RealGM

Which one would you go with? How would you rank them?

Most talented duos are Rockets, Warriors, Lakers, and Spurs. Spurs have the clearest pre-established proof of concept, Rockets have the least established proof of concept, and Lakers have the most significant skew (by which I mean, both pieces of the duo derive virtually all their value from their offence).

I think I am most interested in seeing Duncan/Wemby. Easy enough to envision Curry/Wilt working out too though, even if I think their playstyles are less of a natural mesh than some likely assume.

Duncan/Wemby (theoretical future Wemby), Curry/Wilt otherwise. I low-key like the Jokic/Carmelo pairing, though... And I'm predicting Iverson/Embiid reaching hilarious levels of aura-to-success ratio. Would definitely want to see that one.

As usual with these exercices, I really like the fit of the Bird and KG pairings, but being paired with non-superstars handicaps them.

Alot of these pairings are bad fits or include overrated guys like Wilt, Kobe, Iverson, Melo, etc. I guess I'd gamble on Duncan/Wemby, or maybe play safe with Harden/Hakeem. I'd also give some consideration to OKC, Mavs, Celtics and Wolves, where the fit is cleanest.

Duncan Wemby,

Boston not including Russell (when Warriors include Wilt) is highly questionable. If it is Bird/Russell, that might be the winner. I also don't think Wemby has proved anywhere near enough to be ahead of David Robinson yet though he has ATG potential.

Curry/Wilt would be horrifyingly effective in today's game, damn.

We don't know the phenom Wemby will become but yea him and Duncan with Pops coaching

DorianRo wrote:We don't know the phenom Wemby will become but yea him and Duncan with Pops coaching

Ah, heck, that's adding a 3rd party. Let's let Stan Albeck coach them. Those teams were more fun (though not nearly as good) as the Pops teams.

Curry/Wilt seems like both the most talented and best fitting.