kasino wrote:Moses
22/14/1.6 on .48%
Dirk
25/10/.9 on .46%
Since when is 25.9 ppg rounded down to 25? And using FG% in that case is misleading, because of the 3pt%. Nowitzki has 49.3 eFG% while Malone during his best years has 48.1 eFG%. The TS% is also a better tool to get a grasp on the scoring efficiency.
kasino wrote:Dirk well undoubtably stay as the better PS scorer of the two while Moses is of course the better regular season scorer is at 25ppg for his first 13 NBA seasons
Malone scored 23.3 ppg during his first 13 NBA seasons, not 25. Malone also played at a higher pace during those years, which increased his touches. Obviously he went down in the playoffs despite playing more minutes, while Nowitzki went up. Nowitzki's scoring efficiency stays the same in the playoffs, Malone gets worse.
kasino wrote:Moses is unquestionably a better rebounder then Dirk PS and RS
No, he isn't. Malone is just put into a different situation on the offensive end, which led to more opportunities to get offensive rebounds. The DRB% in the RS shows Malone as better, but that changes in the postseason. Now, what do you think is a better indicator of rebounding strength? Beating up weaker opponents in terms of rebounding or being better against better opponents?
Offensive rebounding is based much more on the offensive position than on skills, unless you believe that someone can rebound under the own basket while being incapable of doing it under the opponents basket. Makes no sense to assume such thing. A PF having a more perimeter oriented game will not have as many chances to grab an offensive rebounds than a C who only stays under the opponents basket. That one should be easy to understand. Well, and due to that the offensive rebounding numbers aren't telling you much about the ability of a player to rebound. Let alone that offensive rebounding does not show any kind of positive impact on the overall team success in average.
kasino wrote:I don't understand your use of percentages, those that are in favor of Malone come with negativity from you
Because the numbers have to put into context. Nowitzki as center has a higher BLK% than Moses Malone, just that Nowitzki didn't play that much center. Also, Nowitzki in the post is rather defending the position, while Moses Malone rather tried to challenge the shot. The former is the better way to defend. And given the latter Malone's BLK% is rather low.
kasino wrote:Dirk has never been called a good defender while Moses has, its not unthinkable that he would block more shots
If someone called Moses Malone a good defender, he rather didn't see him play or didn't understand the implications on defense Malone's playing style had.
kasino wrote:he took a very Lebron Cavs Rockets team to the Finals against Bird Celtics
The Rockets run to finals was rather lucky. They played really weak teams and had the luck that their opponents missed more free throws than usually in important games. The Lakers went 22 of 35 from the line in game 3, while the Rockets went 21-22. If both are shooting their free throws normally, the Lakers go 25-35 and the Rockets 17-22, that makes a 7 point swing in a 3pt game. The Rockets should have been out in the first round without the luck at the free throw line. Then they play the Spurs, a team similar to the 2011 Rockets in terms of strength in the next round, then they go on playing the Kings in the WCF, a team as weak as the 2011 Suns. That was really just luck, because the better 1981 Suns lost game 7 at home to those Kings. And then in the finals, despite their two wins, the have in average a -9.8 scoring margin. They basically went lucky twice, which is within the normal variance, in order to not get swept.
The Rockets made the finals 1981, because of circumstances, not because they were such an incredible strong team due to Moses Malone's playing level.
kasino wrote:then had one of the best PS runs with Philly, imo having a better performance then Dirk
No, Malone did not have a better performance level than Nowitzki. Heck, Nowitzki's performance level in 2006 was higher than anything Moses Malone ever did in the playoffs. Malone just happened to play in a faster era, making his raw boxscore numbers looking more impressive. For example, the 1983 76ers had 97.2 pace, the 2006 Mavericks 88.9, the 2011 Mavericks 86.9.
And it is pretty telling that you completely ignore the fact that Nowitzki is clearly superior in terms of ball handling and passing. Keep in mind, Moses Malone went to a team which went to the finals the season before. That team was more depended on Julius Erving than on Malone, when we look at the performance level of the team in games without those respective players.