Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match

Moderators: PaulieWal, Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier, penbeast0, trex_8063

User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 41,681
And1: 19,723
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#61 » by AussieBuck » Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:02 pm

It'd be about the same as Lennox Lewis attempting to guard Steph Curry one on one. Nobody who thinks this is a chance has sparred with anyone good.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
bledredwine
RealGM
Posts: 12,267
And1: 3,886
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
   

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#62 » by bledredwine » Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:32 pm

AussieBuck wrote:It'd be about the same as Lennox Lewis attempting to guard Steph Curry one on one. Nobody who thinks this is a chance has sparred with anyone good.


That last sentence is spot on.
https://undisputedgoat.medium.com/jordan-in-the-clutch-30f6e7ed4c43
LBJ clutch- 19 of 104 career: https://www.yardbarker.com/nba/articles/lebron_james_has_only_made_19_of_107_shots_in_clutch_situation_during_his_career_178_fg_125_from_3_pointers/s1_16751_38344895
frica
Pro Prospect
Posts: 894
And1: 457
Joined: May 03, 2018

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#63 » by frica » Mon Nov 19, 2018 9:12 pm

Samurai wrote:It is interesting to me that today the vast majority of posters feel that Wilt wouldn't have a chance, but they don't point out that a fair number of folks felt that Wilt had a somewhat decent chance of winning back when the fight was discussed. I am not saying Wilt would win, just interesting that at that time more people felt Wilt had a decent shot and today most do not. And none of the ones saying he had no shot now are addressing the difference in opinions between "at the time" and now.

I point this out since both Ali and Wilt are no longer with us so it isn't a matter of the typical "modern player always beats the older player" debate we often get today. So I am curious as to the difference in opinions. Maybe today we have a deeper appreciation of the skill and science of boxing compared to then? Or is it something else?

People also gave McGregor a fair amount of chance at beating Floyd.

They don't know **** about boxing, that is.
If you think anyone can just train boxing for a few months and beat not just any boxer but the great Muhammad Ali you're an absolute and complete imbicile.
Samurai
General Manager
Posts: 8,352
And1: 2,893
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
     

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#64 » by Samurai » Tue Nov 20, 2018 1:13 am

frica wrote:
Samurai wrote:It is interesting to me that today the vast majority of posters feel that Wilt wouldn't have a chance, but they don't point out that a fair number of folks felt that Wilt had a somewhat decent chance of winning back when the fight was discussed. I am not saying Wilt would win, just interesting that at that time more people felt Wilt had a decent shot and today most do not. And none of the ones saying he had no shot now are addressing the difference in opinions between "at the time" and now.

I point this out since both Ali and Wilt are no longer with us so it isn't a matter of the typical "modern player always beats the older player" debate we often get today. So I am curious as to the difference in opinions. Maybe today we have a deeper appreciation of the skill and science of boxing compared to then? Or is it something else?

People also gave McGregor a fair amount of chance at beating Floyd.

They don't know **** about boxing, that is.
If you think anyone can just train boxing for a few months and beat not just any boxer but the great Muhammad Ali you're an absolute and complete imbicile.

There is a vast difference between McGregor/Floyd and Ali/Wilt. McGregor/Floyd was just fought in 2017; the Ali/Wilt fight was discussed 47 years ago. My point, if you read my post, was the difference in opinions on who would win 47 years ago compared to the comments posted currently. Are you really comparing a difference in opinions from a fight just over a year ago is comparable to the differences in opinions to Ali/Wilt? How could you even compare them since McGregor and Floyd actually fought so how do you compare the difference in opinions pre-fight spanning a long period of time? Ali and Wilt never actually fought. I'm not seeing the relevance.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,011
And1: 18,087
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#65 » by NO-KG-AI » Tue Nov 20, 2018 6:03 am

Ali would tool Wilt so bad that it wouldn't be a contest, unless he felt like letting him land stuff. Come on :rofl:
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,813
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#66 » by HeartBreakKid » Tue Nov 20, 2018 6:18 am

When we say "people" gave McGregor a chance against Mayweather and "people" gave Chamberlain a chance against Ali - who are we exactly talking about in regards to "people"?

A minority of casual audiences might have thought those things. But the majority of people certainly thought McGregor would lose to Floyd (and easily), and I'd reckon given just based on how much more revered and famous Ali was in the day, he'd probably be favored over Chamberlain even from the eyes of the uneducated.

If we're talking people who follow boxing or boxing experts or those in the boxing community - I have serious, serious, doubts that anyone beyond the promoters who tried to book this and the outlets they own had Chamberlain as a favorite.
Samurai
General Manager
Posts: 8,352
And1: 2,893
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
     

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#67 » by Samurai » Tue Nov 20, 2018 6:53 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:When we say "people" gave McGregor a chance against Mayweather and "people" gave Chamberlain a chance against Ali - who are we exactly talking about in regards to "people"?

A minority of casual audiences might have thought those things. But the majority of people certainly thought McGregor would lose to Floyd (and easily), and I'd reckon given just based on how much more revered and famous Ali was in the day, he'd probably be favored over Chamberlain even from the eyes of the uneducated.

If we're talking people who follow boxing or boxing experts or those in the boxing community - I have serious, serious, doubts that anyone beyond the promoters who tried to book this and the outlets they own had Chamberlain as a favorite.

In regards to the proposed Ali/Wilt fight, the "people" I am referring to were the media - sports writers and sportscasters. There was no RealGM back then, so you likely recall that all we had was what the media wrote about it or discussed on TV. And of course, the members of the media ranged widely in terms of how much "expertise" they had in the sports they covered. At least, that is what my memory of the topic is from what I recall the media comments were about it back then; if you have a different recollection, please let us know how you remember it since I've never claimed my memory is infallible! My point is just that there seemed to be noticeably more media people feeling Wilt had a decent shot at a win back then compared to the RealGM posters discussing it now in this thread.
taikibansei
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,112
And1: 9,636
Joined: Jul 17, 2008
     

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#68 » by taikibansei » Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:40 am

Samurai wrote:In regards to the proposed Ali/Wilt fight, the "people" I am referring to were the media - sports writers and sportscasters. There was no RealGM back then, so you likely recall that all we had was what the media wrote about it or discussed on TV. And of course, the members of the media ranged widely in terms of how much "expertise" they had in the sports they covered. At least, that is what my memory of the topic is from what I recall the media comments were about it back then; if you have a different recollection, please let us know how you remember it since I've never claimed my memory is infallible! My point is just that there seemed to be noticeably more media people feeling Wilt had a decent shot at a win back then compared to the RealGM posters discussing it now in this thread.


:lol: I was around back then. Nobody I knew, talked to or read felt that Wilt had a real chance. Everyone understood that Ali was doing it for the publicity and the money. (He'd been banned from boxing from March 1967 to October 1970 over his stance on the Vietnam War, so basically had little to no income during that time.) Ali would later go on to fight a professional wrestler (Gorilla Monsoon) and sumo wrestler (Inoki) as well, for heck's sake.

As I shared in two video clips on page two of this thread, trained boxers couldn't hit Ali. He was incredibly quick for a heavyweight. While Wilt was also quick for someone his size, he was still 7'1" and 300 pounds. Can you imagine somebody that height and weight trying to take the fight to Ali? And if you've ever boxed before, you know how heavy your hands start to feel after a few rounds if you haven't been training hard, how they can start to drop on you. Well, imagine you're a big, strong guy fighting somebody smaller but quicker and who hits harder. (Punching strength has little to do with physical strength and lots to do with timing, practice and torque.) Imagine that smaller guy is coming in at every opportunity to work your body, and that the only thing you have to keep him off is your jab, but if you slow down with it even a bit...he's on you again, pounding that body, punching your solar plexus, kidneys, and liver. Yeah, Wilt might keep him off for a round or so, but it was planned to be a 15-round fight, and I'm betting those gloves would have been feeling very heavy by about round 3 or so, and that by about round 7, Wilt would be knocked out.

But don't just take my opinion. From a contemporary:

At the same time, Arum had seen how poorly a world-class athlete from another sport would have performed against Ali. Arum was in London with Ali in the mid-1960s when football superstar Jim Brown was there filming a movie. Brown had yet to announce his retirement from the NFL, but went up to Arum, a close friend, and said he wanted to fight Ali.

Arum relayed the message to Ali who said to bring Brown to London's Hyde Park. When they arrived, Ali told Brown to try to hit and not to worry about his, Ali's safety. "Jimmy was obviously a big, strong guy and he would probably have beaten the (crap) out of everyone in the NFL at the time," Arum said. "Ali told him to hit him and Jimmy started swinging. He was throwing these big, hard punches, but he wasn't coming close to hitting him.

"Then, Ali said he would start to hit back when Jimmy was trying to hit him. And Ali hit him in the face with an open palm and slapped him about 20 times before Jimmy could get out of the way. Jimmy was one of the great athletes ever, but boxing is a different sport and that's why I don't think Chamberlain wouldn't have been much of a threat."


And from the same article:

The sides came to a verbal agreement that Chamberlain and Ali would fight a 15-round bout on July 26, 1971, at the Houston Astrodome. The savvy Arum, though, knew that without a signed contract, there was no guarantee the fight would go through. So Arum pulled Ali aside before the news conference and told him to cool it.

"You know how Ali was and what a great promoter he was," Arum said. "I was assured by Wilt's lawyer he would sign, but I just had a funny feeling. I grabbed Ali before Wilt got there and "told him I thought the guy was getting shaky and might pull out of the fight and I told him to shut up until (Chamberlain) actually signed. And he went, `Yeah, yeah, yeah.'"

But as soon as Chamberlain and his lawyer entered the office at the Astrodome where Ali and Arum were waiting, things changed. The showman in Ali took over even though there were no media there to witness it. As Chamberlain ducked his head through the doorway, Ali shouted `Timber! The tree will fall in four!!"

Chamberlain immediately asked Arum if he could use a private phone for a few minutes before proceeding. Arum set him up in Astrodome owner Judge Roy Hoffheinz' office and left him alone. Chamberlain called Jack Kent Cooke and quickly agreed to terms with the Lakers.


http://lexnihilnovi.blogspot.com/2012/08/ali-v-wilt-fight-that-almost-happened_15.html
THIN MAN HAS NO HEART!
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,813
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#69 » by HeartBreakKid » Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:40 am

taikibansei wrote:
Samurai wrote:In regards to the proposed Ali/Wilt fight, the "people" I am referring to were the media - sports writers and sportscasters. There was no RealGM back then, so you likely recall that all we had was what the media wrote about it or discussed on TV. And of course, the members of the media ranged widely in terms of how much "expertise" they had in the sports they covered. At least, that is what my memory of the topic is from what I recall the media comments were about it back then; if you have a different recollection, please let us know how you remember it since I've never claimed my memory is infallible! My point is just that there seemed to be noticeably more media people feeling Wilt had a decent shot at a win back then compared to the RealGM posters discussing it now in this thread.


:lol: I was around back then. Nobody I knew, talked to or read felt that Wilt had a real chance. Everyone understood that Ali was doing it for the publicity and the money. (He'd been banned from boxing from March 1967 to October 1970 over his stance on the Vietnam War, so basically had little to no income during that time.) Ali would later go on to fight a professional wrestler (Gorilla Monsoon) and sumo wrestler (Inoki) as well, for heck's sake.

As I shared in two video clips on page two of this thread, trained boxers couldn't hit Ali. He was incredibly quick for a heavyweight. While Wilt was also quick for someone his size, he was still 7'1" and 300 pounds. Can you imagine somebody that height and weight trying to take the fight to Ali? And if you've ever boxed before, you know how heavy your hands start to feel after a few rounds if you haven't been training hard, how they can start to drop on you. Well, imagine you're a big, strong guy fighting somebody smaller but quicker and who hits harder. (Punching strength has little to do with physical strength and lots to do with timing, practice and torque.) Imagine that smaller guy is coming in at every opportunity to work your body, and that the only thing you have to keep him off is your jab, but if you slow down with it even a bit...he's on you again, pounding that body, punching your solar plexus, kidneys, and liver. Yeah, Wilt might keep him off for a round or so, but it was planned to be a 15-round fight, and I'm betting those gloves would have been feeling very heavy by about round 3 or so, and that by about round 7, Wilt would be knocked out.

But don't just take my opinion. From a contemporary:

At the same time, Arum had seen how poorly a world-class athlete from another sport would have performed against Ali. Arum was in London with Ali in the mid-1960s when football superstar Jim Brown was there filming a movie. Brown had yet to announce his retirement from the NFL, but went up to Arum, a close friend, and said he wanted to fight Ali.

Arum relayed the message to Ali who said to bring Brown to London's Hyde Park. When they arrived, Ali told Brown to try to hit and not to worry about his, Ali's safety. "Jimmy was obviously a big, strong guy and he would probably have beaten the (crap) out of everyone in the NFL at the time," Arum said. "Ali told him to hit him and Jimmy started swinging. He was throwing these big, hard punches, but he wasn't coming close to hitting him.

"Then, Ali said he would start to hit back when Jimmy was trying to hit him. And Ali hit him in the face with an open palm and slapped him about 20 times before Jimmy could get out of the way. Jimmy was one of the great athletes ever, but boxing is a different sport and that's why I don't think Chamberlain wouldn't have been much of a threat."


And from the same article:

The sides came to a verbal agreement that Chamberlain and Ali would fight a 15-round bout on July 26, 1971, at the Houston Astrodome. The savvy Arum, though, knew that without a signed contract, there was no guarantee the fight would go through. So Arum pulled Ali aside before the news conference and told him to cool it.

"You know how Ali was and what a great promoter he was," Arum said. "I was assured by Wilt's lawyer he would sign, but I just had a funny feeling. I grabbed Ali before Wilt got there and "told him I thought the guy was getting shaky and might pull out of the fight and I told him to shut up until (Chamberlain) actually signed. And he went, `Yeah, yeah, yeah.'"

But as soon as Chamberlain and his lawyer entered the office at the Astrodome where Ali and Arum were waiting, things changed. The showman in Ali took over even though there were no media there to witness it. As Chamberlain ducked his head through the doorway, Ali shouted `Timber! The tree will fall in four!!"

Chamberlain immediately asked Arum if he could use a private phone for a few minutes before proceeding. Arum set him up in Astrodome owner Judge Roy Hoffheinz' office and left him alone. Chamberlain called Jack Kent Cooke and quickly agreed to terms with the Lakers.


http://lexnihilnovi.blogspot.com/2012/08/ali-v-wilt-fight-that-almost-happened_15.html


Two minor things.

Inoki was a pro wrestler not a sumo wrestler (and a real catch wrestler, aka grappler

The colored video you posted of Ali was not a real fight
taikibansei
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,112
And1: 9,636
Joined: Jul 17, 2008
     

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#70 » by taikibansei » Tue Nov 20, 2018 10:27 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:Two minor things.

Inoki was a pro wrestler not a sumo wrestler (and a real catch wrestler, aka grappler

The colored video you posted of Ali was not a real fight


You apparently are right on both accounts! My bad. (Interestingly enough, I watched the Inoki "fight" way back when--a pretty embarrassing spectacle for both parties.)
THIN MAN HAS NO HEART!
User avatar
Zeitgeister
General Manager
Posts: 8,228
And1: 5,850
Joined: Nov 11, 2008
   

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#71 » by Zeitgeister » Tue Nov 20, 2018 12:35 pm

GSP wrote:
Gooner wrote:I'm not saying Wilt would beat Ali,but size and strength do matter.Look at a guy like Bob Sapp,he was a failed NFL player,and then he started his kicboxing career in his late 20's.Only thing he relied on was his raw strength,he never developed much of a skill,and he would be gassed after first minute.Howewer,he made it to K-1 final tournament in 2002,and he even beat Ernesto Hoost,arguably the greatest of all time,he beat him twice.He did it just on raw strength.

Wilt had better physical attributes than Sapp,he was taller,but he was more coordinated,and he had more condition.With training,he would have become a problem.I doubt he could have beaten Ali,but he could have been better than many heavyweight pro's.



The talent and depth in boxing is way higher than kickboxing or Mma. Mark Hunt is a great in K1 kickboxing and he was known for his durability and power but he wasnt anything notable in boxing

Sefo is an alltimer in kickboxing too



there are multiple examples of fighters excelling in kickboxing purely due to size like Semmy Schilt but boxing requires far more than that


You actually think that a sport that limits you strictly to stand up fighting with your hands has more depth than MMA? Ground fighting alone probably has as much or more depth than boxing.
Lenin wrote: All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.
User avatar
CodeBreaker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,871
And1: 4,225
Joined: Jul 21, 2017
 

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#72 » by CodeBreaker » Wed Nov 21, 2018 2:54 am

I see a lot of people did not learn from the beating Floyd gave McGregor.

McGregor is an MMA fighter, champion in his division, and Floyd made him look like he can't fight for his life in a boxing ring.
How do you think Wilt can do against the GOAT Ali when the man he does not even fight...

Lots of casual fans here who don't know sht about the sweet science of boxing.
Image
Greek
Starter
Posts: 2,213
And1: 447
Joined: May 03, 2004
Location: Cyprus

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#73 » by Greek » Fri Nov 23, 2018 2:47 pm

Forget Ali, the real question is if he could beat Chuck Norris

Sent from my ANE-LX1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
OdomFan
General Manager
Posts: 8,214
And1: 6,634
Joined: Jan 07, 2017
Location: Maryland
   

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#74 » by OdomFan » Sat Nov 24, 2018 5:16 pm

Ali would have been waay to fast and experienced for even a giant like Wilt to handle.
Image
D.Brasco
General Manager
Posts: 9,826
And1: 9,355
Joined: Nov 17, 2006

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#75 » by D.Brasco » Sat Nov 24, 2018 7:53 pm

AussieBuck wrote:It'd be about the same as Lennox Lewis attempting to guard Steph Curry one on one. Nobody who thinks this is a chance has sparred with anyone good.


It's not so clear cut an analogy.

In a physical confrontation the larger man will always have an edge. Do I think he would beat Ali? no, but he could have put a hurt on him with a lucky blow.

Lewis would have no such luck at all in your example.

Image
countryboy667
Pro Prospect
Posts: 771
And1: 338
Joined: Jun 07, 2015
       

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#76 » by countryboy667 » Sat Nov 24, 2018 7:58 pm

My take? Ali would have won. OTOH, if Wilt had had a year to actually train as a boxer, it would have been a very good fight and with his reach and strength Wilt would have had a puncher's chance to actually win.

Why? I just snort in derision when I see people here saying Wilt couldn't match the punching power of a Foreman, for instance. They are just totally clueless about how strong Wilt was. And when I see someone say Ali would wear him out in a couple of rounds, I just have to laugh out loud.

In wilt, you are talking about one of the strongest athletes in any sport in memory--and one with great stamina and underrated quickness.

To make the record straight, I'm a Vietnam vet who considers Ali to have been a stinking low-life draft dodger--a self styled "pacifist" (LOL) who made a fortune by beating other men senseless. But I can honestly say that has NO bearing on my analysis above.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,813
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#77 » by HeartBreakKid » Sun Nov 25, 2018 12:12 am

countryboy667 wrote:My take? Ali would have won. OTOH, if Wilt had had a year to actually train as a boxer, it would have been a very good fight and with his reach and strength Wilt would have had a puncher's chance to actually win.

Why? I just snort in derision when I see people here saying Wilt couldn't match the punching power of a Foreman, for instance. They are just totally clueless about how strong Wilt was. And when I see someone say Ali would wear him out in a couple of rounds, I just have to laugh out loud.

In wilt, you are talking about one of the strongest athletes in any sport in memory--and one with great stamina and underrated quickness.

To make the record straight, I'm a Vietnam vet who considers Ali to have been a stinking low-life draft dodger--a self styled "pacifist" (LOL) who made a fortune by beating other men senseless. But I can honestly say that has NO bearing on my analysis above.


What do you mean by you snort at that? George Foreman is one of the hardest punchers in history. Wilt Chamberlain being strong doesn't mean that he is a strong puncher, the two are not that connected.


Not sure what purpose the last paragraph serves other than just to insult Ali. If you hadn't said anything then why would anyone assume you don't like Ali - it's not anyone here knows your personal bias'.
shakes0
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,349
And1: 4,962
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
Location: Chicago
       

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#78 » by shakes0 » Sun Nov 25, 2018 12:48 am

I think Wilt loses this by split decision, but I'm 100% sure that Wilt could turn around the next morning and play hockey better than Bobby Orr.
User avatar
LakerLegend
RealGM
Posts: 12,641
And1: 6,915
Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Location: SoCal

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#79 » by LakerLegend » Sun Nov 25, 2018 1:04 am

Lookup the story of Ali and Jim Brown shadowboxing if you think Wilt would stand a chance.
User avatar
Heej
General Manager
Posts: 8,165
And1: 8,667
Joined: Jan 14, 2011

Re: Wilt Chamberlain vs Muhammad Ali boxing match 

Post#80 » by Heej » Sun Nov 25, 2018 1:10 am

IQ is the number one predictor of success in sports. For Ali to be considered the GOAT he very clearly had to ha D a high IQ. Anyone with a high IQ in the competitive activity of their choice is always able to see their game a step or two ahead of the average person.

I can't imagine Wilt even being able to touch Ali because Ali was so attuned to boxing and had such a great natural aptitude for it that he'd have been able to see minute shifts in Wilt's plant legs and hips and whatnot and always be able to predict where a blow was coming from and reading the optimal angle to avoid it. For those of you who watch One Piece it would literally be like Ali has future sight compared to Wilt. There's just no chance Wilt would be able to land a blow. The difference in boxing IQ is too stark. Everyone knows this
LeBron's NBA Cup MVP is more valuable than either of KD's Finals MVPs. This is the word of the Lord

Return to Player Comparisons