Page 1 of 1

Better chance of returning to form?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:42 pm
by youngcrev
If both of those guys were to be traded to teams that would better suit them, who stands the better chance of returning to form (or at least being a decent player again)?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:46 pm
by mudyez
wallace...e might be older but it seems larry is struggeling, coz his body let him alone...could see ben having 1 or 2 good years if he suits the team (while I'd asume chicago should be a good team for him as they have good outsidedefenders and shoot a lot)

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:16 pm
by semi-sentient
Wallace is the only real choice here because Hughes has always sucked.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:46 pm
by Hard2dhole
So it wouldn't take much by that logic for Hughes to return to he less suckiness of yesteryear.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:57 pm
by Rasheeed!!!
All that Wallace really needs to do is to start trying again and start playing with som energy. Hughes needs a miracle.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:31 pm
by The_Believer
Big Ben- Hughes should be in the D-League now, he's chucking and missing like crazy.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:51 pm
by penbeast0
well, your question doesn't exactly make sense since Larry Hughes's form is exactly what he is showing this year. He's always been a superathletic player with terrible decision making skills so he has always shot poor percentages, gotten burned a lot going for steals, etc. The two years (out of 9) he was at least a mediocre player were the flukes (one he shot >50 points above his average, the other his foul drawing rates were grossly out of proportion to the rest of his career). This year IS a return to form.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:03 pm
by youngcrev
penbeast0 wrote:well, your question doesn't exactly make sense since Larry Hughes's form is exactly what he is showing this year. He's always been a superathletic player with terrible decision making skills so he has always shot poor percentages, gotten burned a lot going for steals, etc. The two years (out of 9) he was at least a mediocre player were the flukes (one he shot >50 points above his average, the other his foul drawing rates were grossly out of proportion to the rest of his career). This year IS a return to form.


Considering he's way under his career averages, I'll disagree.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:36 am
by Joseph17
Hughes. He's a lot younger than Wallace. Wallace is just going to keep getting older and worse as time goes on.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:29 pm
by raps4life~
ill pick wallace. at least his numbers are somewhat respectable.

Posted: Sun Mar 2, 2008 8:09 pm
by youngcrev
Figured I'd bring this back now that both guys have actually been traded (and for one another, lol)

Hughes has looked pretty good in a Bulls jersey IMO, especially today.

Posted: Sun Mar 2, 2008 9:03 pm
by risktaker91
youngcrev wrote:Figured I'd bring this back now that both guys have actually been traded (and for one another, lol)

Hughes has looked pretty good in a Bulls jersey IMO, especially today.


Good call.

Hughes had a great game but too bad they still lost.