Page 2 of 2

Re: #29 - GOAT peaks project (2019)

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:33 pm
by cecilthesheep
freethedevil wrote:
freethedevil wrote:2019 giannis
-> anchored a historically great team on both ends, both as the primary facilitator, defensive anchor, and scoring weapon. It took an atg championship winning defense giving him the pistons treatment to stop him and even then it was by the slimmest of margins. His decimation of a strong celtics defense was quite impressive as well. His passing limitations cost him vs the raptors but no one yet to be listed is strong enough of an offensive threat to warrant anything close to the defensive attention giannis warranted and when you add that to being one of the game's best scorers and a top 5 defender, you get a worthy pick for this spot. He has the highest corp +/- evaluation and the highest corp.


07 Nash. Led an atg offense and i boost him over 05 nash due to suns nash playing a healthy duncan.

not sure who to vote for 3, i'll let other people sway jme.

vote Mikan!! Lol

If you don't like Mikan, I might suggest '97 Karl Malone. Underrated great passing big imo

Re: #29 - GOAT peaks project (2019)

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:53 pm
by LA Bird
Totals as at the deadline are:

1) 49 Mikan = 18.0 points
2) 07 Nash = 9.5 points
3) 05 Nash = 8.0 points
T4) 98 Malone = 7.5 points
T4) 19 Harden = 7.5 points

49 Mikan wins!

Re: #29 - GOAT peaks project (2019)

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:16 pm
by No-more-rings
Moved post to newer thread.

Re: #29 - GOAT peaks project (2019)

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 4:09 am
by Vladimir777
cecilthesheep wrote:
Vladimir777 wrote:
liamliam1234 wrote:
Feel free to join in; we could use the extra activity.


Honestly, I would love to, but I just am not knowledgeable enough, and don't want to skew the results with my lack of historical and statistical knowledge. But I should start discussing in the threads more to potentially drum up more interest from more seasoned posters.

Thanks for the invite!

Have you seen some of these votes? No pressure if you don't want to participate, but I certainly think you're qualified.


Haha, yes, I have, although I know in the original rules that you're supposed to provide some sort of semi-detailed reasoning for your choices.

I appreciate the encouragement, though. I will definitely consider voting in the future. Been kinda busy with nursing school, though, so I drop in and out of the forums lately.