RealGM

Clearly different supporting cast situations but Who was the better anchor offensively throughout their prime?

Um, Moses.

Moses.

Hakeem was essentially a variant of Carmelo Anthony on Offense. Who never had a TS+ above 104 outside of '93 & '94 in his prime years.

Hakeem. Especially in today's NBA.

MiamiBulls wrote:Moses.

Hakeem was essentially a variant of Carmelo Anthony on Offense. Who never had a TS+ above 104 outside of '93 & '94 in his prime years.

Hakeem was more efficient than Moses in the postseason. Also scored on higher volume and was a MUCH better (if still not great) passer.

I think they are comparable as the clear leading anchors without secondary stars, but Moses fits way better with offensive talent.

Yeah, it's Moses rather clearly to me.

One_and_Done wrote:Hakeem. Especially in today's NBA.

What makes Hakeem more suited to modern NBA than Moses?

iggymcfrack wrote:

MiamiBulls wrote:Moses.

Hakeem was essentially a variant of Carmelo Anthony on Offense. Who never had a TS+ above 104 outside of '93 & '94 in his prime years.

Hakeem was more efficient than Moses in the postseason. Also scored on higher volume and was a MUCH better (if still not great) passer.

RS:

1979-83 Moses: 25.0 adj pp75 on +4.7 rTS%
1989-95 Hakeem: 24.5 adj pp75 on +2.3 rTS%

PS:

1979-83 Moses: 24.8 adj pp75 on +2.9 rTS%
1989-95 Hakeem: 27.5 adj pp75 on +3.1 rTS%

Where does this "much more efficienct" come from?

70sFan wrote:

iggymcfrack wrote:

MiamiBulls wrote:Moses.

Hakeem was essentially a variant of Carmelo Anthony on Offense. Who never had a TS+ above 104 outside of '93 & '94 in his prime years.

Hakeem was more efficient than Moses in the postseason. Also scored on higher volume and was a MUCH better (if still not great) passer.

RS:

1979-83 Moses: 25.0 adj pp75 on +4.7 rTS%
1989-95 Hakeem: 24.5 adj pp75 on +2.3 rTS%

PS:

1979-83 Moses: 24.8 adj pp75 on +2.9 rTS%
1989-95 Hakeem: 27.5 adj pp75 on +3.1 rTS%

Where does this "much more efficienct" come from?

I never said that. I said he was "more efficient" and a "MUCH better passer".

iggymcfrack wrote:

70sFan wrote:

iggymcfrack wrote:
Hakeem was more efficient than Moses in the postseason. Also scored on higher volume and was a MUCH better (if still not great) passer.

RS:

1979-83 Moses: 25.0 adj pp75 on +4.7 rTS%
1989-95 Hakeem: 24.5 adj pp75 on +2.3 rTS%

PS:

1979-83 Moses: 24.8 adj pp75 on +2.9 rTS%
1989-95 Hakeem: 27.5 adj pp75 on +3.1 rTS%

Where does this "much more efficienct" come from?

I never said that. I said he was "more efficient" and a "MUCH better passer".

Fair enough, but 0.2 percentage point advantage in TS% isn't something I'd even mention.