Shawn Kemp/Dennis Rodman vs Amare Stoudemire/Draymond Green

[AStark1991]

All at their peaks, which duo would you rather have?

[penbeast0]

IF, and it's a big if, they can work together without imploding, Kemp/Rodman gives you far superior defense than Amare/Draymond and we have found in the modern NBA that there are a lot of guards and wings that can space and score. If the guards situation is such that they need a big man playmaker and the team needs Draymond at point forward, that's the main situation I think my opinion might differ other than personality clashes that make the situation untenable.

[SportsGuru08]

Neither Rodman nor Draymond brings dynamic scoring but Rodman was the better defender. Kemp and Amare are about the same offensively but Kemp is much better defensively.

So Kemp/Rodman gets the edge by virtue of Amare being weak on the defensive end.

[One_and_Done]

Rodman would be unplayable today, so that is your answer.

[Ol Roy]

Not a fan of how Rodman fit next to Robinson with the Spurs offensively, and I view Kemp as a lesser, smaller version of Robinson.

Although Draymond is a fairly impotent scorer...he can fit in an offense well because of his facilitating. And his team-oriented defense is more valuable than Rodman's iso/rebound focus.

Kemp is a better defender than Amare, but Amare also brings more to the table offensively with his excellent midrange shooting.

I'll go with Amare/Draymond.

[Basileus777]

What is Draymond's value on offense if Amare is the one setting screens in the PNR? They both play the same role on offense albeit in different ways, I don't think it's actually a complementary fit despite Draymond being able to cover for Amare's defensive deficiencies.