Quotatious wrote:He was a star, he was just underrated because he spent most of his best years on mediocre/bad Sixers teams.
Sure, he was a peak-play All-Star, absolutely. Not a focal offensive player, but a marvelous defender, a pretty well-rounded guy. His big sin was that he wasn't a hot scorer when things slowed down and had a troubled shot. That's all. Very good player, just not a franchise cornerstone.
I certainly do, too. I agree with Milbuck that Wiggins and Iguodala are totally different players, though.
Not even remotely similar, yeah. Iggy had way more value as a defender and playmaker than we're like to ever see from Wiggins, though Andrew is already looking like he'll overtake Iguodala's peak scoring and is jut in his third season.
I think Wiggins' ceiling is clearly higher than Iguodala's.
Oh? Given that his entire focus is going to be scoring, pretty clearly, you think he'll post a higher ceiling than Iggy? How good a scorer does Wiggins have to become in order for that to be true to you? It's an interesting thought, because it's an age-old debate.