- Draymond Green
vs.
Scottie Pippen
Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.
Winsome Gerbil wrote:this stuff has got to stop.
lorak wrote:Winsome Gerbil wrote:this stuff has got to stop.
Why is it so difficult to so many people to admit, that some new unique player might be better than legends from the past?

lorak wrote:On offense they were comparable (ineffective scorers and very good playmakers), but on defense Green is significantly better, because he is as good as Scottie in covering whole floor (rotations, help D), but at the same time is elite at rim defender and Pippen wasn't. So overall it's clearly Draymond.
Quotatious wrote:lorak wrote:On offense they were comparable (ineffective scorers and very good playmakers), but on defense Green is significantly better, because he is as good as Scottie in covering whole floor (rotations, help D), but at the same time is elite at rim defender and Pippen wasn't. So overall it's clearly Draymond.
To call Pippen an ineffective scorer is a huge overstatement. He had four seasons with 20+ ppg on above average efficiency.
1992: 21.0 ppg on +2.3% above league average
1994: 22.0 ppg on +1.6% above league average
1995: 21.4 ppg on +1.6% above league average
1997: 20.2 ppg on +1.8% above league average
Admittedly, he often declined in the playoffs efficiency-wise, but he also had playoff runs when he was still a pretty good scorer - 1991 and 1992, in particular. Especially '91, when he averaged 21.6 ppg on 56.4% TS (which is a clear improvement compared to his regular season that year - marginally higher efficiency and clearly higher volume, in a tougher defensive environment).
Pippen was never a world beater in terms of scoring efficiency, but he was decent enough, and generally a very good scorer (just not elite), capable of creating his own shot really well, and able to get his points in a lot of ways.
Pippen's scoring ability was EASILY better than Green's, like two tiers ahead of Draymond, especially in terms of creating his own shot on a consistent basis, Scottie was FAR better. I would love to see Draymond trying to be the leading scorer (by a large margin) of a 55-win team, as Pippen was in 1994. There's no way he would be able to do that, not even close.
eminence wrote:Defensively it's not particularly close, Green is just several steps up.

Winsome Gerbil wrote:Just wanted to confirm that we were all discussing the same guy. This is who we are talking about, right?
Draymond Green: 10.2pts (.418 .308 .709) .522TS% 7.9reb 7.0ast 2.0stl 1.4blk 2.4TO 16.5PER?
Jim Naismith wrote:Winsome Gerbil wrote:Just wanted to confirm that we were all discussing the same guy. This is who we are talking about, right?
Draymond Green: 10.2pts (.418 .308 .709) .522TS% 7.9reb 7.0ast 2.0stl 1.4blk 2.4TO 16.5PER?
In the 2017 playoffs, Draymond is averaging 15/9/7 with 2.0 steals and 2.6 blocks.
He also has 23.4 PER, .662 TS%, and 12.8 BPM (7th highest all-time).
The-Power wrote:Everybody who relies on boxscore stats to evaluate Green doesn't understand where his impact is coming from. I'm also not sure why it seems to be ridiculous to call Green an elite defender for whom comparisons with elite defensive big men of the past are not far-fetched. There is a plethora of evidence to support the notion of him being the best defender in the league over the past three years.