Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063
Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,533
- And1: 547
- Joined: Aug 27, 2008
Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
Where would Prime Mullin rank overall in todays league?
Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,724
- And1: 5,460
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
Are we assuming he gets put into a good rehab program?
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 90,897
- And1: 30,652
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
One_and_Done wrote:Are we assuming he gets put into a good rehab program?
Even without, the way he was playing in his five-year prime in this league environment?
He'd be a monster.
Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 26,564
- And1: 4,191
- Joined: Jan 21, 2005
- Location: Dallas
Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
His 64.3 TS% in 89-90 when the league average was 53.7% is nuts
Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
- cpower
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,770
- And1: 8,621
- Joined: Mar 03, 2011
-
Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
He has 1797 TS Added for his career,, just for comparison Carmelo has 72 , Rashard Lewis has 877, PG has 475, Ray has 2130. From scoring efficiency perspective he is elite.
Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
-
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 30,161
- And1: 9,776
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
-
Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?
So was Adrian Dantley, more so even. Would Mullin be that elite today? Both he and Dantley would have an easier time scoring inside (in absolute, if not relative terms). His 3 point ability would be worth more and, being used more and earlier in his career, would probably be as or more efficient than it already was.
His passing, the other key place where he separates himself from other SFs, would also be a bit more valuable when offenses are built to run through the wings rather than inside out. I have no doubts, he'd be a very valuable player offensively, maybe more so than in his heyday.
His defensive issues (slow feet, lack of strength relative to the stronger forwards), which were very real back then, would also be magnified today so I would guess he'd be a bit less valuable than he was. At absolute peak, top 5-10, prime top 15 or so in the league as his archetype is more common today.
His passing, the other key place where he separates himself from other SFs, would also be a bit more valuable when offenses are built to run through the wings rather than inside out. I have no doubts, he'd be a very valuable player offensively, maybe more so than in his heyday.
His defensive issues (slow feet, lack of strength relative to the stronger forwards), which were very real back then, would also be magnified today so I would guess he'd be a bit less valuable than he was. At absolute peak, top 5-10, prime top 15 or so in the league as his archetype is more common today.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.