consider individual success things pretty much balance out.

If you stop here then you can definitely say Russell > Jordan no problem. However, if at this point you also factor in context like era, league size, teammates, eye test, statistics, intangibles, impact on the sport...then it becomes a clear win for Jordan.

If were looking at resume with no context then it probably goes Russell > Kareem > Jordan > Wilt/Lebron > Magic/Tim > Kobe/Shaq/Bird.


MJ's argument is basically scoring + rings + good at everything else but in terms of intangibles, his are probably the worst of any of the top 20 players in NBA history unless you have Barkley in your top 20. The rings plus the marketing cover this up but if he hadn't had great team success and had continued the ripping teammates publicly, locker room fights, ignoring coaches to go hero ball, etc. then it would actually hurt his legacy considerably. But the rings and how he won the rings excuse this just as Russell's rings and how he won those rings excuse his weak offense.


But don't his teammates praise him? Don't they call him a great teammate and a great leader? Don't they claim he drove them to be the best versions of themselves? And didn't they win...every single year? How is that not being a great leader?

As far as having the worst intangibles in terms of leadership and locker room culture that honor belongs to Lebron.


I don't know if I would go so far as saying Jordan had the worst intagibles of anyone in the top-20, but he's definitely not 1st. Russell, Duncan and Bird are all easy picks above him, and I would hazard that KG, Dirk, West and Magic are all better. Of course, this is pretty subjective which is why I only feel comfortable with the 3 I mentioned for sure above Jordan. Also Lebron's not last lol.
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,467
And1: 5,349
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#66 » by JordansBulls » Mon Sep 12, 2022 6:11 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
JordansBulls wrote:MJ = 6 Titles, 6 finals MVP's, 5 League MVP's = 17 Points total
Russell = 11 Titles, 0 finals MVP's, 5 League MVP's = 16 Points Total
Kareem = 6 Titles, 2 finals MVP's, 6 League MVP's = 14 Points Total
Lebron = 4 Titles, 4 finals MVP's, 4 League MVP's = 12 Points Total
Magic = 5 Titles, 3 finals MVP's, 3 League MVP's = 11 Points Total
Duncan = 4 Titles, 3 finals MVP's, 2 League MVP's = 9 Points Total
Kobe = 5 Titles, 2 finals MVP's, 1 League MVP's = 8 Points Total
Shaq = 4 Titles, 3 finals MVP's, 1 League MVP's = 8 Points Total
Bird = 3 Titles, 2 finals MVP's, 3 League MVP's = 8 Points Total
Wilt = 2 Titles, 1 finals MVP's, 4 League MVP's = 7 Points Total
Hakeem = 2 Titles, 2 finals MVP's, 1 League MVP's = 5 Points Total
Moses Malone = 1 Titles, 1 finals MVP's, 3 League MVP's = 5 Points Total

Also turned a franchise that never won that drafted him into a dynasty and never played with anyone for a season that won league nor finals mvp.
Top in Box Plus/Minus, PER, WS/PER 48 minutes for career in season and playoffs. Also never lost a series with HCA.



Of course as there was no "finals MVP" until 1969, that does give MJ a significant advantage over Russell who would probably have around 8-10 of them in this simplistic analysis in which case he would blow MJ away by this metric.

Well no one else had to only win 2 series for a title either or get a by.
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,153
And1: 25,431
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#67 » by 70sFan » Mon Sep 12, 2022 6:33 pm

JordansBulls wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
JordansBulls wrote:MJ = 6 Titles, 6 finals MVP's, 5 League MVP's = 17 Points total
Russell = 11 Titles, 0 finals MVP's, 5 League MVP's = 16 Points Total
Kareem = 6 Titles, 2 finals MVP's, 6 League MVP's = 14 Points Total
Lebron = 4 Titles, 4 finals MVP's, 4 League MVP's = 12 Points Total
Magic = 5 Titles, 3 finals MVP's, 3 League MVP's = 11 Points Total
Duncan = 4 Titles, 3 finals MVP's, 2 League MVP's = 9 Points Total
Kobe = 5 Titles, 2 finals MVP's, 1 League MVP's = 8 Points Total
Shaq = 4 Titles, 3 finals MVP's, 1 League MVP's = 8 Points Total
Bird = 3 Titles, 2 finals MVP's, 3 League MVP's = 8 Points Total
Wilt = 2 Titles, 1 finals MVP's, 4 League MVP's = 7 Points Total
Hakeem = 2 Titles, 2 finals MVP's, 1 League MVP's = 5 Points Total
Moses Malone = 1 Titles, 1 finals MVP's, 3 League MVP's = 5 Points Total

Also turned a franchise that never won that drafted him into a dynasty and never played with anyone for a season that won league nor finals mvp.
Top in Box Plus/Minus, PER, WS/PER 48 minutes for career in season and playoffs. Also never lost a series with HCA.



Of course as there was no "finals MVP" until 1969, that does give MJ a significant advantage over Russell who would probably have around 8-10 of them in this simplistic analysis in which case he would blow MJ away by this metric.

Well no one else had to only win 2 series for a title either or get a by.

1956 Warriors and 1958 Hawks did.

Celtics had to win three series to win the title in Russell last 4 years and they won 3 out of 4 available titles then. It seems that longer playoffs runs didn't do much against Russell success.
Stalwart
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,839
And1: 959
Joined: Jun 06, 2021

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#68 » by Stalwart » Mon Sep 12, 2022 7:58 pm

capfan33 wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
MJ's argument is basically scoring + rings + good at everything else but in terms of intangibles, his are probably the worst of any of the top 20 players in NBA history unless you have Barkley in your top 20. The rings plus the marketing cover this up but if he hadn't had great team success and had continued the ripping teammates publicly, locker room fights, ignoring coaches to go hero ball, etc. then it would actually hurt his legacy considerably. But the rings and how he won the rings excuse this just as Russell's rings and how he won those rings excuse his weak offense.


But don't his teammates praise him? Don't they call him a great teammate and a great leader? Don't they claim he drove them to be the best versions of themselves? And didn't they win...every single year? How is that not being a great leader?

As far as having the worst intangibles in terms of leadership and locker room culture that honor belongs to Lebron.


I don't know if I would go so far as saying Jordan had the worst intagibles of anyone in the top-20, but he's definitely not 1st. Russell, Duncan and Bird are all easy picks above him, and I would hazard that KG, Dirk, West and Magic are all better. Of course, this is pretty subjective which is why I only feel comfortable with the 3 I mentioned for sure above Jordan. Also Lebron's not last lol.


Based on what tho? Style or substance and results? Where are you guys getting this notion that guys like Russell, Bird, and Duncan have more intangibles than Jordan?

This criticism seems completely out of left field and actually baseless. But maybe im missing something?
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,153
And1: 25,431
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#69 » by 70sFan » Mon Sep 12, 2022 8:29 pm

Stalwart wrote:
capfan33 wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
But don't his teammates praise him? Don't they call him a great teammate and a great leader? Don't they claim he drove them to be the best versions of themselves? And didn't they win...every single year? How is that not being a great leader?

As far as having the worst intangibles in terms of leadership and locker room culture that honor belongs to Lebron.


I don't know if I would go so far as saying Jordan had the worst intagibles of anyone in the top-20, but he's definitely not 1st. Russell, Duncan and Bird are all easy picks above him, and I would hazard that KG, Dirk, West and Magic are all better. Of course, this is pretty subjective which is why I only feel comfortable with the 3 I mentioned for sure above Jordan. Also Lebron's not last lol.


Based on what tho? Style or substance and results? Where are you guys getting this notion that guys like Russell, Bird, and Duncan have more intangibles than Jordan?

This criticism seems completely out of left field and actually baseless. But maybe im missing something?

I can ask the same thing - how can you say that Jordan intangibles were better than Russell for example?

I think the overall picture drawn from multiple reports of their teammates and coaches shows significantly more negative takes about Jordan than Russell, Bird or Duncan.
capfan33
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 751
Joined: May 21, 2022
 

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#70 » by capfan33 » Mon Sep 12, 2022 8:40 pm

Stalwart wrote:
capfan33 wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
But don't his teammates praise him? Don't they call him a great teammate and a great leader? Don't they claim he drove them to be the best versions of themselves? And didn't they win...every single year? How is that not being a great leader?

As far as having the worst intangibles in terms of leadership and locker room culture that honor belongs to Lebron.


I don't know if I would go so far as saying Jordan had the worst intagibles of anyone in the top-20, but he's definitely not 1st. Russell, Duncan and Bird are all easy picks above him, and I would hazard that KG, Dirk, West and Magic are all better. Of course, this is pretty subjective which is why I only feel comfortable with the 3 I mentioned for sure above Jordan. Also Lebron's not last lol.


Based on what tho? Style or substance and results? Where are you guys getting this notion that guys like Russell, Bird, and Duncan have more intangibles than Jordan?

This criticism seems completely out of left field and actually baseless. But maybe im missing something?


I mean, Jordan was a documented **** who also didn't seem to naturally play in a way that always optimized the team's production over his own. As I said I don't think he was the worst in the top-20 but I highly doubt he was the best either.

To the point about substance and results, I think enough of Jordan's ability as a player that I believe he may have won in spiteof his leadership and playstyle tendencies. One major part of this is Pippen, by all accounts, Pippen was basically the good cop to Jordan's bad cop and was an incredible leader/friend to the rest of the team that helped smooth over Jordan's rougher tendencies. You can see this some in the Last Dance. Also, Jordan only really started to have team success when the triangle was implemented by Jackson and they basically told him "hey, you have to be a bit more of a team player so we can win" etc.

Also to substance and results, Russell had better results strictly speaking. Moreover, if there was ever a way to measure intangibles, the guy who won at every level multiple times, who never lost a game 7, and won razor close playoff series countless times, I'm going with him lol. Personally I don't really care much about intangibles but if I was going to, it's hard to pick against Russell.

Think of it this way, just assume Jordan is a better player than Russell. If you could choose to have one of them in your locker room for their presence and leadership, but they can't actually play, are you really picking Jordan over Russell? That's how I would think of it at least.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,610
And1: 43,862
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#71 » by zimpy27 » Mon Sep 12, 2022 9:13 pm

If Jordan had success with another team or system or coach and shown similar success then I'd have him as GOAT still.

But the history of Jordan was that success came with Phil Jackson coming in as coach and Scottie Pippen becoming a top two-way wing in the league. The main change they had was replacing Horace Grant with Kukoc and Rodman.
Even when Jordan left the team they continued to be an excellent team that had a chance to win the championship.

Jordans success is intertwined with the GOAT coach and probably the GOAT second fiddle. Outside those two pieces he never won a championship.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
Morb
Junior
Posts: 332
And1: 86
Joined: May 08, 2017
 

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#72 » by Morb » Mon Sep 12, 2022 9:17 pm

Total WS.))

Sent from my Nokia 5.1 Plus using RealGM mobile app
PG Lebron '09, SG T-Mac '03, SF Durant '14, PF ????, C Wemby '26.
no-zone-baby))
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,266
And1: 2,273
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#73 » by rk2023 » Mon Sep 12, 2022 10:36 pm

I believe MJ to have 1 of the 2 greatest peaks in basketball along-side 09,12,13 LeBron James (89-91). As one whom is more keen on the idea of prime qualities and total careers/bodies of work, I don't have Michael Jordan as my "GOAT" off of championship equity.

If there were to be new indicators of his peak being substantially better than LeBron's best and indicators for his top 7 seasons (88-93, 96) taking a fair share of voting points than the top 7 LeBron seasons (09-10 12-13 14 16-17), that could lead me to have a new opinion.
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#74 » by HeartBreakKid » Tue Sep 13, 2022 12:24 am

Stalwart wrote:
capfan33 wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
But don't his teammates praise him? Don't they call him a great teammate and a great leader? Don't they claim he drove them to be the best versions of themselves? And didn't they win...every single year? How is that not being a great leader?

As far as having the worst intangibles in terms of leadership and locker room culture that honor belongs to Lebron.


I don't know if I would go so far as saying Jordan had the worst intagibles of anyone in the top-20, but he's definitely not 1st. Russell, Duncan and Bird are all easy picks above him, and I would hazard that KG, Dirk, West and Magic are all better. Of course, this is pretty subjective which is why I only feel comfortable with the 3 I mentioned for sure above Jordan. Also Lebron's not last lol.


Based on what tho? Style or substance and results? Where are you guys getting this notion that guys like Russell, Bird, and Duncan have more intangibles than Jordan?

This criticism seems completely out of left field and actually baseless. But maybe im missing something?


You can't see the irony in that you could ask yourself that very question?

Your go to argument is that Jordan's teammates said that he was a great teammate. Think about that. The greatest player of all time, who won 6 titles, have teammates that compliment him...that isn't exactly uncommon. You also are the one who made a baseless statement saying James is the worst or something.

We know Jordan's personality, and know many players who have his traits who usually get torn down. Jordan benefits from confirmation bias, obviously. If a player with Jordan's personality traits isn't as good as Jordan and his team doesn't have success, they would be seen as someone with a bad intangibles. Jordan has gambling addictions, jealousy/insecurity issues, violent out lashes, is demeaning, abrasive and easily irritable. He is like that even in the professional world, much less in basketball. You tell me if he wasn't a freak athlete with great basketball skills how good those things would go over?

It's nice to think that his personality trait is that he is just "pissed off at his skill level and therefore just wants to work on his jumper all day" - but he's not a cartoon character he has more than two dimensions.

Go to work and pretend to act like Michael Jordan (the actual Jordan not Space Jam Jordan), how do you think you'd be seen? Even if you were stellar at your job - are you going to say Steve Jobs has great intangibles too?




I mean going off of teammates opinions...how is Jordan even coming ahead still? Bill Russell was his teams coach at one point. He "was" the locker room. Bill Russell played through severe racism and even had some teammates who had traditional racist backgrounds and still put it together. Russell wasn't pampered with big commercials, sneaker lines and millions of dollars - he had to sleep in barns and **** in certain cities simply because he was black.

Russell played a style that no one ever played, was criticized for it, ignored it, and now in 2022 about half of the basketball players in the world now play like Bill Russell.

And lastly, intangibles is generally seen as dominating in ways that doesn't show up in the boxscore. One of the biggest arguments against Russell are his boxscore stats aren't good especially relative to Wilt Chamberlain who is the boxscore king. He ended up becoming a multi time MVP and "won" more than anyone else.

Bill Russell had a few negative traits like he was also irritable but there is nothing to suggest he has the amount of negative traits as Jordan or the severity of it. In addition, Bill Russell has more positive feats than Jordan. The fact that the best thing you could say about Jordan is that Steve Kerr talked him up after punching him in the face for being a crappy and smaller player shows that he lacks evidence to be in the conversation for best intangibles. If that was the best story you could tell about Bill Russell, he wouldn't be very high up on the intangibles list either.

so you tell me, if you had to pick one, why would Jordan be better than Russell in intangibles? No, you cannot cop out and say "well, they're both good, so its equal" because I totally feel like that is what you're going to do. What is his argument, because you can't say "his teammates said good things about him" as that goes with Bill Russell, and literally every great player including the WORST intangible guy Lebron.



Michael Jordan has/had untreated personality disorders. It's 2022, we know these things exist.
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,933
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#75 » by OhayoKD » Tue Sep 13, 2022 3:19 am

capfan33 wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
MJ's argument is basically scoring + rings + good at everything else but in terms of intangibles, his are probably the worst of any of the top 20 players in NBA history unless you have Barkley in your top 20. The rings plus the marketing cover this up but if he hadn't had great team success and had continued the ripping teammates publicly, locker room fights, ignoring coaches to go hero ball, etc. then it would actually hurt his legacy considerably. But the rings and how he won the rings excuse this just as Russell's rings and how he won those rings excuse his weak offense.


But don't his teammates praise him? Don't they call him a great teammate and a great leader? Don't they claim he drove them to be the best versions of themselves? And didn't they win...every single year? How is that not being a great leader?

As far as having the worst intangibles in terms of leadership and locker room culture that honor belongs to Lebron.


I don't know if I would go so far as saying Jordan had the worst intagibles of anyone in the top-20, but he's definitely not 1st. Russell, Duncan and Bird are all easy picks above him, and I would hazard that KG, Dirk, West and Magic are all better. Of course, this is pretty subjective which is why I only feel comfortable with the 3 I mentioned for sure above Jordan. Also Lebron's not last lol.

Didn't bird basically lose the celtics a title by getting into a barfight?

What puts bird above jordan in terms of intagibles? Both seem kind of similar in mentality. I suppose jordan's issues manifested more frequently, but listing bird alongside russell or duncan seems wierd. Feel like Curry/Giannis are more appropiate "leadership" picks.

Magic also seems questionable. Iirc he basically tried a lockeroom mutiny on kareem who at the time was the consensus goat and clear best player on the team because he wanted to helio more.
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,408
And1: 5,004
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#76 » by Dutchball97 » Tue Sep 13, 2022 8:38 am

70sFan wrote:
Dutchball97 wrote:
70sFan wrote:He still wouldn't touch Russell's level of success.


Eh that's team success though. I'm very high on Russell and believe he was the main engine for the Celtics from the moment he made his debut till he retired but counting rings as a legitimate argument for the GOAT debate is a bit questionable.

So you think Russell was simply a worse player than Jordan, correct? Why do you think so?


I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. I said rings isn't a legit argument, I did not say Russell has no argument over Jordan at all.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,153
And1: 25,431
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#77 » by 70sFan » Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:26 am

Dutchball97 wrote:
70sFan wrote:
Dutchball97 wrote:
Eh that's team success though. I'm very high on Russell and believe he was the main engine for the Celtics from the moment he made his debut till he retired but counting rings as a legitimate argument for the GOAT debate is a bit questionable.

So you think Russell was simply a worse player than Jordan, correct? Why do you think so?


I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. I said rings isn't a legit argument, I did not say Russell has no argument over Jordan at all.

Well, you said that with Jordan not retiring during his career would cause no GOAT debate. How should I interpret that? It's a legitimate question, maybe I didn't understand your point.
Stalwart
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,839
And1: 959
Joined: Jun 06, 2021

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#78 » by Stalwart » Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:33 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:
Stalwart wrote:
capfan33 wrote:
I don't know if I would go so far as saying Jordan had the worst intagibles of anyone in the top-20, but he's definitely not 1st. Russell, Duncan and Bird are all easy picks above him, and I would hazard that KG, Dirk, West and Magic are all better. Of course, this is pretty subjective which is why I only feel comfortable with the 3 I mentioned for sure above Jordan. Also Lebron's not last lol.


Based on what tho? Style or substance and results? Where are you guys getting this notion that guys like Russell, Bird, and Duncan have more intangibles than Jordan?

This criticism seems completely out of left field and actually baseless. But maybe im missing something?


You can't see the irony in that you could ask yourself that very question?

Your go to argument is that Jordan's teammates said that he was a great teammate. Think about that. The greatest player of all time, who won 6 titles, have teammates that compliment him...that isn't exactly uncommon. You also are the one who made a baseless statement saying James is the worst or something.

We know Jordan's personality, and know many players who have his traits who usually get torn down. Jordan benefits from confirmation bias, obviously. If a player with Jordan's personality traits isn't as good as Jordan and his team doesn't have success, they would be seen as someone with a bad intangibles. Jordan has gambling addictions, jealousy/insecurity issues, violent out lashes, is demeaning, abrasive and easily irritable. He is like that even in the professional world, much less in basketball. You tell me if he wasn't a freak athlete with great basketball skills how good those things would go over?

It's nice to think that his personality trait is that he is just "pissed off at his skill level and therefore just wants to work on his jumper all day" - but he's not a cartoon character he has more than two dimensions.

Go to work and pretend to act like Michael Jordan (the actual Jordan not Space Jam Jordan), how do you think you'd be seen? Even if you were stellar at your job - are you going to say Steve Jobs has great intangibles too?


I dunno man. Michael's personality just doesn't bother me the way it bothers you. Leadership is measured by one's ability to direct a group of people while bringing out the best or the most in those following you. Leadership is not about being a nice guy or everyone holding hands and being friends. In fact true leaders are rarely liked. These guys were in the Boston Celtics, Bad Boy, New York Knicks era where players would be extremely physical while trying to intimidate and get in each others heads. Remember when young Pippen used to get punked all the time by Detroit and New York? Literally slapped around by Charles Oakley? Yes, he and everyone else needed to toughen up in order to win. Jordan dos that for them.

Its not about his teammates "saying nice things" about him. They actually detailed how Jordan's personality drove them to be better individual players. They've explained how the pressure Jordan put on them throughout the season prepared them for the big moments. Pippen explained how he wouldn't have been as good as he was without battling Jordan everyday in practice. Phil Jackson explained how he ran the team through Jordan and Pippen.

I don't know why you're so offended by MJs personality. Maybe its a generational or cultural thing. Just seems like you are being extremely judgemental when its unnecessary and short sighted to do so. Alot of these guys are aholes to some degree. Shaq, Kobe, Bird, Lebron, Wilt, Kareem, Pippen...all jerks. Its the results that matter not the style.

I mean going off of teammates opinions...how is Jordan even coming ahead still? Bill Russell was his teams coach at one point. He "was" the locker room. Bill Russell played through severe racism and even had some teammates who had traditional racist backgrounds and still put it together. Russell wasn't pampered with big commercials, sneaker lines and millions of dollars - he had to sleep in barns and **** in certain cities simply because he was black.

Russell played a style that no one ever played, was criticized for it, ignored it, and now in 2022 about half of the basketball players in the world now play like Bill Russell.

And lastly, intangibles is generally seen as dominating in ways that doesn't show up in the boxscore. One of the biggest arguments against Russell are his boxscore stats aren't good especially relative to Wilt Chamberlain who is the boxscore king. He ended up becoming a multi time MVP and "won" more than anyone else.

Bill Russell had a few negative traits like he was also irritable but there is nothing to suggest he has the amount of negative traits as Jordan or the severity of it. In addition, Bill Russell has more positive feats than Jordan. The fact that the best thing you could say about Jordan is that Steve Kerr talked him up after punching him in the face for being a crappy and smaller player shows that he lacks evidence to be in the conversation for best intangibles. If that was the best story you could tell about Bill Russell, he wouldn't be very high up on the intangibles list either.

so you tell me, if you had to pick one, why would Jordan be better than Russell in intangibles? No, you cannot cop out and say "well, they're both good, so its equal" because I totally feel like that is what you're going to do. What is his argument, because you can't say "his teammates said good things about him" as that goes with Bill Russell, and literally every great player including the WORST intangible guy Lebron.


I don't have a problem putting Russell over Jordan in terms of leadership as Russell was an actual player/coach. I think Jordan's on court intangibles are significantly higher than Russells in terms of producing in big moments or games. At least offensively. Jordan is extremely clutch.

My main gripe is not that Jordan is #1 in intangibles it was the dismissal of his intangibles and the characterization of him actually being a bad leader. I was taken aback by the animosity so many of you have for him lol. Like..stop being so judgemental for no reason. Heres what Jordan has to say to critics like you:



Michael Jordan has/had untreated personality disorders. It's 2022, we know these things exist.


Michael Jordan grew up in an extremely abusive household. He grew up in a home where his father would routinely rape his sister with the approval of his mother(according to his sister). It is through this trauma and abuse that Jordan developed his extraordinary ability to disassociate and hyperfocus in moments of intense pressure.

Jordan is a monarch athlete. His abilities are based largely on his personality disorder(s) which were intentionally and systematically curated and developed through out his life by his father and others. He was actually groomed to be a professional athlete both mentally and physically. The main point is that if you take away Jordan's personality disorders you take away Jordan.
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,408
And1: 5,004
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#79 » by Dutchball97 » Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:35 am

70sFan wrote:
Dutchball97 wrote:
70sFan wrote:So you think Russell was simply a worse player than Jordan, correct? Why do you think so?


I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. I said rings isn't a legit argument, I did not say Russell has no argument over Jordan at all.

Well, you said that with Jordan not retiring during his career would cause no GOAT debate. How should I interpret that? It's a legitimate question, maybe I didn't understand your point.


I meant it as I already have Jordan as my GOAT as things stand now, if he'd add the 4.5 seasons he didn't play during his career due to retirements the main argument Kareem and LeBron have over him (longevity) would be minimized to a degree where I personally couldn't entertain a case for them over MJ. To be fair to your initial comment, this does imply Jordan is the best player to ever play in the NBA in my opinion and I do stand by that. Comparing MJ to Russell is a complete apples to oranges story because they both did certain things better than the other but in terms of overall impact I'm taking Jordan over anyone. I'd be fine with other people still going with other choices but to me there would be a runaway #1.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,153
And1: 25,431
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: People who don't have Jordan as GOAT: What metric(s) would make you change your mind? 

Post#80 » by 70sFan » Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:54 am

Stalwart wrote:I don't have a problem putting Russell over Jordan in terms of leadership as Russell was an actual player/coach. I think Jordan's on court intangibles are significantly higher than Russells in terms of producing in big moments or games. At least offensively. Jordan is extremely clutch.

That's not true, it's simply caused by the lack of footage from Russell's prime. Bill had a lot of huge moments and games in his career, just most of them weren't available to watch and you don't know about them.

Return to Player Comparisons