parsnips33 wrote:Onus wrote:I think it's funny that there are so many lebron fans acting like Lebron is a victim. The lakers had 3 no 2 picks on the team and don't own their pick until 2027 and traded all of that so that they could win a bubble title. AD and Lebron are no longer top 10 players in the league. What does trading 2027 and 2029 pick do for this team? Make them a play in team?
This is the first time in Lebron's career he's actually had to play on a rebuilding team. He's switched teams at this point every time this situation has arose in his last stops. Those teams mortgaged their future so that they could go to the finals, but once it was time to rebuild, Lebron left for greener pastures. Now he has to finally see the cost.
This is his legacy. Teams mortgage their future to go to the finals for 4 years and then they have to rebuild but Lebron leaves to repeat the process. This is the first time he's chosen to stay and pay for those title chances but now he's the victim.
At the risk of really riling people up, it seems that victim status is something you see Lebron fans cling to in a way you really don't see for Jordan. Whether he's the victim of Dan Gilbert's incompetence, KD's decision to join the Warriors, or I guess now Buss/Pelinka's incompetence. I guess it could be reflective of broader ways that our society values the status of "victim" compared to the 90s
What was Jordan the victim of, though? You have to be a victim to be called a victim. Not sure James is a victim, either. But, his first stint with the Cavs was rife with blunders from bad coaches to a bad front office. No real talent was put around him. That was well documented. James didn't cause that. Not sure, he's a victim, but it obviously affects the team and Lebron.
Miami years? Not much other than Wade spiraling into NBA journeyman much quicker than most thought. Again, it happened to a James lead team. James didn't cause that, but his team sure did feel the effects.
Second Cavs stint? Again, not much other than the second best player on the team being an immature whackadoodle of a diva, thinking he should be the alpha, thus forcing his way off of the team and making that team worse. James didn't cause Irving's delusions of grandeur, which hurt that franchise. Did that happen to Jordan? Oh yeah, and in regards to on court play, who can forget JR's **** up in the Finals game 1, in a game James hung a 50 spot. Yep, James has all the luck.
Lakers stint? Well, it went pretty well by getting a great big and number two in AD. They won a championship with James as their best player. After that, the fun ended and for some reason he, at the least, encouraged the front office to go after Westbrook. Dumb move, obviously. And the last couple years, injuries, which are part of the game and part of aging. He certainly isn't a victim of anything, but the facts are there that he has had some really bad luck with teammates and front offices that Jordan, and many other greats, never had.