PC Board All-Time Fantasy League Project - Discussion Thread

CaliBullsFan · Post #741 » by **CaliBullsFan** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 5:50 pm

Yeah this is an unwritten rule no one has mentioned names of undrafted plyers

whitehops · Post #742 » by **whitehops** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 5:55 pm

CaliBullsFan wrote:Yeah this is an unwritten rule no one has mentioned names of undrafted plyers

pretty sure it's a written rule

MisterHibachi · Post #743 » by **MisterHibachi** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:06 pm

CaliBullsFan wrote:Yeah this is an unwritten rule no one has mentioned names of undrafted plyers

Actually it is written lol

MisterHibachi · Post #744 » by **MisterHibachi** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:38 pm

Narigo wrote:.

You're up.

john248 · Post #745 » by **john248** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:43 pm

I like the way they're seeded now personally due to the advantages of draft position. But really I don't care too much.

Sent from my Galaxy Note 3

Post #746 » by **Quotatious** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:54 pm

How about punishing ardee for breaking the rule by forcing him to take Dantley with his next pick? :lol:

CaliBullsFan · Post #747 » by **CaliBullsFan** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 7:29 pm

Very excited about my next pick. He brings 2 very specific skills and nothing else, PERFECT role player on my team. I will be devastated if I don't get him.

RSCD3_ · Post #748 » by **RSCD3_** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:08 pm

Quotatious wrote:
Notanoob wrote:Also, I'm happy to see Iverson get picked. I was worried that no one was willing to start him, but because of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vMPO-FE9dg

He might go totally undrafted. I'm happy to see that isn't the case, but man is he a big risk. I know that a number of people do not think highly of him at all.

Yeah, I'm also happy that Iverson was finally drafted. I honestly thought no one would take him. I'm very curious how RSCD is gonna use him. He's not a good fit with LeBron (worse fit than Wade), and I can't imagine AI being willing to come off the bench. He wasn't willing to do it even when he was way past his prime in Memphis. Maybe on a team with other great players it'd be easier for him to accept that role? Naive me... He would be amazing as an instant offense off the pine type of guy.

Iverson is impractical for one other reason in this type of team too - he needs to take a lot of shots, and doesn't really convert that many of them. I think you'd rather want efficient players who will be okay with having their role a bit limited. Heck, I'm even a little worried about that with Kobe.

Right now it seems to me that there are two players who can be huge steals that late in the draft. Efficient 30 PPG scorer anyone?

Well considering we're using 2013 rules which are a lot more " open movement " than 2001. So iverson would benefit considerably. Also without going into too much detail he would get time In. As LeBron is the leader of my team I think he can connect with young iverson like hea.s doing to beasley. Ik that might sound like a bunch of unquantifiable values but having a team guy like that rubs off.

Sent from my SCH-I800 using RealGM Forums mobile app

Notanoob · Post #749 » by **Notanoob** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:30 pm

Darn it! I was going to select Michael Cooper! I figured he was interchangeable with Mookie. I never figured that I'd loose him to the one person between my next pick. Arg. Sorry guys, I'll have to think about this now, and my day is about to get difficult, so it might be a while.

CaliBullsFan · Post #750 » by **CaliBullsFan** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:31 pm

I heavily considered Aldridge in round 5 super surprised he lasted this long.

My Power Rankings are

1.RSCD3_
2.CaliBullsfan
3.Narigo

Narigo · Post #751 » by **Narigo** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:33 pm

Notanoob wrote:Darn it! I was going to select Michael Cooper! I figured he was interchangeable with Mookie. I never figured that I'd loose him to the one person between my next pick.

Thats what you get for taking Paul Pierce lol

ThunderDan9 · Post #752 » by **ThunderDan9** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:36 pm

No, I was going to select Cooper!

Narigo has a SICK bench!

ThunderDan9 · Post #753 » by **ThunderDan9** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:37 pm

Notanoob wrote:Just a suggestion, but shouldn't the match-ups be random too? Otherwise people might build their teams for their first match-up.

I totally agree. That would be reasonable, fair and exciting.

whitehops · Post #754 » by **whitehops** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:03 pm

I liked the cooper pick by narigo.

and yeah I would be totally fine with a randomized bracket, would probably be more suspenseful to be honest.

MisterHibachi · Post #755 » by **MisterHibachi** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:08 pm

I'll randomize the names after the draft is over.

CaliBullsFan · Post #756 » by **CaliBullsFan** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:41 pm

How many judges do we have? And what will be the system

MisterHibachi · Post #757 » by **MisterHibachi** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:52 pm

The judges for the playoffs are bastillon, TMACFORMVP, penbeast0, ronnymac2, and Doctor MJ. More people can volunteer if they want. Also I hoped that GMs who get eliminated in the playoffs would agree to turn into to judges. Makes the deeper rounds in the playoffs tougher cuz you gotta convince more people.

CaliBullsFan · Post #758 » by **CaliBullsFan** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:14 pm

Do you think we should recruit more judges? I think the more diverse opinions the better.

Also for the judging will it simply be picking one or the other or will it be a point system like A vs B you can either pick A regular meaning you think they win but its relatively close(1 point) or you pick A big meaning you don't think its close(1.5 points)

MisterHibachi · Post #759 » by **MisterHibachi** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:18 pm

I'm not sure about the system. I figured it would be just like judges saying 'team a would win' or team b would win. But honestly, I also want to know how many games it would take in a 7 game series. Point system would be a good one. I'm honestly not sure about the system.

And yeah, I'm hoping we get more judges. I've mentioned a few times people can volunteer to be judges so I hope more people do that. More opinions the better chance that the better team wins.

MisterHibachi · Post #760 » by **MisterHibachi** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:23 pm

We can do a points system in this manner:

Each judge says 'team A would win in so many games'

7 games is 1 one point, because well 7 game series would be close as hell.
6 games is 2 points
5 games is 3 points
4 games is 4 points

And some manner of adding points for being voted the winning team by the judge. So maybe 5 points for being chosen the winner by the judge plus the points awarded by the amount of games the judge chose you for.

So judges would cast final votes in this manner:

Team A in 6 games. 7 points.

After all the judges have voted, the team with the most points advances.

This way we can also see which team in the end is most dominant. One team could theoretically sweep all its match ups but lose in the finals. They would have the most points, but wouldn't be the winner. So that would add a nice twist to it I think.

Thoughts?