Page 1 of 1
Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:46 am
by rrravenred
The Nuggs are currently rolling along quite nicely thankyou, with an even, distributed style of play (8 players are over 20 mpg). It's top scorer (Gallinari) is only averaging 17 ppg, but they're still the 5th best offensive team in the league (by ORtg). Defensively, they're only middle of the range, but are still a solid 5th seed if the playoffs started today.
Would the team improve with Melo back in the side (even this year's arguably-in-the-MVP-conversation Melo), or would messing with the roster give them a worse record? Some reasoning with your answers would be nice.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:38 am
by Doormatt
i mean, the nuggets arent even remotely contenders so yeah theyd probably be better with melo. right now they are beating teams with a fast paced high powered offense and a slightly below average defense. i made this comparison earlier in the season but to me they are a deeper version of the rockets but instead of harden they have gallinari. so really i dont see them sustaining any sort of success in the playoffs as they dont really have a player who can consistently create offense at a slower pace, especially since they thrive on fast breaks and turnovers. melo would help that and give them a better chance of winning in the postseason. they are currently a team that is imo built to win regular season games and then be a non factor in the playoffs, maybe pull off an upset if they face a team dealing with injuries, but certainly go no further than the 2nd round.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:46 am
by rrravenred
Well he arguably hasn't done a lot for NY during the past few playoff runs, it has to be said...
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:04 am
by Doormatt
different situation.
the question is would melo's ability to iso and create offense be better for the nuggets in the playoffs replacing gallo? i say yes it would.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:05 am
by kasino
Well he didn't have much to work with look at the roster celtics completely focused on him
Last season Amare and Shump went down the Heat completely focused on him
This is the first season since 09 the team around him is contender worthy
The Nuggets with all they have from the Melo trade and with Iggy is surely a better team with Melo then they would be without them
Idk why Melo gets bashed so often, never missing the PS while some players are given all the credit in the world and have more messed PS pretty often
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:16 am
by Doormatt
melo is pretty overrated by the media and fans in general. he certainly doesnt belong in the MVP discussion as there are at least 5-10 players more deserving of that, but i still the nuggets could use a scorer of the likes of melo considerably.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:26 am
by rrravenred
And for kicks, overall pace differences between RS and Playoffs:
Code: Select all
Year R/S POffs Percentage Difference
1980 103.1 98.4 4.53%
1981 101.8 95.2 6.51%
1982 100.9 98.4 2.45%
1983 103.1 100.2 2.77%
1984 101.4 97.9 3.48%
1985 102.1 103.5 -1.35%
1986 102.1 99.0 3.07%
1987 100.8 97.5 3.28%
1988 99.6 94.0 5.61%
1989 100.6 94.4 6.20%
1990 98.3 95.9 2.47%
1991 97.8 93.3 4.63%
1992 96.6 91.7 5.12%
1993 96.8 90.8 6.17%
1994 95.1 88.6 6.83%
1995 92.9 89.0 4.21%
1996 91.8 87.1 5.13%
1997 90.1 87.2 3.26%
1998 90.3 85.9 4.85%
1999 88.9 85.7 3.62%
2000 93.1 87.8 5.68%
2001 91.3 89.3 2.14%
2002 90.7 90.5 0.22%
2003 91.0 90.3 0.76%
2004 90.1 88.4 1.89%
2005 90.9 89.3 1.79%
2006 90.5 89.2 1.47%
2007 91.9 89.5 2.63%
2008 92.4 88.0 4.75%
2009 91.7 88.7 3.23%
2010 92.7 89.7 3.28%
2011 92.1 87.8 4.66%
2012 91.3 89.0 2.49%
Average 94.81 91.85 3.57%
I'd love to have broken it down by series, but Basketball Reference doesn't give per-game pace numbers (damn you, Kubatko, daaaaaamn you).
So whilst the effect is real enough, it averages 3 possessions per game slower (except for 1985... which is an outlier) with quite a few years being negligibly slower.
By decade it goes...
1980s - 3.75% - 3.7 possessions per game
1990s - 4.63% - 4.4 possessions per game
2000s - 2.46 - 2.2 possessions per game
Interesting that the 90s were the decade with the biggest disparity, which I put down to the murderous early 90s defence as well as the glut of talented post players, giving more incentive to slow it down.
To what degree those 2 - 4.5 possessions difference require new skillsets and gamestyles is arguable, although the finer grained pace-per-playoff-round would make this a much easier question to answer.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:00 am
by Doormatt
hm its not just the absolute pace but just the way playoff games are played. youre playing against a team for potentially 7 games, teams will game plan to slow you down, and youre not going to get as many fast breaks or easy buckets. it works in the regular season becuase teams could be resting players/dealing with injuries, coming off of back to backs (like the lakers were tonight), or in general out of rhythm. playoff basketball is just different, not so much so that its a different game, but enough to the point where having a guy like melo with a different skill set and style would be more beneficial than having someone like gallo. plus in the playoffs since youre playing against one team for a whole series, whatever stats/averages were happening in the regular season against the entire league arent as meaningful, since you are facing a certain matchup (usually a better team since this is the playoffs).
look at the nuggets last year. they were 2nd in pace (+2.9 to league average) in the regular season and in the playoffs against a laker team that liked to play very slow (20th in pace in the regular season) they were 5th in pace (+1.3). there offense was slightly worse too and went from 109.2 (+4.6) to 107.1 (+3.5). and yeah against the lakers the nuggets couldve used someone like melo, and i dont see how this year is any different.
the nuggets can be successful in the regular season because they are young, deep and can get out and run. 2 of those advantages are much less important in the playoffs where rotations shorten and being young/inexperienced all of a sudden isnt as valuable where your next game could mean elimination.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:12 am
by jman2585
Melo is overrated lately, him being an MVP candidate was absurd, but then so are the Nuggets. Regardless of how he'd fit on this team with their balance, etc, they'd be better off, because a happy, contracted Melo has better trade value.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:13 pm
by JordansBulls
Not sure really. The way the Knicks started off this year you would think so, but now they are pretty much equal to the Nuggets recordwise.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:25 pm
by E-Balla
28.4/6.5/2.7 on 56TS while being second, on the second best team in the conference, in on/off. Melo PRIOR to this year was overrated but Melo right now is probably underrated by most fans (especially on here). I don't see any way you can say he's not a top 5-10 MVP candidate. He's arguably 4th by any metric.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:27 pm
by E-Balla
Also they'll easily be better with him. They were badly missing a great scorer last year in the playoffs. This team is good without a lead star but they don't had anyone good enough to lead them. Melo giving them 27/7/3 a night would definetly help.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:32 pm
by hokageinfamus
obviously if it wasn't for Melo the Nuggets wouldn't be as deep as they are now. You add him to the current team they're a contender
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:27 pm
by fatal9
Melo has improved his spot up shooting (I think? some data to confirm this would be good) and off ball scoring in the past year, that could probably make him a better fit in Denver than he was before. Still a serious ball stopper in non spot-up opportunities, and his efficiency is regressing to what is more typical of him, but I think Karl could make better use of him now because his jumpshooting seems to have improved (and I'd say a higher % of his offense comes from "in the flow" opportunities than before). So imo his game is a bit more conducive to an offense with ball movement than it was before.
They do have issues offensively when they can't dictate the pace so he helps them out there, but there's always a fine line with Melo, he can shoot you out of a game just as easily. Denver is going to be the favorite in all of their home games, they have an amazing home court advantage, but having Melo maybe gives them a better chance of stealing one on the road in the playoffs (though I don't feel comfortable saying this considering Melo has never shown himself to be a reliable player in the playoffs). Still a lot of the same issues with him, awful team defender, not particularly good at reading defenses but you can plan your half court offense around the defensive attention he receives (especially with good three point shooting around him), but still the same poor feel for the game at a team level that has always kept him from making superstar impact. To me he helps their offense overall, especially in a playoff setting, he has made improvements to his game since his previous stint with the team, but I don't think he helps them breakthrough against the Clippers, OKC or Spurs. Maybe gives them a better chance to beat the Grizzlies though. The next breakthrough for Denver will come once they improve defensively (Iggy has helped, but their PG defense is terrible, Faried and McGee have the talent to be good defenders but are prone to a lot of mistakes), and Melo doesn't help them in that regard at all. The potential improvement in half court offense comes at the expense of having to play another weak defensive player, so I don't see them getting past the second round when they will run into one of the offensive powerhouses (SAS, OKC, LAC).
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:40 pm
by JordansBulls
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:41 pm
by SideshowBob
fatal9 wrote:Melo has improved his spot up shooting (I think? some data to confirm this would be good) and off ball scoring in the past year, that could probably make him a better fit in Denver than he was before. Still a serious ball stopper in non spot-up opportunities, and his efficiency is regressing to what is more typical of him, but I think Karl could make better use of him now because his jumpshooting seems to have improved (and I'd say a higher % of his offense comes from "in the flow" opportunities than before). So imo his game is a bit more conducive to an offense with ball movement than it was before.
They do have issues offensively when they can't dictate the pace so he helps them out there, but there's always a fine line with Melo, he can shoot you out of a game just as easily. Denver is going to be the favorite in all of their home games, they have an amazing home court advantage, but having Melo maybe gives them a better chance of stealing one on the road in the playoffs (though I don't feel comfortable saying this considering Melo has never shown himself to be a reliable player in the playoffs). Still a lot of the same issues with him, awful team defender, not particularly good at reading defenses but you can plan your half court offense around the defensive attention he receives (especially with good three point shooting around him), but still the same poor feel for the game at a team level that has always kept him from making superstar impact. To me he helps their offense overall, especially in a playoff setting, he has made improvements to his game since his previous stint with the team, but I don't think he helps them breakthrough against the Clippers, OKC or Spurs. Maybe gives them a better chance to beat the Grizzlies though. The next breakthrough for Denver will come once they improve defensively (Iggy has helped, but their PG defense is terrible, Faried and McGee have the talent to be good defenders but are prone to a lot of mistakes), and Melo doesn't help them in that regard at all. The potential improvement in half court offense comes at the expense of having to play another weak defensive player, so I don't see them getting past the second round when they will run into one of the offensive powerhouses (SAS, OKC, LAC).
FWIW fatal here's what Synergy has for his spot-up shooting this season (but there's nothing to compare it to):
203 plays, 1.11 points per play (#62 in the league), 78/188 overall, 58/145 on 3 pointers for an overall eFG% of 56.9%.
Re: Would the Nuggets be better with Melo?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:48 pm
by rrravenred
Thanks for that Fatal, just the sort of analysis I was looking for.
One reason I ask is that I've a bit of a fascination with George Karl as a coach, and his teams are almost always built around multi-polar offences and don't rely on having great one-out players. Add Nique to those early 90s Sonics teams, are they as successful?
Granted, back then he had a bit more talent to work with than currently.