The Explorer wrote:1984 Boston Celtics vs 2013 Heat
7 game series in a battle of 2 league MVPs
Boston has home court advantage
Series is played in a neutral era, let's say in the year 2000
What happens in this series and who wins?
Heat in 5 (maybe 4) depending on certain things.
How much time do the 1984 Celtics get to modernize their offense to produce three-point attempts? What the defense? When you look at the 1984, 1985, even 1986, 1987 Celtics and the way they play perimeter defense even with hand checking, there would be zero way for them to contain any type of rim pressure via penetration.
Additionally, the year 2000 is right before they changed the illegal defense rules, so in essence, you could have a peakish LeBron 4-1 overload ISOing in space via a clearout due to illegal defense rules, something he never had the opportunity to do in any season in his career after the rules changes. On that note, if this is a healthy 2013 Wade, then they’d take turns doing this with nobody on the Celtics’ roster able to do anything about it. Aggressive double teams to take the ball out of James’s hands would lead to wide open threes with one ball rotation, the easiest offense the team would ever see. So, you’d have easy drives off of iso in a league that handed out a LOT of FTs (watch any series during this time and see how many FTs are handed out on touch fouls with the one or two hard fouls we’ve all seen in highlights), and easy three point opportunities. On defense, if the Celtics haven’t modernized, the Heat would feel like they’re not even having to play defense with the smaller area they have to cover and extend themselves. Post up fadeaways by Bird, by Parish and post up killing by McHale vs. open threes and easy ISO drives…I don’t like that for the Celtics.
The one advantage I see for the Celtics would be rebounding as they’d get plenty of offensive rebounding opportunities.