Page 1 of 1
player who were more or less than the sum of their skills
Posted: Mon Apr 4, 2022 8:09 pm
by falcolombardi
we often talk about teams that are more or are less thsn the sum of their parts, but what about players?
who are guys who were great in a lot of thinghs so it felt like thet should have been great but couldnt put it all together for whatever reason?
or alternstively, guys whose profile doesnt sound that impressive when you list his strenghts and weakness but they made it work really really well in the court ?
Re: player who were more or less than the sum of their skills
Posted: Mon Apr 4, 2022 8:16 pm
by Owly
This might depend a lot on what you consider a "skill" (e.g. court awareness? athleticism? etc).
Re: player who were more or less than the sum of their skills
Posted: Mon Apr 4, 2022 8:29 pm
by JLei
I'm guessing this is kind of a draft bust thread. Players that always tantalize teams and show flashes but ultimately the result is pretty meh. I.e. you catch them on the right night and they look like unstoppable world beaters but take an average they are much lower.
So. Jeff Green, Andrew Wiggins, Dion Waiters, Harrison Barnes, D'Aaron Fox, Tim Thomas.
Others who are actually good but given their unicorn talent you think they should have been more. Kristaps, Cousins, Lamar Odom, Antoine Walker
Re: player who were more or less than the sum of their skills
Posted: Mon Apr 4, 2022 8:54 pm
by penbeast0
I was thinking Gerald Green or Rex Chapman (quicks, hops, 3 point shooting, and yet never put it together).
At the other end of the spectrum, guys like Adrian Dantley or Cedric Maxwell who really put a lot more out there than you would think they had just watching them at combines.
Re: player who were more or less than the sum of their skills
Posted: Mon Apr 4, 2022 9:57 pm
by Texas Chuck
Al Horford is a guy who doesn't wow you with really anything, but has been a really high level player for a long time. Paul Milsap, his former running mate another guy like that. T
Re: player who were more or less than the sum of their skills
Posted: Mon Apr 4, 2022 10:07 pm
by falcolombardi
Owly wrote:This might depend a lot on what you consider a "skill" (e.g. court awareness? athleticism? etc).
i consider basketball intellicence, size or athletism as skills for the purpose s of this thread
Re: player who were more or less than the sum of their skills
Posted: Tue Apr 5, 2022 1:38 am
by BenoUdrihFTL
Nic Batum is a multiskilled and versatile guy who checks all the physical boxes and seemingly could do it all in theory, yet he's never made the progression to All-Star caliber
On the flip side; Jimmy Butler is a guy with (relatively) short arms and mediocre athleticism whose 3pt shooting skills have completely abandoned him, yet he consistently delivers All-Star caliber numbers and All-NBA caliber impact
Re: player who were more or less than the sum of their skills
Posted: Tue Apr 5, 2022 4:11 am
by Mogspan
BenoUdrihFTL wrote:Nic Batum is a multiskilled and versatile guy who checks all the physical boxes and seemingly could do it all in theory, yet he's never made the progression to All-Star caliber
On the flip side; Jimmy Butler is a guy with (relatively) short arms and mediocre athleticism whose 3pt shooting skills have completely abandoned him, yet he consistently delivers All-Star caliber numbers and All-NBA caliber impact
Jimmy is way above average athletically for the NBA.
Re: player who were more or less than the sum of their skills
Posted: Tue Apr 5, 2022 4:17 am
by colts18
Evan Turner should have been Scottie Pippen. He had all of Pippen's skills in college. I still can't figure out why he never made it.
Re: player who were more or less than the sum of their skills
Posted: Tue Apr 5, 2022 5:18 pm
by Im Your Father
I think Kyrie is the perfect example of this. He's GOAT level at pretty much any skill you can practice alone in your back yard. Not a GOAT level player though.