1995 Rockets vs 2003 Spurs

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Who wins in 7?

1995 Rockets
11
65%
2003 Spurs
6
35%
 
Total votes: 17

Matt15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,545
And1: 553
Joined: Aug 27, 2008

1995 Rockets vs 2003 Spurs 

Post#1 » by Matt15 » Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:11 am

Who wins in 7?
No-more-rings
Head Coach
Posts: 7,104
And1: 3,912
Joined: Oct 04, 2018

Re: 1995 Rockets vs 2003 Spurs 

Post#2 » by No-more-rings » Sat Aug 13, 2022 11:25 am

The postseason Rockets were clearly better…
User avatar
AdagioPace
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,875
And1: 7,421
Joined: Jan 03, 2017
Location: Contado di Molise
   

Re: 1995 Rockets vs 2003 Spurs 

Post#3 » by AdagioPace » Sat Aug 13, 2022 12:56 pm

going only by playoff SRS: 2003 Spurs (9.65)** vs 1995 Rockets (8.57).

https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=1977066

**(three Dirk-less games included though)
"La natura gode della natura; la natura trionfa sulla natura; la natura domina la natura" - Ostanes
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,618
And1: 3,133
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: 1995 Rockets vs 2003 Spurs 

Post#4 » by Owly » Sat Aug 13, 2022 1:41 pm

AdagioPace wrote:going only by playoff SRS: 2003 Spurs (9.65)** vs 1995 Rockets (8.57).

https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=1977066

**(three Dirk-less games included though)

Even then ... don't these models tilt heavily on RS performance to figure opponent strength?

but
1) Whilst that may be an accurate picture of them on average over a large sample, it's less likely to be so versus a specific match-up over a smaller sample.
and/or
2) If one is going to tilt heavily towards postseason, use it as the primary discussion point etc then wouldn't one say RS performance is largely meaningless whilst playoffs are where it happens (and thus for instance Stockton-Malone Jazz, Robinson-Rodman Spurs are going to be much overrated opponents, Shaq-Kobe Lakers underrated opponents) making significant RS weighting problematic?

Return to Player Comparisons