Post#94 » by therealbig3 » Thu Oct 21, 2021 5:20 am
Re: Simmons vs Mccollum and why I would take Mccollum in most situations:
Simmons is a very good defender, but I wouldn't say he's as good as the super elite defenders like Draymond/Davis/Giannis/Bam/Gobert or even Embiid on his own team. He's not someone that can anchor a defense imo, he's just a really good perimeter defender with size and length, so he's got versatility. Like Iguodala back in the day, or George, or Kawhi. That has solid value for sure, but it's really not superstar level value, and it's not really the same as what a strong offensive player can provide, unless Simmons was also backing it up with good offense.
First of all, I firmly believe that Mccollum is a zero-time All-Star solely because he's been in the West, which has been stacked with superstar talent on the perimeter, way moreso than the East. No doubt in my mind that he would be a multi-time All-Star if he was on an Eastern team. So that shouldn't be held against him in a comparison with Simmons. In terms of actual on-court value, Mccollum is a really good offensive player, similar to what Klay Thompson gives an offense. He's capable on the ball, but excels in terms of off-ball offense, and is a dangerous outside threat in terms of spotting up and off the dribble. Capable passer too, don't think he's a tunnel vision player.
He just doesn't do much defensively, I don't think he's so bad he kills a team out there, I don't think he's all that good either that he's worth nothing either. But he gives a lot of offensive value. I'll take that over a defensive role player, which is what Simmons is right now. Simmons can handle the ball and pass, but he's so scared to shoot, and defenses know that, and it actively hurts his team offensively. His performance against the Hawks was pretty damning.