Page 1 of 3
LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:10 am
by Cavsfansince84
How do you compare/rank them in terms of playoffs performance(favoring conf finals and finals), competition and whatever else you want to throw in. So basically rank them 1-8 which impressed you the most to least.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:35 am
by Statlanta
2000
2016
2001
2013
2002
2012
2020
2006
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2023 9:00 pm
by rk2023
Focusing on aggregate value and weighting PS:
2012
2013
2000
2016
2001
2002
2020
.
.
.
.
2006
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 7:47 am
by migya
2000
2001
2012
2016
2012
2013
2020
2006
Shaq carried far more than Lebron.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 7:58 am
by 70sFan
migya wrote:Shaq carried far more than Lebron.
How did you come to that conclusion?
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 9:58 am
by rand
2016 has to be #1. Cleveland beat the 73 win Warriors thanks to LeBron's magnificence.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 1:07 pm
by migya
rand wrote:2016 has to be #1. Cleveland beat the 73 win Warriors thanks to LeBron's magnificence.
Magnificence has changed in definition over the decades.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 3:24 pm
by AEnigma
True, I remember a time when the standards were so low for magnificence that they were often applied to ability to score against Dale Davis and an injured Rik Smits, and how even that may have constituted an improvement over the standards a few years earlier.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 3:49 pm
by rk2023
migya wrote:rand wrote:2016 has to be #1. Cleveland beat the 73 win Warriors thanks to LeBron's magnificence.
Magnificence has changed in definition over the decades.
If averaging 33/12/9/2.4/2.8 on 51.6% from the field and 38% from three (good for a GameScore of 29.9, which all of is exceeded by the eye test) after going down 0-2 isn’t excellence - then perhaps we define the term differently.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 3:54 pm
by migya
rk2023 wrote:migya wrote:rand wrote:2016 has to be #1. Cleveland beat the 73 win Warriors thanks to LeBron's magnificence.
Magnificence has changed in definition over the decades.
If averaging 33/12/9/2.4/2.8 on 51.6% from the field and 38% from three (good for a GameScore of 29.9, which all of is exceeded by the eye test) after going down 0-2 isn’t excellence - then perhaps we define the term differently.
I think personality and humility are a big characteristic of excellence and drama queen Lebron, calling himself greatest of alltime and constantly bringing attention to himself, isn't that.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 3:58 pm
by CzBoobie
migya wrote:rk2023 wrote:migya wrote:
Magnificence has changed in definition over the decades.
If averaging 33/12/9/2.4/2.8 on 51.6% from the field and 38% from three (good for a GameScore of 29.9, which all of is exceeded by the eye test) after going down 0-2 isn’t excellence - then perhaps we define the term differently.
I think personality and humility are a big characteristic of excellence and drama queen Lebron, calling himself greatest of alltime and constantly bringing attention to himself, isn't that.
That sounds more like a you problem...
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 4:13 pm
by 70sFan
migya wrote:rk2023 wrote:migya wrote:
Magnificence has changed in definition over the decades.
If averaging 33/12/9/2.4/2.8 on 51.6% from the field and 38% from three (good for a GameScore of 29.9, which all of is exceeded by the eye test) after going down 0-2 isn’t excellence - then perhaps we define the term differently.
I think personality and humility are a big characteristic of excellence and drama queen Lebron, calling himself greatest of alltime and constantly bringing attention to himself, isn't that.
Was Shaq known for his good personality and humility, along with lack of off-court drama? If not, then you bring it up only to attack player you dislike, which is quite sad.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 7:04 pm
by SHAQ32
LeBron's 2016 title would be #1 if he stayed in Cleveland the entire time and won, but he cherry-picked his way back to Cleveland. So, I would definitely rate Shaq's 2000 and 2001 as 1 and 2.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2023 7:10 pm
by CzBoobie
SHAQ32 wrote:LeBron's 2016 title would be #1 if he stayed in Cleveland the entire time and won, but he cherry-picked his way back to Cleveland. So, I would definitely rate Shaq's 2000 and 2001 as 1 and 2.
Yeah, because Shaq played for the Lakers his whole career and never changed teams

Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:22 am
by migya
70sFan wrote:migya wrote:rk2023 wrote:
If averaging 33/12/9/2.4/2.8 on 51.6% from the field and 38% from three (good for a GameScore of 29.9, which all of is exceeded by the eye test) after going down 0-2 isn’t excellence - then perhaps we define the term differently.
I think personality and humility are a big characteristic of excellence and drama queen Lebron, calling himself greatest of alltime and constantly bringing attention to himself, isn't that.
Was Shaq known for his good personality and humility, along with lack of off-court drama? If not, then you bring it up only to attack player you dislike, which is quite sad.
Can't compare the two. Shaq was mostly comedic, Lebron is self obsessed
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:33 am
by VanWest82
Shaq getting the threepeat is easily the biggest accomplishment between the two. We've seen too many dynastic teams fall short after two to not respect the consistency and grind there. Bron should've had a threepeat but he choked the 2011 Finals away.
I don't really agree with the concept of doing a title by title comparison because the circumstances were so different based on what was accomplished previously and the pressure, expectations, and level of mental and physical team exhaustion. In that vein, Bron's 2014 and 2018 seasons kind of stand out fron an on court perspective even though he was a DH. They're almost as impressive as his title runs. Almost.
In any event, if we're forced to do this exercise and pretend like none of the context exists...
2013
2000
2012
2016
2002
2001 - Shaq deserves endless critisicm for throwing away a RS in his prime even though he was so dominant by the end
2020
2006
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:41 am
by migya
VanWest82 wrote:Shaq getting the threepeat is easily the biggest accomplishment between the two. We've seen too many dynastic teams fall short after two to not respect the grind there. Bron should've had a threepeat but he choked the 2011 Finals away.
I don't really agree with the concept of doing a title by title comparison because the circumstances were so different based on what was accomplished previously and the pressure, expectations, and level of mental and physical team exhaustion. In that vein, Bron's 2014 and 2018 seasons kind of stand out fron an on court perspective even though he was a DH. They're almost as impressive as his title runs. Almost.
In any event, if we're forced to do this exercise and pretend like none of the context exists...
2013
2000
2012
2016
2002
2001 - Shaq deserves endless critisicm for throwing away a RS in his prime even though he was so dominant by the end
2020
2006
All of those championships by both player's can be scrutinized and said they could've early not won them, except Shaq 2001, a rampage run. Shaq never choked anything either.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:47 am
by VanWest82
migya wrote:VanWest82 wrote:Shaq getting the threepeat is easily the biggest accomplishment between the two. We've seen too many dynastic teams fall short after two to not respect the grind there. Bron should've had a threepeat but he choked the 2011 Finals away.
I don't really agree with the concept of doing a title by title comparison because the circumstances were so different based on what was accomplished previously and the pressure, expectations, and level of mental and physical team exhaustion. In that vein, Bron's 2014 and 2018 seasons kind of stand out fron an on court perspective even though he was a DH. They're almost as impressive as his title runs. Almost.
In any event, if we're forced to do this exercise and pretend like none of the context exists...
2013
2000
2012
2016
2002
2001 - Shaq deserves endless critisicm for throwing away a RS in his prime even though he was so dominant by the end
2020
2006
All of those championships by both player's can be scrutinized and said they could've early not won them, except Shaq 2001, a rampage run. Shaq never choked anything either.
But 2001 Shaq had so much more to scrutinize! At least another 40 lbs worth! His fat ass is lucky he didn't break down and get hurt before finally playing himself into shape.
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:48 am
by MyUniBroDavis
migya wrote:rk2023 wrote:migya wrote:
Magnificence has changed in definition over the decades.
If averaging 33/12/9/2.4/2.8 on 51.6% from the field and 38% from three (good for a GameScore of 29.9, which all of is exceeded by the eye test) after going down 0-2 isn’t excellence - then perhaps we define the term differently.
I think personality and humility are a big characteristic of excellence and drama queen Lebron, calling himself greatest of alltime and constantly bringing attention to himself, isn't that.
This dude lives rent free in your head, at levels I’ve never seen before. The other dude literally crowned himself and gets salty on TNT constantly.
They’re both confident in their ability and they should be lol
Re: LeBron's 4 rings vs Shaq's
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:49 am
by MyUniBroDavis
2016 > 2013 even if you think 2013 was his peak, 2016 was basically the legacy defining season for him