Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today?

Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063

Matt15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,533
And1: 547
Joined: Aug 27, 2008

Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today? 

Post#1 » by Matt15 » Thu Apr 3, 2025 10:35 pm

Where would Prime Mullin rank overall in todays league?
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,724
And1: 5,460
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today? 

Post#2 » by One_and_Done » Thu Apr 3, 2025 11:30 pm

Are we assuming he gets put into a good rehab program?
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 90,897
And1: 30,652
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today? 

Post#3 » by tsherkin » Fri Apr 4, 2025 12:21 pm

One_and_Done wrote:Are we assuming he gets put into a good rehab program?


Even without, the way he was playing in his five-year prime in this league environment?

He'd be a monster.
CBS7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,564
And1: 4,191
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: Dallas

Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today? 

Post#4 » by CBS7 » Fri Apr 4, 2025 1:45 pm

His 64.3 TS% in 89-90 when the league average was 53.7% is nuts
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 20,770
And1: 8,621
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today? 

Post#5 » by cpower » Fri Apr 4, 2025 4:02 pm

He has 1797 TS Added for his career,, just for comparison Carmelo has 72 , Rashard Lewis has 877, PG has 475, Ray has 2130. From scoring efficiency perspective he is elite.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,161
And1: 9,776
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Where would Prime Chris Mullin rank today? 

Post#6 » by penbeast0 » Fri Apr 4, 2025 8:32 pm

So was Adrian Dantley, more so even. Would Mullin be that elite today? Both he and Dantley would have an easier time scoring inside (in absolute, if not relative terms). His 3 point ability would be worth more and, being used more and earlier in his career, would probably be as or more efficient than it already was.

His passing, the other key place where he separates himself from other SFs, would also be a bit more valuable when offenses are built to run through the wings rather than inside out. I have no doubts, he'd be a very valuable player offensively, maybe more so than in his heyday.

His defensive issues (slow feet, lack of strength relative to the stronger forwards), which were very real back then, would also be magnified today so I would guess he'd be a bit less valuable than he was. At absolute peak, top 5-10, prime top 15 or so in the league as his archetype is more common today.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.

Return to Player Comparisons