RealGM

CP3 vs Deron.Who's the best PG in the game?Poll.
They play against each other now!

paul

CP3...

Paul

Paul followed by Nash.

NYK 455 wrote:Paul followed by Nash.

Nash is not even close to being the best anymore. He may be #6 now.

Paul

JordansBulls wrote:

NYK 455 wrote:Paul followed by Nash.

Nash is not even close to being the best anymore. He may be #6 now.

cp3. nash was always over rated because of his inflated stats and he played no def. being the pg of the team that leads the league in scoring doesnt mean anything.

Paul

D-will

D-Will.

Another years Paul was always slighty better in every category stats, now he is only clearly better in spg and Deron is clearly better scoring.

Deron 21.3 ppg 4.3 rpg, 9.8 apg, 1.3 spg
Paul 16.6 ppg, 4.7 rpg, 10.1 apg, 3.1 spg

And Paul isn't able to win vs Deron.

FJS wrote:D-Will.

Another years Paul was always slighty better in every category stats, now he is only clearly better in spg and Deron is clearly better scoring.

Deron 21.3 ppg 4.3 rpg, 9.8 apg, 1.3 spg
Paul 16.6 ppg, 4.7 rpg, 10.1 apg, 3.1 spg

And Paul isn't able to win vs Deron.

I like Deron more but why did you left out Paul's superior scoring efficiency (Deron 558TS%, Paul 608TS%) and the fact that Paul is playing less minutes (34.4MPG - Paul, 38.6MPG - Deron)?

Kobe8Player wrote:

FJS wrote:D-Will.

Another years Paul was always slighty better in every category stats, now he is only clearly better in spg and Deron is clearly better scoring.

Deron 21.3 ppg 4.3 rpg, 9.8 apg, 1.3 spg
Paul 16.6 ppg, 4.7 rpg, 10.1 apg, 3.1 spg

And Paul isn't able to win vs Deron.

I like Deron more but why did you left out Paul's superior scoring efficiency (Deron 558TS%, Paul 608TS%) and the fact that Paul is playing less minutes (34.4MPG - Paul, 38.6MPG - Deron)?

Because there's no point cherry-picking stats if you include all the things the other guy does better than your guy.

Plus, who cares about turnovers when it comes to point guards(like CP3's 2.3 to D-Will's 3.6).

It's all about the PPG.

^^that.


It's amazing how little Paul turns the ball over considering how much he has the ball in his hands.

JordansBulls wrote:

NYK 455 wrote:Paul followed by Nash.

Nash is not even close to being the best anymore. He may be #6 now.

Only if you only look at volume scoring. He's averaging 19/9.5. Chris Paul is averaging 16.5/10, and Deron Williams is averaging 21/10, with lower efficiency.

How are they clearly better than Nash?

NYK 455 wrote:

JordansBulls wrote:

NYK 455 wrote:Paul followed by Nash.

Nash is not even close to being the best anymore. He may be #6 now.

Only if you only look at volume scoring. He's averaging 19/9.5. Chris Paul is averaging 16.5/10, and Deron Williams is averaging 21/10, with lower efficiency.

How are they clearly better than Nash?

It's called defense, but your team wouldn't know anything about that, would they?

frozt wrote:It's called defense, but your team wouldn't know anything about that, would they?

Oh snap son, you got me good.

And anyway, although Paul and Williams are better defenders than Nash, it's exaggerated like crazy. Especially with Deron, who's really not a good defender.

Kobe8Player wrote:

FJS wrote:D-Will.

Another years Paul was always slighty better in every category stats, now he is only clearly better in spg and Deron is clearly better scoring.

Deron 21.3 ppg 4.3 rpg, 9.8 apg, 1.3 spg
Paul 16.6 ppg, 4.7 rpg, 10.1 apg, 3.1 spg

And Paul isn't able to win vs Deron.

I like Deron more but why did you left out Paul's superior scoring efficiency (Deron 558TS%, Paul 608TS%) and the fact that Paul is playing less minutes (34.4MPG - Paul, 38.6MPG - Deron)?

because he's FJS?

FJS wrote:D-Will.

Another years Paul was always slighty better in every category stats, now he is only clearly better in spg and Deron is clearly better scoring.

Deron 21.3 ppg 4.3 rpg, 9.8 apg, 1.3 spg
Paul 16.6 ppg, 4.7 rpg, 10.1 apg, 3.1 spg

And Paul isn't able to win vs Deron.

Extreme cherry pick.

Cp3 all day.