Defense only
Team 1.
Hakeem Olajuwon
Anthony Davis
Team 2.
David Robinson
Draymond Green
Team 3.
Ben Wallace
Dennis Rodman
Team 4.
Dikembe Mutombo
Giannis
Team 5.
Tim Duncan
Kevin Garnett
Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,455
- And1: 1,804
- Joined: Aug 11, 2014
-
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,854
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
The ones that make the best offensive duo--Duncan and KG
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,111
- And1: 1,487
- Joined: Aug 13, 2005
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
Just defense Robinson and Draymond could be best but Duncan and Garnett probably are.
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,483
- And1: 2,941
- Joined: May 11, 2014
-
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
1. Duncan/Garnett
(small gap)
2. Robinson/Draymond
3. Hakeem/AD
4. Dikembe/Giannis
5. Wallace/Rodman
Duncan & Garnett are clearly the best duo because KG adds extraordinary defensive versatility. Pre-2005 KG could very comfortably switch out onto the perimeter and guard wings.
Robinson is a better defender than both Duncan and Garnett but Draymond is the weakest defender of the 4. Draymond adds the same versatility that KG does, however, he's not as good of a paint/rim protector.
Hakeem & AD would be my pick for the absolute best 4/5 defensive duo in the modern NBA. However, in earlier eras AD's tendency to shy away from contact would hurt him.
Dikembe/Giannis is just Lopez/Giannis on steroids. And the latter duo has put up relative Drtg's in the upper stratosphere historically.
And Wallace/Rodman is just a worse version of Robinson/Draymond.
(small gap)
2. Robinson/Draymond
3. Hakeem/AD
4. Dikembe/Giannis
5. Wallace/Rodman
Duncan & Garnett are clearly the best duo because KG adds extraordinary defensive versatility. Pre-2005 KG could very comfortably switch out onto the perimeter and guard wings.
Robinson is a better defender than both Duncan and Garnett but Draymond is the weakest defender of the 4. Draymond adds the same versatility that KG does, however, he's not as good of a paint/rim protector.
Hakeem & AD would be my pick for the absolute best 4/5 defensive duo in the modern NBA. However, in earlier eras AD's tendency to shy away from contact would hurt him.
Dikembe/Giannis is just Lopez/Giannis on steroids. And the latter duo has put up relative Drtg's in the upper stratosphere historically.
And Wallace/Rodman is just a worse version of Robinson/Draymond.
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,455
- And1: 1,804
- Joined: Aug 11, 2014
-
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
uberhikari wrote:1. Duncan/Garnett
(small gap)
2. Robinson/Draymond
3. Hakeem/AD
4. Dikembe/Giannis
5. Wallace/Rodman
Duncan & Garnett are clearly the best duo because KG adds extraordinary defensive versatility. Pre-2005 KG could very comfortably switch out onto the perimeter and guard wings.
Robinson is a better defender than both Duncan and Garnett but Draymond is the weakest defender of the 4. Draymond adds the same versatility that KG does, however, he's not as good of a paint/rim protector.
Hakeem & AD would be my pick for the absolute best 4/5 defensive duo in the modern NBA. However, in earlier eras AD's tendency to shy away from contact would hurt him.
Dikembe/Giannis is just Lopez/Giannis on steroids. And the latter duo has put up relative Drtg's in the upper stratosphere historically.
And Wallace/Rodman is just a worse version of Robinson/Draymond.
I had a feeling that this would be the everyones favorite pick because of how complimentary that there are for eachother.
Imo there is very little that separates these tandems.
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,550
- And1: 3,230
- Joined: Mar 21, 2013
-
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
Ben and Worm is the only duo with a real perimeter defender
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,257
- And1: 17,961
- Joined: May 31, 2015
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
You said "during prime," which disqualifies AD due to health.
It's admittedly difficult to imagine "defense only" for many of these players, as I tend to think more holistically. I still have to vote Duncan/KG, though, as I think Duncan is the greatest defender ever (total career value) and KG is clearly a DPoY level player who could mesh with anyone defensively.
These are really good pairings, though. (Makes me wanna 2K.) Give AD health, and I wouldn't be mad if you ranked Duncan/KG fifth here!
It's admittedly difficult to imagine "defense only" for many of these players, as I tend to think more holistically. I still have to vote Duncan/KG, though, as I think Duncan is the greatest defender ever (total career value) and KG is clearly a DPoY level player who could mesh with anyone defensively.
These are really good pairings, though. (Makes me wanna 2K.) Give AD health, and I wouldn't be mad if you ranked Duncan/KG fifth here!
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
- homecourtloss
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,376
- And1: 18,774
- Joined: Dec 29, 2012
Re: Which Defensive Combination would you rather have?
migya wrote:Just defense Robinson and Draymond could be best but Duncan and Garnett probably are.
The other thing about Duncan and Garnett is that they’re both good offensive players and as such, they limit the amount of transition opportunities for the opposition, which in turn always leads to a better defense. On top of that, both of them are very good defensive rebounders, which limits offensive rebounding opportunities, opportunities that are always high points per possession opportunities; limiting these opportunities tends to lead to better defenses.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.
lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…