2009 Kobe vs. 2019 Kawhi:I think this comes down to Kobe's ability to step up and be the primary ball-handler/creator vs. Kawhi's better shooting and size/strength advantage helping him on defense.
Kawhi averaged 30.5 PPG on .619 TS% (+5.9)
Kobe averaged 30.2 PPG on .564 TS% (+2.0)
So from a scoring-only perspective, it looks like Kawhi's efficiency edge is hard to get past. But Kobe was such a versatile perimeter offensive threat that he could be the sole perimeter playmaker as well as the go-to volume scorer. Take a look at the APG between the two teams during the playoffs.
2009 Lakers Playoffs1. Kobe ------- 5.5 APG -- 2.6 TOV
2. Pau --------- 2.5 APG -- 1.9 TOV
3. Ariza ------- 2.3 APG -- 1.7 TOV
4. Fisher ------ 2.2 APG -- 1.1 TOV
5. Walton ----- 2.1 APG -- 1.0 TOV
2019 Raptors Playoffs1. Lowry ------ 6.6 APG -- 2.2 TOV
2. Kawhi ------ 3.9 APG -- 3.1 TOV
3. Gasol ------- 3.0 APG -- 0.9 TOV
4. Siakam ----- 2.8 APG -- 1.4 TOV
5. VanVleet --- 2.6 APG -- 0.9 TOV
Whereas Kobe averaged more than twice as many assists as anyone else on his team and had the BEST AST/TOV ratio among the top 5 playmakers on his squad, Kawhi was a distant 2nd in APG on his team and had the WORST AST/TOV ratio among the top 5 playmakers on his squad. I know the Lakers had a great frontcourt which the Triangle emphasized, but Kobe's diversity of skills is why they won 65 games and a Championship with a complete lack of playmaking from the perimeter. The next best creators on his team were Bigs in Pau and Odom.
Offensively, I think 2009 Kobe was a superior run to 2019 Kawhi because I value his playmaking enough to make up for Kawhi's scoring efficiency edge.
But Kawhi's performance as the primary defender on Giannis when the Raptors shut him down was something else. It wasn't like Kawhi did it by himself, the Wall formed by Gasol + Siakam and co. was a team effort, but he was one of the few people in the league strong/quick enough to give Giannis resistance on the initial move to the basket which is why the wall was so effective.
Kawhi also led the Raptors in RPG (both DRB and ORB) while Kobe was 3rd on the Lakers in RPG (3rd in DRB and 5th in ORB).Kobe was a good defender and tough dude, he was battling with Denver Bully-Ball Melo in the post which was no picnic. And I'm sure he could've grabbed more boards if the roster construction of the team was different.
But as tough and fearless as Kobe was, he wasn't capable of guarding the freakshow that was MVP Giannis. He just wasn't strong enough. It's just so hard. Kawhi as a pure scorer, Kobe as an overall offensive force, Kawhi for his two-way impact at his best. Ultimately I side with Kobe because although Kawhi had brilliant defensive moments, he also struggled at times and looked like the weakest defender on the floor for the Raptors during certain stretches (after all, it was an amazing defensive roster).
It's really a tie but gun to my head, I'd go with Kobe due to his greater offensive responsibility.2001 Kobe vs. 2019 Kawhi:I think this thread created by s0ciety was really cool and gave even more perspective on how dominant the 2001 Lakers were during the playoffs. They had a ridicuclous
18.28 SRS which was
#1 All-Time among playoff teams that made the Finals, compared to the 2019 Raptors' 9.83 SRS (32nd) or the 2009 Lakers' 11.06 SRS (21st).
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1977066I think the 2001 Lakers' run was a historic moment in the sport when for the first and only time in league history, one team had the Top 2 players during the playoffs. Kobe's performance in the Finals was a little weak but if you treat the 76ers as the 4th best team they faced in that playoffs (which they were by SRS) and treat the Spurs/Kings series as the two most dangerous series of that playoff run, you could argue that Kobe was the MVP of that playoff run. Even before weighting the Finals performance less, he was tied with Shaq in a lot of advanced metrics + led the league in Playoff RAPM. Against the very best team in the league besides themselves in the Spurs, Kobe was CLEARLY the MVP of that series and put on a historic performance.
'00-'02 Shaq is a player on the shortlist for most dominant peaks ever. '01 Playoff Shaq might've been the most overpowering offensive version ever, based on what he did vs. DPOY Mutombo in the Finals. So for '01 Kobe (22 years old at the time) to be arguably better than THAT version of Shaq during the playoffs is just insane. I know '01 Shaq makes it tough to compare '01 Kobe to a lot of runs by clearcut #1s like 2019 Kawhi or even 2009 Kobe. But to me, this was a special performance by Kobe and the monster WCF run ending with the epic Spurs series was the greatest moment of his career.
As much as I respect '19 Kawhi and '09 Kobe, I'd rank '01 Kobe as the best run of the 3 by a tiny margin. 2008 Kobe may have been the best version of Kobe all things considered. I think '08 Kobe would've been in the mix had they won the title that year, about on the same level as '19 Kawhi and '09 Kobe. But he just completely fell apart during those final 3 games in that series and because of that, I can't put that run above '19 Kawhi.
2010 Kobe had my favorite series of his career against the '10 Suns. And the series right before vs. the Jazz was incredible as well. Probably the 2nd best multi-series stretch of his career besides '01 vs. the Kings/Spurs. But the Thunder series wasn't too impressive and the Finals vs. the Celtics was once again an absolute grind. Great playoff run but I'd rank it 5th behind '01 Kobe, '09 Kobe, '19 Kawhi, and '08 Kobe in that order.
...
TLDR: 0/1/2, I think you could go with any of those as the right answer. I went with 2 but it was tough.