Bulls 1st and 2nd 3peat fusion paired players. Could these hybrid players win the 2025 championship? Did I chose right?
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 1:37 am
Rules to this game are that every player relevant to any of the 6 championships must be selected and paired with a player from the other 3peat to create a fusion player with the best qualities of both players. Irrelevant players should not be used.
If a guy appeared in every playoff game and played more than 5 minutes per game on average then the guy is relevant.
Need to pair like with like not pair a guard with a center.
My picks
Paxson Kerr
Armstrong randy Brown
Hodges Harper
Jordan
Pippen
Grant Rodman
Cartwright Longley
Stacy King, Purdue Bison Dele
Williams Wennington
Levingston Kukok
2nd copy of Hodges and Jud Beuchler
I have kind of broke the rules 3 times.
The size difference between Rodman and Horace Grant is arguably too large. Rodman was 6’ 5” and Horace Grant was 6’ 10” but they were the starting power forwards for the 2 3peats. A 6’ 10 version of Rodman which is what we get would be so dominant and this 6’ 10” Rodman gets to score like Grant instead of being afraid of the ball.
Using Hodges twice is kind of cheating. My alternative is to pair 1993 Trent Tucker with Judd Buechler. I had forgotten that Trent Tucker ever played for the Bulls. Tucker played every game but did not play much. Tucker was arguably relevant for the 1993 championship. I would rather use better player and better 3 point shooter Hodges twice than use old fading from the league 1993 Trent Tucker.
Stacy King was relevant for the first 3 championships. Purdue was relevant for 1 of the first 3 championships. Purdue was relevant for the 2 in between the 3peats years. Purdue was relevant for being traded for Rodman.
First 3peat Jordan combined with 2nd 3peat Jordan is an improvement over the real Jordans. 1st 3peat Jordan attacked the rim and 2nd 3peat Jordan hit jumpers with a hand in his face.
Levingston fixes Kukoc’s lack of speed, lack of defensive aggression and lack of defensive skill which lets you play Kukoc for his passing and 3 point shooting without getting burned on defense.
Post Cavs and Clippers injuries Ron Harper was a weak offensive player but adding Hodges to Harper lets Harper become a floor spacing 3 point shooter. But Hodges only shot open 3s not 3s on the move with a defender’s hand in his face Klay Thompson style.
But could the team win the 2025 championship if the team was inserted into the current NBA? The only thing wrong with this team is that they do not shoot a lot of 3s. Their 3 point percentages are OK but their volume of 3s is too low. They would be a good 3 point shooting team by 1990s standards and this fusion player thing makes them a lot better at shooting 3s then any of the real 6 Bulls champions were.
But do they shoot 3s well enough to win the 2025 championship?
If a guy appeared in every playoff game and played more than 5 minutes per game on average then the guy is relevant.
Need to pair like with like not pair a guard with a center.
My picks
Paxson Kerr
Armstrong randy Brown
Hodges Harper
Jordan
Pippen
Grant Rodman
Cartwright Longley
Stacy King, Purdue Bison Dele
Williams Wennington
Levingston Kukok
2nd copy of Hodges and Jud Beuchler
I have kind of broke the rules 3 times.
The size difference between Rodman and Horace Grant is arguably too large. Rodman was 6’ 5” and Horace Grant was 6’ 10” but they were the starting power forwards for the 2 3peats. A 6’ 10 version of Rodman which is what we get would be so dominant and this 6’ 10” Rodman gets to score like Grant instead of being afraid of the ball.
Using Hodges twice is kind of cheating. My alternative is to pair 1993 Trent Tucker with Judd Buechler. I had forgotten that Trent Tucker ever played for the Bulls. Tucker played every game but did not play much. Tucker was arguably relevant for the 1993 championship. I would rather use better player and better 3 point shooter Hodges twice than use old fading from the league 1993 Trent Tucker.
Stacy King was relevant for the first 3 championships. Purdue was relevant for 1 of the first 3 championships. Purdue was relevant for the 2 in between the 3peats years. Purdue was relevant for being traded for Rodman.
First 3peat Jordan combined with 2nd 3peat Jordan is an improvement over the real Jordans. 1st 3peat Jordan attacked the rim and 2nd 3peat Jordan hit jumpers with a hand in his face.
Levingston fixes Kukoc’s lack of speed, lack of defensive aggression and lack of defensive skill which lets you play Kukoc for his passing and 3 point shooting without getting burned on defense.
Post Cavs and Clippers injuries Ron Harper was a weak offensive player but adding Hodges to Harper lets Harper become a floor spacing 3 point shooter. But Hodges only shot open 3s not 3s on the move with a defender’s hand in his face Klay Thompson style.
But could the team win the 2025 championship if the team was inserted into the current NBA? The only thing wrong with this team is that they do not shoot a lot of 3s. Their 3 point percentages are OK but their volume of 3s is too low. They would be a good 3 point shooting team by 1990s standards and this fusion player thing makes them a lot better at shooting 3s then any of the real 6 Bulls champions were.
But do they shoot 3s well enough to win the 2025 championship?