2000 Lakers vs 2008 Celtics

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Djoker
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 1,879
Joined: Sep 12, 2015
 

2000 Lakers vs 2008 Celtics 

Post#1 » by Djoker » Thu Oct 12, 2023 3:21 pm

Who wins a seven game series between them?

Both monstrous regular season teams that struggled a bit in the playoffs and both from before the 3pt explosion so we don't melt everyone's brains discussing tactical evolution and how the older team can't adapt.
Homer38
RealGM
Posts: 12,170
And1: 13,700
Joined: Dec 04, 2013

Re: 2000 Lakers vs 2008 Celtics 

Post#2 » by Homer38 » Thu Oct 12, 2023 4:08 pm

The 2008 celtics were much better in the ECF and Finals that they were in the first 2 rounds.It was not the case for the lakers when they were outscored by the blazers and pacers in the last 2 rounds.So the celtics are my choice.Celtics in 6
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,974
And1: 31,575
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: 2000 Lakers vs 2008 Celtics 

Post#3 » by tsherkin » Thu Oct 12, 2023 4:14 pm

I'm trying to envision how Boston is going to guard Shaq in his apex season while dealing with Horry, Glen Rice and Kobe. That's a pretty tall order. I guess the specific defensive environment does matter, though, as there were some noteworthy rules changes after 2000.

I suppose it hinges pretty heavily on how Kobe plays. He was dog crap in the Finals, which was sort of his MO, but he was critical in the WCF series versus Portland, so which Kobe do you get?
Djoker
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 1,879
Joined: Sep 12, 2015
 

Re: 2000 Lakers vs 2008 Celtics 

Post#4 » by Djoker » Thu Oct 12, 2023 6:09 pm

Kobe was injured in the 2000 Finals. We're assuming both teams are fully healthy.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,974
And1: 31,575
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: 2000 Lakers vs 2008 Celtics 

Post#5 » by tsherkin » Thu Oct 12, 2023 6:09 pm

Djoker wrote:Kobe was injured in the 2000 Finals. We're assuming both teams are fully healthy.


Kobe scored poorly in most of the Finals he played in, not just 2000, which is to what I was referring.
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,373
And1: 18,772
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: 2000 Lakers vs 2008 Celtics 

Post#6 » by homecourtloss » Sat Oct 14, 2023 12:46 am

The Lakers would have game seven at home, which makes me want to go with them, the way the Celtics match up with them. The Celtics’ struggles are a bit overblown as that first round series with the Hawks wasn’t really close, and the Hawks would never in a position where they could win and were blown out basically all four times in Boston. I didn’t pay all that great vs. the Cavs then again, it was a LeBron.

The Lakers were quite fortunate in the fourth quarter in the game seven versus the Blazers.

Celtics in six.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
Djoker
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 1,879
Joined: Sep 12, 2015
 

Re: 2000 Lakers vs 2008 Celtics 

Post#7 » by Djoker » Sat Oct 14, 2023 3:47 am

Yes the Celtics destroyed the Hawks despite it going seven but they were actually outscored by the Cavs (-1.1) and also played a very close series with the Pistons (+1.7).
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: 2000 Lakers vs 2008 Celtics 

Post#8 » by pillwenney » Sat Oct 14, 2023 11:36 pm

Perk with KG helping would be one of the better historical combos to throw at 2000 Shaq. But man, it's still 2000 Shaq.

Return to Player Comparisons