Brevin Knight vs. Jose Calderon
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 12:50 am
Who had/has more inflated stats?
RealGM
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
Brevin Knight vs. Jose Calderon
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=747890
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 1:00 am
Do you mean Inflated?
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 1:21 am
This is insulting to Jose, lock this garbage.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 1:30 am
VintaGe36 wrote:Do you mean Inflated?
thanks i fixed it
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 1:47 am
04-05 Brevin knight was posting 10 points and 9 assists per game and only 2 turnovers per game along with 3 rebounds in only 29 minutes per game. Sounds familiar?
Mind you his percentages were off but their importance to the team were much the same.
Mind you his percentages were off but their importance to the team were much the same.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:04 am
um brevin knight was on a **** team. Jose is not.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:10 am
cb4_89 wrote:um brevin knight was on a **** team. Jose is not.
what does his assists have to do with being on a bad team? That just shows he is a better distributer if that is what you are applying.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:12 am
ajmal wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
what does his assists have to do with being on a bad team? That just shows he is a better distributer if that is what you are applying.
implying.. I have a hard time taking someones thread seriously when they can't even speak english.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:38 am
positivetension wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
implying.. I have a hard time taking someones thread seriously when they can't even speak english.
Just for your education. If I have a team full of stars (suns), I should expect career highs in assists as a point gaurd. If i have a team full of scrubs, I expect to have lower assist numbers compared to the team full of stars.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:01 am
Its harder to average better numbers on a good team than on a bad team.
Re: Brevin Knight vs. Jose Calderon
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:07 am
ajmal wrote:Who had/has more inflated stats?
Your a clown, tell me how calderon has inflated stats... hes playing great when he actually gets starter minutes, averaging 14 and 10in his starts this year..
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:47 am
cb4_89 wrote:Its harder to average better numbers on a good team than on a bad team.
TORONTO RAPTORS IS NOT A GOOD TEAM.........
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:50 am
cb4_89 wrote:Its harder to average better numbers on a good team than on a bad team.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:52 am
Oden Rules wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
TORONTO RAPTORS IS NOT A GOOD TEAM.........
shut up troll
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:57 am
Oden Rules wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
TORONTO RAPTORS IS NOT A GOOD TEAM.........
English speak you well........
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:12 am
Big_Dub wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
English speak you well........
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:19 am
Brevin Knight in 04-05, was really good, and no one noticed.
The reasons Calderon blows this guy out of the water, is that Calderon is doing this when he's 3 years younger, with better defense (Knight is 5'9'' on a good day), he's a much, much better shooter, and a much much more efficient scorer.
Brevin Knight is one of the best pure distributors in the league. But it really doesn't matter because he's a minus player in all other respects.
Jose Calderon is a net positive in almost all categories, the main category missing being man defense. Yet he's still a better man defender than Knight, just due to natural advantage.
The reasons Calderon blows this guy out of the water, is that Calderon is doing this when he's 3 years younger, with better defense (Knight is 5'9'' on a good day), he's a much, much better shooter, and a much much more efficient scorer.
Brevin Knight is one of the best pure distributors in the league. But it really doesn't matter because he's a minus player in all other respects.
Jose Calderon is a net positive in almost all categories, the main category missing being man defense. Yet he's still a better man defender than Knight, just due to natural advantage.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:22 am
Brevin Knight, career shooting percentages: 41.5 FG%.
Jose Calderon: 49.1%.
If Knight was 6'3" and a lights-out shooter, like Calderon, he would have been a great player. But he was neither, which made him a journeyman.
Jose Calderon: 49.1%.
If Knight was 6'3" and a lights-out shooter, like Calderon, he would have been a great player. But he was neither, which made him a journeyman.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:47 am
Schadenfreude wrote:Brevin Knight, career shooting percentages: 41.5 FG%.
Jose Calderon: 49.1%.
If Knight was 6'3" and a lights-out shooter, like Calderon, he would have been a great player. But he was neither, which made him a journeyman.
i did state that aside from the percentages they have identical statistics..
someone explain how it is harder to average more assists on a team with better offensive options compared to a team with weak offensive options?
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:49 am
BrooklynBulls wrote:Brevin Knight in 04-05, was really good, and no one noticed.
The reasons Calderon blows this guy out of the water, is that Calderon is doing this when he's 3 years younger, with better defense (Knight is 5'9'' on a good day), he's a much, much better shooter, and a much much more efficient scorer.
Brevin Knight is one of the best pure distributors in the league. But it really doesn't matter because he's a minus player in all other respects.
Jose Calderon is a net positive in almost all categories, the main category missing being man defense. Yet he's still a better man defender than Knight, just due to natural advantage.
Have u seen Calderon's defense? Its like a pylon sliding on ice...