Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Relentless88
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,794
- And1: 101
- Joined: Apr 08, 2008
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Beasley >>>>>>>> Randolph
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- oaktownwarriors87
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,861
- And1: 4,421
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
J-Rich- wrote:Dresta wrote:Beasley 21/12/3/2/2, 9/14 shooting against the Cavs.
He's doing better than an injured Randolph, I'm very impressed.
Yeah, the only time Beasleys stat line looks better is when Randolph is on the bench or in street clothes.
Randolph>>>Tito
cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Wade2k6
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,104
- And1: 77
- Joined: May 29, 2004
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Beasleys numbers from his rookie year are nearly identical to Randolphs this year with just about the same amount of minutes (excluding pace which definitely helps AR). Beasley is just a better basketball player, plain and simple.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
MSGBallerz
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,748
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 17, 2009
- Location: NYC
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Are we seriously going to start posting individual games again? Just last night Beasley had 6 pts on 2-11 shooting with 1 assist 7 rebs and 4 TOs. Lets just admit they both have a very long way to go.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,076
- And1: 16,465
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
I'd rather have Jason Thompson than both to be honest.
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
J-Rich-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,725
- And1: 4
- Joined: Jan 27, 2003
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Wade2k6 wrote:Beasleys numbers from his rookie year are nearly identical to Randolphs this year with just about the same amount of minutes (excluding pace which definitely helps AR). Beasley is just a better basketball player, plain and simple.
You're forgetting about who Randolph plays for. Randolph survived being mind ****ed from Nellie as a rookie and lived to tell about it. Plus Beasley was drafted high so Miami aren't gonna just bench him just because he's a rookie. Beasley was automatically given playing time while Randolph had to fight for it. The more you play the more experience you get
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
ReekDaVill
- Banned User
- Posts: 188
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 14, 2010
- Location: Chicago, Illinois -->I'm not a Bulls Fan been a Knicks fan since 98'
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
J-Rich- wrote:Wade2k6 wrote:Beasleys numbers from his rookie year are nearly identical to Randolphs this year with just about the same amount of minutes (excluding pace which definitely helps AR). Beasley is just a better basketball player, plain and simple.
You're forgetting about who Randolph plays for. Randolph survived being mind ****ed from Nellie as a rookie and lived to tell about it. Plus Beasley was drafted high so Miami aren't gonna just bench him just because he's a rookie. Beasley was automatically given playing time while Randolph had to fight for it. The more you play the more experience you get
Ball.
Nobody gives a *u** so just let this thread die down, and Beasely is better than Randolph but it doesn't matter since both are fourth option or no defense players.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
Tommy Gun
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,240
- And1: 2
- Joined: Feb 24, 2003
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
A 66 page thread for these guys????
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
SportsWorld
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,601
- And1: 133
- Joined: Dec 03, 2006
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Michael Beasley was just awful last night and looks as dumb as a rock (a PF that spends most of the game standing around the 3 point line, no thanks). That being said, he's still better than Anthony "Magic" Randolph.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- oaktownwarriors87
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,861
- And1: 4,421
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Wade2k6 wrote:Beasleys numbers from his rookie year are nearly identical to Randolphs this year with just about the same amount of minutes (excluding pace which definitely helps AR). Beasley is just a better basketball player, plain and simple.
This post is about as stupid as it gets. Randolph has a per of 19.0 and Beasley is getting 17.0.
Randolph averages 22.7 minutes, Beasley has only played less than 22.7 minutes 3 times this season. That's an accomplishment, but when Randolph actually plays minutes it's clear he's statistically superior.
Now you guys can talk crap about Randolph not getting minutes... and the entire cycle starts again.
cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Relentless88
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,794
- And1: 101
- Joined: Apr 08, 2008
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
oaktownwarriors87 wrote:Wade2k6 wrote:Beasleys numbers from his rookie year are nearly identical to Randolphs this year with just about the same amount of minutes (excluding pace which definitely helps AR). Beasley is just a better basketball player, plain and simple.
This post is about as stupid as it gets. Randolph has a per of 19.0 and Beasley is getting 17.0.
Randolph averages 22.7 minutes, Beasley has only played less than 22.7 minutes 3 times this season. That's an accomplishment, but when Randolph actually plays minutes it's clear he's statistically superior.
Now you guys can talk crap about Randolph not getting minutes... and the entire cycle starts again.
Statistically superior lol.
Maggette must be better than Pierce and Granger?
Ellis should be in MVP talks now then.
Get real, stats from GSW don't matter to anyone else other than your fans.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- oaktownwarriors87
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,861
- And1: 4,421
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Relentless88 wrote:oaktownwarriors87 wrote:Wade2k6 wrote:Beasleys numbers from his rookie year are nearly identical to Randolphs this year with just about the same amount of minutes (excluding pace which definitely helps AR). Beasley is just a better basketball player, plain and simple.
This post is about as stupid as it gets. Randolph has a per of 19.0 and Beasley is getting 17.0.
Randolph averages 22.7 minutes, Beasley has only played less than 22.7 minutes 3 times this season. That's an accomplishment, but when Randolph actually plays minutes it's clear he's statistically superior.
Now you guys can talk crap about Randolph not getting minutes... and the entire cycle starts again.
Statistically superior lol.
Maggette must be better than Pierce and Granger?
Ellis should be in MVP talks now then.
Get real, stats from GSW don't matter to anyone else other than your fans.
Ellis has poor stats, so I don't know what you're talking about. You're right though, look at players like Nash, Dirk and Jackson post-Nelson... clearly they had a statistical slumps.

cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
Blame Rasho
- On Leave
- Posts: 42,377
- And1: 10,152
- Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
There are never a lack of bad posts in this thread.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
Chosen01
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,107
- And1: 534
- Joined: May 08, 2009
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
SportsWorld wrote:Michael Beasley was just awful last night and looks as dumb as a rock (a PF that spends most of the game standing around the 3 point line, no thanks). That being said, he's still better than Anthony "Magic" Randolph.
Thats not his game, its cause we have the worst coach in the leauge, he mkes beasley share half his minutes at the 3 to give haslem his minutes at the 4, and how the heat use their sfs, as spot up 3pt shooters, blame the coach.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
BBallFreak
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 57,542
- And1: 18,795
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
J-Rich- wrote:Wade2k6 wrote:Plus Beasley was drafted high so Miami aren't gonna just bench him just because he's a rookie. Beasley was automatically given playing time while Randolph had to fight for it. The more you play the more experience you get
Yup. High lottery picks never have to fight for time. That's why Hasheem Thabeet, Darko Millicic, Jordan Hill, and Joe Alexander were just force fed playing time. Because they were drafted so high you couldn't bench them. I mean, Thabeet, Darko, Hill, and Alexander's teams are, or were, all in the midst of a playoff hunt, like Beasley's was, and they all saw/see plenty of time...
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Wade2k6
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,104
- And1: 77
- Joined: May 29, 2004
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
oaktownwarriors87 wrote:Wade2k6 wrote:Beasleys numbers from his rookie year are nearly identical to Randolphs this year with just about the same amount of minutes (excluding pace which definitely helps AR). Beasley is just a better basketball player, plain and simple.
This post is about as stupid as it gets. Randolph has a per of 19.0 and Beasley is getting 17.0.
Randolph averages 22.7 minutes, Beasley has only played less than 22.7 minutes 3 times this season. That's an accomplishment, but when Randolph actually plays minutes it's clear he's statistically superior.
Learn to read. I said Beasley numbers from his rookie year are nearly identical/similar to Randolphs this year. And that doesn't include pace, which definitely helps AR.
13.9 ppg, 5.4 rpg, 1 apg, 0.5 bpg in 24.8 MPG. 47.2% from the field.
11.6 ppg, 6.5 rpg, 1.3 apg, 1.5 bpg in 22.7 MPG. 44.3% from the field.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Coxy
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,574
- And1: 15,020
- Joined: Jun 17, 2008
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
BBallFreak
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 57,542
- And1: 18,795
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
And yet, I'd still rather have Beasley than someone who plays 33 games in a season with a itty bitty whiddle ankle injury...Coxy wrote::D
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Tim_Hardawayy
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,780
- And1: 10,511
- Joined: Sep 17, 2008
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
This is the thread that never ends...
It just goes on and on my friends...
It just goes on and on my friends...
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- wiff
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,887
- And1: 21
- Joined: Jul 22, 2006
- Location: Gettin da boot!
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
It's funny how much life this thread has. I don't see it dying anytime soon with talks about Miami not being happy with Beasley.





