Lakers

Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063

Taiwan Killa
Banned User
Posts: 1,027
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 31, 2007

Lakers 

Post#1 » by Taiwan Killa » Sat Jan 5, 2008 7:21 am

Fisher
Bryant
Mr. X
Odom
Bynum


So Luke Walton, Trevor Ariza, Vlad Radmonovic.

Who should start for the Lakers?
Oomph
Veteran
Posts: 2,651
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 30, 2005

 

Post#2 » by Oomph » Sat Jan 5, 2008 9:07 am

Artest?
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,068
And1: 1,942
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#3 » by Ballings7 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 9:46 am

Ariza because of his defense and athleticism. Once he gets his jumpshot as reliable (average at best right now, from what I've seen), that'll be great.

--------------

Lakers aren't getting Artest from the Kings in a two-way trade. A three-way trade is tough to get done.

Only way I could see Ron as a Laker is settling for the MLE if he opts out of the final year of his deal, and does not get the contract he's going to be looking for. Who knows what will happen with that, though. Also Radmanovic/Ariza will have to be dealt with (traded or used much lesser), and Walton will be a permanent bench player.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
User avatar
EHL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,312
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 05, 2003

 

Post#4 » by EHL » Sat Jan 5, 2008 11:30 am

Ariza, without question.
User avatar
TonyMontana
RealGM
Posts: 11,726
And1: 398
Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
     

Re: Lakers 

Post#5 » by TonyMontana » Sat Jan 5, 2008 9:03 pm

Taiwan Killa wrote:Fisher
Bryant
Mr. X
Odom
Bynum


So Luke Walton, Trevor Ariza, Vlad Radmonovic.

Who should start for the Lakers?


Me Mang , Antonio MONTANA a Politkel Rfugee Fm CUBA Mang , thats Wo......
Image
User avatar
TMACFORMVP
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,947
And1: 161
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: 9th Seed

 

Post#6 » by TMACFORMVP » Sat Jan 5, 2008 9:18 pm

Ariza, helps Kobe save a bit more energy on the defensive end and a high activity player that gets into the passing lanes and can finish around the basket.

Walton is probably more effective off the bench being more of a play-maker and he'd be able to use that skill more in the second unit.
Taiwan Killa
Banned User
Posts: 1,027
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 31, 2007

 

Post#7 » by Taiwan Killa » Sat Jan 5, 2008 9:21 pm

But do you really want Walton and Radman 2 bad defenders in the game at the same time?
Jules Winnfield
Banned User
Posts: 1,157
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 17, 2006

 

Post#8 » by Jules Winnfield » Sat Jan 5, 2008 10:07 pm

The Lakers really need to explore packaging Luke Walton and Sasha Vujacic for another quality piece.
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

 

Post#9 » by farzi » Sat Jan 5, 2008 10:13 pm

Jules Winnfield wrote:The Lakers really need to explore packaging Luke Walton and Sasha Vujacic for another quality piece.


Who else, other than McHale Ainge or Zeke would give up a quality piece for that garbage?
Jules Winnfield
Banned User
Posts: 1,157
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 17, 2006

 

Post#10 » by Jules Winnfield » Sat Jan 5, 2008 10:18 pm

farzi wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Who else, other than McHale Ainge or Zeke would give up a quality piece for that garbage?


lol. true.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,273
And1: 25,455
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#11 » by hermes » Sun Jan 6, 2008 3:18 am

EHL wrote:Ariza, without question.

Return to Player Comparisons