Page 1 of 2
Would the Suns win 1 game against...
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:01 pm
by Taiwan Killa
The 3 peat Lakers? If the Suns can't handle Bynum what would happen to the Suns vs. Shaq?
In a 7 game series could the Suns get 1 game?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:04 pm
by 40InchVert
No, Shaq would man handle AMare
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:17 pm
by Kabookalu
lol not even close.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:18 pm
by xAIRNESSx
Right, they couldn't win one game? Even the Sixers with Iverson won one game against the Lakers.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:20 pm
by magicfan4life05
Choker wrote:lol not even close.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:21 pm
by NetsForce
Shaq would average at least 40 points per game on 77% shooting from the field. This is insulting to the 3peat lakers...
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:38 pm
by Taiwan Killa
xAIRNESSx wrote:Right, they couldn't win one game? Even the Sixers with Iverson won one game against the Lakers.
But the Sixers had good D and Mutumbo in the middle/.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:56 pm
by ITK9
xAIRNESSx wrote:Right, they couldn't win one game? Even the Sixers with Iverson won one game against the Lakers.
the 2001 sixers were 5435346536 times better defensively than suns.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:59 pm
by Patterns
No they wouldn't. The Suns won't be able to stop Shaq and without the Zone, Kobe would be relentless driving inside again.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:06 pm
by kandiking
jesus amare gets handled by anybody in the low post, much less shaq.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:20 pm
by CzBoobie
I would love to see how Marion (their best defender) is guarding prime Shaq...lol.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:23 pm
by penbeast0
Marion wouldn't be on Shaq; for all his issues, Amare would be. Marion is a terrific defender but he's a three who is able to play the four only because of his athleticism; he's way too small to be trying to guard the like of Shaq.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:29 pm
by Basileus777
Shaq would drop 40/15 while fouling out the entire Phoenix frontcourt.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:03 pm
by corona
Marion wouldn't be on Shaq; for all his issues, Amare would be.
for the first 2 minutes of the 1st quarter. at that point he'd pick up his 2nd personal foul and the duties would go to brian skinner. then he'd pick up his second halfway through the 1st, and the game would essentially be over because shaq would score at will for the rest of the game.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:29 pm
by That Nicka
Shaq would dominate but the Nash/Amare pick and roll would also be deadly as Shaq was terrible at defending the pick and roll and Amare is athletic enough to get Shaq in foul trouble at least 1 or 2 games
Id say Lakers in 5
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:21 am
by RJM
If you thought the 2002 NBA Finals was one sided......
Hint: Shaq breaks the all time playoff scoring record.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:44 am
by hermes
maybe one
but the lakers would have to have a bad night
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:45 am
by WadeKnicks2010
xAIRNESSx wrote:Right, they couldn't win one game? Even the Sixers with Iverson won one game against the Lakers.
The Suns don't have 2001 Iverson on their team.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:52 am
by Griever24
IggyTheKing wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
the 2001 sixers were 5435346536 times better defensively than suns.
not to mention they barely beat us that one game .. we swept through every other team coming into that series and ended 16-1 playoff record (best ever in playoffs) our 00 squad was pretty solid too
only one squad i think maybe 1 is our 02 squad when we were getting sorta old .. but in no way did i say any chance of winning the series .. Nash couldnt even handle us back then when he had Dirk with the mavs
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:53 am
by SuigintouEV
the 2001 sixers were 5435346536 times better defensively than suns.
The 2008 sybs are 5435346536 times better offensively than sixers.
<I>
The Suns don't have 2001 Iverson on their team.</i>
They have a player who's about twice as good?