RealGM

Process:

- Capture BPM (advanced box score xposs), VORP (advanced box score cumulative), EPM (advanced impact xposs), and EW (advanced impact cumulative)
- Rank each player for each stat separately on a 100 scale
- Composite is (BPM+EPM+2*VORP+2*EW)/6. Why 2*VORP and 2*EW? To weigh durability and season-long contribution a bit more heavily and get a better sense of a player's total impact to his team over the course of the entire season.

I'd appreciate any feedback on using those variables and the composite method. Here's the top 50:

CoP wrote:Process:

- Capture BPM (advanced box score xposs), VORP (advanced box score cumulative), EPM (advanced impact xposs), and EW (advanced impact cumulative)
- Rank each player for each stat separately on a 100 scale
- Composite is (BPM+EPM+2*VORP+2*EW)/6. Why 2*VORP and 2*EW? To weigh durability and season-long contribution a bit more heavily and get a better sense of a player's total impact to his team over the course of the entire season.

I'd appreciate any feedback on using those variables and the composite method. Here's the top 50:

Spoiler:

Add LEBRON. Also weigh EPM and LEBRON twice as much as BPM

Stopped when I saw Brunson over Embiid.

Laimbeer wrote:Stopped when I saw Brunson over Embiid.

Is it really that surprising Brunson is over Embiid when half the stats used are cumulative? Not to be obtuse or anything but you do realize Embiid only played 39 games this season?

Surprising ratings for FVV and Wagner