Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 - 1982-83 Moses Malone

Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063

User avatar
LA Bird
Analyst
Posts: 3,592
And1: 3,327
Joined: Feb 16, 2015

Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 - 1982-83 Moses Malone 

Post#1 » by LA Bird » Mon Sep 5, 2022 2:55 am

RealGM Greatest Peaks List (2022)
1. 1990-91 Michael Jordan
2. 2012-13 LeBron James
3. 1999-00 Shaquille O'Neal
4. 1976-77 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
5. 1966-67 Wilt Chamberlain
6. 2002-03 Tim Duncan
7. 1993-94 Hakeem Olajuwon
8. 1963-64 Bill Russell
9. 1985-86 Larry Bird
10. 1986-87 Magic Johnson
11. 2016-17 Stephen Curry
12. 2003-04 Kevin Garnett
13. 2020-21 Giannis Antetokounmpo
14. 1963-64 Oscar Robertson
15. 1965-66 Jerry West
16. 2021-22 Nikola Jokic
17. 1976-77 Bill Walton
18. 2005-06 Dwyane Wade
19. 2007-08 Kobe Bryant
20. 1993-94 David Robinson
21. 2016-17 Kawhi Leonard
22. 1975-76 Julius Erving
23. 2010-11 Dirk Nowitzki
24. 2016-17 Kevin Durant
25. ?

Spoiler:
Please vote for your 3 highest player peaks and at least one line of reasoning for each of them.

Vote example 1
1. 1991 Jordan: Explanation
2. 2013 LeBron: Explanation
3. 2000 Shaq: Explanation

In addition, you can also list other peak season candidates from those three players. This extra step is entirely optional

Vote example 2
1. 1991 Jordan: Explanation
(1990 Jordan)
2. 2013 LeBron: Explanation
(2012 LeBron)
(2009 LeBron)
3. 2000 Shaq: Explanation

You can visit the project thread for further information on why this makes a difference and how the votes will be counted at the end of the round.

Voting for this round will close on Friday September 9, 9am ET..
Samurai
General Manager
Posts: 8,896
And1: 3,113
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#2 » by Samurai » Mon Sep 5, 2022 3:17 am

Repeating my ballot from the last round:

1. George Mikan 1950. (alternate 1951) I said that he would be my next selection so here he is. Most dominant 2-way player relative to his peers of anyone left. Led the league in scoring, Win Shares and Defensive WS. Likely would have led the league in rebounds and blocks if those stats were recorded then and would have been the clear favorite for Defensive Player of the Year is such an award existed. There is no question whatsoever that he was the best of his era, more so than anyone left. In terms of in-era dominance, he has a very good case for being the GOAT. As is, he may well be the most impactful player ever, given that the 24-second rule was established largely due to Mikan's dominance and the widening of the key was dubbed "the Mikan rule". A good argument can be made that the introduction of the shot clock is the single biggest and most influential rule change since the NBA started. The question is how much do we penalize him for playing in a weaker era. This is where I would draw the line at continuing to penalize him.

2. Bob Pettit 1959. (alternate 58, 62)I have Pettit as very close to Mikan so I suppose it makes sense for me to list him just after Mikan. In terms of how he did against his peers, I think a good argument could be made that 59 Pettit could have been a top ten season. Obviously we also have to look at the context of his season and the quality of his competition and figure out how much to penalize him for the era he played in. He was MVP in a league that had Bill Russell averaging 23 boards/game, a rookie Elgin Baylor averaging 25 pts and 15 rebounds/game, and Hall of Famers like Schayes, Arizin, Hagan, Cousy and Twyman in their primes. Pettit led the league with 29.4 pts/game, a 28.2 PER and 14.8 WS while finishing second in rebounds with 16.4/game.

3. Moses Malone 1983. Led the league in PER, OReb%, TRB%, Reb/game, WS and WS/48. RS MVP as well as Finals MVP. Dominant RS and an even better playoff run to lead one of the best team playoff performances of all time. And while he is best known for his scoring and GOAT-level rebounding, he also finished second in Defensive Win Shares and tenth in blocks that season. He wasn't a perfect player, but he did so incredibly well at his strengths that I can overlook the assist and turnover numbers.
DraymondGold
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 748
Joined: May 19, 2022

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#3 » by DraymondGold » Mon Sep 5, 2022 3:30 am

DraymondGold wrote:Expanding my ballot a bit, since there's more uncertainty the closer the peaks get together:
1. 1949 Mikan (1950/1951)
[Old vote for 1976 Ewing was here]
2. 2014 Chris Paul (2015, 2009)
3. 2020 Anthony Davis
4. 2007 Steve Nash (2006, 2005)


Previous vote reasoning: https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=100961668#p100961668
Stat Box: https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=100988617#p100988617
Spoiler:
DraymondGold wrote:I didn't get the chance to post this before Robinson got voted in, so I'll include him here for reference.

Stat Box for this tier of Peaks: Robinson, KD, Kawhi, Dirk, CP3, AD, Nash, Erving, Moses [to add later: McGrady, Karl Malone, Barkley, Mikan]

Plus minus data
Ai. AuPM: 94/95/96 Robinson > 14/15 Paul > 14/16/17 KD > Dirk > Nash > 17/19/21 Kawhi ~ Moses (better in single year peak, worse multi-year) > AD > Erving (no 76 Erving)
Aii. Postseason AuPM: old Robinson > Paul > Dirk (better 1 year, worse 2) >~ Kawhi (higher 1 year than KD) >~ Nash >~ KD (better 2 year) > AD
Bi. Goldstein RAPM: Nash >~ old Robinson ~ Dirk > Paul > Moses (very small historical sample) > Kawhi > KD > AD
Bii. Goldstein RS/Playoff PIPM: Robinson > Paul > Kawhi > KD (21 higher than Kobe) > Dirk > AD > Erving (no 76) > Moses (better 1 year, worse multi-year) ~ Nash (better closer to peak, worse than 80s Erving)
Ci. Additional plus minus stats: Fivethirtyeight’s Overall RAPTOR +/- (per 75): Paul > Kawhi > AD > KD
Cii. Additional plus minus stats: Bball-Index’s LEBRON: Paul (best multi-year) ~ KD (14’s the best peak 1 year, worse multi-year) ~ Kawhi (middle) > AD > Dirk
D. Additional plus minus stats: DARKO: Paul > Kawhi > KD > AD
E. Additional plus minus stats: ESPN’s RPM: Paul > KD > Dirk ~ Kawhi > AD (worse peak year than Nash, better multi-year) > Nash
Fi Additional Plus Minus stats: WOWY: Robinson > Nash [> Kawhi in smaller samples] >> Dirk > Erving > Paul > KD [> AD in smaller samples] >> Moses
Fii. Additional plus minus stats: Backpicks’ CORP evaluation: KD >~ Robinson > Dirk > Erving > AD ~ Paul > Nash > Kawhi > Moses


Box score-based data
Gi. Backpicks BPM: Robinson >~ KD > Paul > Kawhi ~ AD > Dirk ~ Nash (better than 11 Dirk, worse than younger) > Moses > Erving (no 76 Erving)
Gii. Postseason Backpicks BPM: 17 KD (14 is bottom) > Paul ~ Kawhi (21 above KD, 17/19 below Paul) > Nash ~ AD ~ Dirk >~ Robinson (worse younger, better older) > Moses (better 1 year, worse multi-year) ~ Erving (no 76 Erving)
Hi. BR’s BPM: Robinson > 76 Erving (better 1 year than KD) >~ KD > Paul > Kawhi > AD > Dirk (worse 10/11, better younger) >~ Nash > Moses
Hii. BR’s Postseason BPM: Kawhi > 76 Erving > KD > Paul > Dirk (worse in 11, better 10/younger) ~ AD (better in 20, worse other years) >~ Robinson (worse younger, better older) > Moses > Nash


Tier 0 (best in everything): Robinson.
-Robinson: Glad he got voted in. He's worse in post-season BPM, but otherwise he's top 2 in basically every stat including other postseason stats.

Tier 1 (better in most, with some flaws): Paul >~ KD >~ Kawhi >~ Dirk
-Paul is ahead of this group in plus minus metrics (especially in AuPM, Raptor, LeBron, Darko, RPM). He's ahead of Dirk in Box metrics but behind KD in box metrics. The concern for Paul is health, resilience, and scalability, which the stats might miss. Year: I'm taking 14/15 Paul as my peak, though some will argue for 08/09 based more on the box score than impact metrics.
-KD's ahead in all 4 box metrics, tied with Dirk in impact metrics, but below Paul in most impact metrics. He does well in both resilience and scalability. Year: I'd see arguments for 14, 16, and 17.
-Kawhi’s clearly worse in the regular season (e.g. in AuPM and RAPM), but better in the postseason (e.g. in PIPM and BPM).
-Dirk's worst in BPM, but he makes some ground in WOWY and RAPM. Year: he’s better in some stats when he was younger ~06/07, but had some of his best playoffs and scoring ~10/11.
[-Kobe’s below KD in BPM and just above in impact metrics, for those curious]

Tier 2 (still great, but larger flaws): Nash, Erving, AD
-Nash has the clear advantage against these 3 in regular impact metrics (e.g. AuPM, WOWY, and RAPM especially where he's first), but he has some of the worst box metrics of anyone here.
-Erving’s missing stats in 76 pulls him down. His non-76 years are last in AuPM and Backpicks’ BPM, but he has mid-pack WOWY regardless and his 76 Basketball Reference BPM just beats KD. If we check WS/48, he’s just below Kawhi/KD in the regular season and above KD near Kawhi in the postseason Year: Interestingly, almost every stat (AuPM, BPM, RS/PS PIPM, etc.) are better in 80/81/82 than 77/78/79. Is this a sign of worse “goodness” in the 70s or worse fit when joining the NBA?
-AD bottom 2 in almost every impact metric (e.g. AuPM, RAPM, WOWY), but his Playoff PIPM from 2020 puts him mid-pack as does BPM.

Tier 3 (clearly below the rest): Moses
-Moses’ best two stats are regular season AuPM (where he sneaks past AD/Erving) and RAPM (where he has a 10 game sample). But he’s bottom 2 in this tier in literally every stat we have here. He’s particularly putrid in WOWY, and he only loses ground if we take multi-year samples.
Reasoning for KD/Dirk: I see both at quite a close level. Durant's impact metrics, scalability, and resilience (alongside another offensive engine) are all great. A similar thing can be said for Dirk. Both are great scorers, likely a hair above Kawhi. Both are clearly the better creators and fit better within an offensive scheme, though passing is neither of their strong suits. Defensively, I'm most concerned with Dirk, particularly as a big man. It's a bit like Jokic, where it becomes a bit of a team making challenge to get the most out of their offense without sacrificing defense. While KD's defense and rebounding is generally overrated due to his athleticism, 17 was finally the year he put it together. Yes, a lot of that was context -- but he also showed a decline in those areas the next year in 18, when he had quite a similar context, so I do think 17 represents KD's peak from a "defensive / team-first mentality" standpoint.

Mikan: He's clearly the most dominant of anyone here by any (few) stats we have, and by any (limited) film we have [see my previous conversation on the topic]. The big question is how much to discount him for his competition or from a "goodness" perspective. I'm honestly not sure what the answer is. I put him here, approximately around the boundary between two Tiers of peaks. I think there'll definitely be some arbitrariness in when he gets voted in though. I just wish we had more info on him!

Paul: I suspect he'll be given the Robinson treatment. His regular season impact is clearly just as good as anyone here. The concern for him is playoffs. And while I think the constant harping about him as a "choker" is overrated (and often health related), he does show a decline in the film and in the stats (BPM/PIPM/AuPM) even in the playoffs where he's relatively healthy. Add some scalability concerns, and he gets discounted a bit, but stays above those who seem to be a small tier below him.

Edit for Paul: in a parallel thread, people are looking at relative Offensive Rating when a player's on the court since 1997/2001ish. 2015 Paul's on-court rORTG peak is the 3rd best peak, in the same tier as 2016/2017 Curry or 2005/2007 Nash. That's crazy good offense! His 2018 rating is also top 10, and his 2008, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2016 ratings are all also in the upper echelon.

In this metric (which is just one metric that could benefit from more context, but still), Paul seems to come out ahead offensively over Harden and even Dirk, Shaq, and LeBron (in the same tier as Durant, below Nash/Curry). It's regular season-only, so this might not assuage the postseason concerns, but it reinforces just how good Paul is in the regular season. Give Paul clearly better defense over Harden (who also isn't the better postseason performer, health aside) or Nash (who's a larger negative on defense), and Paul's case over the other guards starts to build.
Source: Sprees Opening post and my post (#19) in the on-court rORTG thread (https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2222668).


We have quite the group of modern players here, with Dirk and Durant just voted in, and now AD as the incoming favorite. That's potentially 3 in a row from the 2010s. Add in Kawhi who went before Dirk, and Nash and Chris Paul seem to also be near the top of upcoming players, and I wonder... Are we sure we're not having modern bias against other older players in this tier, like Karl Malone / Barkley / Ewing?

Back in 2019, people voted in Ewing over Durant/Kawhi/CP3/Nash/AD. People voted Barkley over Kawhi/CP3/Nash/AD. In the 2015 project, Ewing and Barkley also went right after Durant and Kobe. This seems quite unlikely for our current project.

I'm not saying that this group (including me!) necessarily has a modern bias, or that the different voting pool isn't the reason for this change, but we should at least be clear on our reasoning for why we're lowering these older peaks like Barkley/Ewing/Karl Malone relative to modern players like Kawhi/Durant/CP3/Nash/AD.
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,286
And1: 6,896
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#4 » by falcolombardi » Mon Sep 5, 2022 3:33 am

1-1950 george mikan (1951)

As i have said before i dont think there is a right answer to the mikan question of how to evaluate a player who dominated nba early stages when talent pool, game advancement, rules and segregation made it such a different league

But i feel like if we are gonna include him in the project he deserves a placing that more closely indicates how much he dominated the league when he played, otherwise i would prefer to keep pre shot clock seasons out of the project


2-2007 steve nash (2006)

I pick 2007 over 2006 because oh his rather absurd spurs serie but i think either year is a great pick, 2006 has the most impressive regular season leading the suns to a great offense even without amare

I have talked about nash before in this post to explain why i think he may be a (very marginally) better offensive player than curry

Going more in depth. I think criticisms on nash ball dominance or "heliocentrism" are way overstated

Botg because he dominated the ball a lot less than people imagine (people seem to imagine he must have "ball hogged" as much as a luka currently) and because suns offense was way more dinamic than people (and me before rewstching nash suns games) remember it like

If you watch nash suns they are sort of like a reverse motion system.

Instead of having a "static" guy on ball while everyone else cuts/screens the way a team like the warriors do. Nash pushes the pace and makes quick decisions to drive/shot/pass....and he often cancels mid action to improvise somethingh else as everyone else reacts to the advabtage he created

Think running into a leaning jump forward jumper (like a floater but in a 2-handed jumpshot motion) and either hitting it smoothly or throwing a perfect dime on the jump to a cutter who just saw nash do start his jumper and started cutting just in case he gets a pass

Or driving past a big, stopping to freeze the defend, put the big in jail with his back and doing a hand off 2 meters off the rim to a running stoudamire who quicly realized the chance for a hand off dunk

He was not -quite- curry/reggie off ball movement wise but even though he was a on-ball player he was almost always running until he gave up the ball

you rarely saw him walk up the ball slowly or run a slow set. He would always be applying constant pressure in some way and making consistently great quick reads for passing and scoring off the chaos he created

The motion thingh i mention is because diaw,richardson, grant hill, barbosa, marion amd even (and perhaps surprisingly, mainly) stoudamire would "read and react" to nash quickly and cut/spot timely and accurstely to nash moves and then do quick decisions to shoot/pass or drive after receiving his passes

The whole thingh is just so smooth and contradicts the idea that on-ball quarterbacks turn role players into nothingh but lob or 3-point finishers. The suns are a constant moving machine around nash on-ball play in a similar way warriors best offense is a constant movement machine around curry off ball threath

Where a chris paul is like peyton manning running perfectly executed sets, nash is more like a lamar jackson or patrick mahomes. He can run, pass, run pass and you never know which is coming as he is always moving.

That is the best way to describe nash, he is always moving, he just does it more on ball than curry and more than your usual ball handler

You dont create the arguably goat offense relative to era with "just" a 6 foot guard playing pick and roll as everyonr else spots up. Nash is not big enough to just do a lebron through teams and get to the paint to score nonstop. He is a bit too small for that. Instead he achieves this by creating openings consistently that all of his twammates or himself later in the play can exploit to score

Where lebron and curry always "start with white" so to speak. Aka curry and lebron sort of compromise the defense before the play even starts cause their shooting or driving threat is so big that teams react preventively to take that option away. They always play chess with 1 move advantage as far as compromising the defense goes

Nash instead doesnt cause either effect (maybe if he shot mpre 3's today?) As teams didnt guard his 3 as tightly as curry's and he obviously is not lebron going to the paint.

Instead he maximizes his skillset to the max exploiting every small advantage by pushing the pace, using his handles and size to sneak in the paint and put the defense in an awkward position to stop his passing and because he is a more gifted passer/decision maker than curry and even bron. He makes it work. He does thinghs then reacts mid move to the defense reaction and finds somethingh ovet and over.

His motor/agressiveness may be low key as valuable as his mind, handles or jumper. And all these 4 thinghs combine for a perfect package that wouldnt work nearly as well if only one of the 4 thinghs was lesser

I think both are incresible offensive players who created absurd results when they got a coach (D'Antoni and kerr) who had a revolutionary approach based on their skillset.

But of the two it is nash who has the overall better offensive results relative to era and resiliency in my opinion. I suspect because he is faster at adapting to the defense and finding the best way to change the team approach than curry


I think he is a negative in defense due to his small size and frame making him a permanently (negative) mismatch on any player he guards but he ammeliorates this with good effort and rotations

3-2019 james harden (2018, 2020)

one of the best one man army offense players in league history. Notable playoffs drop but he drop down from very high regular season highs. At his best was able to be both an all time level "floor raiser" and combine well results wise with another ballhandlers and offensive co star in more shared roles

I think he is a ok enough defender in that he is not the best off ball defender but holds his own 1vs1 and has surprising ability on "mismatches" in the post against bigger players which has tactical usefulness

My biggest worry i suppose is that unlike other helios (nash, lebron to a lesser degree paul) his team offensive results just seem to fall a notch below and he seems to take a bigger hit in the playoffs. Still his durability in his iron man years puts him over paul for me

4- 2020 anthony davis (2018)

Just one of the most valuable and "portable" seasons ever. Absolutely elite defense, great iso scoring, spacing and elite off-ball skills.

Only reason to not be as high on him is like with paul, he is so fragile he may get injured at really any moment AND is not as reliable being the guy you run your offense through.

Honestly other than durability i dont think his peak is worse than robinson but that may be controversial

His playoffs run was just the stuff of legends so that propels him above paul who on average i have as the better player. And if it was not for the "fragility tax" i would put him over harden too
User avatar
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,047
And1: 5,850
Joined: Jul 24, 2022
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#5 » by AEnigma » Mon Sep 5, 2022 3:34 am

1. Anthony Davis (2020)
With Dirk off the board I hope people give Davis another look, because at this point really no one has a better postseason aptitude to their name. Imagine 2020, or even 2018, Davis on a slightly adjusted (to make up for the spacing decline going from Dirk to Davis) version of that 2011 Mavericks team. As a playoff scorer, prime Davis (in a limited sample) has proved his acumen, and we also know he can be the world’s best defender. Two-way impact like that reliably translates across many different teams and eras, and I would comfortably prefer to build a title team around his peak than around anyone else’s. Biggest issue is of course the regular season, but 2018-20 Davis is a pretty strong baseline regardless: he still averaged 27 points per 75 on +4.5 efficiency, good passing for a big, and near DPoY-level defence, with a third place MVP finish.

Here Unibro’s take is close to definitive and thoroughly discredits assumptions about Davis’s “reliance” on Lebron:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2215651#p100682968

And here is my post on his reputation for being easily injured:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2223040#p101086087

2. Steve Nash a.) 2007 b.) 2006 c.) 2005
Along with Russell and Walton, Nash is one of three all-time peaks players who to some extent defy box score impact. People more readily recognise that box scores can fail elite defenders, and in Russell’s case especially without available steals or blocks, but with Nash it is apparently much more confusing how a player could showcase all-time WOWY(R) and top of the line RAPM almost entirely off his offence without that jumping out at you on a stat-sheet. The other difference of course is that Russell and Walton both lead their teams to a title, and Nash sadly did not — although I believe he could have with some better luck in 2006 or 2007, or with some better front office decisions throughout his prime.

What Nash did do was consistently spearhead contending teams in a manner that I feel would translate well across eras. Nash’s passing, much like Magic’s, is a brilliant magnifier and maximiser of existing talent — but that is not something that you find in the boxscore, or at least not until BBR buys access to Elgee’s passer model. :oops: I also think Nash is an easy top eight shooter in the history of the sport, with a decent claim to second. His shot and shot percentages are every bit as good as anyone’s, they maintain into the postseason, and he created those shots for himself far more than any other top shooter did. This was a massive advantage in his time, but with the spacing revolution I think his gravity would take another leap. (Note: I am not suggesting he would be a regular high volume scorer in the modern league, which is a claim I think grossly misinterprets the value and intent of his playstyle; simply going more to his playoff volume and increasing the proportion of threes taken would already represent a notable jump and would even further strain defences that have become hyper-aware of the effects of that type of spacing.)

I came across plenty of good commentary reading through past projects and RealGM threads — I may re-post some later to drive conversation — but I am not sure Nash’s peak case is all that mysterious anymore. That Backpicks profile was what, five years ago now? Everyone should have seen those arguments and statistics, even if not everyone is inclined to accept them. His downside is that he is a small guard with at best uninspiring defence, and although that was hardly disastrous in his time, he would certainly be picked on more today (that said, his play awareness should keep him well above the Trae/Isaiah/Lillard tier of abject liability). Like I said when we were comparing him with Jokic, it seems intuitively easier to build a defence with a weak guard than it is to build a defence with a weak big, even if that big provides a higher baseline defensive value than the guard (sadly, running a team of slower-footed giants does not seem to stack as well as you may hope, and teams have yet to develop the approach of abandoning small guards entirely). I think the 2006 Suns have a strong shot at making it past the Mavericks (at which point they would be up against notorious pnr defender Shaq) if they simply had a healthy Kurt Thomas (I encourage people to check Phoenix’s net ratings with Nash on-court and Amar’e off-court; not exactly struggling, are they?). Nash does not need stars or hot shooting or favourable matchups to do well in the postseason; at his peak, all he really needed was some healthy support.

3. Patrick Ewing (1990)
Basically 1982 Moses Malone with defence. Ewing sadly had no true chance at MVP that year with peak-ish Magic and Jordan in the league, nor was he fortunate enough to be traded to a 1982 76ers equivalent. However, he did go on his own monstrous scoring run and pull off an unexpected upset of Bird’s Celtics, where Ewing won three straight elimination games averaging an efficient 36/13/5, including a road win in the league’s toughest road environment. Shortly after, with Pat Riley as his coach and a better but still unspectacular supporting cast, he came the closest to beating each of the 1992 Bulls, 1993 Bulls, and 1994 Rockets in their respective title years. If he had been his 1990 self, instead of a few years on with degrading knees and overall athleticism, maybe he could have broken through (almost certainly in 1994). Timing is such an under-appreciated element of how legacies are built in this sport.

Here are some of the best posts and articles I was able to find about that season. I do not agree with every claim (e.g. calling Ewing a better pnr defender than Hakeem), but for the most part I think this all does a better job of detailing his season than I could on my own:
Spoiler:
https://hardwoodhype.com/the-work/f/nba-1989-90-peak-patrick-ewing
Hardwood Hype wrote:Already a bona fide star, the 1989-90 season is the one in which Ewing catapulted himself into SUPERstardom.

Ewing hit on 55.1% of his shots and a career-high 77.5% of his free throws en route to 28.6 points per game, third-best in the league and a career-high. For good measure, 10.9 rebounds per game, which was fifth in the league, was his best to date, as were his Assist (10.0%) and Turnover Rates (12.4%).

Twenty-one times he scored at 35 points in a game – in no other season did he do so more than eleven times. Eleven times he went for at least 40 – it’s the only time he reached 40 more than four times in a season. He set a single-season high with twelve games of 30+ and at least 15 rebounds. On ten of those occasions he scored at least 35 – he never did this more than five times in any other season. Eight times in his career Ewing scored at least 30 and grabbed at least 20 rebounds. He did it three times in ’89-‘90 – it’s the only season in which he did it more than once. Two of these were the only 40-20 games of his career. By Basketball Reference Game Score, this is the season in which he turned his top four (and five of the top-ten) individual performances, regular and postseason. Only once since 1983-84 (the date from which B-R has Game Scores) has a center topped four such games in a season.

This is a breakout season of volume greatness and performances, by a short-lived version of Patrick Ewing. Beyond the goofy great statistics and but special, historic performances (more on this in a sec), this is a different Ewing than the Dream Teamer, let alone, the one who anchored the contending Knicks teams to come.

Consider the first of those 40-20s. A month into the season, during the Knicks’ annual visit to Oakland, Ewing positively battered the Warriors, making 17 of 27 shots on his way to 44 points, while grabbing 24 rebounds – ten of them offensive –blocking three shots and handing out four assists in an easy win.

And the hits just kept coming. Three nights later in Phoenix, he had 41, 8 and 4, with five blocks. Two weeks after that, on December 16, it was 30, 14 and six blocks in a home win over the Sonics. Three nights after that, 41, 15 and four blocks in another win, this time over the Jazz.

By the numbers, that night in northern California remained the best regular performance of his career… for about five weeks. On January 7 he basically replicated the feat at home against the Clippers, again scoring 44, this time with 22 rebounds, seven blocked shots, four assists and a pair of steals. Two nights later he hung 35 on the Bullets, before putting a 33 and 12, with five assists and eight blocks on the Bulls at MSG.

And so it went… 38, 15 and four blocks in Dallas… 24, 11 and nine against Miami… 35, 13 and seven the next night in Orlando… 33, 13 and six in Houston… a pair of 41s in wins on either side of the All-Star break, with a combined 25 rebounds and eleven blocks… 37, 13, six assists and three blocks against the defending champion Pistons… 30, 18 and six blocks against Philly… and on… and on…

The game at the Garden on March 24 was always going to be an event, as any visit from the Celtics was in those days. Though the Knicks ultimately fell by five, it was another milestone for Ewing, who grabbed a whopping 18 rebounds to go with a career-high 51, and looked completely unstoppable doing it.

The next time out it was 41 and 12 with four blocks against the Bullets. Four days later it was 37, 21 and six against Denver. This is one of ten 35/20/6 performances recorded since 1973-74 – it was Ewing’s second of the season, and remains the most recent. He went for 37 twice more in the week that followed, first with 17 rebounds in Washington, and two nights later, with 19 rebounds and nine blocks in a home win against Philly. Six times since 1973-74 has a player has scored 35, grabbed 15 rebounds and blocked nine shots in a game. Only four times has it been done in regulation. This is one of them. No one has done it since.

fatal9 wrote:Some context around the 1990 Knicks: The Knicks started out 34-17 before making the Strickland/Cheeks trade. Then finished the season 11-20 for a combination of reasons. I wish I had game 3 of the Celtics series on my computer because Peter Vecsey does a decent job in a halftime segment of showing all the chemistry issues the Knicks had in the last couple of months of the season (these issues were why Knicks were given no chance to beat the Celtics). From making the Strickland trade, to Mark Jackson getting booed on the court and benched for 33 year old Cheeks, to Oakley fracturing his left hand and missing games, to Kiki V coming back and joining the team. These are a LOT of lineup changes for a team to endure mid-season, Knicks had a different starting PG, a different starting PF (Oakley out), a different starting SF (all of whom were defensive downgrades) in the last month of the season than they did when they were winning and putting up one of the best records in the league. I don't think it's a coincidence how the team performance changed so much just as the Knicks began encountering instability in their lineup. Unfortunately this stretch thwarted Ewing's MVP campaign as well (he was in the convo with Magic, Barkley, MJ for it). That was a 50+ win team disguised by the issues at the end of the season, so I would say Ewing was doing a great job of getting the best out of what he was given.

Some posts here seem to be have no sense of context surrounding his season, no analysis of his game (probably haven't bothered to watch any games), just going off a very very superficial analysis of "let me check PER and team defensive rating" and draw conclusions. This type of analysis is only going to produce outrageous statements such as "90 Malone was better than Ewing" or that Ewing "wasn't even on par with Dwight".

This is a peak project, I have a feeling people are letting their bias from mid/late 90s Ewing (who I have issues with offensively too) cloud their judgement on how good he was this year. I had a similar bias, but then I began watching his games from that season (about 15 or so) and what I'm seeing a dominant defender (his defensive versatility is better here than later in the 90s, my one gripe defensively would be that he was more prone to foul trouble this season than he would be later) with an offensive package like we've never seen Ewing put together at any other point of his career.

Why was he so much better offensively? As I've been mentioning, he had more variety in his offensive game, this was something everyone in the league was talking about. He went from being a predictable offensive player who was easy to game plan for, to being a lot more well rounded who mixed up and expanded his scoring repertoire. He was better at creating space on his shots, got that extra bit of separation he wasn't quite getting later as the years went on and a result he was having a lot of success as a one on one scorer in the post. He was at his physical peak in the NBA, insane stamina, a lot more athletic, moved better, had a bit more spring in his legs, which naturally allowed him to have a better conversion rate around the basket. His aggressiveness is completely different, he wasn't content to bail you out with fadeaways all game, he attacked the defense more often ever and consequently posted the best FTA numbers of his career (combined with a career best FT% which further raised his efficiency). His passing also took a big leap that year. While he wasn't Shaq or prime Hakeem, he was competent at reading doubles, this is another observation that is obvious to me from watching games and also reading/listening to what people around the league were saying.

This isn't a guy who saw an increase in his averages because he just upped his numbers and feasted on bad defenses either (like say D-Rob in '94), he was lighting up everyone. Here he is putting up 41/15 on Eaton:

Here is the game where he put up 45/16 against the best defensive team in the league:
His offensive numbers against good defensive teams/centers were very good over the course of the entire season.

Here's a Sports Illustrated article midway through the season (when Knicks were 25-10) talking about Ewing's amazing improvement on offense and how surprised everyone was by how much he improved:
But what the NBA is seeing these days, and is likely to be seeing through a good bit of the next decade, is much, much more. Some of the old images of Ewing are dated. He has buried them under an avalanche of soft, turnaround jump shots. "The book on him always was, Make him shoot over you, make him earn it," says Boston's backup center, Joe Kleine. "Well, now he's earning it." The power, the intimidation, the fearlessness are still there, but so are grace and finesse and economy of movement, terms previously associated with Houston's Akeem Olajuwon, Ewing's yardstick through most of the '80s, and San Antonio rookie David Robinson, the only other NBA center currently mentioned in the same breath with Ewing and Olajuwon.

Ewing's play has been an even more important component of New York's success. "He might be the best in the game right now," Los Angeles's Mychal Thompson told the New York Daily News after Ewing scored 29 points in a 115-104 loss on Dec. 3. "He and Magic [Johnson] are shoulder to shoulder."

"I know what people are saying now," says Jazz coach Jerry Sloan, "but when he came out of college, I don't recall anybody thinking he would score like this."

"I worked on some things this summer, just like I always do. I wanted to get better on coming into the lane with my left hand, and I've done that. I'm getting to the foul line more [his eight attempts per game are about two more than last season], and that's helped my scoring. But I haven't changed my jump shot. It just got better.

Ewing gradually improved under Pitino, but only recently has the whole package been unwrapped. It reveals an agile seven-footer whose turnaround jumper is accurate up to 20 feet; a heady player who discourages double-teaming with canny passes; an outstanding athlete who has somehow figured out the exotic fast-break passing strategies of point guards Mark Jackson and Rod Strickland, both of whom never make a simple move when 13 complicated ones will do; and a defensive intimidator whose 3.7 blocks per game at week's end were second only to Olajuwon's league-leading 4.2.

''He has taken his game to another level,'' Johnson continued, ''a level I've never seen him play at before. He's dominating offensively and defensively, but he's also making the right plays at the right time. He's leading his team, as opposed to before, when it seemed he'd just as soon let somebody else lead. That's the real mark of an MVP.'

https://vault.si.com/.amp/vault/1990/01/22/the-big-man-gets-bigger-patrick-ewing-has-added-finesse-to-his-intimidating-presence-and-made-new-york-an-nba-force

And people are questioning this guy's defense? Come on...this is '92-'94 Ewing but with way better knees. I mean every game I've seen of his from this season, it's the type of combo of scoring variety, defense and athleticism, Knicks fans always wished he had. He was seen as a better center than Hakeem that year, made the all-NBA first over him and had coaches around the league saying he was the best center in the league.

Parish said that Ewing "is a better player today because he has variety of shots, just doesn't throw the fadeaway jumpshot, he gives you the jump hook and his spin move on the baseline is the toughest thing for me to guard" (so this isn't exactly the fadeaway jumpers all game long offensive version of Ewing we remember most). From what I've read guys say about him, he took a big leap in his post game that season but declined as the 90s went on because his knees got worse and worse (and of course he aged, he was in his 30s during '92-'94...and consequently shot jumpers wayyyyyy more often), and as a result so did his efficiency. Even in something like FT shooting, it's way above his career average and his best year ever. He is doing a lot of heavy lifting offensively...must be turning the ball over a lot like he always did, but nope, while putting up the scoring numbers he did, he also posted the third best TOV% of his career. It's not like Ewing is inexperienced here either, he is 27-28 which is usually when players peak so career trajectory wise, it makes sense.

Knicks were still above average defensively considering the following things: a rookie head coach (Stu Jackson, fired 15 games into next season...and only coached one other team after that, the 6-33 Grizzlies), the second best defender on the team missing 21 games, a bad defensive backcourt particularly when Kiki joins the team. I would say he's making pretty good impact here (and we know he can probably make a lot more if he is on a championship caliber team where he doesn't have to score as much). This is one of the great interior defenders of all time, he didn't learn defense when he was 30 years old just like KG didn't magically learn to play defense when he joined the Celtics. His comparison was Bill Russell coming out of college, he was seen as one of the finest defensive talents ever. The questions weren't "can he defend?" but "can he add enough to his post game?" (and he did in 1990). In terms of interior defense, he's ones of the best ever, anything you threw around the basket was going to get challenged, no easy baskets even it meant you put him on a poster. He's second in the league in blocks behind Hakeem, I know averages aren't everything but this isn't Javale McGee we are talking about, but a fundamentally sound defensive player, who plays great post defense and whose block averages reflect his ability to absolutely lock down the paint. I'm going to guess a better moving version of the guy who was anchoring historic defenses a year and a half later was still pretty damn effective on defense. Seems like a reasonable conclusion.

Regarding the Ewing Theory. It refers to the mid/late 90s version of Ewing (in his mid 30s) who is 5+ years away from the year in question here and a CLEAR step down offensively. Even if it were true, it's not very relevant. It's like using Kobe's impact last couple of years to define his impact in '08.

One thing I kind of wish there was more of an argument for was D-Rob (who I think went a few spots too high) vs. Ewing. Would people really take '95 D-Rob in a playoff series over '90 Ewing? Has D-Rob ever taken over offensively for his teams in the playoffs like that? Could D-Rob give the bad boy Pistons defense 45 point game and then come back and drop 30 points in the second half of the next game? And don't forget the intangibles, Ewing was intimidating on the court, a better leader, a guy who has an impact over the entire mentality of the team. I think a great argument I read for D-Rob was that he'd be a great second banana offensively on a championship team but would still be the best overall player on the team...could the same thing not be said about '90 Ewing?
lorak wrote:Another great post by fatal and I agree with you 100% (even youtube video you posted was uploaded by me, because I was so impressed by Ewing's play).

And Ewing theory is completly BS... at least until he was 36 years old. In 1986 he missed 32 games and NYK without him were worse by 6.2 efficiency pts (Ewing improved offense by 1 and defense by 5,2).

1987: 19 games missed, -7 without Ewing (0.4 offense, 6,6 defense)

1996: 6 games missed, -10.6 without Ewing (he improved defense by 12.2 drtg! but offense was worse with him by 1.6)

1998: 56 games missed, -5.4 without Ewing (he improved defense by 7.3 but offense was worse with him by 1.9)

1999: 12 games missed, NYK were better without him by 2.7 eff pts (but still defense was better with Ewing by 1.5)

2000: 20 games missed, team worse by 1.1 with Ewing (but with him offense was better by 3.5 and defense worse by 4.6)

So we see that through almost whole career he was great defensive player and during his early years, before knees were destroyed by injuries, he was also slightly positive player on offense. I really see no reason to put him so much behind DRob whose profile and impact on the game are very close to Ewing's.

E-Balla wrote:1990 Patrick Ewing - This season is spectacular. Ewing was legitimately up for MVP along with Barkley and Magic for most of the season prior to his team making some moves that hurt them. In the first 52 games of the season the Knicks went 34-17 (55 win pace) with Ewing averaging 27.8/10.2/2.3 (4.9 combined blocks and steals) on 58.7 TS% with a 114 ORTG. After the trade the Knicks went 11-20 which would make one assume Ewing didn't play well but he actually played better with the team around him falling apart. He averaged 30.0/12.1/2.1 (4.9 combined blocks and steals) on 61.9 TS% with a 116 ORTG in the last 31 games.

At one point they had a 1-9 stretch where Ewing averaged 32.1/12.5/1.3 (5.0 blocks and steals combined) on 64.5 TS%. His career high was in that stretch, a 51 point performance in a loss to the Celtics.

Then the playoffs came and Ewing went off. In game 1 vs Boston they lost pretty handedly and in game 2 they allowed Boston to break the playoff record for points with 157 (a record that still stands). Following that embarrassment at Boston they were facing elimination in game 3. Ewing and Oakley really turned on the defense and dominated the glass with Ewing grabbing 19 boards in the 3 point win. They followed that with a game 4 blowout win where Ewing played what's probably his best game ever with 44 points, 7 steals, 5 assists, and shooting 75% from the field. Now they were tied up in the series attempting to become the 2nd [sic] team to comeback from being down 0-2 and at the same time hoping to break a 28 game losing streak in Boston (the last time they won in Boston was in 84). The Knicks won that closely contested game with the momentum shifting towards the end of the game with Larry Bird missing an easy dunk and Ewing shortly after making his iconic turnaround 3 pointer.

On Larry Bird missing that dunk this is from SI's article on that series:
When Larry Bird missed the dunk—a point-blank dunk at crunch time in a do-or-die playoff game in Boston Garden—he did so not as a result of any strange astrological occurrence or the Massachusetts budget crisis or even tough defense.

He did so, by his own account, because he was worried. "I wasn't going to dunk it," he explained after the game. "But I thought Patrick was coming, so I tried to. And then I jumped too high, if you can believe it."

Believe it, as hard as it may seem. It is not the business of Boston Celtics to feel shadowy presences, least of all for Larry Legend to feel one from a New York Knick in the building in which New York had lost 26 straight times and hadn't won in the playoffs since the Nixon administration. This was the Garden, and the ghosts are supposed to be friendly. But: "I thought Patrick was coming."

If the truth be told, at the time of Bird's misguided dunk attempt, any Celtic was entitled to be wary of these Knicks. A little more than four minutes remained in Sunday's fifth and final game of these teams' first-round Eastern Conference playoff series, and the Patrick in question, a certain Mr. Ewing, had just feathered in a jump-hook to give New York a 103-99 lead. Ewing did just about everything asked of him in this game. He finished with 31 points and 10 assists, and those figures are stark testimony to how shrewdly he picked apart Boston's double teams with opportune passes and drives.

https://vault.si.com/.amp/vault/1990/05/14/oh-those-cheeky-knicks-mo-cheeks-drove-new-york-to-a-stunning-win-over-boston

Following that series they were completely outmatched by the Pistons but Ewing wasn't. He had some stinkers but overall averaged 27.2 ppg on 56 TS% which is more PPG than anyone outside of MJ (who was only as efficient as Ewing one of those 3 years) averaged against the Pistons in a series between 88 and 90.

EDIT: I punched the numbers. MJ averaged 30.0 ppg on 56.0 TS% against the Pistons from 88 to 90. He averaged 25.4 points per 36. Ewing averaged 26.2 points per 36 against them on 56.0 TS%. So his scoring performance against them was right there with MJ's average scoring performance against them.

Overall that's a pretty great season, but it's not the most impressive left on the board so why 90 Ewing? Well here's how I see his game:

Scoring - 28.6 ppg on +6.2 rTS% speaks for itself. Post merger only Moses (in 81), Robinson (in 94), and Shaq (in 94, 95, 00, and 01) have scored more ppg as a center. Only Shaq in 94, 00, and 01 did it on higher efficiency. In the playoffs he showed he could consistently score on that level scoring 29.4 ppg on 57.9 TS% in the playoffs. Post merger only Shaq (in 98, 00, and 01), Hakeem (in 88 and 95), and Kareem (in 77 and 80) scored more ppg than Ewing in the 90 playoffs. Only Kareem in both years, and Shaq in 98 did it on higher efficiency.

Then you look at his skillset. He had a robotic but effective post game with a predictable but at times unstoppable running hook shot, great speed and strength, the best jumper for any true C I've seen outside of KAT, and his one weakness was probably his small hands which at times limited him on lobs and lead to easy misses of his signature finger roll. There's a solid argument to be made that outside of the true greats (Kareem, Hakeem, Wilt, Moses, Shaq) he's the best scoring C ever. I think his scoring game would suit the modern game amazingly too. Ewing got most of his buckets back then off quick actions and turnaround jumpers, things that would be more valued in today's league at his size.

His passing and rebounding on the other hand were never strong. His passing was below average and his rebounding was mediocre at best for his size.

There's been a lot of discussion about his defense this year. Discussion I don't really understand. Ewing was still an elite defender in 1990 and I don't really have any reason to think he improved after 1990. Played better? In 1992, definitely, but outside of that the biggest change in the quality of the Knicks defense those years was due to his support and most of all the coach. The coach's effect on defensive ratings is always overlooked but there's no great defenses that don't have great defensive coaches and his supporting cast was Oak, Wilkins, and a bunch of scrubs in 1990.

On that end he was a beast out on the perimeter capable of sticking with smaller guys, super athletic and capable of blocking shots at their apex, the best PNR defender of all the Cs of that era (DRob, Hakeem, Deke, and a little later Zo) and he had fast hands capable of stopping drives. Can anyone actually say what he improved at under Pat Riley? I mean performances aren't consistent which is why I think he was better defensively in 89, 92, etc. but why believe Ewing was a meaningfully better defender in the mid 90s just because he finally got a supporting cast that was dominant on that end and a great defensive coach?

I think tons of people just aren't used to seeing young Ewing so they see the numbers and can't connect it to him being legitimately better, and assume he had to have improved later when in reality he lost a ton of his athleticism and really didn't add much to his game. 93/94 Ewing isn't locking down Edwards on the perimeter, forcing Isiah to pick up his dribble and rush a pass (causing a turnover) after a switch in the PNR, drawing a charge on Isiah all the way at the dotted line with his quick reaction and movement (it was called blocking but he's clearly there in time), stopping 3 on 1 fast breaks because no one wanted to go up with it with him around, and at the end of the game blocking Isiah's layup from the other side of the basket.
MyUniBroDavis wrote:Some people are clearly far too overreliant on data without context and look at good all in one or impact numbers and get wowed by that rather than looking at how a roster is actually built around a player
Stan
Veteran
Posts: 2,559
And1: 3,850
Joined: Oct 11, 2019

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#6 » by Stan » Mon Sep 5, 2022 4:49 am

While I don't agree with the exact order, I agree with every player that's made the list so far. It'd be a shame if the top 25 was ruined by messing up the final spot. I'm sure the basketball historians will disagree with me on this, and I understand he was extremely dominant for his era, but having a guy from 1950 who didn't even play with the shot clock make the top 25 would be a pretty big blemish on the list imo.

1. I think Sir Charles deserves this spot, and I'll go with his MVP season of '93. He led the Suns to the best record in the league with his best teammate missing half the season, winning 5 more games than the b2b champion Bulls. Then in the playoffs, he had a 40 point triple double & 44/24 in Game 7 to clinch the conference, then had two more all time performances in the Finals, coming within literally a single play of getting to host Game 7 at home.

1B. 1990 Barkley.

2. 1983 Moses. Led the Sixers on one of the greatest seasons and most dominant playoff runs ever. Won MVP, FMVP, made All NBA & All-Defensive First Team, and outplayed Kareem h2h in the Finals.

3. 1975 Barry. This admittedly could've gone to a ton of other players, but I went with Barry taking one of the weakest championship rosters ever to the title.
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,286
And1: 6,896
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#7 » by falcolombardi » Mon Sep 5, 2022 5:22 am

I dislike barkley defense a bit too much to have hin top 25 although he may make my top 30

Considering relativeness to position i am not even sure he is much more valuable defender than nash who i have a level ahead of him offensively

https://youtu.be/x8o-jrLq3xM

Barkley is one of the most impressive offensive renounders of all time: his combination of lower body of gravity, wide body mass, quick jumping and long arms as well as great effort and reactions on the boards made him a unvaluably good offensive rebounder.

He was a underated passer. Specially on the break where he could grab the defensive board and quickstar the fastvreak as BOTH the ball handler and target in a way that was outright lebron/giannis lite. And his post up game was reliable if unremarkable tool to generate offense against set defense

A incredible offensive player but lacking that extra bit of passing and/or ballhandling (preferably both) to be among the offensive goats. And very unremarkable on the other end.

He had all the physical tools to be a versatile, switchable defender. And to his credit teams didnt hunt him down all that much and was a strong defensive rebounder

The issue is that his timing, reads and positioning in rotations and specially the paint ranged from subpar to abysmal. What could have been a strenght with his lenght and athletism as a lebron or wade esque secondary rim protector was often a weakness

DEFENSE

11:30 first of many mistakes. Barkley dies on the screen so easily, concedes a open jumper

14:50 great defensive steal, he was not totally bad in defense (great physical tools 1 on 1, ideal body for a 3-5 switch defender if that skill had been more in demand at the time, great D rebounding) notice the good defense on pippen drive the next play. Shame this was less commong that the bad plays

19:50 this is one of his best contests this game in that it is understandable to foul pippen in a drive like that. Next ones will be a lot more of a issue. Also trying a charge could have been more useful but wont fault him too much here

44:25 not bad defense if you are a guard or even a wing. But here is where a bigger power forward wkth better shot blocking instincts may have helped

This is not bad per se. But is a issue of barkley not being either a lock down defender in the perimeter or a good help defender in the perineter or paint. His defensive value ends up being very harden-like. Defend post ups well and not be too targeted one on one

48:00. Bad help defense and one of the weirdest...charge attempts? I have seen you are not supposed to defend the drive with your back

A stronger help defending PF could have either gone for the charge with a quicker read or get into position to contest that drive better

1:03:00 not his lone fault. But notice how barkley and his teammate dont nltice the wide open shooter amid the chaos in the paint and stand there

1:07:25 another bad off ball defense. Leads to opem jumper

1:09:30 not his worst mistake but another slow reaction leads to a open corner 3.

1:11:00 is in position to contest but doesnt at all

1:15:05 continues getting lost chasing rivals off ball











OFFENSE

11:50 not as commonly as with ewing ( who i hope i get the time to write a bit on) but barkley coukf stubbornly get into iso- mode against 2-3 defenders at times.....of course he gets his own rebound lmao, what a beast

16:40 Lmao my man just trolling

18:50 great defensive box out, grabs the board to start the break and a nice pass. These sequences are a underated part of barkley value... of course he rebounds the missed shot lmao

23:00 in some ways i prefer face up drive barkley to post up barkley. Less likely to miss a pass (like the one he hits here) for focusing on a tough iso

37:10 .here is the off ball part of his fastbreak game that is just lebronesque in how he absorbs contact before finishing

38:20 his best pass of the game, just beatiful

38:40 another great targrt man basket ofg the fastbreak

REBOUNDING

7:50 can make a basic but solid drive and kick as a point forward. But the remarkable thingh is how quickly he -moves- into rebounding position after hus drive, -reacts- to the board and explodes in an instant to take th3 ball over the bulls defender back

10:30 notice the pre shot work for positioning. Moses malone would be a proud teacher

11:50 the pure HUSTLE rebound after his miss, this motor as a superstar is inpressive (if only it extended to defense lol) and often missing in his suns years which is why i prefer this version

17:40 MORE offensive rebound bullying. He can get offensive rebounds in every way. By outmuscling you out of position. Out athetism'ing you and jumping over your back or just by hustling faster to them

18:50 anotha one

23:40 not a rebound but notice hoe often he just steals position

28:30 is just bullying grant at this point lol

29:50 starts the fastbreak off the rebound and throws such a great bullet to the paint pass

45:40 this is just illegal at this point charles. Horace has a family

1:17:55 cayse why the **** no lol

I think this is enough to make my point. I love his offensive game. And not overly concerned about spacing when he is a trascendent offensive rebounder which has huge value.

Overall i think his offense ks just a level below the goat tier offense peaks with his combo of scoring, passing, fastbreak game and offensive rebounding

My issue is that i struggle to see him as anythingh but a negative defender relative to position. I am not even sure he is better than nash on that end when adjusting for position but that may be mpre of a hot take
trelos6
Senior
Posts: 506
And1: 204
Joined: Jun 17, 2022
Location: Sydney

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#8 » by trelos6 » Mon Sep 5, 2022 6:18 am

25. Steve Nash 2007. Engine of an amazing offense (+7.5 team rOrtg) and was a lights out shooter. He was 19.8 ppg on +11.3 rTS%.

26. 2007-08 Chris Paul. CP3 was an elite offensive initiator AND point of attack defender. Advanced stats love this season. 13.2 OWS, 4.6 DWS. Had a strong argument for MVP going up against a peak Kobe season.

27. James Harden 2019. Hard to pick a year. 18 v 19. Both were great. In 18-19 he was 36.2 pp75!!!! At +5.9 rTS%. Team rOtg was +5.1. Not to mention the assists he generated for teammates. Harden was the modern definition of a solar system offence.

28. Anthony Davis 2020. AD was the epitome of a modern big. Defended the rim. Could defend on the perimeter. Shot the ball amazingly well. Prime AD was a beast. Hopefully we can see more of it going forward.
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,424
And1: 6,352
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#9 » by CharityStripe34 » Mon Sep 5, 2022 7:29 pm

Copy and pasted from the last thread.

1. Bob Pettit (1959) : Arguably the league's best player in the first half-decade of the shot-clock era, and certainly a Top 5 player for literally 95% of his career until his last season when he got a knee-injury and decided to retire (as an All-NBA 2nd teamer) to pursue banking/finance (take that plumbers and firemen). The league's first true, prototypical PF that could shoot from distance and rebound like a MF'er who won two MVP's and a title. His 1959 was his absolute peak coming off a dominant title-winning season the year before.

Honorable mention: (1958, 1962)

2. Moses Malone (1983): The most lethal booty of one of the most competitive eras of hoops. Bodied the entire league for 5-6 years to multiple MVP's and a dominant title run with some of the most powerful hips and thighs in history, and without Shaq's girth. Ran through a very competitive East and nearly sent Kareem to AARP early in the Finals. Goosed his rebound numbers 'cause he knew it would inflate his PER like a boss.

Honorable mention: 1979, 1982

3. Rick Barry (1975): Someone who definitely gets lost in all-time discussions, mostly because he made a big impact coming into the league in the mid-late 60's, but then went to the ABA for a few seasons. Only then to return to the NBA and, thanks to his awesome season, took the Warriors as a massive underdog to the Finals against a really good Bullets team and demolished them in a sweep. 30-6-5 on 46% shooting and considering he did much of his damage shooting dribble pull-ups that's pretty damn good, in my eyes. He had better post-season stats in 1967, but 28-6-6 with 3 steals is nothing to sneeze at (12.7 WS). Yeah, he had a girly FT shooting motion, but led basketball multiple times with above 90% from the stripe.

Honorable mention: 1967, 1969
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,552
And1: 1,569
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#10 » by f4p » Tue Sep 6, 2022 1:44 am

falcolombardi wrote:I dislike barkley defense a bit too much to have hin top 25 although he may make my top 30


but what does 2007 nash really have on 1993 charles barkley? both suns teams finished #1 in offense. the 1993 suns made the finals if we need team results. barkley of course dwarfs nash in regular season PER, WS48, BPM and the other productions stats. and similar to other people, even if you just take his 1986-1997 playoff averages, his PER, WS48, and BPM all handily beat nash's career high (some from 2007, some others not). if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.

nash also went 6-17 and 6-19 in close losses to the spurs. one was the unfair suspensions game but it's worth noting the suns were up 6 after 3 quarters on the back of a 56 point defensive effort through 3 quarters and then nash shot 1-8 in the 4th. barkley of course has the well-known 44/24 game 7 to close out seattle in his biggest career game to that point, but also went a ridiculous 43/15/10 in a close game 5 that the suns won by 6 and was only 3 points after 3. and also had 42/13 and 32/12/10, both on very nice efficiency, in close losses to the bulls (also amazingly only had 10 total turnovers in the finals).
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,286
And1: 6,896
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#11 » by falcolombardi » Tue Sep 6, 2022 1:49 am

f4p wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:I dislike barkley defense a bit too much to have hin top 25 although he may make my top 30


but what does 2007 nash really have on 1993 charles barkley? both suns teams finished #1 in offense. the 1993 suns made the finals if we need team results. barkley of course dwarfs nash in regular season PER, WS48, BPM and the other productions stats. and similar to other people, even if you just take his 1986-1997 playoff averages, his PER, WS48, and BPM all handily beat nash's career high (some from 2007, some others not). if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.

nash also went 6-17 and 6-19 in close losses to the spurs. one was the unfair suspensions game but it's worth noting the suns were up 6 after 3 quarters on the back of a 56 point defensive effort through 3 quarters and then nash shot 1-8 in the 4th. barkley of course has the well-known 44/24 game 7 to close out seattle in his biggest career game to that point, but also went a ridiculous 43/15/10 in a close game 5 that the suns won by 6 and was only 3 points after 3. and also had 42/13 and 32/12/10, both on very nice efficiency, in close losses to the bulls (also amazingly only had 10 total turnovers in the finals).


Essentially? I think nash offense is better and barkley mediocre defense doesnt make up the gap
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,247
And1: 2,955
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#12 » by LukaTheGOAT » Tue Sep 6, 2022 2:24 am

f4p wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:I dislike barkley defense a bit too much to have hin top 25 although he may make my top 30


but what does 2007 nash really have on 1993 charles barkley? both suns teams finished #1 in offense. the 1993 suns made the finals if we need team results. barkley of course dwarfs nash in regular season PER, WS48, BPM and the other productions stats. and similar to other people, even if you just take his 1986-1997 playoff averages, his PER, WS48, and BPM all handily beat nash's career high (some from 2007, some others not). if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.

nash also went 6-17 and 6-19 in close losses to the spurs. one was the unfair suspensions game but it's worth noting the suns were up 6 after 3 quarters on the back of a 56 point defensive effort through 3 quarters and then nash shot 1-8 in the 4th. barkley of course has the well-known 44/24 game 7 to close out seattle in his biggest career game to that point, but also went a ridiculous 43/15/10 in a close game 5 that the suns won by 6 and was only 3 points after 3. and also had 42/13 and 32/12/10, both on very nice efficiency, in close losses to the bulls (also amazingly only had 10 total turnovers in the finals).


I also think when you look at 2007 Nash, you might want to index on his play against a tougher opponent versus say a weaker one.

Nash's 07 first round series was pretty weak for his standards, but it was a series the Suns won in 5, and I guess you could argue were in control of. The Suns had a raw rORTG of 6.1 in this series.

In the second round against a vaunted Spurs defense (had a rDRTG of -6.5, which is #16 all-time, just barely behind the 06 Spurs for the #15 spot), Nash played closer to what you would expect of an all-time offensive player in the box-score. First off the Suns had a better rORTG (7), hinting at a resilient offense. Even without his full squad for the whole series,

Nash averaged 21.3 pts per 75 possessions on a rTS% of 8.6%. He is estimated to have created about 17.3 shots per 100 possessions. Dating back to 2001, that shots created per 100 possessions would be the highest ever up until that point in his history. His PlayVal (Playmaking value, an estimate of a player’s points per 100 impact from playmaking only) of 3, would be the fourth highest on record up until that point with 2 of the 3 spots ahead of it being records set by none other than Nash himself.

Also, the Nash and Barkley suns had different levels of offensive success.

In 07- the Suns had an offensive rating 7.5 points better than league average. In the PS, this numbers was 7.6 points better than league average.

In 93- the Barkley suns had an offensive rating 5.3 points better than league average. In the PS, this number was 5.2 points better than league average.
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,552
And1: 1,569
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#13 » by f4p » Tue Sep 6, 2022 8:32 am

LukaTheGOAT wrote:
f4p wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:I dislike barkley defense a bit too much to have hin top 25 although he may make my top 30


but what does 2007 nash really have on 1993 charles barkley? both suns teams finished #1 in offense. the 1993 suns made the finals if we need team results. barkley of course dwarfs nash in regular season PER, WS48, BPM and the other productions stats. and similar to other people, even if you just take his 1986-1997 playoff averages, his PER, WS48, and BPM all handily beat nash's career high (some from 2007, some others not). if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.

nash also went 6-17 and 6-19 in close losses to the spurs. one was the unfair suspensions game but it's worth noting the suns were up 6 after 3 quarters on the back of a 56 point defensive effort through 3 quarters and then nash shot 1-8 in the 4th. barkley of course has the well-known 44/24 game 7 to close out seattle in his biggest career game to that point, but also went a ridiculous 43/15/10 in a close game 5 that the suns won by 6 and was only 3 points after 3. and also had 42/13 and 32/12/10, both on very nice efficiency, in close losses to the bulls (also amazingly only had 10 total turnovers in the finals).


I also think when you look at 2007 Nash, you might want to index on his play against a tougher opponent versus say a weaker one.

Nash's 07 first round series was pretty weak for his standards, but it was a series the Suns won in 5, and I guess you could argue were in control of. The Suns had a raw rORTG of 6.1 in this series.

In the second round against a vaunted Spurs defense (had a rDRTG of -6.5, which is #16 all-time, just barely behind the 06 Spurs for the #15 spot), Nash played closer to what you would expect of an all-time offensive player in the box-score. First off the Suns had a better rORTG (7), hinting at a resilient offense. Even without his full squad for the whole series,



either you misread my post or i'm not sure what you're referring to, but i thought that's exactly what i did when i said:

if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.


i specifically mentioned it replying to falco because you and falco brought it up in some earlier kawhi discussion. barkley's +10.9 against his best defensive opponent, the #2 defense sonics (i had a typo when saying 10.8), is easily ahead of nash's +7.9 against the spurs. even smoothing it out with the bulls series (best opponent, 2nd best defense), it would be a +9.1 rORtg for the 2 series for the 1993 suns.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,247
And1: 2,955
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#14 » by LukaTheGOAT » Tue Sep 6, 2022 12:03 pm

f4p wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
f4p wrote:
but what does 2007 nash really have on 1993 charles barkley? both suns teams finished #1 in offense. the 1993 suns made the finals if we need team results. barkley of course dwarfs nash in regular season PER, WS48, BPM and the other productions stats. and similar to other people, even if you just take his 1986-1997 playoff averages, his PER, WS48, and BPM all handily beat nash's career high (some from 2007, some others not). if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.

nash also went 6-17 and 6-19 in close losses to the spurs. one was the unfair suspensions game but it's worth noting the suns were up 6 after 3 quarters on the back of a 56 point defensive effort through 3 quarters and then nash shot 1-8 in the 4th. barkley of course has the well-known 44/24 game 7 to close out seattle in his biggest career game to that point, but also went a ridiculous 43/15/10 in a close game 5 that the suns won by 6 and was only 3 points after 3. and also had 42/13 and 32/12/10, both on very nice efficiency, in close losses to the bulls (also amazingly only had 10 total turnovers in the finals).


I also think when you look at 2007 Nash, you might want to index on his play against a tougher opponent versus say a weaker one.

Nash's 07 first round series was pretty weak for his standards, but it was a series the Suns won in 5, and I guess you could argue were in control of. The Suns had a raw rORTG of 6.1 in this series.

In the second round against a vaunted Spurs defense (had a rDRTG of -6.5, which is #16 all-time, just barely behind the 06 Spurs for the #15 spot), Nash played closer to what you would expect of an all-time offensive player in the box-score. First off the Suns had a better rORTG (7), hinting at a resilient offense. Even without his full squad for the whole series,



either you misread my post or i'm not sure what you're referring to, but i thought that's exactly what i did when i said:

if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.


i specifically mentioned it replying to falco because you and falco brought it up in some earlier kawhi discussion. barkley's +10.9 against his best defensive opponent, the #2 defense sonics (i had a typo when saying 10.8), is easily ahead of nash's +7.9 against the spurs. even smoothing it out with the bulls series (best opponent, 2nd best defense), it would be a +9.1 rORtg for the 2 series for the 1993 suns.


It makes a difference however, because Nash went up against a top 15-ish defense ever based on rDRTG, which is much different from a typical "best defense in the league," most guys see every year. I don't necessarily think the relationship is linear in terms of accounting for performance against historic defenses, so the Suns being able to get such separation is noteworthy to me.

The RS rORTg, I shared just shows that their PS performance was not necessarily a fluke, and that they were a stronger offensive team during the RS (another data point).

While perhaps you could argue there were years Nash played better (like the two prior), people view goodness through different lenses. By your criteria, I think 05 and 06 look as better years to pick, but others might like a more mature Nash. 09 is another year that might be noteworthy to include in terms of anchored team success.
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,552
And1: 1,569
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#15 » by f4p » Tue Sep 6, 2022 10:42 pm

LukaTheGOAT wrote:
f4p wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
I also think when you look at 2007 Nash, you might want to index on his play against a tougher opponent versus say a weaker one.

Nash's 07 first round series was pretty weak for his standards, but it was a series the Suns won in 5, and I guess you could argue were in control of. The Suns had a raw rORTG of 6.1 in this series.

In the second round against a vaunted Spurs defense (had a rDRTG of -6.5, which is #16 all-time, just barely behind the 06 Spurs for the #15 spot), Nash played closer to what you would expect of an all-time offensive player in the box-score. First off the Suns had a better rORTG (7), hinting at a resilient offense. Even without his full squad for the whole series,



either you misread my post or i'm not sure what you're referring to, but i thought that's exactly what i did when i said:

if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.


i specifically mentioned it replying to falco because you and falco brought it up in some earlier kawhi discussion. barkley's +10.9 against his best defensive opponent, the #2 defense sonics (i had a typo when saying 10.8), is easily ahead of nash's +7.9 against the spurs. even smoothing it out with the bulls series (best opponent, 2nd best defense), it would be a +9.1 rORtg for the 2 series for the 1993 suns.


It makes a difference however, because Nash went up against a top 15-ish defense ever based on rDRTG, which is much different from a typical "best defense in the league," most guys see every year. I don't necessarily think the relationship is linear in terms of accounting for performance against historic defenses, so the Suns being able to get such separation is noteworthy to me.


you see how the goalposts keep moving though, right? kawhi crushes nash in individual stats and wins team results. then it's pointed out nash had better team rORtg in the playoffs. when i point out that actually kawhi had better results, it's said to focus on the best defenses. then we get to barkley, who wins the individual stats and team results (though not by as much individually) and i specifically point out that he also wins rORtg against his best defense, by 3.0 points, and now it has to be a top-15 defense, which is hard to find. and it's not like barkley edged him out 8.0 to 7.9, it was 10.9 to 7.9. any non-linearity would seem to be taken care of. and it's not like barkley doesn't have plenty of other areas to be ahead in, this is basically the only thing nash would win.

and i'm not sure how good the claim is that all-time defenses are harder to break away from. is this based on something? the first team i thought of was the '94 knicks. the second series i clicked on was a +8 rORtg from the league-average offense chicago bulls. then the 2004 pistons, who indeed smushed everyone. then the 2005 spurs, to get us more to this argument. i knew the suns did well against them so i looked at other teams. the sonics in the 2nd round were +8. the pistons, a slightly below-average offense, were +7. then just to see, i checked the 2006 spurs. not quite as elite defensively but still elite. +9.8 from the kings in the 1st round (and this is not peak kings, only 11th in offense) and +15.1 from the mavericks. basically matching the suns great number from 2005. even in 2007, the jazz put up a +6.1 the very next round after phoenix. from 2005 to 2007, it was 60% chance of +7 and 70% chance of +6 rORtg against the spurs defense. the suns +7.9 barely even stands out.
User avatar
AEnigma
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,047
And1: 5,850
Joined: Jul 24, 2022
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#16 » by AEnigma » Tue Sep 6, 2022 10:59 pm

Not matching your own personal goalposts of individual production or single season teams results which you entirely attribute to a single productive individual does not mean the goalposts themselves are changing. Elite all-time offence is a consistent trend for Nash. He guarantees one across changing teams and coaches and opponents (and opponent defensive quality). If you enjoy blindly attributing all team results to one player, then you should focus in on 2005. For most people, 2007 looks like a natural evolution from 2005 even if the slight shift toward better team balance falls short of the impossible offensive heights of 2005.
MyUniBroDavis wrote:Some people are clearly far too overreliant on data without context and look at good all in one or impact numbers and get wowed by that rather than looking at how a roster is actually built around a player
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,286
And1: 6,896
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#17 » by falcolombardi » Tue Sep 6, 2022 11:28 pm

AEnigma wrote:Not matching your own personal goalposts of individual production or single season teams results which you entirely attribute to a single productive individual does not mean the goalposts themselves are changing. Elite all-time offence is a consistent trend for Nash. He guarantees one across changing teams and coaches and opponents (and opponent defensive quality). If you enjoy blindly attributing all team results to one player, then you should focus in on 2005. For most people, 2007 looks like a natural evolution from 2005 even if the slight shift toward better team balance falls short of the impossible offensive heights of 2005.



To expand a bit here. Lots of players have single series or even single playoff runs with outlier results. The sample size is still small enough for it. Like if we ranked jamal murray based on his 2020 playoffs run at face value without other similar results to "confirm" that was the "real" jamal

So if we take single years in a vacuum (which is a valid approach) vs if we take a wider approach (like looking at a player 3-4 years best stretch) the result is gonna be faitly different

The 2005 suns had like a +15 relative offense in the playoffs so nash still would hold the offensive results advantage over 93 barkley by that approach (who i consider inferior to 89-91~ barkley) and unlike other matchups of nash vs someone. Here barkley defense doesnt hold much of an advantage to make up the gaps

I also want to notice that the 93 suns were a excellent offensive roster that was among the league best offenses before barkley came. They were the league 5th best offense at +3.9 before trading barkley for hornacek then went to +5.3 as league best offense next season. A really nice improvement (and kevin johnson missed many games and hornscek was a nice player so is more impressive than it looks)

But the suns in 2005 improved by nearly 10 points. From -1.5 to +8.4 with nash. It was not all nash but the change pre and post nash with relatively little other roster change was absurd

He joined a offense that was leagues worse than the one barkley joined and had them reach higher. Some of this absurd impact was kind of circunstancial (D'antony was light years ahead unironically) but it still has to count for somethingh
NBA4Lyfe
Analyst
Posts: 3,398
And1: 1,989
Joined: Mar 23, 2022
       

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#18 » by NBA4Lyfe » Wed Sep 7, 2022 12:12 am

f4p wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
f4p wrote:
but what does 2007 nash really have on 1993 charles barkley? both suns teams finished #1 in offense. the 1993 suns made the finals if we need team results. barkley of course dwarfs nash in regular season PER, WS48, BPM and the other productions stats. and similar to other people, even if you just take his 1986-1997 playoff averages, his PER, WS48, and BPM all handily beat nash's career high (some from 2007, some others not). if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.

nash also went 6-17 and 6-19 in close losses to the spurs. one was the unfair suspensions game but it's worth noting the suns were up 6 after 3 quarters on the back of a 56 point defensive effort through 3 quarters and then nash shot 1-8 in the 4th. barkley of course has the well-known 44/24 game 7 to close out seattle in his biggest career game to that point, but also went a ridiculous 43/15/10 in a close game 5 that the suns won by 6 and was only 3 points after 3. and also had 42/13 and 32/12/10, both on very nice efficiency, in close losses to the bulls (also amazingly only had 10 total turnovers in the finals).


I also think when you look at 2007 Nash, you might want to index on his play against a tougher opponent versus say a weaker one.

Nash's 07 first round series was pretty weak for his standards, but it was a series the Suns won in 5, and I guess you could argue were in control of. The Suns had a raw rORTG of 6.1 in this series.

In the second round against a vaunted Spurs defense (had a rDRTG of -6.5, which is #16 all-time, just barely behind the 06 Spurs for the #15 spot), Nash played closer to what you would expect of an all-time offensive player in the box-score. First off the Suns had a better rORTG (7), hinting at a resilient offense. Even without his full squad for the whole series,



either you misread my post or i'm not sure what you're referring to, but i thought that's exactly what i did when i said:

if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.


i specifically mentioned it replying to falco because you and falco brought it up in some earlier kawhi discussion. barkley's +10.9 against his best defensive opponent, the #2 defense sonics (i had a typo when saying 10.8), is easily ahead of nash's +7.9 against the spurs. even smoothing it out with the bulls series (best opponent, 2nd best defense), it would be a +9.1 rORtg for the 2 series for the 1993 suns.


nash is overrated, would he even make 1st or 2nd team all nba in the modern game. guys like trae young are averaging 29 and 9 and are barely getting on the 3rd team. Nash's popularity and his knack for winning mvps was simple. The league wanted get away from the kobe incident and the pacers/pistons brawl. It was just perfect timing, nash stats on basketball reference dont put him anywhere near harden or cp3 for that matter. If you have to rate a player by TEAM offensive ratings instead of the traditional stats like bpm, vorp, per, and win shares 48. Then you have no argument
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,247
And1: 2,955
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#19 » by LukaTheGOAT » Wed Sep 7, 2022 1:04 am

f4p wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
f4p wrote:

either you misread my post or i'm not sure what you're referring to, but i thought that's exactly what i did when i said:



i specifically mentioned it replying to falco because you and falco brought it up in some earlier kawhi discussion. barkley's +10.9 against his best defensive opponent, the #2 defense sonics (i had a typo when saying 10.8), is easily ahead of nash's +7.9 against the spurs. even smoothing it out with the bulls series (best opponent, 2nd best defense), it would be a +9.1 rORtg for the 2 series for the 1993 suns.


It makes a difference however, because Nash went up against a top 15-ish defense ever based on rDRTG, which is much different from a typical "best defense in the league," most guys see every year. I don't necessarily think the relationship is linear in terms of accounting for performance against historic defenses, so the Suns being able to get such separation is noteworthy to me.


Huh, bro? Can you stop interacting with me as if I am apart of a single monolith in cahoots with the other guys? This is the 2nd time you have done this I think Kawhi has a top 10 peak ever, so your argument already falters from the very outset.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,247
And1: 2,955
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Greatest Peaks Project (2022): #25 

Post#20 » by LukaTheGOAT » Wed Sep 7, 2022 1:07 am

NBA4Lyfe wrote:
f4p wrote:
LukaTheGOAT wrote:
I also think when you look at 2007 Nash, you might want to index on his play against a tougher opponent versus say a weaker one.

Nash's 07 first round series was pretty weak for his standards, but it was a series the Suns won in 5, and I guess you could argue were in control of. The Suns had a raw rORTG of 6.1 in this series.

In the second round against a vaunted Spurs defense (had a rDRTG of -6.5, which is #16 all-time, just barely behind the 06 Spurs for the #15 spot), Nash played closer to what you would expect of an all-time offensive player in the box-score. First off the Suns had a better rORTG (7), hinting at a resilient offense. Even without his full squad for the whole series,



either you misread my post or i'm not sure what you're referring to, but i thought that's exactly what i did when i said:

if team rORtg against the best defenses is important, the 1993 suns +6.9 against the bulls compares favorably to the +7.9 for the 2007 suns against the spurs, but the 1993 suns +10.8 vs the #2 defense sonics (their best defensive opponent), handily beats it.


i specifically mentioned it replying to falco because you and falco brought it up in some earlier kawhi discussion. barkley's +10.9 against his best defensive opponent, the #2 defense sonics (i had a typo when saying 10.8), is easily ahead of nash's +7.9 against the spurs. even smoothing it out with the bulls series (best opponent, 2nd best defense), it would be a +9.1 rORtg for the 2 series for the 1993 suns.


nash is overrated, would he even make 1st or 2nd team all nba in the modern game. guys like trae young are averaging 29 and 9 and are barely getting on the 3rd team. Nash's popularity and his knack for winning mvps was simple. The league wanted get away from the kobe incident and the pacers/pistons brawl. It was just perfect timing, nash stats on basketball reference dont put him anywhere near harden or cp3 for that matter. If you have to rate a player by TEAM offensive ratings instead of the traditional stats like bpm, vorp, per, and win shares 48. Then you have no argument


I used box-score numbers in my post to prove how Nash's series against the 07 Spurs was special. Box-creation, scoring rate, etc.

But here you go and since I know you are a big backer of Harden.

The argument for Nash over Harden might look like something like the following:

I take Nash for peak and an all-time sense. The only people who have a 8 year string of postseason offense as good as Nash are Shaq and Lebron (via backpicks).
Furthermore, per Backpicks BPM, James Harden has among the greatest dropoffs from a NBA superstar from the RS to PS, which I think pushes things favorably in Nash's favor (does not include 20-22 PS)

Continuing on, I suppose I should provide some more data to back my Nash>Harden opinion, because looking solely at box-score numbers, this conclusion might still come as a suprise.

For one, Steve Nash was on a #1 offense for 9 years straight in his career, playing with Dirk and then becoming the #1 guy during this timespan. This gives validity to the idea that Nash truly was a special driving force and could mesh with other high end talent.

Furthermore, RPM and APM figures are very kind to Nash.

https://sites.google.com/site/rapmstats/rapm-by-player

At this link not only does Nash have the top peak offensive peak per RAPM ahead of Peak Lebron, Peak Kobe, Peak Wade, etc., but he takes up multiple spots in the upper echelon.

Even if we adjust for dominance relative to year, Nash is beating out Kobe, Wade, Lebron (only goes up to 13)

Read on Twitter

According to Steve Ilardi's 04-09 APM, Steve Nash also has the highest offensive peak by quite the margin as well. https://sites.google.com/site/rapmstats/04-09-6-year-apm

Finally, I should bring up 19 year RAPM, which captured the downside of Nash's career yet still ranks him higher than Harden

Read on Twitter


While yes numbers aren't everything, the fact that Nash ends up so high in all these measures where we have a large samples size is telling. His playoff improvement and upped aggression in the second season gives more confidence in him such that if I had to pick between Harden or Nash to run my team, I would feel more certain what I am getting with Nash. Finally, a lot of people contribute Nash and Harden's success to D'Antoni's scheme but considering they have the same coach, I think we can be more confident that we are comparing their actual abilities and not just who is more well coached (also Nash lead a top 10 offense ever in 2010 with D'Antoni...plus you we maybe could argue D'Antoni got better as a coach as time went on, as perhaps he learned from past mistakes). Also I am focusing largely on offense as I consider both Harden and Nash as slight negatives on D, but neither being laughably worse than the other.

Return to Player Comparisons