Jason Kidd vs Alex Caruso
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2024 1:42 pm
Who is the better defender in their prime
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2360671
trex_8063 wrote:I don't think longevity has anything to do with it when the question pertains who was/is better in their respective primes.
That said, I'd still give it to Kidd in light of minutes, as well as context (wrt offensive responsibilities).....
Caruso might be a marginally better defender on a per-minute basis (definitely not gonna die on that hill, but there's a case to be made; he's that good).
However, prime Kidd did what he did per minute (which included being co-anchor of some elite defenses) while playing 37-40 mpg AND while simultaneously shouldering a MUCH larger offensive burden than Caruso ever has.
Caruso has never played more than 28 mpg [yes, minutes are lower today, largely because the court is "bigger"], and with relatively minimal offensive expectations.
How good might Kidd have been defensively if he was afforded a role playing just ~30 mpg (i.e. fatigue [pacing oneself] is virtually a non-issue) with ONLY defense to focus his energy and attention upon?
Texas Chuck wrote:Kidd doing it against much bigger, better players.....
trex_8063 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Kidd doing it against much bigger, better players.....
Are you saying players were both bigger and better ["much" so, in both cases] ~20 years ago?
Texas Chuck wrote:trex_8063 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Kidd doing it against much bigger, better players.....
Are you saying players were both bigger and better ["much" so, in both cases] ~20 years ago?
No.
I'm saying Kidd was used to defend big wings. Something Caruso is not regularly tasked with doing. And defending these big wings is the most important man to man assignment in either time period imo. And that's Caruso's strength-- man to man. As help defenders the edge only grows for Kidd.
I mean take just 38 year old Kidd. He took on Kobe, then KD, then Lebron(and Wade) at key moments of that title run. Caruso likely gets none of those assignments and if he does, he's physically overmatched in them.
Texas Chuck wrote:trex_8063 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Kidd doing it against much bigger, better players.....
Are you saying players were both bigger and better ["much" so, in both cases] ~20 years ago?
No.
I'm saying Kidd was used to defend big wings. Something Caruso is not regularly tasked with doing. And defending these big wings is the most important man to man assignment in either time period imo. And that's Caruso's strength-- man to man. As help defenders the edge only grows for Kidd.
I mean take just 38 year old Kidd. He took on Kobe, then KD, then Lebron(and Wade) at key moments of that title run. Caruso likely gets none of those assignments and if he does, he's physically overmatched in them.
Caruso is a very good man defender. Kidd was an elite one. And a more versatile one. And a better help defender. And was doing it against starters while playing much heavier minutes in longer stretches while carrying a much more significant offensive load. I can only imagine the defensive impact Kidd could have if he was told go defend this one style of player for 6 minutes, don't worry about the other end, and then we'll get you a blow. And largely do this off the bench. It's just completely different.
trex_8063 wrote:I also want to point out that Caruso presently has a defensive on/off of -8.2.
That's better than Rudy Gobert......or Draymond Green.....or Joel Embiid.....or Giannis Antetokounmpo.......or Paul George [it's even better than PG13's '19 campaign]........or Victor Wembanyama for the godawful Spurs.
The only player I've [so far] found with a better defensive on/off this year is Brook Lopez [-9.1].
Caruso's an all-out beast on defense when he's on the court. I went with Kidd in the poll; but let's not make this out like it's a joke question. Caruso's a special defensive player.
trex_8063 wrote:I also want to point out that Caruso presently has a defensive on/off of -8.2.
That's better than Rudy Gobert......or Draymond Green.....or Joel Embiid.....or Giannis Antetokounmpo.......or Paul George [it's even better than PG13's '19 campaign]........or Victor Wembanyama for the godawful Spurs.
The only player I've [so far] found with a better defensive on/off this year is Brook Lopez [-9.1].
Caruso's an all-out beast on defense when he's on the court. I went with Kidd in the poll; but let's not make this out like it's a joke question. Caruso's a special defensive player.
HeartBreakKid wrote:trex_8063 wrote:I also want to point out that Caruso presently has a defensive on/off of -8.2.
That's better than Rudy Gobert......or Draymond Green.....or Joel Embiid.....or Giannis Antetokounmpo.......or Paul George [it's even better than PG13's '19 campaign]........or Victor Wembanyama for the godawful Spurs.
The only player I've [so far] found with a better defensive on/off this year is Brook Lopez [-9.1].
Caruso's an all-out beast on defense when he's on the court. I went with Kidd in the poll; but let's not make this out like it's a joke question. Caruso's a special defensive player.
Unless you think he is a better defender than all of those guys, what is the point of using that stat?
Texas Chuck wrote:I don't think it's a joke question. I think its an apples to oranges comparison though.
But I've been clear throughout -- Caruso is a very good defensive player. Me thinking he's not quite Jason Kidd shouldn't be seen as any kind of knock....
trex_8063 wrote:
It's fine to think Kidd is better (I voted for him myself in the poll). But the reasons for feeling that way should be clear, or---more importantly---accurate/valid.
You have posited (and essentially re-stated above ["it's an apples to oranges comparison"]) that Kidd routinely guarded the bigger star wings or other lead scorer/point-of-attack opponents (and that Caruso didn't), while also stating that Caruso's main/only value was as a man defender and that he doesn't provide much value as a help defender.
Both of those things [wrt Caruso] are at least somewhat [if not fully] demonstrably untrue, as noted in prior post.
That's all I'm saying. It's fine to favour Kidd in this comparison. But if the reasons and assumptions that brought you to that conclusion are, in fact, almost entirely false..........well, idk; I just know I'm not comfortable arriving at the "right" answer for the all the wrong reasons.