Brevin Knight vs. Jose Calderon

ajmal · Post #1 » by **ajmal** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 12:50 am

Who had/has more inflated stats?

Post #2 » by **VintaGe36** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 1:00 am

Do you mean Inflated?

Mr. Perfect · Post #3 » by **Mr. Perfect** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 1:21 am

This is insulting to Jose, lock this garbage.

ajmal · Post #4 » by **ajmal** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 1:30 am

VintaGe36 wrote:Do you mean Inflated?

thanks i fixed it

ajmal · Post #5 » by **ajmal** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 1:47 am

04-05 Brevin knight was posting 10 points and 9 assists per game and only 2 turnovers per game along with 3 rebounds in only 29 minutes per game. Sounds familiar?

Mind you his percentages were off but their importance to the team were much the same.

cb4_89 · Post #6 » by **cb4_89** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:04 am

um brevin knight was on a **** team. Jose is not.

ajmal · Post #7 » by **ajmal** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:10 am

cb4_89 wrote:um brevin knight was on a **** team. Jose is not.

what does his assists have to do with being on a bad team? That just shows he is a better distributer if that is what you are applying.

positivetension · Post #8 » by **positivetension** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:12 am

ajmal wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

what does his assists have to do with being on a bad team? That just shows he is a better distributer if that is what you are applying.

implying.. I have a hard time taking someones thread seriously when they can't even speak english.

ajmal · Post #9 » by **ajmal** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:38 am

positivetension wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

implying.. I have a hard time taking someones thread seriously when they can't even speak english.

Just for your education. If I have a team full of stars (suns), I should expect career highs in assists as a point gaurd. If i have a team full of scrubs, I expect to have lower assist numbers compared to the team full of stars.

cb4_89 · Post #10 » by **cb4_89** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:01 am

Its harder to average better numbers on a good team than on a bad team.

Big_Dub · Post #11 » by **Big_Dub** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:07 am

ajmal wrote:Who had/has more inflated stats?

Your a clown, tell me how calderon has inflated stats... hes playing great when he actually gets starter minutes, averaging 14 and 10in his starts this year..

Oden Rules · Post #12 » by **Oden Rules** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:47 am

cb4_89 wrote:Its harder to average better numbers on a good team than on a bad team.

TORONTO RAPTORS IS NOT A GOOD TEAM......... :wavefinger:

hermes · Post #13 » by **hermes** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:50 am

cb4_89 wrote:Its harder to average better numbers on a good team than on a bad team.

cb4_89 · Post #14 » by **cb4_89** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:52 am

Oden Rules wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

TORONTO RAPTORS IS NOT A GOOD TEAM.........

shut up troll

Big_Dub · Post #15 » by **Big_Dub** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:57 am

Oden Rules wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

TORONTO RAPTORS IS NOT A GOOD TEAM.........

English speak you well........

xAIRNESSx · Post #16 » by **xAIRNESSx** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:12 am

Big_Dub wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

English speak you well........

Post #17 » by **BrooklynBulls** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:19 am

Brevin Knight in 04-05, was really good, and no one noticed.

The reasons Calderon blows this guy out of the water, is that Calderon is doing this when he's 3 years younger, with better defense (Knight is 5'9'' on a good day), he's a much, much better shooter, and a much much more efficient scorer.

Brevin Knight is one of the best pure distributors in the league. But it really doesn't matter because he's a minus player in all other respects.

Jose Calderon is a net positive in almost all categories, the main category missing being man defense. Yet he's still a better man defender than Knight, just due to natural advantage.

Post #18 » by **Schad** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:22 am

Brevin Knight, career shooting percentages: 41.5 FG%.
Jose Calderon: 49.1%.

If Knight was 6'3" and a lights-out shooter, like Calderon, he would have been a great player. But he was neither, which made him a journeyman.

ajmal · Post #19 » by **ajmal** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:47 am

Schadenfreude wrote:Brevin Knight, career shooting percentages: 41.5 FG%.
Jose Calderon: 49.1%.

If Knight was 6'3" and a lights-out shooter, like Calderon, he would have been a great player. But he was neither, which made him a journeyman.

i did state that aside from the percentages they have identical statistics..

someone explain how it is harder to average more assists on a team with better offensive options compared to a team with weak offensive options?

ajmal · Post #20 » by **ajmal** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:49 am

BrooklynBulls wrote:Brevin Knight in 04-05, was really good, and no one noticed.

The reasons Calderon blows this guy out of the water, is that Calderon is doing this when he's 3 years younger, with better defense (Knight is 5'9'' on a good day), he's a much, much better shooter, and a much much more efficient scorer.

Brevin Knight is one of the best pure distributors in the league. But it really doesn't matter because he's a minus player in all other respects.

Jose Calderon is a net positive in almost all categories, the main category missing being man defense. Yet he's still a better man defender than Knight, just due to natural advantage.

Have u seen Calderon's defense? Its like a pylon sliding on ice...