Natural talent

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,026
And1: 8,376
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Natural talent 

Post#1 » by SNPA » Wed Mar 8, 2023 6:16 am

Read on Twitter
?cxt=HHwWgIC23bWTo6ItAAAA

Name the savant skills of ATG’s that are analogous to this kid’s ability? Those elements of their game that can’t be taught. It’s just part of them, and always was.

It’s an ATG’s natural talents list.

This isn’t about learned skills honed through repetition. This 5 yr old didn’t learn that.

My affinity for Bird is known. He sees the game at a level like this kid hears music. The same for Magic offensively.

I think Russell’s ability to tap into his teammates and opponents mentally and understand them reaches this level.

Jordan’s intrinsic killer instinct.

Duncan has some of this in his game but it’s harder to pin down IMO.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,827
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Natural talent 

Post#2 » by HeartBreakKid » Wed Mar 8, 2023 6:29 am

You can't really tell if someone is a savant at 5 years old. It's entirely possible if not likely that even if that person keeps training their entire life they won't stand out much from others who started at a later age.

Progression isn't that linear. "Wow, they're THAT good at basketball at 7, imagine when he is 21!". We see this with kids in sports.


Almost every basketball player has some type of natural talent that sticks out to varying degrees. The players you're talking about have good vision and spatial awareness (Bird, Jokic, Russell) - that isn't really instinctively a more natural talent than Curry being able to shoot 3s in his sleep. It does make the game look effortless to them though.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,026
And1: 8,376
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Natural talent 

Post#3 » by SNPA » Wed Mar 8, 2023 6:39 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:You can't really tell if someone is a savant at 5 years old. It's entirely possible if not likely that even if that person keeps training their entire life they won't stand out much from others who started at a later age.

Progression isn't that linear. "Wow, they're THAT good at basketball at 7, imagine when he is 21!". We see this with kids in sports.


Almost every basketball player has some type of natural talent that sticks out to varying degrees. The players you're talking about have good vision and spatial awareness (Bird, Jokic, Russell) - that isn't really instinctively a more natural talent than Curry being able to shoot 3s in his sleep. It does make the game look effortless to them though.

I get your approach to the concept, and it can level out. But, this thread is not about progression. It’s about natural talent. The 21 yr old that gets to be as good as the 5 yr old progressed. The 5 yr old didn’t have too. It was always there.
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,266
And1: 2,272
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: Natural talent 

Post#4 » by rk2023 » Wed Mar 8, 2023 6:44 am

Basketball is far, far more nuanced and crystallized (from an intelligence / efficacy angle) than these macro-level thoughts, especially savant syndrome - which is impossible for an outsider to quantify and common across almost any pantheon caliber player
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,042
And1: 6,703
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: Natural talent 

Post#5 » by Jaivl » Wed Mar 8, 2023 6:55 am

Ricky Rubio is the under-16 GOAT
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
Gooner
Head Coach
Posts: 6,591
And1: 5,415
Joined: Sep 02, 2018
 

Re: Natural talent 

Post#6 » by Gooner » Wed Mar 8, 2023 9:11 am

Jaivl wrote:Ricky Rubio is the under-16 GOAT


I remember him playing for Joventut Badalona in the Euroleague at the age of 15.
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,932
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: Natural talent 

Post#7 » by OhayoKD » Wed Mar 8, 2023 10:54 am

SNPA wrote:
Read on Twitter
?cxt=HHwWgIC23bWTo6ItAAAA

Name the savant skills of ATG’s that are analogous to this kid’s ability? Those elements of their game that can’t be taught.

Barring a specific disability/deficit, everything the kid is exhibiting can be taught. "What can you do at 5" is near-universally, not a great predictor of success, because at the top level, it's no longer about a musican's "bag", as it is about how they deploy what they use. Natural ability makes the journey faster, but at least in music/arts, it isn't what differentiates someone's ceiling.

Unlike basketball where height alone serves as a mass filter, music, at least in theory, open to everyone. Closest to such a filter for music is probably pitch/range though that can obviously expand with proper training/practice. And even if you have a "bad" voice, you can always establish the framework where "bad" becomes good:
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Natural talent 

Post#8 » by Colbinii » Wed Mar 8, 2023 5:40 pm

Outliers: The Story of Success by Malcolm Gladwell is a good read about a similar topic.
dooki667
Junior
Posts: 380
And1: 259
Joined: Feb 26, 2019
   

Re: Natural talent 

Post#9 » by dooki667 » Wed Mar 8, 2023 5:46 pm

SNPA wrote:
Read on Twitter
?cxt=HHwWgIC23bWTo6ItAAAA

Name the savant skills of ATG’s that are analogous to this kid’s ability? Those elements of their game that can’t be taught. It’s just part of them, and always was.

It’s an ATG’s natural talents list.

This isn’t about learned skills honed through repetition. This 5 yr old didn’t learn that.

My affinity for Bird is known. He sees the game at a level like this kid hears music. The same for Magic offensively.

I think Russell’s ability to tap into his teammates and opponents mentally and understand them reaches this level.

Jordan’s intrinsic killer instinct.

Duncan has some of this in his game but it’s harder to pin down IMO.


This young man is absolutely incredible ty for sharing this.
Ein Sof
Pro Prospect
Posts: 950
And1: 798
Joined: Jun 11, 2021

Re: Natural talent 

Post#10 » by Ein Sof » Wed Mar 8, 2023 5:50 pm

Colbinii wrote:Outliers: The Story of Success by Malcolm Gladwell is a good read about a similar topic.

Any bulletpoints?
User avatar
Heej
General Manager
Posts: 8,469
And1: 9,170
Joined: Jan 14, 2011

Re: Natural talent 

Post#11 » by Heej » Wed Mar 8, 2023 6:33 pm

I think most of the people you consider rare talents have the ability to consistently work hard be their rarest talent. Like there are guys out there in the world as athletic as Lebron. Or at least functionally close enough. Josh Smith from the late 2000s Hawks comes to mind as someone who a lot of people basically considered close to what LeBron would've been if he had no bag or work ethic lol.

There's probably a few guys out there with Curry's natural hand-eye coordination, that we may not be able to see as easily. But none of those approximates had anywhere near the natural capacity and voraciousness for the hard work it takes to be successful that came *naturally* to these guys from a young age. Those guys are giga-stars because they've had a natural talent for "the grind"

That's really what sets these guys apart from their contemporaries to me. They were trying hard, playing hard, practicing hard, for YEARS. All throughout their childhood, and that crystallized. They all outlasted guys who started hotter than them that others might consider more "naturally talented" but never actually had an affinity for hard work.

The older I get the more I realize that true greatness lies in consistency, and the people who "make it" are the ones who persevere and are able to maximize their time. Kyle Korver said in a recent interview with JJ Reddick that the one thing he considers "superhuman" about LeBron is how he was able to mentally recover and be ready to come in to work everyday.

During The Last Dance documentary, iirc Phil talked about how MJ had the most remarkable ability to remain engaged in the present at all times. These guys naturally live for the grind, and I don't know if that can truly be taught the way mostly everything else can.
LeBron's NBA Cup MVP is more valuable than either of KD's Finals MVPs. This is the word of the Lord
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,266
And1: 2,272
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: Natural talent 

Post#12 » by rk2023 » Wed Mar 8, 2023 7:35 pm

Heej wrote:I think most of the people you consider rare talents have the ability to consistently work hard be their rarest talent. Like there are guys out there in the world as athletic as Lebron. Or at least functionally close enough. Josh Smith from the late 2000s Hawks comes to mind as someone who a lot of people basically considered close to what LeBron would've been if he had no bag or work ethic lol.

There's probably a few guys out there with Curry's natural hand-eye coordination, that we may not be able to see as easily. But none of those approximates had anywhere near the natural capacity and voraciousness for the hard work it takes to be successful that came *naturally* to these guys from a young age. Those guys are giga-stars because they've had a natural talent for "the grind"

That's really what sets these guys apart from their contemporaries to me. They were trying hard, playing hard, practicing hard, for YEARS. All throughout their childhood, and that crystallized. They all outlasted guys who started hotter than them that others might consider more "naturally talented" but never actually had an affinity for hard work.

The older I get the more I realize that true greatness lies in consistency, and the people who "make it" are the ones who persevere and are able to maximize their time. Kyle Korver said in a recent interview with JJ Reddick that the one thing he considers "superhuman" about LeBron is how he was able to mentally recover and be ready to come in to work everyday.

During The Last Dance documentary, iirc Phil talked about how MJ had the most remarkable ability to remain engaged in the present at all times. These guys naturally live for the grind, and I don't know if that can truly be taught the way mostly everything else can.


If you haven’t seen it yet, I highly recommend the Bill Russell documentary on Netflix. Very similar rhetoric regarding his unwavering commitment towards being his unique self and playing to his calling card.
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
wallflower
Senior
Posts: 631
And1: 111
Joined: Dec 17, 2008

Re: Natural talent 

Post#13 » by wallflower » Wed Mar 8, 2023 9:13 pm

SNPA wrote:
Read on Twitter
?cxt=HHwWgIC23bWTo6ItAAAA

Name the savant skills of ATG’s that are analogous to this kid’s ability? Those elements of their game that can’t be taught. It’s just part of them, and always was.

It’s an ATG’s natural talents list.

This isn’t about learned skills honed through repetition. This 5 yr old didn’t learn that.

My affinity for Bird is known. He sees the game at a level like this kid hears music. The same for Magic offensively.

I think Russell’s ability to tap into his teammates and opponents mentally and understand them reaches this level.

Jordan’s intrinsic killer instinct.

Duncan has some of this in his game but it’s harder to pin down IMO.


Julian newman
User avatar
Heej
General Manager
Posts: 8,469
And1: 9,170
Joined: Jan 14, 2011

Re: Natural talent 

Post#14 » by Heej » Wed Mar 8, 2023 9:39 pm

rk2023 wrote:
Heej wrote:I think most of the people you consider rare talents have the ability to consistently work hard be their rarest talent. Like there are guys out there in the world as athletic as Lebron. Or at least functionally close enough. Josh Smith from the late 2000s Hawks comes to mind as someone who a lot of people basically considered close to what LeBron would've been if he had no bag or work ethic lol.

There's probably a few guys out there with Curry's natural hand-eye coordination, that we may not be able to see as easily. But none of those approximates had anywhere near the natural capacity and voraciousness for the hard work it takes to be successful that came *naturally* to these guys from a young age. Those guys are giga-stars because they've had a natural talent for "the grind"

That's really what sets these guys apart from their contemporaries to me. They were trying hard, playing hard, practicing hard, for YEARS. All throughout their childhood, and that crystallized. They all outlasted guys who started hotter than them that others might consider more "naturally talented" but never actually had an affinity for hard work.

The older I get the more I realize that true greatness lies in consistency, and the people who "make it" are the ones who persevere and are able to maximize their time. Kyle Korver said in a recent interview with JJ Reddick that the one thing he considers "superhuman" about LeBron is how he was able to mentally recover and be ready to come in to work everyday.

During The Last Dance documentary, iirc Phil talked about how MJ had the most remarkable ability to remain engaged in the present at all times. These guys naturally live for the grind, and I don't know if that can truly be taught the way mostly everything else can.


If you haven’t seen it yet, I highly recommend the Bill Russell documentary on Netflix. Very similar rhetoric regarding his unwavering commitment towards being his unique self and playing to his calling card.

Oh snap good call I'll watch that tonight
LeBron's NBA Cup MVP is more valuable than either of KD's Finals MVPs. This is the word of the Lord
User avatar
Heej
General Manager
Posts: 8,469
And1: 9,170
Joined: Jan 14, 2011

Re: Natural talent 

Post#15 » by Heej » Wed Mar 8, 2023 9:39 pm

wallflower wrote:
SNPA wrote:
Read on Twitter
?cxt=HHwWgIC23bWTo6ItAAAA

Name the savant skills of ATG’s that are analogous to this kid’s ability? Those elements of their game that can’t be taught. It’s just part of them, and always was.

It’s an ATG’s natural talents list.

This isn’t about learned skills honed through repetition. This 5 yr old didn’t learn that.

My affinity for Bird is known. He sees the game at a level like this kid hears music. The same for Magic offensively.

I think Russell’s ability to tap into his teammates and opponents mentally and understand them reaches this level.

Jordan’s intrinsic killer instinct.

Duncan has some of this in his game but it’s harder to pin down IMO.


Julian newman

Lmao he's ballin out as a content creator now. Good for him
LeBron's NBA Cup MVP is more valuable than either of KD's Finals MVPs. This is the word of the Lord
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,266
And1: 2,272
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: Natural talent 

Post#16 » by rk2023 » Wed Mar 8, 2023 9:47 pm

Heej wrote:
rk2023 wrote:
Heej wrote:I think most of the people you consider rare talents have the ability to consistently work hard be their rarest talent. Like there are guys out there in the world as athletic as Lebron. Or at least functionally close enough. Josh Smith from the late 2000s Hawks comes to mind as someone who a lot of people basically considered close to what LeBron would've been if he had no bag or work ethic lol.

There's probably a few guys out there with Curry's natural hand-eye coordination, that we may not be able to see as easily. But none of those approximates had anywhere near the natural capacity and voraciousness for the hard work it takes to be successful that came *naturally* to these guys from a young age. Those guys are giga-stars because they've had a natural talent for "the grind"

That's really what sets these guys apart from their contemporaries to me. They were trying hard, playing hard, practicing hard, for YEARS. All throughout their childhood, and that crystallized. They all outlasted guys who started hotter than them that others might consider more "naturally talented" but never actually had an affinity for hard work.

The older I get the more I realize that true greatness lies in consistency, and the people who "make it" are the ones who persevere and are able to maximize their time. Kyle Korver said in a recent interview with JJ Reddick that the one thing he considers "superhuman" about LeBron is how he was able to mentally recover and be ready to come in to work everyday.

During The Last Dance documentary, iirc Phil talked about how MJ had the most remarkable ability to remain engaged in the present at all times. These guys naturally live for the grind, and I don't know if that can truly be taught the way mostly everything else can.


If you haven’t seen it yet, I highly recommend the Bill Russell documentary on Netflix. Very similar rhetoric regarding his unwavering commitment towards being his unique self and playing to his calling card.

Oh snap good call I'll watch that tonight


The first episode is a great watch when it comes to his basketball foundation and I also found it to address the mental aspect of basketball well without coming off as hagiography. The guy won and prevented two players I hold very highly (in West and Baylor) from many titles, and I still consider him a role model and basketball hero with all he embodied.
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
uberhikari
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,483
And1: 2,941
Joined: May 11, 2014
   

Re: Natural talent 

Post#17 » by uberhikari » Wed Mar 8, 2023 10:04 pm

There's no such thing as natural basketball talent. Basketball is primarily predicated on one's physical skill. You literally can't become that good at it unless your body is physically developed enough. This is not comparable to something like music or chess where the only impediment is mental aptitude. It's possible for a 5-year-old to play Mozart; it wasn't possible for LeBron to be very good at basketball at 5 years old.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,261
And1: 2,972
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Natural talent 

Post#18 » by LukaTheGOAT » Wed Mar 8, 2023 10:07 pm

Jaivl wrote:Ricky Rubio is the under-16 GOAT


Cam Boozer is better.
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,042
And1: 6,703
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: Natural talent 

Post#19 » by Jaivl » Wed Mar 8, 2023 11:07 pm

LukaTheGOAT wrote:
Jaivl wrote:Ricky Rubio is the under-16 GOAT


Cam Boozer is better.

Looked him up cause I thought there was a joke I was missing but apparently you were serious (hence wrong)?

A high-minute pro at 15 versus... "the son of".
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
capfan33
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 751
Joined: May 21, 2022
 

Re: Natural talent 

Post#20 » by capfan33 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 12:01 am

OhayoKD wrote:
SNPA wrote:
Read on Twitter
?cxt=HHwWgIC23bWTo6ItAAAA

Name the savant skills of ATG’s that are analogous to this kid’s ability? Those elements of their game that can’t be taught.

Barring a specific disability/deficit, everything the kid is exhibiting can be taught. "What can you do at 5" is near-universally, not a great predictor of success, because at the top level, it's no longer about a musican's "bag", as it is about how they deploy what they use. Natural ability makes the journey faster, but at least in music/arts, it isn't what differentiates someone's ceiling.

Unlike basketball where height alone serves as a mass filter, music, at least in theory, open to everyone. Closest to such a filter for music is probably pitch/range though that can obviously expand with proper training/practice. And even if you have a "bad" voice, you can always establish the framework where "bad" becomes good:


I agree with the first part completely, but isn't knowing what to deploy when part of natural talent? There's no amount of music training or practice that would allow me to compose like Mozart or play a solo like Hendrix, you can mimic genius of course, and copy someone's style but you're going to hit a wall at some point. I may be misinterpreting what you're saying, but natural ability/talent is definitely a differentiating factor when it comes to almost anything artistic, and I don't think it can be organically copied.

Return to Player Comparisons