

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
E-Balla wrote:The 94 Sonics were a 63 win team with the 2nd best offense and 3rd best defense in the league. The 94 Nuggets were a 42 win squad with a top 5 defense because of Deke. They beat Seattle in 5 and went to 7 with the 53 win Jazz.
They clearly had the bigger upset and the most impressive performance.
E-Balla wrote:The 94 Sonics were a 63 win team with the 2nd best offense and 3rd best defense in the league. The 94 Nuggets were a 42 win squad with a top 5 defense because of Deke. They beat Seattle in 5 and went to 7 with the 53 win Jazz.
They clearly had the bigger upset and the most impressive performance.
GSP wrote:Which is the biggest and most impressive upset in Nuggets history
trex_8063 wrote:E-Balla wrote:The 94 Sonics were a 63 win team with the 2nd best offense and 3rd best defense in the league. The 94 Nuggets were a 42 win squad with a top 5 defense because of Deke. They beat Seattle in 5 and went to 7 with the 53 win Jazz.
They clearly had the bigger upset and the most impressive performance.
Generally agree, though I suppose I think it's closer than you imply.
I mean, there's no question that the disparity in talent and overall team quality was larger in the '94 match-up. But otoh, it was only a 5-game series (easier for flukey things to happen in a 5-game series than in a 7-game). Additionally, the '20 match-up has the added drama/narrative of being a comeback from down 3-1 (and not only that, but the second series in a row doing so for the Nuggets: no team has EVER come back from down 3-1 TWICE in the same playoffs).
So those are points in favour of the '20 series.
I still kinda hedge toward the '94 series, though. Again, the talent disparity was massive in that one. The closing of that '94 series felt more dramatic, too [with the last-second block and huge reaction by Deke].
Anyway, it's perhaps telling of just how loaded this Clipper team was that---even though this is a pretty solid Denver team (on pace for 51-52 wins, a +2.35 SRS in rs, and beating a +2.52 SRS team [on pace for 50 wins] in seven games)----this is still seen as a historically big upset.
euroleague wrote:His team would be considered a super-team in other eras, and that's why commentators like Charles Barkley criticize LBJ for his complaining. He has talent on his team, he just doesn't try during the regular season
Owly wrote:Not looked at it closely enough to come to decision but counterpoints ...
'20 Denver won over a best of 7 game series (versus best of 5 for '94 - this might be mitigated for you by the Utah series ... I will stick to the question as posed)
'20 Denver outscored their opponents (725-722 versus '94 series Denver 471-475)
Clippers playoff (notional) power arguably undersold by RS performance. Leonard and George a very clear 1 and 2 in minutes is the series, 2 and 5 in the RS.
trex_8063 wrote:Generally agree, though I suppose I think it's closer than you imply.
I mean, there's no question that the disparity in talent and overall team quality was larger in the '94 match-up. But otoh, it was only a 5-game series (easier for flukey things to happen in a 5-game series than in a 7-game). Additionally, the '20 match-up has the added drama/narrative of being a comeback from down 3-1 (and not only that, but the second series in a row doing so for the Nuggets: no team has EVER come back from down 3-1 TWICE in the same playoffs).
So those are points in favour of the '20 series.
I still kinda hedge toward the '94 series, though. Again, the talent disparity was massive in that one. The closing of that '94 series felt more dramatic, too [with the last-second block and huge reaction by Deke].
Anyway, it's perhaps telling of just how loaded this Clipper team was that---even though this is a pretty solid Denver team (on pace for 51-52 wins, a +2.35 SRS in rs, and beating a +2.52 SRS team [on pace for 50 wins] in seven games)----this is still seen as a historically big upset.
Owly wrote:
Fwiw, Denver '94 were down 2 on the verge of elimination too.