Peaks: James Harden vs Cp3

Moderators: PaulieWal, Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier, penbeast0, trex_8063

Better peak

Harden
9
28%
Chris Paul
23
72%
 
Total votes: 32

thekdog34
Starter
Posts: 2,354
And1: 782
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
     

Re: Peaks: James Harden vs Cp3 

Post#21 » by thekdog34 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:16 am

dhsilv2 wrote:
thekdog34 wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
The team got better around him, he had better bench guys to come in for him. The fact that they continue to use him like this and have increased the role tells me the coach sees that value. And remember the real plus numbers are already "wrong". They are range based, so we as analysts of the game have to figure out if they are over or under stated as they always are a bit off. That's the nature of statistics after all. I think he was under valued last year based on what I saw. I'm open to alternatives, but I'm using the points and assists as my basis for believing the impact numbers under valued him along with having a better bench.

Be interested if you have a good case for me being wrong. I certainly wish I'd seen more rockets games last year, so I admit to a small sample size for my review.


His highest impact year was 2014-15. That team was good and made the WCF. I believe he was top 5 in RPM and top 10ish in RAPM.

He played some defense, had much fewer turnovers (particularly live ball), got to the rim more, shot a higher % from 3, and moved off the ball some. He also got more steals.

Then he had his out of shape year, and he has played slow ever since. He's set the turnover record two years in a row and his 3pt percentage has been declining as has his rate of taking shots at the rim.

Given those stats, I'm not surprised at all that his impact numbers are down despite higher box score numbers in D'Antoni's system.


The problem is in part that his role completely changed. You can use RAPM but when a role changes it is just harder to use that. Throw in that his team massively out paced expectations last year at the same time his stats went WOW level.


Except that his RAPM tanked in 2015-16 when almost the exact same team was brought back and his role didn't change at all. And his RAPM was pretty good in okc and first years on the rockets (pre- slow Harden).

His 2016-17 season impact-wise was much closer to the disaster 15-16 season than the prior years.

That his role changed is a bit overrated. He just went from being on the ball 85% of the time to being on the ball 100% of the time.

The system did change dramatically though. He could get an assist simply by walking the ball up (using all 8 seconds) and making a single pass to Gordon, Anderson, Ariza, or Beverley would would often immediately shoot it.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 42,717
And1: 22,476
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Peaks: James Harden vs Cp3 

Post#22 » by dhsilv2 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:20 am

thekdog34 wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
thekdog34 wrote:
His highest impact year was 2014-15. That team was good and made the WCF. I believe he was top 5 in RPM and top 10ish in RAPM.

He played some defense, had much fewer turnovers (particularly live ball), got to the rim more, shot a higher % from 3, and moved off the ball some. He also got more steals.

Then he had his out of shape year, and he has played slow ever since. He's set the turnover record two years in a row and his 3pt percentage has been declining as has his rate of taking shots at the rim.

Given those stats, I'm not surprised at all that his impact numbers are down despite higher box score numbers in D'Antoni's system.


The problem is in part that his role completely changed. You can use RAPM but when a role changes it is just harder to use that. Throw in that his team massively out paced expectations last year at the same time his stats went WOW level.


Except that his RAPM tanked in 2015-16 when almost the exact same team was brought back and his role didn't change at all. And his RAPM was pretty good in okc and first years on the rockets (pre- slow Harden).

His 2016-17 season impact-wise was much closer to the disaster 15-16 season than the prior years.

That his role changed is a bit overrated. He just went from being on the ball 85% of the time to being on the ball 100% of the time.

The system did change dramatically though. He could get an assist simply by walking the ball up (using all 8 seconds) and making a single pass to Gordon, Anderson, Ariza, or Beverley would would often immediately shoot it.


I think we're in agreement that in 16 Harden showed up fat and lazy. He still had a heck of a year given that, but I wasn't contesting that year.
thekdog34
Starter
Posts: 2,354
And1: 782
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
     

Re: Peaks: James Harden vs Cp3 

Post#23 » by thekdog34 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:33 am

dhsilv2 wrote:
thekdog34 wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
The problem is in part that his role completely changed. You can use RAPM but when a role changes it is just harder to use that. Throw in that his team massively out paced expectations last year at the same time his stats went WOW level.


Except that his RAPM tanked in 2015-16 when almost the exact same team was brought back and his role didn't change at all. And his RAPM was pretty good in okc and first years on the rockets (pre- slow Harden).

His 2016-17 season impact-wise was much closer to the disaster 15-16 season than the prior years.

That his role changed is a bit overrated. He just went from being on the ball 85% of the time to being on the ball 100% of the time.

The system did change dramatically though. He could get an assist simply by walking the ball up (using all 8 seconds) and making a single pass to Gordon, Anderson, Ariza, or Beverley would would often immediately shoot it.


I think we're in agreement that in 16 Harden showed up fat and lazy. He still had a heck of a year given that, but I wasn't contesting that year.


Right, I'm just saying 17 Harden had very similar rapm to 16 harden.

I'm more inclined that the system and supporting cast hid that he was basically the same player as in 16.

But I guess we'll find out.
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,446
And1: 5,314
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Re: Peaks: James Harden vs Cp3 

Post#24 » by JordansBulls » Sat Aug 5, 2017 5:01 am

Harden, he led a team further than CP3 with less talent in a more stacked conference.
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
The-Power
General Manager
Posts: 9,681
And1: 9,087
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Peaks: James Harden vs Cp3 

Post#25 » by The-Power » Sat Aug 5, 2017 10:17 am

K_chile22 wrote:A lot of time that gives guys extra credit for having bad back ups

This isn't how regression-based metrics work.
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 15,811
And1: 7,935
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: RE: Re: Peaks: James Harden vs Cp3 

Post#26 » by K_chile22 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:47 pm

The-Power wrote:
K_chile22 wrote:A lot of time that gives guys extra credit for having bad back ups

This isn't how regression-based metrics work.

Maybe not RAMP but On/Off and single year RPM most certainly do
thekdog34
Starter
Posts: 2,354
And1: 782
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
     

Re: RE: Re: Peaks: James Harden vs Cp3 

Post#27 » by thekdog34 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:57 pm

K_chile22 wrote:
The-Power wrote:
K_chile22 wrote:A lot of time that gives guys extra credit for having bad back ups

This isn't how regression-based metrics work.

Maybe not RAMP but On/Off and single year RPM most certainly do


Not rpm. It is like rapm with a box score prior
thekdog34
Starter
Posts: 2,354
And1: 782
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
     

Re: Peaks: James Harden vs Cp3 

Post#28 » by thekdog34 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:59 pm

K_chile22 wrote:Between this and the Kawhi thread I'd say 08 CP3 is underrated around here. To me, CP3 at his peak is quite a bit better than peak Harden and noticably better than peak Kawhi

I'm also really tired of people using impact stats as be all end all instead of just a piece of the puzzle. A lot of time that gives guys extra credit for having bad back ups


Isn't Chris Paul's main argument impact stats?

He's also generally had pretty poor backups. And Rivers wouldn't even stagger rest for his best players, magnifying on/off

Return to Player Comparisons